J/ApJS/222/14  Planetary candidates from 1st yr K2 mission  (Vanderburg+, 2016)

Planetary candidates from the first year of the K2 mission. Vanderburg A., Latham D.W., Buchhave L.A., Bieryla A., Berlind P., Calkins M.L., Esquerdo G.A., Welsh S., Johnson J.A. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 222, 14 (2016)> =2016ApJS..222...14V 2016ApJS..222...14V (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Stars, double and multiple ; Planets ; Stars, diameters ; Radial velocities ; Abundances Keywords: methods: data analysis; planets and satellites: detection; techniques: photometric Abstract: The Kepler Space Telescope is currently searching for planets transiting stars along the ecliptic plane as part of its extended K2 mission. We processed the publicly released data from the first year of K2 observations (Campaigns 0, 1, 2, and 3) and searched for periodic eclipse signals consistent with planetary transits. Out of the 59174 targets that we searched, we detect 234 planetary candidates around 208 stars. These candidates range in size from gas giants to smaller than the Earth, and range in orbital periods from hours to over a month. We conducted initial reconnaissance spectroscopy of 68 of the brighter candidate host stars, and present high-resolution optical spectra for these stars. We make all of our data products, including light curves, spectra, and vetting diagnostics available to users online. Description: During Campaign 0, K2 observed a field centered at RAJ2000=06:33:11.14,DEJ2000=+21:35:16.40, for a period of 80 days between March and May of 2014. During Campaign 1, K2 observed a field centered at RAJ2000=11:35:45.51,DEJ2000=+01:25:02.28 for 83 days between June and August of 2014. Field 2 of the K2 mission is centered at RAJ2000=16:24:30.34,DEJ2000=-22:26:50.28, and was observed for 79 days between 2014 August and November. Field 3 of the K2 mission is centered at RAJ2000=22:26:39.68,DEJ2000=-11:05:47.99, and was observed for 69 days between 2014 November and 2015 February. We observed 68 stars with the high-resolution Tillinghast Reflector Echelle Spectrograph (TRES; on the 1.5m telescope at Fred L. Whipple Observatory (FLWO) on Mt. Hopkins, Arizona; R=44000) at least once, collecting a total of 101 spectra, and extracted the spectra using the procedure described in Buchhave et al. (2010, J/ApJ/720/1118). See tables 3 and 4. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 117 234 Planet candidate parameters table2.dat 75 208 Stellar parameters for planet candidate host stars table3.dat 75 68 Summary of spectroscopic observations with TRES table4.dat 84 101 List of individual observations with TRES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: V/133 : Kepler Input Catalog (Kepler Mission Team, 2009) J/MNRAS/456/2260 : K2 Variability Catalogue II (Armstrong+, 2016) J/A+A/582/A33 : K2-19b light curve (Armstrong+, 2015) J/A+A/579/A19 : K2 Variable Catalogue (Armstrong+, 2015) J/ApJ/810/95 : Kepler pipeline S/N studies. II. 2011 (Christiansen+, 2015) J/AJ/150/85 : Photometry and spectroscopy of HAT-P-56 (Huang+, 2015) J/A+A/579/A19 : K2 Variable Catalogue (Armstrong+, 2015) J/ApJS/217/31 : Kepler planetary candidates. VI. 4yr Q1-Q16 (Mullally+, 2015) J/ApJ/800/135 : HARPS-N radial velocities of KOI-69 (Dressing+, 2015) J/ApJ/800/85 : Teff, radii and luminosities of cool dwarfs (Newton+, 2015) J/ApJ/784/45 : Kepler's multiple planet candidates. III. (Rowe+, 2014) J/ApJS/210/20 : Small Kepler planets radial velocities (Marcy+, 2014) J/A+A/559/A36 : Exoplanets WASP-65b and WASP-75b (Gomez Maqueo Chew+, 2013) J/ApJS/208/9 : Intrinsic colors and temperatures of PMS stars (Pecaut+, 2013) J/ApJS/207/35 : Kepler pipeline signal-to-noise studies (Christiansen+, 2013) J/MNRAS/426/739 : Velocities for 7 transiting hot Jupiters (Hellier+, 2012) J/ApJ/757/112 : Stellar diameters. II. K and M-stars (Boyajian+, 2012) J/other/Nat/486.375 : Stellar parameters of KOI stars (Buchhave+, 2012) J/ApJS/199/24 : The first three quarters of Kepler mission (Tenenbaum+, 2012) J/AJ/142/112 : KIC photometric calibration (Brown+, 2011) J/ApJ/738/170 : False positive Kepler planet candidates (Morton+, 2011) J/ApJ/736/19 : Kepler planetary candidates. II. (Borucki+, 2011) J/ApJ/720/1118 : i-band photometry of HAT-P-16 (Buchhave+, 2010) http://cfop.ipac.caltech.edu/k2/ : ExoFOP-K2 home page http://archive.stsci.edu/prepds/k2sff/ : K2 extracted lightcurves "K2SFF" Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 I1 --- Type [0/1] Transit type (0=regular or 1=deep transit) 3- 14 F12.2 --- ID [201126503.01/206543223.01] Identifier 16- 17 I2 h RAh Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) 19- 20 I2 min RAm Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) 22- 27 F6.3 s RAs Second of Right Ascension (J2000) 29 A1 --- DE- Sign of the Declination (J2000) 30- 31 I2 deg DEd Degree of Declination (J2000) 33- 34 I2 arcmin DEm Arcminute of Declination (J2000) 36- 40 F5.2 arcsec DEs Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) 42- 46 F5.2 mag Kpmag [8.2/18.2] Kepler magnitude 48- 58 F11.8 d Per [0.18/55] Period 60- 67 F8.3 d T0 [1939.1/2165.8] Barycentric Julian Date of transit time; BJD-2454833 69- 73 F5.2 h T1-4 [0.3/18.8] Transit duration between 1st and 4th contacts 75- 78 F4.2 --- Depth [0/1] Transit impact parameter 80- 86 F7.4 % e_Depth [0.01/39] Percent uncertainty in Depth 88- 94 F7.5 --- Rp/R* [0.01/0.64] Planet to stellar radii ratio 96-100 F5.2 Rsun R* [0.1/17.3] Stellar radius 102-108 F7.3 Rgeo Rpfit [0.7/233] Estimated planetary radius (1) 111-117 F7.3 Rgeo Rpdel [0.7/217] Estimated planetary radius (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Calculated by multiplying the best-fit Ratio by R*. Note (2): Calculated by multiplying sqrtδ with R*. Our best-fit parameters can sometimes converge to unphysical high impact parameter values, in which case Rpdel is a more reliable estimator of the planetary radius. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 I9 --- EPIC [201126503/206543223] EPIC identifier 11- 15 F5.2 mag Kpmag [8.2/18.2] Kepler magnitude 17- 18 I2 h RAh Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) 20- 21 I2 min RAm Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) 23- 28 F6.3 s RAs Second of Right Ascension (J2000) 30 A1 --- DE- Sign of the Declination (J2000) 31- 32 I2 deg DEd Degree of Declination (J2000) 34- 35 I2 arcmin DEm Arcminute of Declination (J2000) 37- 41 F5.2 arcsec DEs Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) 43 I1 --- Camp [0/3] Campaign number (see the "Description" section above) 45- 49 I5 K Teff [2586/46696] Stellar effective temperature (1) 51 A1 --- f_Teff [a-g] Flag on Teff (2) 53- 57 F5.2 Rsun R* [0.1/17.3] Stellar radius based on Teff 59- 63 F5.1 mas/yr pm [0/319.5]? Total proper motion of host star 65- 69 F5.2 --- Rpm [-4/10.5]? Reduced proper motion (HJ=5+J+5log10pm) 71- 73 A3 --- Giant [Yes] Possible giant? (3) 75 I1 --- NTRES [1/5]? Number of TRES spectroscopic observations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Our photometric estimate of the stellar effective temperature, obtained following the procedure outlined in Section 5.1. Note (2): Flag as follows: a = Teff derived using the Boyajian et al. (2013ApJ...771...40B 2013ApJ...771...40B) V-K relation. b = Teff derived using the Boyajian et al. (2013ApJ...771...40B 2013ApJ...771...40B) B-V relation. c = Teff derived using the Boyajian et al. (2013ApJ...771...40B 2013ApJ...771...40B) g-r relation. d = Teff derived using the Gonzalez Hernandez & Bonifacio (2009, J/A+A/497/497) J-K relation. e = Teff derived by interpolating the Mamajek H-K spectral type tables. f = Teff derived by interpolating the Mamajek V-R spectral type tables. g = Teff derived using the Casagrande et al. (2008, J/MNRAS/389/585) V-K relation. Note (3): A binary flag noting possible giant host stars based on reduced proper motion. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 I9 --- EPIC [201295312/206535016] EPIC identifier 11 I1 --- NTRES [1/5] Number of TRES spectroscopic observations 13- 16 I4 K Teff [4382/6022]? SPC effective temperature output 18- 19 I2 K e_Teff [50/60]? Uncertainty in Teff 21- 24 F4.2 [cm/s2] log(g) [4.2/4.8]? SPC Log surface gravity output 26- 29 F4.2 [cm/s2] e_log(g) [0.1/0.2]? Uncertainty in log(g) 31- 35 F5.2 [-] [M/H] [-0.4/0.5]? SPC metallicity output 37- 40 F4.2 [-] e_[M/H] [0.08]? Uncertainty in [M/H] 42 A1 --- l_vsini Limit flag on vsini 44- 47 F4.1 km/s vsini [2.5/14.5]? SPC equatorial rotational velocity output 49- 51 F3.1 km/s e_vsini [0.5]? Uncertainty in vsini 53- 58 F6.2 m/s RVel [-38.9/43.6]? Absolute radial velocity 60- 63 F4.2 m/s e_RVel [0.1/0.6]? Uncertainty in RVel 65- 68 I4 m/s stdev [1/2174]? Observed scatter in radial velocity 70- 71 I2 m/s sigma [14/87]? Typical measurement uncertainty 73- 75 A3 --- Notes [,a-g] Additional notes (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Note as follows: a = One exposure is significantly weaker than others, so multi-order velocity results are not reported. b = Composite spectrum, so SPC and multi-order velocity results are not reported. c = Moonlight contamination, so interpret results with caution. SPC and multi-order velocities may not be reported depending on the contamination. d = Cool star with Teff<4200, so SPC results are not reported. e = Weak CCF with the normalized cross correlation peak height <0.9, so SPC results are not reported. f = Weak exposure with S/N per resolution element less than 25, so SPC results are not reported g = Surface gravity log(g)<4.2, so SPC results are not reported. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 I9 --- EPIC [201295312/206535016] EPIC identifier 11- 23 F13.5 d BJD Barycentric Julian Date; UTC 25- 30 F6.2 km/s ARVel [-75.8/95.8] Absolute radial velocity (1) 32- 38 F7.1 km/s RRVel [-4302/329]? Relative radial velocity (2) 40- 43 F4.1 km/s e_RRVel [14/96]? Uncertainty in RRV 45- 46 I2 km/s vsini [0/20] Equatorial rotational velocity (3) 48- 52 F5.1 --- SNRe [7/113] Signal-to-Noise (4) 54- 57 I4 s Exp [250/4500] Exposure time 59- 84 A26 --- Notes Additional note -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Absolute RV is measured from the cross correlation of the TRES order containing the Mg b triplet near 519nm, as described in Section 5.2. The accuracy of these measurements is perhaps 100m/s, mostly limited by systematic errors in establishing the transfer to the IAU Radial Velocity Standard Stars. Note (2): Relative RV is measured from the multi-order velocity analysis described in Section 5.2, and can have a precision as good as about 15m/s. Note (3): Of the model spectrum producing the highest cross-correlation peak, and is only a rough estimate of vsini. The values should not be trusted for rotational velocities slower than about 5km/s. Note (4): Per resolution element in the continuum near 519nm. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 08-Feb-2016
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line