J/ApJ/923/262       NIR spectroscopic obs. of z>6.5 quasars       (Yang+, 2021)
Probing early supermassive black hole growth and quasar evolution with near-
infrared spectroscopy of 37 reionization-era quasars at 6.3<z≤7.64.
    Yang J., Wang F., Fan X., Barth A.J., Hennawi J.F., Nanni R., Bian F.,
    Davies F.B., Farina E.P., Schindler J.-T., Banados E., Decarli R.,
    Eilers A.-C., Green R., Guo H., Jiang L., Li J.-T., Venemans B.,
    Walter F., Wu X.-B., Yue M.
   <Astrophys. J., 923, 262 (2021)>
   =2021ApJ...923..262Y 2021ApJ...923..262Y
ADC_Keywords: QSOs; Ultraviolet; Spectra, infrared; Redshifts; 
              Equivalent widths; Black holes
Keywords: Quasars ; Supermassive black holes ; Reionization
Abstract:
    We report the results of near-infrared spectroscopic observations of
    37 quasars in the redshift range 6.3<z≤7.64, including 32 quasars at
    z>6.5, forming the largest quasar near-infrared spectral sample at
    this redshift. The spectra, taken with Keck, Gemini, VLT, and
    Magellan, allow investigations of central black hole mass and quasar
    rest-frame ultraviolet spectral properties. The black hole masses
    derived from the MgII emission lines are in the range
    (0.3-3.6)x109M☉, which requires massive seed black holes with
    masses ≥103-104M☉, assuming Eddington accretion since z=30.
    The Eddington ratio distribution peaks at λEdd∼0.8 and has a
    mean of 1.08, suggesting high accretion rates for these quasars. The
    CIV-MgII emission-line velocity differences in our sample show an
    increase of CIV blueshift toward higher redshift, but the evolutionary
    trend observed from this sample is weaker than the previous results
    from smaller samples at similar redshift. The FeII/MgII flux ratios
    derived for these quasars up to z=7.6, compared with previous
    measurements at different redshifts, do not show any evidence of
    strong redshift evolution, suggesting metal-enriched environments in
    these quasars. Using this quasar sample, we create a quasar composite
    spectrum for z>6.5 quasars and find no significant redshift evolution
    of quasar broad emission lines and continuum slope, except for a
    blueshift of the CIV line. Our sample yields a strong broad absorption
    line quasar fraction of ∼24%, higher than the fractions in
    lower-redshift quasar samples, although this could be affected by
    small sample statistics and selection effects.
Description:
    The NIR spectral sample presented in this paper is constructed based
    on
    (1) quasars from the survey described in W19 (Wang+ 2019ApJ...884...30W 2019ApJ...884...30W)
    and Y19 (Yang+ 2019AJ....157..236Y 2019AJ....157..236Y),
    (2) other known z>7 quasars (i.e., J1120+0641 and J1342+0928),
    (3) quasars observed in our Keck/NIRES NIR spectroscopic programs, and
    (4) other z>6.5 quasars (i.e., J0024+3913 and J2232+2930) that are not
    in the first three categories but have Gemini/GNIRS data in the
    archive.
    We obtained NIR spectroscopy of our quasar sample using the following
    facilities: Keck/NIRES (Near-Infrared Echellette Spectrometer),
    Gemini/GNIRS (Gemini Near-Infrared Spectrograph), VLT/X-Shooter,
    Gemini/F2 (FLAMINGOS-2 near-infrared imaging spectrograph), and
    Magellan/FIRE.
    We observed 18 quasars with Keck/NIRES from 2018 to 2020 (0.94-2.45um,
    R∼2700). Spectra of 22 quasars were taken with Gemini North/GNIRS,
    including 18 quasars observed in our programs from 2018 to 2020 and
    four from Gemini archival data (0.85-2.5um, R∼500-700). In addition,
    we observed three quasars with VLT/X-Shooter (ID: 0103.A-0423(A)) in
    2019. X-Shooter covers the wavelength range from 3000 to 24800Å
    (R∼8900 and ∼8100). Quasars J0313-1806 and J0525-2406 were observed
    with Gemini South F2 in 2019 (1.45-2.5um, R∼400). In addition to the
    NIRES, GNIRS, and F2 observations, quasar J0313-1806 was also observed
    with Magellan/FIRE (0.8-2.5um) in echelle mode in 2019 November and
    December (R∼4800 and ∼3600).
    All results refer to a ΛCDM cosmology with parameters
    ΩΛ=0.7, Ωm=0.3, and h=0.7.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl  Records  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80        .  This file
table1.dat     150       38  Quasar and observation information of the
                              37 quasars in the sample
table2.dat     161       37  Spectral fitting and quasar properties
table3.dat      32     1849  z>6.5 quasar composite spectrum
table4.dat      69       37  Quasar BH masses derived from the spectral fitting
                              based on the 
                              Vestergaard & Wilkes (2001ApJS..134....1V 2001ApJS..134....1V ; VW01)
                              iron template
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
 II/319 : UKIDSS-DR9 LAS, GCS and DXS Surveys (Lawrence+ 2012)
 II/359 : The VISTA Hemisphere Survey (VHS) cat. DR4.1 (McMahon+, 2013)
 II/357 : The Dark Energy Survey (DES): Data Release 1 (Abbott+, 2018)
 II/371 : The Dark Energy Survey (DES): Data Release 2 (Abbott+, 2021)
 J/ApJ/613/682    : AGN masses & broad-line region sizes (Peterson+, 2004)
 J/ApJS/166/470   : SDSS-Spitzer type I QSOs IR photometry (Richards+, 2006)
 J/ApJ/692/758    : BAL QSOs in SDSS-DR5 (Gibson+, 2009)
 J/ApJ/699/800    : Mass functions of active black holes (Vestergaard+, 2009)
 J/ApJS/194/45    : QSO properties from SDSS-DR7 (Shen+, 2011)
 J/AJ/148/13      : Redshifts of 65 CANDELS supernovae (Rodney+, 2014)
 J/ApJS/227/11    : PS1 z>5.6 quasars follow-up (Banados+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/825/126    : SEAMBHs. V. The third year (Du+, 2016)
 J/A+A/585/A87    : Quasar composite made from bright QSOs (Selsing+, 2016)
 J/MNRAS/465/2120 : Correcting CIV-based virial BH masses (Coatman+, 2017)
 J/ApJ/856/6      : SEAMBHs IX. 10 new Hβ light curves (Du+, 2018)
 J/MNRAS/487/3305 : Broad-line velocity shifts in 1.5<z<7.5 QSOs (Meyer+, 2019)
 J/ApJ/873/35     : Gemini GNIRS NIR sp. of 50 QSOs at z≳5.7 (Shen+, 2019)
 J/ApJ/901/55     : SDSS-RM project: MgII lags from 4yrs (Homayouni+, 2020)
 J/ApJ/905/51     : X-SHOOTER/ALMA QSOs at 5.78<z<7.54. I. (Schindler+, 2020)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 19 A19    ---     Name     Position based identifier (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s)
  21- 21 A1     ---   f_Name     Flag on Name (1)
  23- 32 A10    ---     SName    Short Name used in text
  34- 48 A15    ---     Inst     Instrument used
  50- 61 A12    s       ExpTime  Exposure time(s)
  63- 68 F6.4   ---     zsp      [6.35/7.65]? Spectroscopic redshift
  70- 75 F6.4   ---   e_zsp      [0.0001/0.05]? Uncertainty in zsp
  77-115 A39    ---     Disc     Discovery, ADS bibcode(s)
 117-117 A1     ---     [CII]    [YN] Detection of [CII]
 119-137 A19    ---   r_zsp      Reference for zsp, ADS bibcode (2)
 139-139 A1     ---     NIR      [YN] Previously published BH mass measurements
 141-145 F5.2   mag     Jmag     [17.46/21.3]? J-band (AB system) photometric
                                  data used to scale the NIR spectra (3)
 147-150 F4.2   mag   e_Jmag     [0.02/0.3]? Uncertainty in Jmag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Notes on object names. Code as follows:
    d = These quasars are also named as PSO J006.1240+39.2219, PSO
        J011.3898+09.0324, PSO J172.3556+18.7734, PSO J261.0364+19.0286, and
        PSO J338.2298+29.5089, respectively;
    e = These quasars are previously unpublished. Details of their selection
        and identification will be reported separately (J. Yang et al. in
        prep).
Note (2): The reference for the redshifts used in the spectral analysis. If
    the quasar has a [CII] detection (column [CII] = Y), the reference is
    for the [CII]-based redshift, and the redshift listed in column z is
    the [CII]-based redshift. Most of the [CII] detections are from a
    series of ALMA/NOEMA programs that will be reported in detail in F. Wang
    et al. (in prep).
Note (3): The J-band photometric data used to scale the NIR spectra. For
    the quasars J0525-2406, J0923+0753, and J1058+2930 without J data, we
    used Y or K-band photometry, as described in Section 2.3.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units      Label      Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 19 A19    ---        Name       Position based identifier
                                       (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s)
  21- 30 A10    ---        SName      Short Name used in text
  32- 34 A3     ---      f_Name       Flag(s) on Name (1)
  36- 41 F6.4   ---        z[CII]     [6.46/7.65]? Redshift based on [CII]
  43- 48 F6.4   ---      e_z[CII]     [0.0001/0.004]? Uncertainty in z[CII]
  50- 54 F5.3   ---        zCIV       [6.33/7.53]? Redshift based on CIV
  56- 60 F5.3   ---      e_zCIV       [0.001/0.04]? Uncertainty in zCIV
  62- 67 F6.4   ---        zMgII      [6.3/7.62] Redshift based on MgII
  69- 74 F6.4   ---      e_zMgII      [0.0002/0.02] Uncertainty in zMgII
  76- 81 F6.2   mag        M1450      [-27.5/-25] Absolute rest-frame 1450Å
                                       magnitude
  83- 87 I5     km/s       FWHM-CIV   [1908/11989]? Full width at half maximum,
                                       CIV line
  89- 92 I4     km/s     e_FWHM-CIV   [26/3206]? Uncertainty in FWHM-CIV
  94- 97 I4     km/s       FWHM-MgII  [1741/5504] Full width at half maximum,
                                       MgII line
  99-101 I3     km/s     e_FWHM-MgII  [14/763] Uncertainty in FWHM-MgII
 103-106 F4.1   0.1nm      EW-CIV     [5.9/70.1]? Equivalent width, CIV,
                                       in Angstroms
 108-111 F4.1   0.1nm    e_EW-CIV     [0.9/26.2]? Uncertainty in EW-CIV
 113-116 F4.1   0.1nm      EW-MgII    [7.9/34.7] Equivalent width, MgII,
                                       in Angstroms
 118-121 F4.1   0.1nm    e_EW-MgII    [0.6/18.2] Uncertainty in EW-MgII
 123-126 F4.1   10+39W     LBol       [4.6/34] Bolometric luminosity,
                                       10+46erg/s
 128-130 F3.1   10+39W   e_LBol       [0.1/3.5] Uncertainty in LBol
 132-136 F5.3   10+9Msun   MBH        [0.26/3.6] Black hole mass
 138-142 F5.3   10+9Msun e_MBH        [0.003/0.7] Uncertainty in MBH
 144-148 F5.2   ---        alpha      [-1.74/-0.24] Power-law continuum slope
 150-153 F4.2   ---      e_alpha      [0.01/1] Uncertainty in alpha
 155-157 F3.1   ---        REdd       [0.3/2.3] Eddington Ratio, Lbol/LEdd
 159-161 F3.1   ---      e_REdd       [0.1/1] Uncertainty in REdd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Flags on Name. Code as follows:
    b = The measurements of the quasar J0439+1634 have been corrected for
        gravitational lensing using a magnification of 51.3,
        Fan et al. (2019ApJ...870L..11F 2019ApJ...870L..11F);
    c = BAL quasars. See details in Section 6.2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units Label  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  6 F6.1   0.1nm lambda [1150.5/2998.5] Wavelength, rest frame, Angstroms
   8- 29 F22.19 ---   Flam   [-0.04/3.14] Flux density, arbitrary units
  31- 32 I2     ---   Nqso   [4/38] Number of QSOs contributing to data point
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units      Label      Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 19 A19    ---        Name       Position based identifier
                                       (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s)
  21- 30 A10    ---        SName      Short Name used in text
  32- 35 F4.1   10+39W     LBol       [5/37] Bolometric luminosity, 10+46erg/s
  37- 39 F3.1   10+39W   e_LBol       [0.1/4] Uncertainty in LBol
  41- 44 I4     km/s       FWHM-MgII  [1729/7825] Full width at half maximum,
                                       MgII line
  46- 49 I4     km/s     e_FWHM-MgII  [8/1314] Uncertainty in FWHM-MgII
  51- 55 F5.3   10+9Msun   MBH        [0.24/8.4] Black hole mass
  57- 61 F5.3   10+9Msun e_MBH        [0.001/1.5] Uncertainty in MBH
  63- 65 F3.1   ---        REdd       [0.2/2.3] Eddington Ratio, Lbol/LEdd
  67- 69 F3.1   ---      e_REdd       [0.1/1] Uncertainty in REdd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                    Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS]  05-Jun-2023