J/A+A/566/A37       Iron abundances for 42 Galactic Cepheids (Genovali+, 2014)

On the fine structure of the Cepheid metallicity gradient in the Galactic thin disk. Genovali K., Lemasle B., Bono G., Romaniello M., Fabrizio M., Ferraro I., Iannicola G., Laney C.D., Nonino M., Bergemann M., Buonanno R., Francois P., Inno L., Kudritzki R.-P., Matsunaga N., Pedicelli S., Primas F., Thevenin F. <Astron. Astrophys., 566, A37-37 (2014)> =2014A&A...566A..37G 2014A&A...566A..37G
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, open ; Stars, variable ; Abundances Keywords: stars: abundances - stars: variables: Cepheids - stars: oscillations - Galaxy: disk - open clusters and associations: general Abstract: We present homogeneous and accurate iron abundances for 42 Galactic Cepheids based on high resolution (R∼38000) high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N≥100) optical spectra collected with UVES at VLT (128 spectra). The above abundances were complemented with high-quality iron abundances provided either by our group (86) or available in the literature. We were careful to derive a common metallicity scale and ended up with a sample of 450 Cepheids. We also estimated accurate individual distances for the entire sample by using homogeneous near-infrared photometry and the reddening free period-Wesenheit relations. The new metallicity gradient is linear over a broad range of Galactocentric distances (RG∼5-19kpc) and agrees quite well with similar estimates available in the literature (-0.060±0.002dex/kpc). We also uncover evidence that suggests that the residuals of the metallicity gradient are tightly correlated with candidate Cepheid groups (CGs). The candidate CGs have been identified as spatial overdensities of Cepheids located across the thin disk. They account for a significant fraction of the residual fluctuations, and also for the large intrinsic dispersion of the metallicity gradient. We performed a detailed comparison with metallicity gradients based on different tracers: OB stars and open clusters. We found very similar metallicity gradients for ages younger than 3Gyr, while for older ages we found a shallower slope and an increase in the intrinsic spread. The above findings rely on homogeneous age, metallicity, and distance scales. Finally, by using a large sample of Galactic and Magellanic Cepheids for which accurate iron abundances are available, we found that the dependence of the luminosity amplitude on metallicity is vanishing. Description: In this investigation we present a spectral analysis based on high-resolution (R∼38000) spectra collected with the UVES spectrograph available at the Nasmyth B focus of UT2/VLT Cerro Paranal telescope. Multi-epoch spectra for eleven Galactic Cepheids were collected during observing run B (P89). This sample includes 44 high-resolution spectra (from four to six spectra per star) for a total of eleven Cepheids. The covered spectral range is 4726-5804Å and 5762-6835Å over the two chips, collected by only using the red arm configuration and the cross disperser CD 3 (central wavelength at 580nm). The S/N ranges from ∼50 to ∼300 (see Fig. 1). The seeing during the observations ranged from 0.5-arcsec to 2.5-arcsec, with a typical mean value of 1.2-arcsec, while the exposure times changed from 20s to 1400s. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table3.dat 95 42 Mean NIR magnitudes, mean distances and mean iron abundances for the current sample of classical Cepheids table4.dat 95 375 Galactic Cepheids for which the iron abundance was available in the literature table5.dat 77 67 Individual ages, distances, and metallicities for the current sample of open clusters table6.dat 81 10 Structural parameters and metallicities of the candidate Cepheid groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/A+A/511/A56 : Abundances of five open clusters (Pancino+, 2010) J/AJ/142/51 : Galactic Cepheids abundance variations (Luck+, 2011) J/AJ/142/136 : Spectroscopy of Cepheids. l=30-250° (Luck+, 2011) J/A+A/554/A132 : Iron line list (FeI and FeII) (Genovali+, 2013) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat table4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 A9 --- Name Variable name 11- 18 A8 --- VType Variable type (from GCVS) (1) 20- 26 F7.4 [d] logPer logarithmic period 28- 33 F6.3 mag <Jmag> Mean J magnitude 35- 40 F6.3 mag <Hmag> Mean H magnitude 42- 47 F6.3 mag <Kmag> Mean K magnitude 49- 53 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]l Iron abundance available in the literature rescaled to our solar abundance 55- 59 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H] Current iron abundance 61- 64 F4.2 [Sun] e_[Fe/H] ? rms uncertainty on [Fe/H] (only in table3) 66 I1 --- Nsp ? Number of spectra used to estimate the mean iron abundance (only in table3) 68- 72 F5.2 mag Mod True distance modulus 74- 77 F4.2 mag e_Mod rms uncertainty on Mod 79- 83 I5 pc Rgal Galactocentric distance (R☉=7.95±0.37kpc) 85- 87 I3 pc e_Rgal rms uncertainty on Rgal 89- 90 A2 --- Notes Notes on the NIR photometry and distances for individual objects (2) 92- 95 A4 --- Ref References (3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): In table4, we note that V556 Cas and V1397 Cyg are misclassified in the GCVS since they have been identified as classical Cepheids by Wils & Greaves (2004IBVS.5512....1W 2004IBVS.5512....1W). Moreover, their nature was confirmed by Luck & Lambert (2011AJ....142..136L 2011AJ....142..136L, Cat J/AJ/142/136) on the basis of spectroscopic evidence. Note (2): Notes as follows: a = Mean magnitudes provided by Monson & Pierce (2011ApJS..193...12M 2011ApJS..193...12M, Cat. J/ApJS/193/12) transformed into the 2MASS photometric system using the zero-points given in their Table 1. b = Mean magnitudes provided by Laney & Stobie (1992A&AS...93...93L 1992A&AS...93...93L) and by Laney (priv. comm.) transformed into the 2MASS photometric system using the zero-points provided by Koen et al. (2007MNRAS.380.1433K 2007MNRAS.380.1433K). + = objects marked with a "+" (a+ or b+) (Laney, priv. comm.) do not have a complete coverage of the light-curve (the number of phase points ranges from 4 to 14). c = Mean magnitudes based on single-epoch measurements from the 2MASS catalog and the NIR template light curves provided by Soszynski et al. (2005PASP..117..823S 2005PASP..117..823S). * = An asterisk indicates the use of single-epoch photometry in the distance determination (see Sect. 3 for details). For these stars the magnitudes listed are the single-epoch measurements retrieved from the 2MASS catalog. d = The weighted mean of the three true distance moduli. The errors account for uncertainties affecting the mean magnitudes and for the intrinsic dispersion of the adopted NIR PW relations. e = The weighted mean Galactocentric distances were estimated assuming Rgal=7.94±0.37±0.26kpc (Groenewegen et al., 2008A&A...481..441G 2008A&A...481..441G). The errors account for uncertainties affecting both the solar Galactocentric distance and the heliocentric distances. Note (3): References for the iron estimate. The priority was given, in the following order, to evaluations from our group: G13 = Genovali et al. 2013A&A...554A.132G 2013A&A...554A.132G, Cat. J/A+A/554/132 PED = Pedicelli et al. 2010A&A...511A..56P 2010A&A...511A..56P, Cat. J/A+A/511/A56 LEM = Lemasle et al. 2007A&A...467..283L 2007A&A...467..283L, 2008A&A...490..613L 2008A&A...490..613L ROM = Romaniello et al. 2008A&A...488..731R 2008A&A...488..731R and from the literature: LII = Luck et al. (2011AJ....142...51L 2011AJ....142...51L, Cat. J/AJ/142/51) LIII = Luck & Lambert (2011AJ....142..136L 2011AJ....142..136L, Cat. J/AJ/142/136) SZI = Sziladi et al. 2007A&A...473..579S 2007A&A...473..579S YON = Yong et al. 2006AJ....131.2256Y 2006AJ....131.2256Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 10 A10 --- Cluster Cluster name 12- 16 F5.2 Gyr Age Cluster age 18- 21 F4.1 kpc Rgal Galactocentric distance (R☉=7.94±0.37kpc) 23- 27 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]l Iron abundance available in the literature 29- 33 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H]r Metallicity rescaled to current solar abundance 35- 73 A39 --- r_[Fe/H]l Reference for metallicity 75- 77 A3 --- r_Age Reference for age-dist (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): References as follows: SF = Salaris et al. 2004A&A...414..163S 2004A&A...414..163S; Friel 1995ARA&A..33..381F 1995ARA&A..33..381F C = Carraro group: Carraro et al. 2002MNRAS.332..705C 2002MNRAS.332..705C, 2005MNRAS.356..647C 2005MNRAS.356..647C, 2005MNRAS.360..655C 2005MNRAS.360..655C, 2005A&A...442..917C 2005A&A...442..917C; Moitinho et al. 2006A&A...445..493M 2006A&A...445..493M; Villanova et al. 2007MNRAS.379.1089V 2007MNRAS.379.1089V, 2009A&A...504..845V 2009A&A...504..845V B = BOCCE: Gratton & Contarini 1994A&A...283..911G 1994A&A...283..911G; Bragaglia et al. 2001AJ....121..327B 2001AJ....121..327B; Kalirai & Tosi 2004MNRAS.351..649K 2004MNRAS.351..649K; Bragaglia et al. 2006MNRAS.366.1493B 2006MNRAS.366.1493B; Carretta et al. 2004A&A...422..951C 2004A&A...422..951C, 2005A&A...441..131C 2005A&A...441..131C, 2007A&A...473..129C 2007A&A...473..129C W = WEBDA YON = Yong et al. 2012AJ....144...95Y 2012AJ....144...95Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 A4 --- ID Cepheid group identification number (I to X) 6- 11 F6.3 kpc X Galactic coordinate X of the group barycenter 13- 18 F6.3 kpc Y Galactic coordinate Y of the group barycenter 20- 25 F6.3 kpc Z Galactic coordinate Z of the group barycenter 27- 32 F6.3 kpc Rgal Galactocentric radius of the group barycenter 34- 38 F5.3 kpc dRgal- Galactocentric distance of the inner edge of the Cepheid group 40- 44 F5.3 kpc dRgal+ Galactocentric distance of the outer edge of the Cepheid group 46- 50 F5.3 kpc Diam Diameter of the Cepheid group 52- 53 I2 --- N [6/52] Number of Cepheids per Cepheid group 55- 58 F4.2 d Per [5.08/8.74] Mean period of Cepheids in group 60- 63 F4.2 d e_Per Intrinsic dispersion of Per 65- 68 F4.1 kpc-3 rho Density of tje Cepheid group 70- 75 F6.3 [Sun] D[Fe/H] Mean residual iron abundance Δ[Fe/H] 77- 81 F5.3 [Sun] e_D[Fe/H] Intrinsic dispersion σ(Δ[Fe/H]) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal References: Lemasle et al., Paper I 2007A&A...467..283L 2007A&A...467..283L Romaniello et al., Paper II 2008A&A...488..731R 2008A&A...488..731R Lemasle et al., Paper III 2008A&A...490..613L 2008A&A...490..613L Pedicelli et al., Paper IV 2009A&A...504...81P 2009A&A...504...81P Pedicelli et al., Paper V 2010A&A...518A..11P 2010A&A...518A..11P Genovali et al., Paper VI 2013A&A...554A.132G 2013A&A...554A.132G, Cat. J/A+A/554/A132 Lemasle et al., Paper VII 2013A&A...558A..31L 2013A&A...558A..31L
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 08-Sep-2014
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line