II/326              Revised SWIRE photometric redshifts  (Rowan-Robinson+, 2013)

Revised SWIRE photometric redshifts. Rowan-Robinson M., Gonzalez-Solares E., Vaccari M., Marchetti L. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 428, 1958-1967 (2013)> =2013MNRAS.428.1958R 2013MNRAS.428.1958R =2013yCat.2336....0R 2013yCat.2336....0R
ADC_Keywords: Surveys ; Galaxies, IR ; Galaxies, photometry ; Redshifts Keywords: galaxies: evolution - galaxies: starburst - galaxies: star formation - cosmology: observations - infrared: galaxies Abstract: We have revised the Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic survey (SWIRE) Photometric Redshift Catalogue to take account of new optical photometry in several of the SWIRE areas, and incorporating Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) and UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) near-infrared data. Aperture matching is an important issue for combining near-infrared and optical data, and we have explored a number of methods of doing this. The increased number of photometric bands available for the redshift solution results in improvements both in the rms error and, especially, in the outlier rate. We have also found that incorporating the dust torus emission into the quasi-stellar object (QSO) templates improves the performance for QSO redshift estimation. Our revised redshift catalogue contains over 1 million extragalactic objects, of which 26 288 are QSOs. Description: The revised SWIRE photometric redshift catalogues for the Lockman, EN1, EN2 and XMM-LSS areas (plus original catalogues for ES1, CDFS, VVDS and SXDS areas). (version zcatrev12ff4.dat.gz, 2016) There are 1160613 lines of data (EN1: 209696, EN2: 117845, Lock: 220472, XMM-LSS (including VVDS and SXDS): 317136, ES1: 145698, CDFS: 149766). The methodology is based on Rowan-Robinson et al. (2008MNRAS.386..697R 2008MNRAS.386..697R). Since publication of Rowan-Robinson et al (2008MNRAS.386..697R 2008MNRAS.386..697R) I have reprocessed the XMM-LSS and and ES1 areas using new photometric data collected in the Mattia et al. fusion catalogues (http://www.mattiavaccari.net/df/ ). XMM benefited from the CFHTLS-T0007 data release and ES1 from the substantially expanded ESIS BVR Final Data Release. The number of SWIRE photometric redshifts has increased by 15%. The quality of the XMM redshifts is significantly improved. The absence of u-band photometry in ES1 and CDFS means these redshifts are of lower reliability. The main change here is the incorporation of SDSS and UKIDSS data into the solution. The details of how this was done will be reported in Rowan-Robinson et al. (2013MNRAS.428.1958R 2013MNRAS.428.1958R) but the main features are: (1) WFC data treated as in RR08 (Cat. II/290), but revised WFS data of Gonzalez-Solares et al. (2011MNRAS.416..927G 2011MNRAS.416..927G) used for EN1, EN2, Lockman. New Megacam data used for XMM-LSS. (2) SDSS model magnitudes used, aperture corrected by forcing r-band magnitude to be same as r-WFC. (3) 2MASS point-source magnitudes used if available, aperture corrected by using a multiple (0.8) of the WFC r-band aperture correction. If not, UKIDSS point-source magnitudes used, aperture corrected by using a multiple (1.1) of the WFC r-band aperture correction. (4) IRAC fluxes are aperture corrected as in Rowan-Robinson et al. (2008MNRAS.386..697R 2008MNRAS.386..697R). (5) Lockman data are from 2008 reduction, with requirement that S(3.6)>7.5µJy. (6) SXDS sources with new Megacam data are reanalyzed using Subaru+Megacam data (40553 sources). The remainder (13655 sources) are from the 2008 reduction. New spectroscopic redshifts from Chris Simpson (2012 in prep) are incorporated. (7) For quasars we have added AGN dust torus templates to our 3 QSO templates, with amplitudes corresponding to Ltor/Lopt = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, and used 1.25-8.0µm data in the redshift solution. This improves the outlier rejection (see the paper for details). (8) Although the redshifts have not changed greatly from the 2008 catalogue, it was necessary to rerun the infrared template fitting in order to register the correct infrared luminosity, ir sed type and derived quantities like star formation rate, dust mass and stellar mass. It is planned to refine the template fitting to take into account the lessons of the IRS line diagnostics (Rowan-Robinson and Efstathiou, 2009MNRAS.399..615R 2009MNRAS.399..615R). File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file zcatrev.dat 1479 1152665 Revised SWIRE photometric redshift catalogues -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/255 : SWIRE ELAIS N1 Source Catalogs (Surace+, 2004) III/250 : The VIMOS VLT deep survey (VVDS-DEEP) (Le Fevre+ 2005) J/MNRAS/351/1290 : ELAIS: final band-merged catalogue (Rowan-Robinson+, 2004) J/AJ/128/1483 : Optical properties of CLASXS X-ray sample (Steffen+, 2004) J/AJ/129/1198 : SDSS quasars in SWIRE ELAIS N1 field (Hatziminaoglou+, 2005) J/AJ/129/2074 : Faint Chandra sources in SWIRE (Franceschini+, 2005) J/A+A/467/565 : z=1-3 ULIRGs from the Spitzer SWIRE survey (Berta+, 2007) J/A+A/476/151 : SWIRE ELAIS-S1 IR-peak galaxy IR fluxes (Berta+, 2007) J/MNRAS/379/1343 : UKIDSS massive supercluster infrared study (Swinbank+, 2007) J/MNRAS/386/1252 : SWIRE/SDSS quasars (Hatziminaoglou+, 2008) Byte-by-byte Description of file: zcatrev.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 8 I8 --- IR [2/714568] Infrared identifier 10- 17 I8 --- Opt [0/13182599] Optical identifier 19- 29 F11.6 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) 31- 41 F11.6 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) 43- 52 F10.2 uJy S3.6 ?=-99 Spitzer/IRAC flux density at 3.6um 54- 63 F10.2 uJy S4.5 ?=-99 Spitzer/IRAC flux density at 4.5um 65- 74 F10.2 uJy S5.8 ?=-99 Spitzer/IRAC flux density at 5.8um 76- 85 F10.2 uJy S8.0 ?=-99 Spitzer/IRAC flux density at 8.0um 87- 96 F10.2 uJy S24 ?=-99 Spitzer/MIPS flux density at 24um 98-107 F10.2 uJy S70 ?=-99 Spitzer/MIPS flux density at 70um 109-118 F10.2 uJy S160 ?=-99 Spitzer/MIPS flux density at 160um 120-129 F10.2 uJy e_S3.6 []?=-99 rms uncertainty on S3.6 131-140 F10.2 uJy e_S4.5 []?=-99 rms uncertainty on S4.5 142-151 F10.2 uJy e_S5.8 []?=-99 rms uncertainty on S5.8 153-162 F10.2 uJy e_S8.0 []?=-99 rms uncertainty on S8.0 164-173 F10.2 uJy e_S24 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on S24 175-184 F10.2 uJy e_S70 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on S70 186-195 F10.2 uJy e_S160 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on S160 197-204 F8.2 mag Umag ?=-99 SWIRE U magnitude (am1) (1) 206-213 F8.2 mag gmag ?=-99 SWIRE g magnitude (am2) (1) 215-222 F8.2 mag rmag ?=-99 SWIRE r magnitude (am3) (1) 224-231 F8.2 mag imag ?=-99 SWIRE i magnitude (am4) (1) 233-240 F8.2 mag Zmag ?=-99 SWIRE Z magnitude (am5) (1) 242-249 F8.2 mag e_Umag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on Umag 251-258 F8.2 mag e_gmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on gmag 260-267 F8.2 mag e_rmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on rmag 269-276 F8.2 mag e_imag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on imag 278-285 F8.2 mag e_Zmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on Zmag 287-294 F8.2 mag umag2 ?=-99 u magnitude (am21) (1) 296-303 F8.2 mag gmag2 ?=-99 g magnitude (am22) (1) 305-312 F8.2 mag rmag2 ?=-99 r magnitude (am23) (1) 314-321 F8.2 mag imag2 ?=-99 i magnitude (am25) (1) 323-330 F8.2 mag zmag2 ?=-99 z magnitude (am26) (1) 332-339 F8.2 mag e_umag2 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on umag2 341-348 F8.2 mag e_gmag2 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on gmag2 350-357 F8.2 mag e_rmag2 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on rmag2 359-366 F8.2 mag e_imag2 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on imag2 368-375 F8.2 mag e_zmag2 ?=-99 rms uncertainty on zmag2 377-384 F8.2 mag Jmag ?=-99 J magnitude (am6) (1) 386-393 F8.2 mag Hmag ?=-99 H magnitude (am7) (1) 395-402 F8.2 mag Kmag ?=-99 K magnitude (am8) (1) 404-411 F8.2 mag e_Jmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on Jmag 413-420 F8.2 mag e_Hmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on Hmag 422-429 F8.2 mag e_Kmag ?=-99 rms uncertainty on Kmag 433-434 I2 --- mst [-5/5] Stellar flag (-1=star, 1=galaxy, 0=indeterminate) 436-443 F8.3 mag dmag ? Aperture correction in magnitudes, applied to all bands 445-452 F8.3 mag dmag1 Other aperture correction in magnitudes 454-456 I3 --- J1 [1/36] Optical template type (1-11 galaxies, 13-30 QSOs) for AV=0 solution (2) 458-464 F7.3 --- alz [0/0.85] log(1+zph) for AV=0 solution 466-475 F10.3 --- err0 Reduced chi2 for AV=0 solution 477-479 I3 --- J2 [1/36] Optical template type (1-11 galaxies, 13-15 QSOs) for free AV solution (2) 481-487 F7.3 --- alz2 [0/0.85] log(1+zph) for free AV solution 489-494 F6.2 mag AV1 Absorption in V band 496-505 F10.3 --- err1 Reduced chi2 for free AV solution 507-509 I3 --- N91 [1/17] Total number of photometric bands in solution 511-513 I3 --- Nopt [-9/10] Number of optical bands in solution 515-522 F8.2 mag BMAG ?=0.00 MB (corrected for extinction) for free AV solution 524-531 F8.2 [Lsun] logLB B-band luminosity 533-542 F10.5 --- zsp ?=0.00000 Spectroscopic redshift 544-547 I4 --- q_zsp [0/219] Redshift class (VVDS) (3) 549-552 I4 --- r_zsp [-9/40] Reference for zsp (3) 554-556 I3 --- NIR [0/6] Number of bands with infrared excess 558-563 F6.2 --- alp1 [0/1]? Relative amplitude of cirrus component at 8um (alp1+alp2+alp3+alp4=1) 565-570 F6.2 --- alp2 [0/1]? Relative amplitude of M82 starburst component at 8um 572-577 F6.2 --- alp3 [0/1]? Relative amplitude of AGN dust torus component at 8um 579-584 F6.2 --- alp4 [0/1]? Relative amplitude of A220 starburst component at 8um 586-595 F10.3 --- errIR Reduced chiν2 of infrared template fit 597-604 F8.2 [Lsun] logL1 ?=0.00 Cirrus component luminosity (1-1000um) 606-613 F8.2 [Lsun] logL2 ?=0.00 M82 starburst component luminosity 615-622 F8.2 [Lsun] logL3 ?=0.00 AGN dust torus component luminosity 624-631 F8.2 [Lsun] logL4 ?=0.00 A220 component luminosity, 633-640 F8.2 [Lsun] logLIR ?=0.00 Infrared luminosity, 642-644 I3 --- IRt [1/6] IR template type (4) 646-650 F5.2 [mJy] logS70 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 70um 652-657 F6.2 [mJy] logS160 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 160um 659-664 F6.2 [mJy] logS350 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 350um 666-671 F6.2 [mJy] logS450 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 450um 673-678 F6.2 [mJy] logS850 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 850um 680-685 F6.2 [mJy] logS1250 ?=0.00 Predicted flux density at 1250um 687-692 F6.2 [Lsun] logL3.6 Luminosity at 3.6um 694-699 F6.2 [Msun] logM* Stellar mass 701-706 F6.2 [Msun/yr] logSFR ?=-9.99 Star formation rate 708-713 F6.2 [Msun] logMdust ?=0.00 Dust mass 715-1479 85F9.2 --- chi2A ?=-99.00 Array of reduced χν2 as function of alz2, minimized over all templates, in bins of 0.01 in log(1+zph), from 0.01 to 0.85 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Magnitudes are aperture corrected. UgriZ magnitudes are AB magnitudes for XMM-LSS field, Vega for all the other fields. Table 1: Explanation of magnitude fields ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Field am1-5[UgriZ] am21-26[ugriz2] am6-8[JHK] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EN1 Rev. WFC UgriZ SDSS ugriz 2MASS/UKIDSS JHK EN2 Rev. WFC UgriZ SDSS ugriz 2MASS JHK Lock Rev. SWIRE Ugri SDSS ugriz 2MASS/UKIDSS JHK VVDS VVDS ugri UBVRI VVDS JK SXDS Subaru MegaCam ugriz - XMM SWIRE UgriZ(AB) MegaCam ugriz UKIDSS JHK CDFS SWIRE gri - - S1 SWIRE B, V, R - - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (2): Optical template type: J=13-15, 16-18, 19-21, 22-24, 25-27, 28-30, correspond to Ltor/Lopt=0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1. respectively. Note (3): Spectroscopic redshift references: * N1,N2 regions: 1 = Perez-Fournon et al. (2004, in prep.), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 2 = Serjeant et al. (2004MNRAS.355..813S 2004MNRAS.355..813S), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 3 = La Franca et al. (2005ApJ...635..864L 2005ApJ...635..864L), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 4 = Pozzi et al. (2003MNRAS.343.1348P 2003MNRAS.343.1348P), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 5 = NED, http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/ , from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 6 = Morel et al. (2001MNRAS.327.1187M 2001MNRAS.327.1187M), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 7 = SLOAN Survey, from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 8 = Willott et al. (2003MNRAS.339..397W 2003MNRAS.339..397W), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 9 = Chapman et al. (2002ApJ...573...66C 2002ApJ...573...66C), Sajina et al. (2003MNRAS.343.1365S 2003MNRAS.343.1365S), from Rowan-Robinson et al., 2004, Cat. J/MNRAS/351/1290 11 = Keck redshifts (Berta et al 2007, Cat. J/A+A/467/565) 20 = WIYN redshifts (Trichas et al., 2007) 25 = GMOS redshifts (Trichas et al., 2007) 30 = Swinbank et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/379/1343 35 = Le Fevre et al. 2005, VVDS (III/250) * VVDS (3-14 VVDS quality flags): 3 = 95% confidence 4 = 100% confidence 9 = Single isolated emission line spectra +10 = a primary QSO target +210 = secondary QSO identified target * Lockman region: -1 = Unobserved (Steffen et al., 2004, Cat. J/AJ/128/1483) 1 = Star-former (Steffen et al., 2004, Cat. J/AJ/128/1483) 2 = Seyfert 2 based on strong [O II] relative to Hβ or strong [Ne III] relative to [O II] (Steffen et al., 2004, J/AJ/128/1483) 3 = Seyfert 2 with [Ne V] or C IV in emission (Steffen et al., 2004, Cat. J/AJ/128/1483) 4 = Broad-line AGN (FWHM>1000km/s) (Steffen et al., 2004, Cat. J/AJ/128/1483) 5 = NED, http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/ 10 = WIYN, Keck, Gemini redshifts (Smith et al., in prep.) 11 = Keck redshifts (Berta et al., 2007, Cat. J/A+A/467/565) * XMM, CDFS regions: 5 = NED, http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/ Note (4): IR template type as follows: 1 = dominated by cirrus 2 = M82 starburst 3 = A220 starburst 4 = AGN dust torus 5 = single band excess 6 = no excess -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: * 06-Nov-2013: Copied from http://astro.ic.ac.uk/public/mrr/swirephotzcat/zcatrev12ff3r.dat.gz * 22-May-2018: revized version copied from http://mattiavaccari.net/dropoff/mrr13/zcatrev12ff4.fits.gz * 09-Nov-2018: revized version copied from http://mattiavaccari.net/df/mrr/zcatrev12ff5.fits.gz References: Rowan-Robinson et al., Paper I, 2008MNRAS.386..697R 2008MNRAS.386..697R
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 06-Nov-2013
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line