J/AJ/153/240  ALMA survey of protoplanetary disks in sigma Ori  (Ansdell+, 2017)
An ALMA survey of protoplanetary disks in the σ Orionis cluster.
    Ansdell M., Williams J.P., Manara C.F., Miotello A., Facchini S.,
    van der Marel N., Testi L., van Dishoeck E.F.
   <Astron. J., 153, 240-240 (2017)>
   =2017AJ....153..240A 2017AJ....153..240A    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Surveys ; Associations, stellar ; YSOs ; Radio lines ;
              Photometry, millimetric/submm ; Spectral types ; Stars, masses
Keywords: accretion, accretion disks - circumstellar matter -
          planets and satellites: formation - protoplanetary disks -
          stars: pre-main sequence - stars: protostars
Abstract:
    The σ Orionis cluster is important for studying protoplanetary
    disk evolution, as its intermediate age (∼3-5Myr) is comparable to the
    median disk lifetime. We use ALMA to conduct a high-sensitivity survey
    of dust and gas in 92 protoplanetary disks around σ Orionis
    members with M*≳0.1M☉. Our observations cover the 1.33mm
    continuum and several CO J=2-1 lines: out of 92 sources, we detect 37
    in the millimeter continuum and 6 in 12CO, 3 in 13CO, and none in
    C18O. Using the continuum emission to estimate dust mass, we find
    only 11 disks with Mdust≳10M⊕, indicating that after only a
    few Myr of evolution most disks lack sufficient dust to form giant
    planet cores. Stacking the individually undetected continuum sources
    limits their average dust mass to 5x lower than that of the faintest
    detected disk, supporting theoretical models that indicate rapid
    dissipation once disk clearing begins. Comparing the protoplanetary
    disk population in σ Orionis to those of other star-forming
    regions supports the steady decline in average dust mass and the
    steepening of the Mdust-M* relation with age; studying these
    evolutionary trends can inform the relative importance of different
    disk processes during key eras of planet formation. External
    photoevaporation from the central O9 star is influencing disk
    evolution throughout the region: dust masses clearly decline with
    decreasing separation from the photoionizing source, and the handful
    of CO detections exist at projected separations of >1.5pc.
    Collectively, our findings indicate that giant planet formation is
    inherently rare and/or well underway by a few Myr of age.
Description:
    Our sample consists of the 92 Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) in σ
    Orionis with infrared excesses consistent with the presence of a
    protoplanetary disk. hese sources are identified by cross-matching the
    Class II and transition disk (TD) candidates from the Spitzer survey
    of Hernandez et al. 2007 (Cat. J/ApJ/662/1067) with the Mayrit catalog
    (Caballero 2008, Cat. J/A+A/478/667). Both catalogs are expected to be
    complete down to the brown dwarf limit. Disk classifications are based
    on the Spitzer/Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) Spectral Energy
    Distribution (SED) slope, as described in Hernandez et al. 2007 (Cat.
    J/ApJ/662/1067). We also include in our sample a Class I disk (source
    1153), as it is located near the Spitzer/IRAC color cutoff for Class
    II disks.
    Our Band 6 Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA)
    observations were obtained on 2016 July 30 and 31 during Cycle 3
    (Project ID: 2015.1.00089.S; PI: Williams). The array configuration
    used 36 and 37 12m antennas on July 30 and 31, respectively, with
    baselines of 15-1124m on both runs. The correlator setup included two
    broadband continuum windows centered on 234.293 and 216.484GHz with
    bandwidths of 2.000 and 1.875GHz and channel widths of 15.625 and
    0.976MHz, respectively. The bandwidth-weighted mean continuum
    frequency was 225.676GHz (1.33mm). The spectral windows covered the
    12CO (230.538GHz), 13CO (220.399GHz), and C18O (219.560GHz)
    J=2-1 transitions at velocity resolutions of 0.16-0.17km/s. These
    spectral windows were centered on 230.531, 220.392, and 219.554GHz
    with bandwidths of 11.719MHz and channel widths of 0.122MHz.
    On-source integration times were 1.2 minutes per object for an average
    continuum rms of 0.15mJy/beam (Table1). This sensitivity was based on
    the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT)/Submillimeter Common User
    Bolometer Array (SCUBA)-2 survey of σ Orionis disks by Williams
    et al. 2013 (Cat. J/MNRAS/435/1671), who found that stacking their
    individual non-detections revealed a mean 850µm continuum signal of
    1.3mJy at 4σ significance. The sensitivity of our ALMA survey
    was therefore chosen to provide ∼3-4σ detections of such disks
    at 1.3mm, based on an extrapolation of the 850µm mean signal using
    a spectral slope of α=2-3.
    Table1 presents the 1.33mm continuum flux densities and associated
    uncertainties (F1.33mm). Table2 gives our integrated line fluxes or
    upper limits.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl    Records    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80          .    This file
table1.dat      80         92    Continuum properties
table2.dat      38         92    Gas properties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
 J/A+A/594/A85    : 2D disk models from CO isotopologues line (Miotello+, 2016)
 J/AJ/152/213     : Interferometry and spectroscopy of sig Ori (Schaefer+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/831/125    : ALMA 887um obs. of ChaI SFR (Pascucci+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/828/46     : ALMA survey of Lupus protoplanetary disks. (Ansdell+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/827/142    : ALMA observations of GKM stars in U. Sco (Barenfeld+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/794/36     : sig Orionis cluster stellar population (Hernandez+, 2014)
 J/MNRAS/435/1671 : SCUBA-2 850um survey in sig Ori cluster (Williams+, 2013)
 J/A+A/548/A56    : X-shooter spectra of 12 YSOs (Rigliaco+, 2012)
 J/A+A/478/667    : The Mayrit catalogue (Caballero, 2008)
 J/ApJ/662/1067   : Sptizer observations of sigma Orionis (Hernandez+, 2007)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units    Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  4  I4    ---     [HHM2007]  [73/1369] Source identification number (G1)
   6-  7  I2    h        RAh       Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) (1)
   9- 10  I2    min      RAm       Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) (1)
  12- 17  F6.3  s        RAs       Second of Right Ascension (J2000) (1)
      19  A1    ---      DE-       Sign of the Declination (J2000) (1)
  20- 21  I2    deg      DEd       Degree of Declination (J2000) (1)
  23- 24  I2    arcmin   DEm       Arcminute of Declination (J2000) (1)
  26- 30  F5.2  arcsec   DEs       Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) (1)
  32- 35  A4    ---      SpT       Spectral type (2)
  37- 39  F3.1  ---    e_SpT       Uncertainty in SpT
  41- 43  A3    ---    r_SpT       Reference for SpT (H14, R12, or VJ) (3)
  45- 48  F4.2  Msun     Mass      [0.04/1.71] Stellar mass (M*) (4)
  50- 53  F4.2  Msun   e_Mass      [0.01/0.32] Uncertainty in Mass (4)
  55- 59  F5.2  mJy      F1.33     [-0.27/15.38] Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-
                                    millimeter Array (ALMA) 1.33mm (225.676GHz)
                                    continuum emission flux density (F1.33mm)
  61- 64  F4.2  mJy    e_F1.33     [0.13/0.25] Uncertainty in F1.33 (5)
  66- 69  F4.2  mJy/beam rms       [0.13/0.18] Root-mean-square
  71- 75  F5.2  Mgeo     Mdust     [-1.2/68.48] Dust mass (Mdust) (6)
  77- 80  F4.2  Mgeo   e_Mdust     [0.57/1.12] Uncertainty in Mdust
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): We detect only 37 out of the 92 observed sources at >3σ
     significance (Figure2 in the paper). For detections, the source locations
     are the fitted source centers output by uvmodelfit, while for
     non-detections they are simply the phase centers of the Atacama Large
     Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array (ALMA) observations, which were chosen
     based on 2MASS positions. The average offsets from the phase centers for
     the detections are Δα=0.057'' and Δδ=-0.096'' (1.9
     and -3.2 pixels), both much smaller than the average beam size (Section 3
     in the paper).
Note (2): Spectral types were primarily taken from the homogenous sample of
     low-resolution optical spectra analyzed in Hernandez et al. 2014
     (Cat. J/ApJ/794/36), but supplemented with those from medium-resolution
     VLT/X-Shooter spectra when available from Rigliaco et al. 2012
     (Cat. J/A+A/548/A56). For the 23 sources that lack spectroscopic
     information, we estimate their spectral types using an empirical relation
     between V-J color and stellar spectral type; the relation was derived by
     measuring synthetic photometry from flux-calibrated VLT/X-Shooter spectra
     of Young Stellar Objects (YSOs) with spectral types from G5 to M9.5, then
     performing a non-parametric fit of the V-J color versus spectral type
     relation (Manara et al. 2017, in prep.). For these sources with
     photometrically derived spectral types, we cautiously assume uncertainties
     of ±2 spectral subtypes. We note that only 5 out of the 37 continuum
     detections have photometrically derived spectral types, which are less
     precise than the spectroscopically determined spectral types (Section 2).
Note (3): Reference codes are defined as follows:
     H14 = Hernandez et al. 2014 (Cat. J/ApJ/794/36);
     R12 = Rigliaco et al. 2012 (Cat. J/A+A/548/A56);
      VJ = derived from V-J color indices (see Section 2).
Note (4): We estimate M* values for our sample by comparing their positions on
     the Hertzsprung-Russel (HR) diagram to the evolutionary models of Siess et
     al. 2000A&A...358..593S 2000A&A...358..593S. In order to place our targets on the HR diagram,
     we convert their spectral types to stellar effective temperatures (Teff)
     and derive their stellar luminosities (L*) from J-band magnitudes using
     the relations in Herczeg & Hillenbrand 2015ApJ...808...23H 2015ApJ...808...23H. The
     uncertainties on L* are obtained by propagating the uncertainties on
     spectral type and bolometric correction, and thus on distance and optical
     extinction (AV). We then calculate the uncertainties on M* using a
     Monte Carlo (MC) method, where we take the standard deviation of 1000
     estimates of M*, each calculated after randomly perturbing the derived
     values of Teff and L* by their uncertainties.
Note (5): The uncertainties are statistical errors and do not include the 10%
     absolute flux calibration error (Section 3 in the paper).
Note (6):
     Our Mdust estimates, derived using Equation (1) with our F1.33mm
     measurements (Section 4.1):
     Mdust=Fνd2/KνBν(Tdust), where:
     Bν(Tdust) = The Planck function for a characteristic dust
                        temperature of Tdust=20K (the median for Taurus disks;
                        Andrews & Williams 2005ApJ...631.1134A 2005ApJ...631.1134A);
              Kν = The dust grain opacity. We take Kν as 10cm2/g at
                        1000GHz and use an opacity power-law index of β=1
                        (Beckwith et al. 1990AJ.....99..924B 1990AJ.....99..924B);
                    d = The source distance, taken as 385pc based on the
                        updated parallax of the σ Ori triple system
                        (Schaefer et al. 2016, Cat. J/AJ/152/213).
     Equation (1) can therefore be approximated as:
     Mdust≃1.34*10-5F1.33mm,
     where F1.33mm is in mJy and Mdust is in M☉.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units     Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  4  I4    ---      [HHM2007] [73/1369] Source identification number (G1)
       6  A1    ---     l_F12CO    [<] Upper limit flag on FC12O
   7- 10  I4   mJy.km/s   F12CO    [63/1204] The 12CO (230.538GHz) line
                                    intensity (F12CO) (7)
  12- 13  I2   mJy.km/s e_F12CO    [33/88]? Uncertainty in F12CO (7)
      15  A1    ---     l_F13CO    [<] Upper limit flag on F13CO
  16- 18  I3   mJy.km/s   F13CO    [72/326] The 13CO (220.399 GHz) line
                                    intensity (F13CO) (7)
  20- 21  I2   mJy.km/s e_F13CO    [54/68]? Uncertainty in F13CO (7)
      23  A1    ---     l_FC18O    [<] Upper limit flag on FC18O
  24- 25  I2   mJy.km/s   FC18O    [48/81] The C18O (219.560GHz) line
                                    intensity (FC18O) (7)
  27- 29  F3.1  MJup      Mgas     [2.4/7.1]? Gas mass (Mgas)
  31- 33  F3.1  MJup    b_Mgas     [1/1]? Lower boundary (minimum mass) of Mgas
                                    (Mgas,min)
  35- 38  F4.1  MJup    B_Mgas     [1/31.4] Upper boundary (maximum mass) of
                                    Mgas (Mgas,max)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (7): Of the 92 targets, only 6 are detected in 12CO, 3 are detected in
     13CO, and none are detected in C18O with >4σ significance. All
     sources detected in 12CO are detected in the continuum, and all sources
     detected in 13CO are detected in 12CO.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Notes:
Note (G1): From Hernandez, Hartmann, Megeath et al. 2007 (Cat. J/ApJ/662/1067).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                 Prepared by [AAS]; Sylvain Guehenneux [CDS]    16-Aug-2017