J/ApJ/832/176        Classical Cepheids in MCs. I. LMC disk        (Inno+, 2016)
The panchromatic view of the Magellanic Clouds from classical Cepheids.
I. Distance, reddening, and geometry of the Large Magellanic Cloud disk.
    Inno L., Bono G., Matsunaga N., Fiorentino G., Marconi M., Lemasle B.,
    da Silva R., Soszynski I., Udalski A., Romaniello M., Rix H.-W.
   <Astrophys. J., 832, 176-176 (2016)>
   =2016ApJ...832..176I 2016ApJ...832..176I    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Magellanic Clouds ; Stars, variable ; Photometry, VRI ;
              Photometry, infrared ; Reddening ; Stars, distances
Keywords: Magellanic Clouds; stars: distances; stars: oscillations;
          stars: variables: Cepheids
Abstract:
    We present a detailed investigation of the Large Magellanic Cloud
    (LMC) disk using classical Cepheids. Our analysis is based on optical
    (I, V; OGLE-IV), near-infrared (NIR: J, H, KS) and mid-infrared
    (MIR: w1; WISE) mean magnitudes. By adopting new templates to estimate
    the NIR mean magnitudes from single-epoch measurements, we build the
    currently most accurate, largest, and homogeneous multi-band data set
    of LMC Cepheids. We determine Cepheid individual distances using
    optical and NIR Period-Wesenheit relations (PWRs), to measure the
    geometry of the LMC disk and its viewing angles. Cepheid distances
    based on optical PWRs are precise at 3%, but accurate to 7%, while the
    ones based on NIR PWRs are more accurate (to 3%), but less precise
    (2%-15%), given the higher photometric error on the observed
    magnitudes. We found an inclination of
    i=25.05±0.02(stat.)±0.55(syst.)°, and a position angle of the
    lines of nodes P.A.=150.76±0.02(stat.)±0.07(syst.)°. These
    values agree well with estimates based either on young (Red
    Supergiants) or on intermediate-age (Asymptotic Giant Branch, Red
    Clump) stellar tracers, but they significantly differ from evaluations
    based on old (RR Lyrae) stellar tracers. This indicates that
    young/intermediate and old stellar populations have different spatial
    distributions. Finally, by using the reddening-law fitting approach,
    we provide a reddening map of the LMC disk, which is 10 times more
    accurate and 2 times larger than similar maps in the literature. We
    also found an LMC true distance modulus of
    µ0,LMC=18.48±0.10(stat. and syst.)mag, in excellent agreement
    with the currently most accurate measurement.
Description:
    We cross-matched the LMC Cepheid catalog from OGLE-IV (Soszynski+,
    2015AcA....65..297S 2015AcA....65..297S) with the ALLWISE-Mep catalog, in order to
    complement our data with MIR ([3.4]um) time-series data.
    See table 9 for subsamples references.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName      Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe            80        .   This file
table9.dat       214     3920   Catalog of optical-NIR-MIR measurements for
                                 Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) Cepheids
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
 I/221   : The Magellanic Catalogue of Stars - MACS (Tucholke+ 1996)
 II/328  : AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013)
 II/305  : SAGE LMC and SMC IRAC Source Catalog (IPAC 2009)
 II/288  : IRSF Magellanic Clouds Point Source Catalog (Kato+ 2007)
 VII/233 : The 2MASS Extended sources (IPAC/UMass, 2003-2006)
 II/246  : 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003)
 IV/33   : Master Catalogue towards the Magellanic Clouds (MC2) (Delmotte+ 2002)
 II/228  : DENIS Catalogue toward Magellanic Clouds (DCMC) (Cioni+ 2000)
 J/A+A/580/A18 : Carina Project VIII. α-element abund. (Fabrizio+, 2015)
 J/A+A/576/A30 : NIR light-curve templates for classical Cepheids (Inno+, 2015)
 J/AJ/149/117  : LMC infrared survey. I. Photometry of Cepheids (Macri+, 2015)
 J/MNRAS/446/3034 : LMC Type II Cepheids J and Ks light curves (Ripepi+, 2015)
 J/MNRAS/438/2440 : Fourier analysis of 13095 LMC RR Lyr stars (Deb+, 2014)
 J/A+A/550/A70    : Galactic & MC Cepheids distance (Groenewegen 2013)
 J/MNRAS/424/1807 : VISTA Magellanic Cloud Survey. V. Cepheids (Ripepi+, 2012)
 J/AcA/61/285  : VI light curves of Galactic Bulge Cepheids (Soszynski+, 2011)
 J/A+A/534/A95 : LMC Cepheids radial velocities (Storm+, 2011)
 J/AJ/142/61   : RGB stars in LMC outer disk (Carrera+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/743/76  : Spitzer photometry of LMC Cepheids (Scowcroft+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/715/277 : Insights into the Cepheid distance scale (Bono+, 2010)
 J/MNRAS/397/933  : LMC type II Cepheids JHKs magnitudes (Matsunaga+, 2009)
 J/ApJ/679/71  : Mid-IR period-luminosity relations (Freedman+, 2008)
 J/AcA/58/163  : VI light curves of LMC classical Cepheids (Soszynski+, 2008)
 J/A+A/476/73  : Calibration of Cepheid Per/Lum relation (Fouque+, 2007)
 J/AJ/128/2239 : JHKs photometry of 92 LMC Cepheids (Persson+, 2004)
 J/A+A/411/361 : VI photometry of extra-galactic Cepheids (Kanbur+, 2003)
 J/ApJS/142/71 : BVRI observations of LMC Cepheids (Sebo+, 2002)
 J/AcA/51/317  : OGLE DIA. Catalog of LMC and SMC images (Zebrun+, 2001)
 J/AcA/50/307  : OGLE LMC BVI photometry (Udalski+, 2000)
 J/AcA/49/543  : OGLE LMC + SMC Cepheids VI photometry (Pietrzynski+, 1999)
 J/AcA/49/223  : BVI photometry of OGLE LMC Cepheids (Udalski+, 1999)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units Label  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 17 A17    ---   ID     Stellar identifier (1)
  19- 20 A2     ---   Mod    Stellar mode ("FO"=first overtone: 1645 instances;
                              "FU"=fundamental mode; 2275 instances)
  22- 29 A8     ---   Set    Sub-sample Cepheid belongs to (2)
  31- 40 E10.4  d     Per    [0.2/99.2] Period
  42- 50 E9.3   mag   Imag   [0/99.9]? Mean I band intensity transformed
                              into mags (3)
  52- 60 E9.3   mag   Vmag   [0/20.3]? Mean V band intensity transformed
                              into mags (3)
  62- 71 E10.4  mag   Jmag   [0/104]? Mean J band intensity transformed
                              into mags
  73- 79 E7.1   mag e_Jmag   [0/10]? Error in Jmag
  81- 90 E10.4  mag   Hmag   [9/102]? Mean H band intensity transformed
                              into mags
  92- 98 E7.1   mag e_Hmag   [0.006/10]? Error in Hmag
 100-109 E10.4  mag   Ksmag  [0/101]? Mean Ks band intensity transformed
                              into mags
 111-117 E7.1   mag e_Ksmag  [0/10]? Error in Ksmag
 119-131 E13.7  deg   RAdeg  Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
 133-146 E14.7  deg   DEdeg  Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
 148-157 E10.4  mag   w1mag  [8.5/16.3]? Mean WISE W1 (3.35um) band intensity
                              transformed into mags
 159-165 E7.1   mag e_w1mag  [0.003/0.3]? Error in w1mag
 167-167 A1     --- f_w1mag  Flag on w1mag (4)
 169-171 I3     --- o_w1mag  [3/211]? Number of epochs available in w1mag
 173-181 E9.3   mag   DM     [17.3/19.1]? Distance modulus (5)
 183-189 E7.1   mag e_DM     [0.003/0.1]? Error in DM
 191-198 E8.1   mag   E(B-V) [-0.3/1.1]? The (B-V) color excess (5)
 200-206 E7.1   mag e_E(B-V) [0.002/0.05]? Error in E(B-V)
 208-214 E7.1   ---   chi2   [0.1/4100]? The Χ2 of the reddening-law fit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The Harvard Variable catalog ID for the first ten Cepheids, and
          the OGLE ID for all the others in the OGLE catalog.
Note (2): As defined in Table 1. Sample as follows:
  2MASS    = Skrutskie+ 2006, VII/233 (1108 instances)
  CPAP     = CPAPIER; Macri+, 2015, J/AJ/149/117;
              <[MNK2015] DDD.ddddd+DD.ddddd> in Simbad (116 instances)
  IRSF     = IRSF/SIRIUS Survey; Kato+ 2007, II/288 (2353 instances)
  P04      = Persson+, 2004, J/AJ/128/2239 (66 instances)
  VMC      = Vista Survey for the Magellanic Clouds; Cioni+ 2011A&A...527A.116C 2011A&A...527A.116C
              (11 instances)
  VMC/CPAP = (169 instances)
  VMC/IRSF = (97 instances)
Note (3): Where 0.0 = not observed.
Note (4): Flag as follows:
    Y = w1mag was obtained by performing the Fourier-fit.
    N = w1mag was obtained by adopting the error-weighted mean of
        the observed magnitudes.
Note (5): Obtained by adopting the reddening-fit method.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                  Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS]    24-Feb-2017