J/ApJ/923/262       NIR spectroscopic obs. of z>6.5 quasars       (Yang+, 2021)

Probing early supermassive black hole growth and quasar evolution with near- infrared spectroscopy of 37 reionization-era quasars at 6.3<z≤7.64. Yang J., Wang F., Fan X., Barth A.J., Hennawi J.F., Nanni R., Bian F., Davies F.B., Farina E.P., Schindler J.-T., Banados E., Decarli R., Eilers A.-C., Green R., Guo H., Jiang L., Li J.-T., Venemans B., Walter F., Wu X.-B., Yue M. <Astrophys. J., 923, 262 (2021)> =2021ApJ...923..262Y 2021ApJ...923..262Y
ADC_Keywords: QSOs; Ultraviolet; Spectra, infrared; Redshifts; Equivalent widths; Black holes Keywords: Quasars ; Supermassive black holes ; Reionization Abstract: We report the results of near-infrared spectroscopic observations of 37 quasars in the redshift range 6.3<z≤7.64, including 32 quasars at z>6.5, forming the largest quasar near-infrared spectral sample at this redshift. The spectra, taken with Keck, Gemini, VLT, and Magellan, allow investigations of central black hole mass and quasar rest-frame ultraviolet spectral properties. The black hole masses derived from the MgII emission lines are in the range (0.3-3.6)x109M, which requires massive seed black holes with masses ≥103-104M, assuming Eddington accretion since z=30. The Eddington ratio distribution peaks at λEdd∼0.8 and has a mean of 1.08, suggesting high accretion rates for these quasars. The CIV-MgII emission-line velocity differences in our sample show an increase of CIV blueshift toward higher redshift, but the evolutionary trend observed from this sample is weaker than the previous results from smaller samples at similar redshift. The FeII/MgII flux ratios derived for these quasars up to z=7.6, compared with previous measurements at different redshifts, do not show any evidence of strong redshift evolution, suggesting metal-enriched environments in these quasars. Using this quasar sample, we create a quasar composite spectrum for z>6.5 quasars and find no significant redshift evolution of quasar broad emission lines and continuum slope, except for a blueshift of the CIV line. Our sample yields a strong broad absorption line quasar fraction of ∼24%, higher than the fractions in lower-redshift quasar samples, although this could be affected by small sample statistics and selection effects. Description: The NIR spectral sample presented in this paper is constructed based on (1) quasars from the survey described in W19 (Wang+ 2019ApJ...884...30W 2019ApJ...884...30W) and Y19 (Yang+ 2019AJ....157..236Y 2019AJ....157..236Y), (2) other known z>7 quasars (i.e., J1120+0641 and J1342+0928), (3) quasars observed in our Keck/NIRES NIR spectroscopic programs, and (4) other z>6.5 quasars (i.e., J0024+3913 and J2232+2930) that are not in the first three categories but have Gemini/GNIRS data in the archive. We obtained NIR spectroscopy of our quasar sample using the following facilities: Keck/NIRES (Near-Infrared Echellette Spectrometer), Gemini/GNIRS (Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph), VLT/X-Shooter, Gemini/F2 (FLAMINGOS-2 near-infrared imaging spectrograph), and Magellan/FIRE. We observed 18 quasars with Keck/NIRES from 2018 to 2020 (0.94-2.45um, R∼2700). Spectra of 22 quasars were taken with Gemini North/GNIRS, including 18 quasars observed in our programs from 2018 to 2020 and four from Gemini archival data (0.85-2.5um, R∼500-700). In addition, we observed three quasars with VLT/X-Shooter (ID: 0103.A-0423(A)) in 2019. X-Shooter covers the wavelength range from 3000 to 24800Å (R∼8900 and ∼8100). Quasars J0313-1806 and J0525-2406 were observed with Gemini South F2 in 2019 (1.45-2.5um, R∼400). In addition to the NIRES, GNIRS, and F2 observations, quasar J0313-1806 was also observed with Magellan/FIRE (0.8-2.5um) in echelle mode in 2019 November and December (R∼4800 and ∼3600). All results refer to a ΛCDM cosmology with parameters ΩΛ=0.7, Ωm=0.3, and h=0.7. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 150 38 Quasar and observation information of the 37 quasars in the sample table2.dat 161 37 Spectral fitting and quasar properties table3.dat 32 1849 z>6.5 quasar composite spectrum table4.dat 69 37 Quasar BH masses derived from the spectral fitting based on the Vestergaard & Wilkes (2001ApJS..134....1V 2001ApJS..134....1V ; VW01) iron template -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/319 : UKIDSS-DR9 LAS, GCS and DXS Surveys (Lawrence+ 2012) II/359 : The VISTA Hemisphere Survey (VHS) cat. DR4.1 (McMahon+, 2013) II/357 : The Dark Energy Survey (DES): Data Release 1 (Abbott+, 2018) II/371 : The Dark Energy Survey (DES): Data Release 2 (Abbott+, 2021) J/ApJ/613/682 : AGN masses & broad-line region sizes (Peterson+, 2004) J/ApJS/166/470 : SDSS-Spitzer type I QSOs IR photometry (Richards+, 2006) J/ApJ/692/758 : BAL QSOs in SDSS-DR5 (Gibson+, 2009) J/ApJ/699/800 : Mass functions of active black holes (Vestergaard+, 2009) J/ApJS/194/45 : QSO properties from SDSS-DR7 (Shen+, 2011) J/AJ/148/13 : Redshifts of 65 CANDELS supernovae (Rodney+, 2014) J/ApJS/227/11 : PS1 z>5.6 quasars follow-up (Banados+, 2016) J/ApJ/825/126 : SEAMBHs. V. The third year (Du+, 2016) J/A+A/585/A87 : Quasar composite made from bright QSOs (Selsing+, 2016) J/MNRAS/465/2120 : Correcting CIV-based virial BH masses (Coatman+, 2017) J/ApJ/856/6 : SEAMBHs IX. 10 new Hβ light curves (Du+, 2018) J/MNRAS/487/3305 : Broad-line velocity shifts in 1.5<z<7.5 QSOs (Meyer+, 2019) J/ApJ/873/35 : Gemini GNIRS NIR sp. of 50 QSOs at z≳5.7 (Shen+, 2019) J/ApJ/901/55 : SDSS-RM project: MgII lags from 4yrs (Homayouni+, 2020) J/ApJ/905/51 : X-SHOOTER/ALMA QSOs at 5.78<z<7.54. I. (Schindler+, 2020) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 A19 --- Name Position based identifier (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s) 21- 21 A1 --- f_Name Flag on Name (1) 23- 32 A10 --- SName Short Name used in text 34- 48 A15 --- Inst Instrument used 50- 61 A12 s ExpTime Exposure time(s) 63- 68 F6.4 --- zsp [6.35/7.65]? Spectroscopic redshift 70- 75 F6.4 --- e_zsp [0.0001/0.05]? Uncertainty in zsp 77-115 A39 --- Disc Discovery, ADS bibcode(s) 117-117 A1 --- [CII] [YN] Detection of [CII] 119-137 A19 --- r_zsp Reference for zsp, ADS bibcode (2) 139-139 A1 --- NIR [YN] Previously published BH mass measurements 141-145 F5.2 mag Jmag [17.46/21.3]? J-band (AB system) photometric data used to scale the NIR spectra (3) 147-150 F4.2 mag e_Jmag [0.02/0.3]? Uncertainty in Jmag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Notes on object names. Code as follows: d = These quasars are also named as PSO J006.1240+39.2219, PSO J011.3898+09.0324, PSO J172.3556+18.7734, PSO J261.0364+19.0286, and PSO J338.2298+29.5089, respectively; e = These quasars are previously unpublished. Details of their selection and identification will be reported separately (J. Yang et al. in prep). Note (2): The reference for the redshifts used in the spectral analysis. If the quasar has a [CII] detection (column [CII] = Y), the reference is for the [CII]-based redshift, and the redshift listed in column z is the [CII]-based redshift. Most of the [CII] detections are from a series of ALMA/NOEMA programs that will be reported in detail in F. Wang et al. (in prep). Note (3): The J-band photometric data used to scale the NIR spectra. For the quasars J0525-2406, J0923+0753, and J1058+2930 without J data, we used Y or K-band photometry, as described in Section 2.3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 A19 --- Name Position based identifier (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s) 21- 30 A10 --- SName Short Name used in text 32- 34 A3 --- f_Name Flag(s) on Name (1) 36- 41 F6.4 --- z[CII] [6.46/7.65]? Redshift based on [CII] 43- 48 F6.4 --- e_z[CII] [0.0001/0.004]? Uncertainty in z[CII] 50- 54 F5.3 --- zCIV [6.33/7.53]? Redshift based on CIV 56- 60 F5.3 --- e_zCIV [0.001/0.04]? Uncertainty in zCIV 62- 67 F6.4 --- zMgII [6.3/7.62] Redshift based on MgII 69- 74 F6.4 --- e_zMgII [0.0002/0.02] Uncertainty in zMgII 76- 81 F6.2 mag M1450 [-27.5/-25] Absolute rest-frame 1450Å magnitude 83- 87 I5 km/s FWHM-CIV [1908/11989]? Full width at half maximum, CIV line 89- 92 I4 km/s e_FWHM-CIV [26/3206]? Uncertainty in FWHM-CIV 94- 97 I4 km/s FWHM-MgII [1741/5504] Full width at half maximum, MgII line 99-101 I3 km/s e_FWHM-MgII [14/763] Uncertainty in FWHM-MgII 103-106 F4.1 0.1nm EW-CIV [5.9/70.1]? Equivalent width, CIV, in Angstroms 108-111 F4.1 0.1nm e_EW-CIV [0.9/26.2]? Uncertainty in EW-CIV 113-116 F4.1 0.1nm EW-MgII [7.9/34.7] Equivalent width, MgII, in Angstroms 118-121 F4.1 0.1nm e_EW-MgII [0.6/18.2] Uncertainty in EW-MgII 123-126 F4.1 10+39W LBol [4.6/34] Bolometric luminosity, 10+46erg/s 128-130 F3.1 10+39W e_LBol [0.1/3.5] Uncertainty in LBol 132-136 F5.3 10+9Msun MBH [0.26/3.6] Black hole mass 138-142 F5.3 10+9Msun e_MBH [0.003/0.7] Uncertainty in MBH 144-148 F5.2 --- alpha [-1.74/-0.24] Power-law continuum slope 150-153 F4.2 --- e_alpha [0.01/1] Uncertainty in alpha 155-157 F3.1 --- REdd [0.3/2.3] Eddington Ratio, Lbol/LEdd 159-161 F3.1 --- e_REdd [0.1/1] Uncertainty in REdd -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flags on Name. Code as follows: b = The measurements of the quasar J0439+1634 have been corrected for gravitational lensing using a magnification of 51.3, Fan et al. (2019ApJ...870L..11F 2019ApJ...870L..11F); c = BAL quasars. See details in Section 6.2. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 6 F6.1 0.1nm lambda [1150.5/2998.5] Wavelength, rest frame, Angstroms 8- 29 F22.19 --- Flam [-0.04/3.14] Flux density, arbitrary units 31- 32 I2 --- Nqso [4/38] Number of QSOs contributing to data point -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 A19 --- Name Position based identifier (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s) 21- 30 A10 --- SName Short Name used in text 32- 35 F4.1 10+39W LBol [5/37] Bolometric luminosity, 10+46erg/s 37- 39 F3.1 10+39W e_LBol [0.1/4] Uncertainty in LBol 41- 44 I4 km/s FWHM-MgII [1729/7825] Full width at half maximum, MgII line 46- 49 I4 km/s e_FWHM-MgII [8/1314] Uncertainty in FWHM-MgII 51- 55 F5.3 10+9Msun MBH [0.24/8.4] Black hole mass 57- 61 F5.3 10+9Msun e_MBH [0.001/1.5] Uncertainty in MBH 63- 65 F3.1 --- REdd [0.2/2.3] Eddington Ratio, Lbol/LEdd 67- 69 F3.1 --- e_REdd [0.1/1] Uncertainty in REdd -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 05-Jun-2023
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line