J/ApJS/205/14 Energy levels and spectral lines of MnII (Kramida+, 2013)
Energy levels and spectral lines of singly ionized manganese (Mn II).
Kramida A., Sansonetti J.E.
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 205, 14 (2013)>
=2013ApJS..205...14K 2013ApJS..205...14K
ADC_Keywords: Atomic physics
Keywords: atomic data - infrared: general - line: identification -
methods: laboratory - techniques: spectroscopic - ultraviolet: general
Abstract:
This compilation revises the previously recommended list of energy
levels of singly ionized manganese (Mn II) and provides a
comprehensive list of observed spectral lines and transition
probabilities in this spectrum. The new level optimization takes into
account critically assessed uncertainties of measured wavelengths and
includes about a hundred high-precision wavelengths determined by
laser spectroscopy and Fourier transform techniques. Uncertainties of
63% of energy levels and 74% of Ritz wavelengths are reduced by a
factor of three on average.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table1.dat 140 3975 Spectral lines of MnII
table2.dat 89 533 Energy levels of MnII
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VI/74 : Atomic Energy Level Data (NIST 1993)
J/ApJS/194/35 : Atomic transition probabilities of Mn (Den Hartog+, 2011)
J/A+A/526/A115 : Electron-impact excitation of H-like ions (Malespin+, 2011)
J/A+A/419/215 : Emission lines of Sr filament near η Car (Hartman+, 2004)
J/A+AS/125/539 : Mn III transition probabilities (Uylings+ 1997)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 7 A7 --- Intens Relative intensity (1)
9- 18 F10.5 0.1nm lambda ? Observed wavelength λ (Å) (2)
20- 24 F5.4 0.1nm e_lambda ? Uncertainty in lambda
26- 35 F10.3 cm-1 sigma ? Observed wavenumber σ (3)
37- 41 F5.3 cm-1 e_sigma ? Uncertainty in sigma
43- 49 A7 --- LowLbl Lower level label (4)
51- 57 A7 --- UppLbl Upper level label (4)
59- 69 F11.5 0.1nm lam.R ? Calculated (Ritz) wavelength (Å) (2)
71- 77 F7.5 0.1nm e_lam.R ? Uncertainty in lam.R
79- 86 E8.2 s-1 A ? Transition probability; A-value
88- 96 E9.2 --- f ? Absorption oscillator strength; f-value
98-106 E9.2 --- LineStr ? Line strength
108-113 F6.3 [-] log(gf) ? log(gf); g is statistical weight of
lower level
115-116 A2 --- Q [A-E+ ] Accuracy of results (5)
118-122 A5 --- Type Transition type (6)
124-130 A7 --- r_A Transition probability reference (7)
132-138 A7 --- r_lambda Wavelength and classification reference (7)
140 A1 --- Com [PSX] Comment about the line (8)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Relative observed intensities in arbitrary units are quoted from
Iglesias & Velasco 1964smi..book.....I 1964smi..book.....I. For extremely weak lines
characterized by Iglesias & Velasco as traces, a value of zero is given.
The intensity value is followed by the line character encoded as:
bl = blended
D = double line
h = hazy
H = extremely hazy
i = identification uncertain
m = masked
w = wide line
: = wavelength was not measured; the value given is a rounded Ritz value
* = multiply classified or intensity given is shared by more than one line
? = questionable observation
Note (2): Vacuum wavelength for λ<2000Å and λ>2µm.
Standard air wavelength for 2000<λ<20000Å.
Conversion between air and vacuum was made with the five-parameter
formula from Peck E. R. & Reeder, K. 1972JOSA...62..958P 1972JOSA...62..958P.
Note (3): Observed wavenumbers of lines quoted from Iglesias & Velasco
1964smi..book.....I 1964smi..book.....I are from the same source. For other lines,
they are calculated from observed wavelengths.
Note (4): Level labels refer to column Lbl of Table 2
Note (5): Transition probability uncertainty code as follows:
------------------------------------------------------
Symbol Uncertainty in A-value Uncertainty in log(gf)
------------------------------------------------------
AA ≤ 1% ≤0.0013
A+ ≤ 2% ≤0.009
A ≤ 3% ≤0.013
B+ ≤ 7% ≤0.03
B ≤10% ≤0.04
C+ ≤18% ≤0.08
C ≤25% ≤0.11
D+ ≤40% ≤0.18
D ≤50% ≤0.24
E >50% >0.24
------------------------------------------------------
Note (6): Transition type as follows:
Blank = electric-dipole transition
E2 = electric-quadrupole transition
M1+E2 = a mix of magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole transitions
Note (7): Reference as follows:
D11 = Den Hartog, E. A., Lawler, J. E., Sobeck, J. S., Sneden, C. &
Cowan, J. J. 2011, Cat. J/ApJS/194/35
H04 = Hartman, H., Gull, T. Johansson, S., Smith, N. & HST Eta Carinae
Treasury Project Team 2004, Cat. J/A+A/419/215
H99 = Holt, R. A., Scholl, T. J. & Rosner, S. D. 1999MNRAS.306..107H 1999MNRAS.306..107H
I64 = Iglesias, L. & Velasco, R. 1964, Publ. Inst. Opt. Madrid (Daza de
Valdes), No. 23, 1 (1964smi..book.....I 1964smi..book.....I)
J95 = Johansson, S., Wallerstein, G., Gilroy, K. K. & Joueizadeh, A.
1995A&A...300..521J 1995A&A...300..521J
K00 = Kling, R. & Griesmann, U. 2000ApJ...531.1173K 2000ApJ...531.1173K
K00a= transition probabilities from Kling & Griesmann (2000ApJ...531.1173K 2000ApJ...531.1173K)
were adjusted using the lifetimes recommended by Den Hartog et al. 2011,
Cat. J/ApJS/194/35
K01 = Kling, R., Schnabel, R. & Griesmann, U. 2001ApJS..134..173K 2001ApJS..134..173K
K88 = Kurucz, R. L. 1988, in Trans. IAU, Vol. 20B, ed. M. McNally
(Dordrecht; Kluwer) 168 (Data available online at
http://kurucz.harvard.edu/linelists.html; downloaded on 2012 December 11)
M03 = Morton, D. C. 2003ApJS..149..205M 2003ApJS..149..205M
N12 = Nave, G. 2012MNRAS.420.1570N 2012MNRAS.420.1570N
T05 = Toner, A. & Hibbert, A. 2005MNRAS.361..673T 2005MNRAS.361..673T
W01 = Wallerstein, G., Gilroy, K. K., Zethson, T., Johansson, S. & Hamann,
F. 2001PASP..113.1210W 2001PASP..113.1210W
Note (8): Flag as follows:
P = Predicted line
X = Excluded from the level optimization
S = This line alone determines one of the energy levels involved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 23 A23 --- Conf Configuration
25- 29 A5 --- Term Term
31 I1 --- J ? J value (1)
33- 42 F10.3 cm-1 E Energy level value; excitation energy
44- 48 F5.3 cm-1 e_E ? Uncertainty in E
50 A1 --- u_E [?] "?" = Questionable level value
52- 56 F5.3 --- Lande ? Lande factor (2)
57 A1 --- u_Lande [?] Uncertainty flag in Lande
58- 60 I3 --- Lpc [0/100]? Leading percentage (2)
62- 63 I2 --- Lpc2 [0/100]? Second leading percentage (2)
65- 77 A13 --- Conf2 Configuration of the 2nd leading component (2)
79- 81 A3 --- Term2 Term of the 2nd leading component (2)
83- 89 A7 --- Lbl Level label (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Blank J values signify unresolved terms, i.e. the energy value given
refers to all possible J values of the term.
Note (2): All Lande factors and percentage compositions are from Sugar, J. &
Corliss, C. 1985, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 14, Suppl. 2, 1
Note (3): Level labels used in transition classifications in Table 1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
(End) Greg Schwarz [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 10-Apr-2013