J/ApJ/850/74 Swift/BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. I. (Koss+, 2017)
BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey.
I. Spectral measurements, derived quantities, and AGN demographics.
Koss M., Trakhtenbrot B., Ricci C., Lamperti I., Oh K., Berney S.,
Schawinski K., Balokovic M., Baronchelli L., Crenshaw D.M., Fischer T.,
Gehrels N., Harrison F., Hashimoto Y., Hogg D., Ichikawa K., Masetti N.,
Mushotzky R., Sartori L., Stern D., Treister E., Ueda Y., Veilleux S.,
Winter L.
<Astrophys. J., 850, 74-74 (2017)>
=2017ApJ...850...74K 2017ApJ...850...74K (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Active gal. nuclei ; Spectra, optical ; Gamma rays ; Redshifts ;
Velocity dispersion ; Equivalent widths
Keywords: black hole physics; galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei;
quasars: general
Abstract:
We present the first catalog and data release of the Swift-BAT AGN
Spectroscopic Survey. We analyze optical spectra of the majority of
the detected AGNs (77%, 642/836) based on their 14-195keV emission in
the 70-month Swift-BAT all-sky catalog. This includes redshift
determination, absorption and emission-line measurements, and black
hole mass and accretion rate estimates for the majority of obscured
and unobscured AGNs (74%, 473/642), with 340 measured for the first
time. With ∼90% of sources at z<0.2, the survey represents a
significant advance in the census of hard X-ray-selected AGNs in the
local universe. In this first catalog paper, we describe the
spectroscopic observations and data sets, and our initial spectral
analysis. The FWHMs of the emission lines show broad agreement with
the X-ray obscuration (∼94%), such that Sy 1-1.8 have
NH<1021.9cm-2, and Seyfert 2 have NH>1021.9cm-2. Seyfert
1.9, however, show a range of column densities. Compared to
narrow-line AGNs in the SDSS, the X-ray-selected AGNs have a larger
fraction of dusty host galaxies (Hα/Hβ>5), suggesting that
these types of AGN are missed in optical surveys. Using the
[OIII]λ5007/Hβ and [NII]λ6583/Hα
emission-line diagnostic, about half of the sources are classified as
Seyferts; ∼15% reside in dusty galaxies that lack an Hβ
detection, but for which the upper limits on line emission imply
either a Seyfert or LINER, ∼15% are in galaxies with weak or no
emission lines despite high-quality spectra, and a few percent each
are LINERS, composite galaxies, H II regions, or in known beamed AGNs.
Description:
A large fraction of the data we use are drawn from several large
public catalogs of optical spectra (see "Source" in table 2 and
section 2.2.1).
The other sources of spectra for our analysis are dedicated
spectroscopic observational campaigns of BAT AGN, taken over the last
several years using a variety of telescopes and instruments.
We had several large, multi-year programs on small 1-2m telescopes.
For 52 sources, the spectral measurements were taken with the KPNO
2.1m telescope and the GoldCam spectrograph. There were also programs
using the Perkins 1.8m telescope and DeVeny Spectrograph at the Lowell
Observatory and CTIO 1.5m RC spectrograph (PI M. Crenshaw).
We also had optical spectroscopic programs using larger telescopes.
For 29 sources, the spectral measurements were obtained with the
Gemini North and South telescopes, using the twin Gemini Multi-Object
Spectrograph (GMOS) instruments. The GMOS observations took place
between 2009 and 2012, as part of nine different observing programs
(P.I. M. Koss, E. Treister, and K. Schawinski). In this study we use
data from Gemini programs GN-2009B-Q-114, GN-2010A-Q-35,
GN-2011A-Q-81, GN-2011B-Q-96, GN-2012A-Q-28, GN-2012B-Q-25,
GS-2010A-Q-54, and GS-2011B-Q80.
We used the Palomar Double Spectrograph (DBSP) on the Hale 200 inch
Hale telescope for 35 targets (P.I. F. Harrison and D. Stern). The
observations were performed between 2012 October and 2015 February.
Finally, we had smaller programs using the 3.5m Apache Point telescope
(APO, 4 sources), the 3m Shane telescope at the Lick observatory (4
sources), and the UH 2.2m telescope (5 sources).
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table2.dat 122 641 Optical spectra
table4.dat 87 641 *Stellar velocity dispersion measurements
table5.dat 117 641 *Emission line measurements -
[OII]3727 spectral region
table6.dat 61 641 *Emission line measurements -
narrow Hbeta spectral region
table7.dat 84 641 *Emission line measurements -
narrow Halpha spectral region
table8.dat 123 641 *Strong emission line classification
table9.dat 102 302 Properties derived from spectral decomposition
of broad Hbeta and broad Halpha sources
table10.dat 74 18 Properties derived from spectral decomposition
of high redshift sources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note on table4.dat, table5.dat, table6.dat, table7.dat, table8.dat:
Source #250 has been excluded from the final table:
its spectrum was actually that of a star rather than an AGN.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VII/237 : HYPERLEDA. I. Catalog of galaxies (Paturel+, 2003)
VII/259 : 6dF galaxy survey final redshift release (Jones+, 2009)
VII/258 : Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (13th Ed.) (Veron+ 2010)
V/147 : The SDSS Photometric Catalogue, Release 12 (Alam+, 2015)
J/ApJS/129/547 : RBSC-NVSS sample. I. (Bauer+, 2000)
J/ApJS/132/37 : Spectroscopy of Southern warm IR galaxies (Kewley+, 2001)
J/ApJS/145/199 : Opt. spec. atlas of low-redshift AGN (Marziani+, 2003)
J/A+A/424/519 : Naked active galactic nuclei (Hawkins+, 2004)
J/ApJ/633/L77 : SWIFT/BAT detections of AGN (Markwardt+, 2005)
J/ApJ/667/131 : Mass function of active black holes (Greene+, 2007)
J/ApJS/183/1 : Cat. of central stellar velocity dispersions (Ho+, 2009)
J/A+A/495/691 : Multifreq. catalog of blazars, Roma-BZCAT (Massaro+, 2009)
J/ApJ/727/20 : The Megamaser Cosmology Project (MCP). III. (Kuo+, 2011)
J/MNRAS/417/2651 : AT20G-optical catalogue (Mahony+, 2011)
J/ApJS/194/45 : QSO properties from SDSS-DR7 (Shen+, 2011)
J/ApJ/733/60 : Accretion rate of AGNs from COSMOS surveys (Trump+, 2011)
J/ApJS/195/10 : The CDF-S survey: 4Ms source catalogs (Xue+, 2011)
J/ApJ/746/L22 : Dual AGNs in the nearby Universe (Koss+, 2012)
J/A+A/545/A101 : Spectra of Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi+, 2012)
J/MNRAS/421/1043 : Emission-line galaxies from SDSS DR7 (Shirazi+, 2012)
J/other/RMxAA/48.9 : Optical spectrosc. atlas of MOJAVE AGNs (Torrealba+, 2012)
J/ApJS/207/19 : X-ray survey from Swift-BAT 70mth (Baumgartner+, 2013)
J/A+A/561/A67 : Spectra of Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi, 2014)
J/ApJS/219/1 : Catalog of Type-1 AGNs from SDSS-DR7 (Oh+, 2015)
J/ApJ/815/L13 : Compton-thick AGNs from 70-mth Swift/BAT (Ricci+, 2015)
J/ApJS/218/10 : HET Massive Galaxy Survey (HETMGS) (van den Bosch+, 2015)
J/MNRAS/460/19 : Update of INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN catalogue (Malizia+, 2016)
J/ApJ/819/62 : The COSMOS-Legacy Survey (CLS) catalog (Civano+, 2016)
J/ApJ/817/172 : X-ray Observations of Stripe 82 (LaMassa+, 2016)
http://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/bs70mon/ : Swift BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey home page
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
ID (G1)
6- 29 A24 --- CName Counterpart source name
31- 39 A9 --- Source Source of optical spectrum (G2)
41- 46 F6.3 --- z[OIII] [-0/3.3] Redshift measured from [OIII]5007
48- 55 F8.2 Mpc Dist [3.6/28370]? Distance
57- 61 F5.2 [10-7W] logLx [40.4/48.7]? Log Swift-BAT 14-195keV X-ray
luminosity
63- 67 F5.2 [10-7W] logLbol [41.3/49.6]? Log 14-195keV bolometric
luminosity (1)
69- 89 A21 --- Date Date(s) taken optical spectra; dd/mm/yyyy
91- 95 I5 s Exp [60/27097] Exposure time
97-102 F6.2 kpc Slit [0/276]? Slit width
104-106 F3.1 --- Type [1/2]? AGN classification following
Osterbrock 1981ApJ...249..462O 1981ApJ...249..462O
108 I1 --- Beam Beamed AGN identifier (1 = beamed AGN)
110-122 A13 --- nH Obscuration identifier (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Estimated from the Swift-BAT X-ray luminosity (14-195keV).
Note (2): "Obs." for NH>1022cm-2 and "Unobs." for NH<1022cm-2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 14 A9 --- Source2 Source of optical spectrum (G2)
16- 22 F7.5 --- z [0.001/1.3]? Redshift measured from stellar
template
24- 26 I3 km/s sigma [85/577]? Stellar velocity dispersion
28- 29 I2 km/s e_sigma ? Formal uncertainty in sigma
31- 34 F4.2 [Msun] logMbh [6.9/10]? Log of the Black Hole mass
36- 39 F4.2 [Msun] e_logMbh ? Formal uncertainty in logMbh
41- 41 I1 --- f_sigma [1/9] Fitting quality flag on sigma (3)
43- 43 I1 --- CaHK [1]? 1= line is fitted
45- 45 I1 --- Mgb [1]? 1= line is fitted
47- 49 I3 km/s sigmaCaT [68/205]? Stellar velocity dispersion
measured from CaT
51- 52 I2 km/s e_sigmaCaT ? Formal uncertainty in sigmaCaT
54 I1 --- f_sigmaCaT [1/9]? Fitting quality flag for sigmaCaT (3)
56- 58 I3 km/s sigmalit [30/462]? Literature stellar velocity
dispersion
60- 62 I3 km/s e_sigmalit ? Formal uncertainty in sigmalit
64- 67 F4.2 [Msun] logMbhlit [6.3/9.5]? Log literature Black Hole mass
69- 72 F4.2 [Msun] e_logMbhlit ? Lower formal uncertainty in logMbhlit
74- 77 F4.2 [Msun] E_logMbhlit ? Upper format uncertainty in logMbhlit
79- 87 A9 --- Ref Reference(s) (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (3): Fitting quality flag as follows:
1 = excellent fit with small error (<sigma_error> =11km/s, sigma<34km/s);
2 = larger error than flag 1 (<sigma_error> =23km/s, sigma<60km/s),
but acceptable fit;
3 = bad fit with high S/N;
7 = presence of broad component at Hbeta or Halpha;
8 = very weak absorption features;
9 = bad fit.
Note (4): Reference as follows:
C04 = Cid Fernandes et al. (2004MNRAS.355..273C 2004MNRAS.355..273C);
C05 = Capetti et al. (2005A&A...431..465C 2005A&A...431..465C);
C09 = Cappellari et al. (2009MNRAS.394..660C 2009MNRAS.394..660C);
D03 = Devereux et al. (2003AJ....125.1226D 2003AJ....125.1226D);
D06 = Davies et al. (2006ApJ...646..754D 2006ApJ...646..754D);
F00 = Ferrarese & Merritt (2000ApJ...539L...9F 2000ApJ...539L...9F);
G05 = Garcia-Rissmann et al. (2005MNRAS.359..765G 2005MNRAS.359..765G);
G13 = Grier et al. (2013ApJ...773...90G 2013ApJ...773...90G);
H05 = Herrnstein et al. (2005ApJ...629..719H 2005ApJ...629..719H);
H09 = Ho et al. 2009, J/ApJS/183/1
Hy = http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr ; see also VII/237
K08 = Kondratko et al. (2008ApJ...678...87K 2008ApJ...678...87K);
K11 = Kuo et al. 2011, J/ApJ/727/20
L03 = Lodato & Bertin (2003A&A...398..517L 2003A&A...398..517L);
L17 = Lamperti et al. (2017MNRAS.467..540L 2017MNRAS.467..540L);
M11 = Medling et al. (2011ApJ...743...32M 2011ApJ...743...32M);
M13 = McConnell & Ma (2013ApJ...764..184M 2013ApJ...764..184M);
NW95 = Nelson & Whittle (1995ApJS...99...67N 1995ApJS...99...67N);
N04 = Nelson et al. (2004ApJ...615..652N 2004ApJ...615..652N);
O14 = Onken et al. (2014ApJ...791...37O 2014ApJ...791...37O);
RJ06 = Rothberg & Joseph (2006AJ....131..185R 2006AJ....131..185R);
T03 = Tadhunter et al. (2003MNRAS.342..861T 2003MNRAS.342..861T);
TYK05 = Trotter+ 1998ApJ...495..740T 1998ApJ...495..740T ; Yamauchi+ 2004PASJ...56..605Y 2004PASJ...56..605Y ;
Kondratko+ 2005ApJ...618..618K 2005ApJ...618..618K
V15 = van den Bosch et al. 2015, J/ApJS/218/10
W06 = Wold et al. (2006A&A...460..449W 2006A&A...460..449W);
W12 = Walsh et al. (2012ApJ...753...79W 2012ApJ...753...79W).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 9 I4 km/s FWHMO2 [205/4134]? Full-width at half-maximum
measured from the [OII]3727Å line
11- 13 I3 km/s e_FWHMO2 ? Formal uncertainty of FWHMO2
15 A1 --- l_F[NeV]3346 The 3σ limit flag on F[NeV]3346
16- 27 F12.1 10-15W/m2 F[NeV]3346 ? Flux of [NeV]3346Å line (G3)
29- 39 F11.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[NeV]3346 [0/]? Formal uncertainty of F[NeV]3346
41 A1 --- l_F[NeV]3426 The 3σ limit flag on F[NeV]3426
42- 51 F10.1 10-15W/m2 F[NeV]3426 ? Flux of [NeV]3426Å line (G3)
53- 55 F3.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[NeV]3426 [0/2]? Formal uncertainty of F[NeV]3426
57 A1 --- l_F[OII]3727 The 3σ limit flag on F[OII]3727
58- 63 F6.1 10-15W/m2 F[OII]3727 [0/3332]? Flux of [OII]3727Å
line (G3)
65- 75 F11.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[OII]3727 [0/]? Formal uncertainty of F[OII]3727
77 A1 --- l_F[NeIII]3869 The 3σ limit flag on F[NeIII]3869
78- 84 F7.1 10-15W/m2 F[NeIII]3869 [0/26999]? Flux of [NeIII]3869Å
line (G3)
86- 92 F7.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[NeIII]3869 [0/11472]? Formal uncertainty of
F[NeIII]3869
94 A1 --- l_F[NeIII]3968 The 3σ limit flag F[NeIII]3968
95-101 F7.1 10-15W/m2 F[NeIII]3968 [0/15343]? Flux of [NeIII]3968Å
line (G3)
103-113 F11.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[NeIII]3968 ? Formal uncertainty of F[NeIII]3968
115-117 A3 --- FitO2 Spectral fitting quality flag (G4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 9 I4 km/s FWHMHb [180/1781]? Full-width at half-maximum
measured from narrow Hbeta
11- 14 I4 km/s e_FWHMHb [0/3866]? Formal uncertainty of FWHMHb
16 A1 --- l_FHeII4686 The 3σ limit flag on l_FHeII4686
17- 22 F6.1 10-15W/m2 FHeII4686 [0.1/1953]? Flux of HeII4686Å line (G3)
24- 27 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_FHeII4686 [0/47]? Formal uncertainty of FHeII4686
29 A1 --- l_FHb The 3σ limit flag on FHb
30- 35 F6.1 10-15W/m2 FHb [0/3409]? Flux of Hβ line (G3)
37- 41 F5.1 10-15W/m2 e_FHb [0/309]? Formal uncertainty of FHb
43 A1 --- f_FHb Hbeta flag (G5)
45- 51 F7.1 10-15W/m2 F[OIII]5007 [0.3/41159]? Flux of [OIII]5007Å
line (G3)
53- 57 F5.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[OIII]5007 [0/180]? Formal uncertainty of F[OIII]5007
59- 61 A3 --- FitHb Spectral fitting quality flag (G4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table7.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 9 I4 km/s FWHMHa [152/1436]? Full-width at half-maximum
measured from narrow Halpha
11- 13 I3 km/s e_FWHMHa [0/426]? Formal uncertainty of FWHMHa
15 A1 --- l_F[OI]6300 The 3σ limit flag on F[OI]6300
16- 20 F5.1 10-15W/m2 F[OI]6300 [0.1/882]? Flux of [OI]6300Å line (G3)
22- 25 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[OI]6300 [0/24]? Formal uncertainty of F[OI]6300
27 A1 --- l_FHa The 3σ limit flag on FHa
28- 33 F6.1 10-15W/m2 FHa [0/6498]? Flux of Hα (G3)
35- 38 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_FHa [0/45]? Formal uncertainty of FHa
40 A1 --- f_FHa Halpha flag (G5)
42 A1 --- l_F[NII]6583 The 3σ limit flag on F[NII]6583
43- 49 F7.1 10-15W/m2 F[NII]6583 [0/11935]? Flux of [NII]6583Å line (G3)
51- 54 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[NII]6583 [0/39]? Formal uncertainty of F[NII]6583
56 A1 --- l_F[SII]6716 The 3σ limit flag on F[SII]6716
57- 62 F6.1 10-15W/m2 F[SII]6716 [0/1149]? Flux of [SII]6716Å line (G3)
64- 67 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[SII]6716 [0/22]? Formal uncertainty of F[SII]6716
69 A1 --- l_F[SII]6731 The 3σ limit flag on F[SII]6731
70- 75 F6.1 10-15W/m2 F[SII]6731 [0/1594]? Flux of [SII]6731Å line (G3)
77- 80 F4.1 10-15W/m2 e_F[SII]6731 [0/28]? Formal uncertainty of F[SII]6731
82- 84 A3 --- FitHa Spectral fitting quality flag (G4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table8.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1209] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 29 A24 --- CName Counterpart source name
31- 33 A3 --- f_CName (B): broad-line source
35- 51 A17 --- N2/O3 The [NII]/Halpha vs. [OIII]/Hbeta
diagnostic classification (5)
53- 69 A17 --- S2/O3 The [SII]/Halpha vs. [OIII]/Hbeta
diagnostic classification (5)
71- 87 A17 --- O1/O3 The [OI]/Halpha vs. [OIII]/Hbeta
diagnostic classification (5)
89-105 A17 --- He2/N2 The [HeII]/Hbeta vs. [NII]/Halpha
diagnostic classification (5)
107-123 A17 --- O3/O1 The [OIII]/[OII] vs. [OI]/Halpha
diagnostic classification (5)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (5): A blank indicates lack of wavelength coverage referring 'no wave'
classification which listed in Fig. 10 and Fig. 11.
AGN Limit = objects which have an Hbeta upper limit either in the
Seyfert or in the LINER region.
No wave = objects which have lack of wavelength coverage.
Comp = HII/AGN composite region.
Poor fit = Bad quality of spectral fitting.
Beamed AGN = Known as blazars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [1/1206] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 10 F5.2 [10-7W] logL5100 [41.6/46.1]? Log monochromatic
luminosity (1)
12- 16 F5.2 [10-7W] logLbol [42.8/46.8]? Log bolometric luminosity (2)
18- 22 I5 km/s FWHMbHb [1222/14999]? Full-width at half-maximum
of broad Hbeta
24- 29 F6.2 0.1nm EWbHb [5/204]? Equivalent width of broad Hbeta
31- 34 F4.2 [Msun] logMbhTN12 [5.3/9.6]? Log black hole mass
with logLbol (2)
36- 40 F5.2 [-] logEddTN12 [-2.7/0.04]? Log Eddington ratio
with logLbol (2)
42 I1 --- bHb ? Fitting quality flag for
broad Hbeta (G6)
44- 50 F7.1 10-15W/m2 FbHa [7.9/12449]? Flux of broad Halpha (G3)
52- 56 F5.1 10-15W/m2 e_FbHa [0/123]? Formal uncertainty of FbHa
58- 62 I5 km/s FWHMbHa [1010/12436]? Full-width at half-maximum of
broad Halpha
64- 67 I4 km/s e_FWHMbHa [0/3245]? Formal uncertainty of FWHMbHa
69- 74 F6.2 0.1nm EWbHa [2.9/992]? Equivalent width of broad Halpha
76- 79 F4.2 [Msun] logMbhGH05 [4.5/9.5]? Log of the black hole mass (3)
81- 81 I1 --- bHa ? Fitting quality flag for
broad Halpha (G6)
83- 87 F5.2 [-] logEddBAT [-2/1.6]? Log Eddington ratio derived from
14-195keV Swift-BAT survey (4)
89- 92 F4.2 [Msun] logMbhlit [5.4/9.2]? Log black hole mass
from literature (5)
94- 97 F4.2 [Msun] e_logMbhlit ? Lower formal uncertainty of logMbhlit
99-102 F4.2 [Msun] E_logMbhlit [0/0.5]? Upper formal uncertainty
of logMbhlit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): At rest-frame 5100 Angstrom.
Note (2): With logLbol estimated from logL5100.
Where TN2012 = Trakhtenbrot & Netzer (2012MNRAS.427.3081T 2012MNRAS.427.3081T).
Note (3): Derived from broad Halpha.
Where GHO5 = Greene & Ho (2005ApJ...630..122G 2005ApJ...630..122G).
Note (4): Following Greene & Ho (2005ApJ...630..122G 2005ApJ...630..122G).
Note (5): From Bentz & Katz (2015PASP..127...67B 2015PASP..127...67B, see also
http://www.astro.gsu.edu/AGNmass/)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table10.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- Seq [120/1171] Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey ID (G1)
6- 27 A22 --- CName Counterpart source name
29- 33 F5.3 --- z [0.5/3.3] Redshift
35- 38 A4 --- Line Broad emission lines (MgII or CIV) (1)
40- 44 F5.2 [10-7W] logLcont [45.1/46.8] Monochromatic luminosity (2)
46- 50 F5.2 10-15W/m2 Flux [1.7/20.8] Emission line flux (G3)
52- 56 F5.2 0.1nm EW [9.8/52.4] Equivalent width of the line
58- 61 I4 km/s FWHM [2009/8207] Full-width at half-maximum
of the line
63- 66 F4.2 [Msun] logMbh [8.3/9.9] Log black hole mass
68- 72 F5.2 [-] logEdd [-1.2/-0.1] Log Eddington ratio
74- 74 I1 --- Fit Spectral fitting quality flag (G6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Fitted to measure spectral quantities listed in this table
(CIV1549 and MgII2798).
Note (2): At rest-frame 1450 Angstrom or 3000 Angstrom.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Note:
Note (G1): Sequential number as in Baumgartner+, 2013, J/ApJS/207/19 ; see also
http://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/bs70mon/
Note (G2): Source as follows:
SDSS = SDSS data release 12 (DR12, Alam+ 2015, V/147)
6DF = The 6dF Galaxy Survey (6dFGS, Jones+ 2009, VII/259)
Palermo = The Palermo BAT catalogs (Parisi+ 2009A&A...507.1345P 2009A&A...507.1345P,
2012, J/A+A/545/A101 ; 2014, J/A+A/561/A67)
KPNO = Kitt Peak National Observatory's 2.1 meter Telescope
Perkins = Lowell Observatory's 72in Perkins Telescope
SAAO = South African Astronomical Observatory Telescope
Palomar = Palomar Observatory's 5.1m Hale Telescope
Masetti = newly identified AGNs from INTEGRAL (Masetti+ 2004A&A...426L..41M 2004A&A...426L..41M,
2006A&A...448..547M 2006A&A...448..547M, 2006A&A...449.1139M 2006A&A...449.1139M, 2006A&A...455...11M 2006A&A...455...11M,
2006A&A...459...21M 2006A&A...459...21M, 2008A&A...482..113M 2008A&A...482..113M, 2010A&A...519A..96M 2010A&A...519A..96M,
2012A&A...538A.123M 2012A&A...538A.123M, 2013A&A...556A.120M 2013A&A...556A.120M)
Gemini = Gemini North and South telescopes, using the twin Gemini
Multi-Object Spectrograph (GMOS) instruments
Marziani = The low-redshift AGN atlas of Marziani+ (2003, J/ApJS/145/199)
CTIO = Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory's 1.5 meter Telescope
Torrealba = Optical Spectroscopic Atlas of the MOJAVE/2cm AGN Sample from
Torrealba+ 2012, J/other/RMxAA/48.9
FAST = Landt et al. 2008ApJS..174..282L 2008ApJS..174..282L
Lick = The 3m Shane telescope at the Lick observatory
UH = University of Hawaii 2.2 meter Telescope
APO = The 3.5m Apache Point telescope
Note (G3): In units of 1e-15 ergs/s/cm2.
Note (G4): Spectral fitting quality flag as follows:
1 = a good fit with small error;
2 = acceptable fit;
3 = bad fit for high S/N source due to either the presence of broad line
component or offset in emission lines,
9 = lack of spectral coverage or no emission line is detected,
f = poor calibration because a single
flux calibration was applied to optical spectra taken over several
different nights as in the 6DF spectra.
Note (G5): Flag discriminating narrow ("n") or broad ("b") Hb or Ha,
and high-z sources ("h").
Note (G6): Fitting quality flag as follows:
1 = a good fit with small error;
2 = acceptable fit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
Acknowledgements:
Michael Koss [Eureka Scientific]
References:
Koss et al. Paper I. 2017ApJ...850...74K 2017ApJ...850...74K This catalog
Berney et al. Paper II. 2015MNRAS.454.3622B 2015MNRAS.454.3622B
Oh et al. Paper III. 2017MNRAS.464.1466O 2017MNRAS.464.1466O
Lamperti et al. Paper IV. 2017MNRAS.467..540L 2017MNRAS.467..540L Cat. J/MNRAS/467/540
Ricci et al. Paper V. 2017ApJS..233...17R 2017ApJS..233...17R Cat. J/ApJS/233/17
Trakhtenbrot et al. Paper VI. 2017MNRAS.470..800T 2017MNRAS.470..800T
Ricci et al. Paper VII. 2017Natur.549..488R 2017Natur.549..488R
Shimizu et al. Paper VIII. 2018ApJ...856..154S 2018ApJ...856..154S
Powell et al. Paper IX. 2018ApJ...858..110P 2018ApJ...858..110P
Oh et al. Paper X. 2018ApJS..235....4O 2018ApJS..235....4O Cat. J/ApJS/235/4
Ichikawa et al. Paper XI. 2019ApJ...870...31I 2019ApJ...870...31I Cat. J/ApJ/870/31
Ricci et al. Paper XII. 2018MNRAS.480.1819R 2018MNRAS.480.1819R
Bar et al. Paper XIII. 2019MNRAS.489.3073B 2019MNRAS.489.3073B
Koss et al. Paper XIV. 2018Natur.563..214K 2018Natur.563..214K
Smith et al. Paper XV. 2020MNRAS.492.4216S 2020MNRAS.492.4216S
Paliya et al. Paper XVI. 2019ApJ...881..154P 2019ApJ...881..154P Cat. J/ApJ/881/154
Baek et al. Paper XVII. 2019MNRAS.488.4317B 2019MNRAS.488.4317B
Liu et al. Paper XVIII. 2020ApJ...896..122L 2020ApJ...896..122L
Rojas et al. Paper XIX. 2020MNRAS.491.5867R 2020MNRAS.491.5867R
Koss et al. Paper XX. 2021ApJS..252...29K 2021ApJS..252...29K Cat. J/ApJS/252/29
Koss et al. Paper XXI. 2022ApJS..261....1K 2022ApJS..261....1K
Koss et al. Paper XXII. 2022ApJS..261....2K 2022ApJS..261....2K Cat. J/ApJS/261/2
Pfeifle et al. Paper XXIII. 2022ApJS..261....3P 2022ApJS..261....3P
Oh et al. Paper XXIV. 2022ApJS..261....4O 2022ApJS..261....4O Cat. J/ApJS/261/4
Mejia-Restrepo et al. Paper XXV. 2022ApJS..261....5M 2022ApJS..261....5M Cat. J/ApJS/261/5
Koss et al. Paper XXVI. 2022ApJS..261....6K 2022ApJS..261....6K Cat. J/ApJS/261/6
Gupta et al. Paper XXVII. 2021MNRAS.504..428G 2021MNRAS.504..428G
den Brok et al. Paper XXVIII. 2022ApJS..261....7D 2022ApJS..261....7D Cat. J/ApJS/261/7
Ricci et al. Paper XXIX. 2022ApJS..261....8R 2022ApJS..261....8R Cat. J/ApJS/261/8
Ananna et al. Paper XXX. 2022ApJS..261....9A 2022ApJS..261....9A
Kakkad et al. Paper XXXI. 2022MNRAS.511.2105K 2022MNRAS.511.2105K
Kawamuro et al. Paper XXXII. 2022ApJ...938...87K 2022ApJ...938...87K
Marcotulli et al. Paper XXXIII. 2022ApJ...940...77M 2022ApJ...940...77M Cat. J/ApJ/940/77
Kawamuro et al. Paper XXXIV. 2023ApJS..269...24K 2023ApJS..269...24K Cat. J/ApJS/269/24
Caglar et al. Paper XXXV. 2023ApJ...956...60C 2023ApJ...956...60C
Powell et al. Paper XXXVI. 2022ApJ...938...77P 2022ApJ...938...77P
Ricci et al. Paper XXXVII. 2022ApJ...938...67R 2022ApJ...938...67R
Ananna et al. Paper XXXVIII. 2022ApJ...939L..13A 2022ApJ...939L..13A
Temple et al. Paper XXXIX. 2023MNRAS.518.2938T 2023MNRAS.518.2938T
Tortosa et al. Paper XL. 2023MNRAS.526.1687T 2023MNRAS.526.1687T
Ricci et al. Paper XLII. 2023ApJ...959...27R 2023ApJ...959...27R
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 15-Feb-2018