J/AJ/143/39       Analysis of hot Jupiters in Kepler Q2    (Coughlin+, 2012)
A uniform search for secondary eclipses of hot Jupiters in Kepler Q2 light
curves.
    Coughlin J.L., Lopez-Morales M.
   <Astron. J., 143, 39 (2012)>
   =2012AJ....143...39C 2012AJ....143...39C
ADC_Keywords: Planets ; Stars, double and multiple ; Effective temperatures ;
              Stars, masses ; Stars, diameters ; Abundances, [Fe/H] ; Models
Keywords: methods: data analysis - planetary systems - techniques: photometric
Abstract:
    In this paper, we present the results of searching the Kepler Q2
    public data set for the secondary eclipses of 76 hot Jupiter planet
    candidates from the list of 1235 candidates published by Borucki et
    al., 2011, Cat. J/ApJ/736/19. This search has been performed by
    modeling both the Kepler pre-search data conditioned light curves and
    new light curves produced via our own photometric pipeline. We derive
    new stellar and planetary parameters for each system, while
    calculating robust errors for both. We find 16 systems with
    1σ-2σ, 14 systems with 2σ-3σ, and 6 systems
    with >3σ confidence level secondary eclipse detections in at
    least one light curve produced via the Kepler pre-search data
    conditioned light curve or our own pipeline; however, results can vary
    depending on the light curve modeled and whether eccentricity is
    allowed to vary or not. We estimate false alarm probabilities of 31%,
    10%, and 6% for the 1σ-2σ, 2σ-3σ, and
    >3σ confidence intervals, respectively.
Description:
    We have analyzed the Kepler Q2 (continuous 90-day observation
    coverage) light curves of 76 hot Jupiter transiting planet candidates
    (selection from Cat. J/ApJ/736/19 of systems with P<5days and
    Rp>0.5RJ) using both the Kepler Pre-search Data Conditioned (PDC)
    data and the results from our own photometric pipeline (CLM) for
    producing light curves from the pixel-level data. Of the 76 initial
    candidates, only 55 have light curves with high enough photometric
    stability to search for secondary eclipses.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName   Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe         80        .   This file
table1.dat    113       55   Modeled systems and their host star properties
table2.dat    209      180   Modeling results: median values and associated
                              1σ uncertainties
table3.dat    162      360   Derived system parameters and associated
                              1σ uncertainties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
 V/133 : Kepler Input Catalog (Kepler Mission Team, 2009)
 J/AJ/142/112  : KIC photometric calibration (Brown+, 2011)
 J/A+A/508/1509 : Sky maps for hot Jupiters (Heller+, 2009)
 J/ApJ/728/117 : Kepler planetary candidates. I. (Borucki+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/736/19  : Kepler planetary candidates. II. (Borucki+, 2011)
 J/AJ/141/78   : Low-mass eclipsing binaries in KIC (Coughlin+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/738/170 : False positive Kepler planet candidates (Morton+, 2011)
 J/ApJS/197/8  : Kepler candidate multiple transiting planets (Lissauer+, 2011)
 J/A+A/546/A10 : Multiplicity in transiting planet-host stars (Lillo-Box+, 2012)
 J/ApJS/204/24 : Kepler planetary candidates. III. (Batalha+, 2013)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units     Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  7  F7.2  ---       KOI     [1.01/1543.01] Kepler Object of Interest
   9- 17  I9    ---       KIC     [3351888/12019440] Kepler ID number
  19- 24  F6.3  mag       Kpmag   [9.958/15.979] KIC host stars' Kepler
                                   magnitude (1)
  26- 29  I4    K         Teff    KIC effective temperature of the star
  31- 34  F4.2  [cm/s2]   logg    KIC surface gravity
  36- 41  F6.3  [Sun]     [Fe/H]  KIC metallicity
  43- 47  F5.3  Msun      M1      Stellar mass from KIC (2)
  49- 53  F5.3  Msun    E_M1      Upper 1σ uncertainty on M1
  55- 59  F5.3  Msun    e_M1      Lower 1σ uncertainty on M1
  61- 65  F5.3  Rsun      R1      Stellar radius from KIC (2)
  67- 71  F5.3  Rsun    E_R1      Upper 1σ uncertainty on R1
  73- 77  F5.3  Rsun    e_R1      Lower 1σ uncertainty on R1
  79- 83  F5.3  Msun      M2      Stellar mass from isochrones (3)
  85- 89  F5.3  Msun    E_M2      Upper 1σ uncertainty on M2
  91- 95  F5.3  Msun    e_M2      Lower 1σ uncertainty on M2
  97-101  F5.3  Rsun      R2      Stellar radius from isochrones (3)
 103-107  F5.3  Rsun    E_R2      Upper 1σ uncertainty on R2
 109-113  F5.3  Rsun    e_R2      Lower 1σ uncertainty on R2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): KIC = Kepler Input Catalog.
Note (2): Computed from the KIC
Note (3): Computed via interpolation of the stellar isochrones 
     (see section 4.1 of the paper for further details).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       1  I1    ---     Type      [1/4] Model type (1)
   3-  9  F7.2  ---     KOI       [1.01/1543.01] Kepler Object of Interest
  11- 17  F7.4  ---     J         Planet-to-star surface brightness ratio
  19- 24  F6.4  ---   E_J         Upper 1σ uncertainty in J
  26- 31  F6.4  ---   e_J         Lower 1σ uncertainty in J
  33- 37  F5.3  ---     rsum      Sum of the fractional radius
  39- 43  F5.3  ---   E_rsum      Upper 1σ uncertainty in rsum
  45- 49  F5.3  ---   e_rsum      Lower 1σ uncertainty in rsum
  51- 56  F6.4  ---     k         Planet-to-star radii ratio
  58- 63  F6.4  ---   E_k         Upper 1σ uncertainty in k
  65- 70  F6.4  ---   e_k         Lower 1σ uncertainty in k
  72- 76  F5.2  deg     i         Orbital inclination
  78- 83  F6.4  deg   E_i         Upper 1σ uncertainty in i
  85- 91  F7.4  deg   e_i         Lower 1σ uncertainty in i
  93- 98  F6.3  ---     ecosw     Eccentricity times cosine of longitude of
                                   periastron e.cosω
 100-104  F5.3  ---   E_ecosw     Upper 1σ uncertainty in ecosw
 106-110  F5.3  ---   e_ecosw     Lower 1σ uncertainty in ecosw
 112-117  F6.3  ---     esinw     Eccentricity times sine of longitude of
                                   periastron e.sinω
 119-123  F5.3  ---   E_esinw     Upper 1σ uncertainty in esinw
 125-129  F5.3  ---   e_esinw     Lower 1σ uncertainty in esinw
 131-138  F8.6  d       P         Orbital period
 140-146  E7.1  d     E_P         Upper 1σ uncertainty in P
 148-154  E7.1  d     e_P         Lower 1σ uncertainty in P
 156-165  F10.5 d       T0        Time of primary transit minimum; BJD-2450000
 167-173  F7.5  d     E_T0        Upper 1σ uncertainty in T0
 175-181  F7.5  d     e_T0        Lower 1σ uncertainty in T0
 183-189  F7.3  ---     ALp       Amplitude of planet's luminosity
 191-196  F6.2  ---   E_ALp       Upper 1σ uncertainty in ALp
 198-203  F6.2  ---   e_ALp       Lower 1σ uncertainty in ALp
 205-209  F5.2  ---     chi2      Reduced χ2 of model
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Model type as follows:
    1 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero in PDC analysis
    2 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero in CLM analysis
    3 = light curve with eccentricity allowed to Vary in PDC analysis
    4 = light curve with eccentricity allowed to Vary in CLM analysis
    PDC = Pre-search Data Conditioned analysis
    CLM = analysis using the pixel-level data and our own photometric pipeline
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Bytes Format Units   Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       1  I1    ---    Type    [1-8] Model type (1)
   3-  9  F7.2  ---    KOI     [1.01/1543.01] Kepler Object of Interest (2)
  11- 17  F7.1 10-6    Lr      Planet-to-star luminosity ratio in parts per
                                million
  19- 25  F7.2 10-6  E_Lr      Upper 1σ uncertainty in Lr
  27- 33  F7.2 10-6  e_Lr      Uncertainty in Lr
  35- 39  F5.2  ---    sig2    Detection significance of secondary eclipse (3)
  41- 44  I4    K      T0      Equilibrium temperature
  46- 49  I4    K    E_T0      Upper 1σ uncertainty in T0
  51- 54  I4    K    e_T0      Lower 1σ uncertainty in T0
  56- 59  I4    K      Teps0   Maximum effective temperature, assuming no albedo
                               or heat recirculation (T(ε=0))
  61- 64  I4    K    E_Teps0   Upper 1σ uncertainty in Teps=0
  66- 69  I4    K    e_Teps0   Lower 1σ uncertainty in Teps=0
  71- 75  I5    K      Tb      Brightness temperature, assuming zero albedo
  77- 80  I4    K    E_Tb      Upper 1σ uncertainty in Tb
  82- 85  I4    K    e_Tb      Lower 1σ uncertainty in Tb
  87- 92  F6.3  ---    Tb/T0   Brightness to equilibrium temperature ratio
  94- 98  F5.3  ---  E_Tb/T0   Upper 1σ uncertainty in Tb/T0
 100-104  F5.3  ---  e_Tb/T0   Lower 1σ uncertainty in Tb/T0
 106-110  F5.3 Rjup    Rp      Planetary radius; in Jupiter radii
 112-116  F5.3 Rjup  E_Rp      Upper 1σ uncertainty in Rp
 118-122  F5.3 Rjup  e_Rp      Lower 1σ uncertainty in Rp
 124-129  F6.4  AU     a       System semi-major axis
 131-136  F6.4  AU   E_a       Upper 1σ uncertainty in a
 138-143  F6.4  AU   e_a       Lower 1σ uncertainty in a
 145-150  F6.2  ---    Amax    Maximum possible geometric albedo
 152-156  F5.2  ---  E_Amax    Upper 1σ uncertainty in Amax
 158-162  F5.2  ---  e_Amax    Lower 1σ uncertainty in Amax
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Model type as follows:
    1 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero and stellar parameters
        from the KIC, in PDC analysis
    2 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero and stellar parameters
        from isochrones. in PDC analysis
    3 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero and stellar parameters
        from the KIC, in CLM analysis
    4 = light curve with eccentricity fixed to zero and stellar parameters
        from isochrones, in CLM analysis
    5 = light curve with eccentricity free and stellar parameters from KIC,
        in PDC analysis
    6 = light curve with eccentricity free and stellar parameters from
        isochrones, in PDC analysis
    7 = light curve with eccentricity free and stellar parameters from KIC,
        in CLM analysis
    8 = light curve with eccentricity free and stellar parameters from
        isochrones, in CLM analysis
Note (2): The first two lines of this table are copied from the PDF version
     and not from the "machine readable (MRT)" version.
Note (3): Negative values mean an increase of light at secondary eclipse,
     instead of the expected decrease.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                Greg Schwarz [AAS], Sylvain Guehenneux [CDS]    12-Apr-2013