J/AJ/136/586 Radial velocities of 10 close binaries (Rucinski+, 2008)
Radial velocity studies of close binary stars. XIII.
Rucinski S.M., Pribulla T., Mochnacki S.W., Liokumovich E., Lu W.,
Debond H., De Ridder A., Karmo T., Rock M., Thomson J.R., Ogloza W.,
Kaminski K., Ligeza P.
<Astron. J., 136, 586-593 (2008)>
=2008AJ....136..586R 2008AJ....136..586R
ADC_Keywords: Binaries, eclipsing ; Radial velocities
Keywords: binaries: close - binaries: eclipsing - binaries: spectroscopic
Abstract:
Radial velocity (RV) measurements and sine-curve fits to the orbital
RV variations are presented for ten close binary systems: EG Cep,
V1191 Cyg, V1003 Her, BD+7 3142, V357 Peg, V407 Peg, V1123 Tau,
V1128 Tau, HH UMa, and PY Vir.
Description:
All data used in the present paper were obtained using the BFs
extracted from the region of the MgI triplet at 5184Ås in most of
the previous papers. In 2005 August, a new 2160 lines/mm grating was
acquired to replace the previously most frequently used 1800 lines/mm
grating which after many years of use lost its efficiency.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table2.dat 152 10 Spectroscopic orbital elements
table1.dat 56 913 DDO radial velocity observations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
J/AJ/130/767 : Radial velocities of 10 close binaries (Rucinski+, 2005)
J/AJ/132/769 : Radial velocities of 10 close binaries (Pribulla+, 2006)
J/AJ/133/1977 : Radial velocities of 10 close binaries (Pribulla+, 2007)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 --- Name Star name
12- 16 A5 --- Type Binary type (EB or EW)
18- 22 A5 --- SpType MK spectral type (1)
24- 44 A21 --- ONames Other names
46- 51 F6.2 km/s V0 Center-of-mass velocity
53- 56 F4.2 km/s e_V0 rms uncertainty on V0
58- 63 F6.2 km/s K1 Velocity amplitude of the primary (2)
65- 68 F4.2 km/s e_K1 rms uncertainty on K1
70- 75 F6.2 km/s K2 Velocity amplitude of the secondary (2)
77- 80 F4.2 km/s e_K2 rms uncertainty on K2
82- 85 F4.2 --- e1 Standard unit-weight error of the solutions
for the primary, ε1 (2)
87- 91 F5.2 --- e2 Standard unit-weight error of the solutions
for the secondary, ε2 (2)
93-102 F10.4 d T0 Spectroscopically determined moment of upper
conjonction or more massive star, T0-2400000
104 I1 10-4d e_T0 rms uncertainty on T0
106-112 F7.4 d O-C (O-C) deviation corresponding to E (3)
114-121 F8.1 --- E Number of elapsed periods (cycle number)
124-133 F10.8 d Per Period
134 I1 10-7d e_Per ? rms uncertainty on Per
137-141 F5.3 Msun M1+M2 (M1+M2)sin3i value
143-144 I2 10-3Msun e_M1+M2 rms uncertainty on M1+M2
146-150 F5.3 --- q Mass ratio, M2/M1
152 I1 10-3 e_q rms uncertainty on q
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The spectral types relate to the combined spectral type of all
components in a system; they are given in parentheses if taken from
the literature, otherwise they are new.
Note (2): The convention of naming the binary components in the table is
that the more massive star is marked by the subscript "1," so that the
mass ratio is always defined to be q≤1.
Note (3): The corresponding (O-C) deviations have been calculated from the
available prediction on primary minimum, as given in the text, using
the assumed periods and the number of epochs given by E.
Ephemerides (HJD{min}-2400000 + period in days) used for the
computation of the (O-C) residuals:
EG Cep = 52500.5214 + 0.54462228 x E
V1191 Cyg = 52500.2507 + 0.3133874 x E
V1003 Her = 48500.43 + 0.493322 x E
BD+7 3142 = 54188.8663 + 0.275277 x E
V357 Peg = 52500.3022 + 0.5784509 x E
V407 Peg = 52558.1703 + 0.636889 x E
V1123 Tau = 52500.2670 + 0.3999474 x E
V1128 Tau = 52500.1463 + 0.3053725 x E
HH UMa = 52500.1967 + 0.3754910 x E
PY Vir = 51901.0416 + 0.311251 x E
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 --- Name Star name
12- 23 F12.4 d HJD ? Heliocentric Julian Date (1)
25- 31 F7.2 km/s RV1 ?=- Primary radial velocity (2)
33- 36 F4.2 --- w_RV1 Primary associated weight (3)
38- 44 F7.2 km/s RV2 ?=- Secondary radial velocity
46- 49 F4.2 --- w_RV2 ?=- Secondary associated weight (3)
51- 56 F6.4 --- Phase Phase (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): For V1191 Cyg the heliocentric Julian dates are omitted because
phase-smoothed BFs were used.
Note (2): Corresponds to the more massive component. It was always the
component eclipsed during the minimum at the epoch T0 (this does not
always correspond to the deeper minimum and photometric phase 0.0).
Note (3): Observations leading to entirely inseparable broadening function
peaks are given a zero weight; these observations may be eventually
used in more extensive modeling of broadening functions. The zero
weight was also assigned to observations of marginally visible peaks
of the secondary component (mainly in the case of EG Cep).
Note (4): Corresponding to T0 and periods given in Table 2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
References:
Lu & Rucinski, Paper I 1999AJ....118..515L 1999AJ....118..515L
Rucinski & Lu, Paper II 1999AJ....118.2451R 1999AJ....118.2451R
Rucinski et al., Paper III 2000AJ....120.1133R 2000AJ....120.1133R
Lu et al., Paper IV 2001AJ....122..402L 2001AJ....122..402L
Rucinski et al., Paper V 2001AJ....122.1974R 2001AJ....122.1974R
Rucinski et al., Paper VI 2002AJ....124.1738R 2002AJ....124.1738R
Rucinski, Paper VII 2002AJ....124.1746R 2002AJ....124.1746R
Rucinski et al., Paper VIII 2003AJ....125.3258R 2003AJ....125.3258R
Pych et al., Paper IX 2004AJ....127.1712P 2004AJ....127.1712P
Rucinski et al., Paper X 2005AJ....130..767R 2005AJ....130..767R, Cat. J/AJ/130/767
Pribulla et al., Paper XI 2006AJ....132..769P 2006AJ....132..769P, Cat. J/AJ/132/769
Pribulla et al., Paper XII 2007AJ....133.1977P 2007AJ....133.1977P, Cat. J/AJ/133/1977
Pribulla et al., Paper XIV 2009AJ....137.3646P 2009AJ....137.3646P
Pribulla et al., Paper XV 2009AJ....137.3655P 2009AJ....137.3655P
(End) Greg Schwarz [AAS], Patricia Vannier [CDS] 12-Feb-2011