J/ApJ/825/19  Mass-radius relationship for planets with Rp<4  (Wolfgang+, 2016)
Probabilistic mass-radius relationship for sub-Neptune-sized planets.
    Wolfgang A., Rogers L.A., Ford E.B.
   <Astrophys. J., 825, 19-19 (2016)>
   =2016ApJ...825...19W 2016ApJ...825...19W    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Planets ; Stars, masses ; Stars, diameters
Keywords: methods: statistical; planets and satellites: composition
Abstract:
    The Kepler Mission has discovered thousands of planets with radii
    <4R{earth}, paving the way for the first statistical studies of the
    dynamics, formation, and evolution of these sub-Neptunes and
    super-Earths. Planetary masses are an important physical property for
    these studies, and yet the vast majority of Kepler planet candidates
    do not have theirs measured. A key concern is therefore how to map the
    measured radii to mass estimates in this Earth-to-Neptune size range
    where there are no Solar System analogs. Previous works have derived
    deterministic, one-to-one relationships between radius and mass.
    However, if these planets span a range of compositions as expected,
    then an intrinsic scatter about this relationship must exist in the
    population. Here we present the first probabilistic mass-radius
    relationship (M-R relation) evaluated within a Bayesian framework,
    which both quantifies this intrinsic dispersion and the uncertainties
    on the M-R relation parameters. We analyze how the results depend on
    the radius range of the sample, and on how the masses were measured.
    Assuming that the M-R relation can be described as a power law with a
    dispersion that is constant and normally distributed, we find that
    M/M{earth}=2.7(R/R{earth})1.3, a scatter in mass of
    1.9M{earth}, and a mass constraint to physically plausible
    densities, is the "best-fit" probabilistic M-R relation for the sample
    of RV-measured transiting sub-Neptunes (Rpl<4R{earth}). More
    broadly, this work provides a framework for further analyses of the
    M-R relation and its probable dependencies on period and stellar
    properties.
Description:
    Table 2 shows all of the masses and radii that we consider, with our
    baseline data set denoted with a label of 0; the list was constructed
    by starting with the WM14 (Weiss & Marcy, 2014ApJ...783L...6W 2014ApJ...783L...6W) data
    set and identifying new planets and updates in the NASA Exoplanet
    Archive (last accessed 2015 January 30). We manually double-checked
    each planet to verify that the reported measurements were correct. See
    section 3 for further details.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName      Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe            80        .   This file
table2.dat        60       90   Masses and radii of small planets
refs.dat          59       46   References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
 J/ApJ/806/183  : Planet radii of Kepler Object of Interest (Wolfgang+, 2015)
 J/ApJS/217/31  : Kepler planetary candidates. VI. 4yr Q1-Q16 (Mullally+, 2015)
 J/ApJS/217/16  : Kepler planetary candidates. V. 3yr Q1-Q12 (Rowe+, 2015)
 J/ApJ/800/135  : HARPS-N radial velocities of KOI-69 (Dressing+, 2015)
 J/A+A/573/A124 : Kepler-117 (KOI-209) transit-timing variations (Bruno+, 2015)
 J/ApJS/210/20  : Small Kepler planets radial velocities (Marcy+, 2014)
 J/ApJS/210/19  : Kepler planetary candidates. IV. 22 months (Burke+, 2014)
 J/ApJS/208/16  : Kepler transit timing observations. VIII. (Mazeh+, 2013)
 J/ApJ/772/L2   : Keck/HIRES radial velocities for HD 97658 (Dragomir+, 2013)
 J/ApJS/204/24  : Kepler planetary candidates. III. (Batalha+, 2013)
 J/A+A/546/A27  : Radial velocity and photometry for GJ3470 (Bonfils+, 2012)
 J/ApJ/749/15   : The Kepler-20 planetary system (Gautier+, 2012)
 J/A+A/539/A28  : New transit photom. for super-Earth 55 Cnc e (Gillon+, 2012)
 J/ApJS/197/8   : Kepler's cand. multiple transiting planets (Lissauer+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/736/19   : Kepler planetary candidates. II. (Borucki+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/728/138  : Follow-up photometry of HAT-P-26 (Hartman+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/710/1724 : Follow-up photometry for HAT-P-11 (Bakos+, 2010)
 J/A+A/520/A66  : CoRoT-8b light and RV curves (Borde+, 2010)
 J/A+A/506/303  : CoRoT-7 radial velocities (Queloz+, 2009)
 http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/ : NASA exoplanet archive
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 12  A12   ---     Name      Planet identifier
  14- 20  F7.3  d       Period    [0.3/267.3] Orbital period
  22- 26  F5.2  Mgeo    Mobs      [-6.4/70]? Observed mass in Earth masses
  28- 32  F5.2  Mgeo  e_Mobs      [0.2/95] The 1σ uncertainty in Mobs
  34- 38  F5.3  Rgeo    Robs      [0.3/6.6] Observed radius in Earth radii
  40- 44  F5.3  Rgeo  e_Robs      [0.01/0.9] The 1σ uncertainty in Robs
  46- 50  A5    ---     1Ref      First reference (see refs.dat file)
  52- 56  A5    ---     MRRef     Mass and radius reference (see refs.dat file)
  58- 60  A3    ---     Note      [,0-6]? Additional note(s) (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Note as follows:
    0 = Included in baseline dataset, which consists of RV masses
        (see Section 3).
    1 = Mass, radius values and their error bars are unchanged
        (within rounding error) from WM14.
    2 = Mass measured by fitting the observed TTVs to N-body integrations
        of the system.
    3 = The Kepler-68 planets were repeated twice in the WM14 dataset, so
        we use the Marcy et al. (2014, J/ApJS/210/20) values.
    4 = The e_Mobs column contains the 2σ upper limit as reported
        in the second reference.
    5 = Only a 1σ upper limit of 3.78 was given, and no posteriors
        were shown; in this analysis, we set the 2σ upper limit at
        9 Mgeo to include 1.8 m/s uncertainty quoted in RV semi-amplitude
        for the larger Kepler-101 b.
    6 = The 2σ upper limit is interpolated from given 1σ and
        3σ upper limits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: refs.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  2  I2    ---     Ref       Reference number
   4- 24  A21   ---     Auth      First author's name and year
  26- 44  A19   ---     BibCode   Bibcode of the reference
  46- 59  A14   ---     Cat       VizieR catalog reference
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                 Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS]    22-Aug-2016