J/ApJS/233/17 Swift/BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. V. X-ray data (Ricci+, 2017)
BAT AGN spectroscopic survey.
V. X-ray properties of the Swift/BAT 70-month AGN catalog.
Ricci C., Trakhtenbrot B., Koss M.J., Ueda Y., Del Vecchio I., Treister E.,
Schawinski K., Paltani S., Oh K., Lamperti I., Berney S., Gandhi P.,
Ichikawa K., Bauer F.E., Ho L.C., Asmus D., Beckmann V., Soldi S.,
Balokovic M., Gehrels N., Markwardt C.B.
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 233, 17-17 (2017)>
=2017ApJS..233...17R 2017ApJS..233...17R (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Gamma rays ; X-ray sources ; Active gal. nuclei ; BL Lac objects ;
Redshifts
Keywords: galaxies: active; galaxies: Seyfert; quasars: general
X-rays: diffuse background; X-rays: general
Abstract:
Hard X-ray (≥10keV) observations of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) can
shed light on some of the most obscured episodes of accretion onto
supermassive black holes. The 70-month Swift/BAT all-sky survey, which
probes the 14-195keV energy range, has currently detected 838 AGNs. We
report here on the broadband X-ray (0.3-150keV) characteristics of
these AGNs, obtained by combining XMM-Newton, Swift/XRT, ASCA,
Chandra, and Suzaku observations in the soft X-ray band (≤10keV) with
70-month averaged Swift/BAT data. The nonblazar AGNs of our sample are
almost equally divided into unobscured (NH<1022cm-2) and
obscured (NH≥1022cm-2) AGNs, and their Swift/BAT continuum is
systematically steeper than the 0.3-10keV emission, which suggests
that the presence of a high-energy cutoff is almost ubiquitous. We
discuss the main X-ray spectral parameters obtained, such as the
photon index, the reflection parameter, the energy of the cutoff,
neutral and ionized absorbers, and the soft excess for both obscured
and unobscured AGNs.
Description:
Our sample consists of the 838 AGNs detected within the 70-month
Swift/BAT catalog (Baumgartner+, 2013, J/ApJS/207/19).
The spectral analysis was carried out combining the 70-month
time-averaged Swift/BAT spectra with data obtained by several X-ray
facilities: ASCA (Section 3.1), Chandra (Section 3.2), Suzaku (Section
3.3), Swift/XRT (Section 3.4), and XMM-Newton (Section 3.5). Only two
AGNs (SWIFT J1119.5+5132 and SWIFT J1313.6+3650A) were not observed by
any X-ray facility in the 0.3-10keV range. Details of the soft X-ray
observation used for the broadband X-ray spectral analysis of each
source are reported in Table 2.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table1.dat 99 838 List of the Swift/BAT AGN from the 70-month catalog
table2.dat 84 838 Log of the soft X-ray observations
table5.dat 210 836 Parameters obtained by the analysis of
the broad-band X-ray spectra
table6.dat 58 26 Parameters of the broken power-law continuum
table7.dat 82 99 Parameters of the warm absorbers
table8.dat 96 309 Parameters of the Gaussian lines
table9.dat 147 75 Spectral parameters obtained with the torus model
table12.dat 60 836 X-ray fluxes of the sources of our sample
table13.dat 55 801 X-ray luminosities of the sources of our sample
table14.dat 31 56 Intrinsic 2-10keV fluxes and luminosities for
Compton-thick (CT, log(NH/cm-2)≥24) AGN
table15.dat 78 836 Values of Gamma-nEc and Gamma-0310
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VIII/76 : Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) Survey of Galactic HI (Kalberla+ 2005)
VII/233 : The 2MASS Extended sources (IPAC/UMass, 2003-2006)
VII/274 : The Roma BZCAT - 5th edition (Massaro+, 2015)
J/A+A/418/465 : Mid-infrared and hard X-ray emission in AGN (Lutz+, 2004)
J/ApJ/633/L77 : SWIFT/BAT detections of AGN (Markwardt+, 2005)
J/ApJ/663/81 : SED of hard X-ray selected AGN in XMDS (Polletta+, 2007)
J/ApJ/673/96 : BAT X-ray Survey - III (Ajello+, 2008)
J/A+A/487/119 : AGN in XMM-Newton Hard Bright Survey (Della Ceca+, 2008)
J/ApJ/681/113 : Swift BAT survey of AGNs (Tueller+, 2008)
J/ApJ/699/603 : Evolution of Swift/BAT blazars (Ajello+, 2009)
J/A+A/505/417 : Second INTEGRAL AGN catalogue (Beckmann+, 2009)
J/MNRAS/397/1177 : Swift-XRT observations of GRBs (Evans+, 2009)
J/A+A/495/691 : Multifreq. catalogue of blazars, Roma-BZCAT (Massaro+, 2009)
J/A+A/510/A48 : Palermo Swift-BAT Hard X-ray Catalogue (Cusumano+, 2010)
J/A+A/524/A64 : The 54-month Palermo BAT-survey catalogue (Cusumano+, 2010)
J/ApJS/186/378 : Hard X-ray survey from Swift-BAT 2004-2006 (Tueller+, 2010)
J/MNRAS/413/1206 : XMM survey of 12um selected galaxies (Brightman+, 2011)
J/ApJ/728/58 : Swift-BAT survey of AGNs (Burlon+, 2011)
J/A+A/530/A42 : X-ray properties of AGNs in XBS (Corral+, 2011)
J/ApJ/739/57 : Ultra hard X-ray AGNs in the Swift/BAT survey (Koss+, 2011)
J/ApJ/742/61 : Phot. redshift of AGNs from XMM- & C-COSMOS (Salvato+ 2011)
J/ApJ/742/66 : New Fermi/LAT extragalactic sources (Teng+, 2011)
J/ApJ/749/21 : AGNs detected by 60 month Swift/BAT survey (Ajello+, 2012)
J/ApJ/754/45 : IR properties of Swift/BAT X-ray AGNs (Ichikawa+, 2012)
J/ApJ/746/L22 : Dual AGNs in the nearby Universe (Koss+, 2012)
J/MNRAS/426/1750 : INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN catalogue (Malizia+, 2012)
J/A+A/545/A101 : Spectra of 29 Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi+, 2012)
J/MNRAS/426/2522 : FeK lines in Seyfert 1 galaxies (Patrick+, 2012)
J/ApJS/207/19 : X-ray survey from Swift-BAT 2004-2010 (Baumgartner+, 2013)
J/MNRAS/430/60 : Suzaku view of ionized outflows in AGN (Gofford+, 2013)
J/ApJ/765/L26 : Swift/BAT hard X-ray data from GOALS LIRGs (Koss+, 2013)
J/ApJS/209/14 : The Swift/BAT hard X-ray transient monitor (Krimm+, 2013)
J/ApJS/206/17 : New gamma-ray blazar candidates in the 3PBC (Maselli+, 2013)
J/ApJ/763/111 : X-ray spectral analysis of Swift/BAT AGNs (Vasudevan+, 2013)
J/ApJ/794/152 : PACS observations of Herschel-BAT sample (Melendez+, 2014)
J/A+A/561/A67 : Spectra of 75 Swift/BAT optical counterparts (Parisi, 2014)
J/A+A/563/A57 : Long-term variability of AGN at hard X-rays (Soldi+, 2014)
J/ApJ/815/L13 : Compton-thick AGNs from 70mth Swift/BAT cat. (Ricci+, 2015)
J/ApJ/807/129 : X-ray to MIR luminosities relation of AGNs (Stern, 2015)
J/A+A/588/A70 : Hard X-ray view of the soft excess in AGN (Boissay+, 2016)
J/MNRAS/460/19 : Update of INTEGRAL/IBIS AGN catalogue (Malizia+, 2016)
J/MNRAS/456/3335 : SPIRE observations of Herschel-BAT sample (Shimizu+, 2016)
J/ApJ/835/74 : IR phot. of AGNs in Swift/BAT 70mth cat. (Ichikawa+, 2017)
J/ApJ/836/99 : NuSTAR serendipitous survey: 40-month (Lansbury+, 2017)
J/ApJ/835/223 : A catalog of nearby galaxies with Chandra obs. (She+, 2017)
J/ApJ/850/74 : Swift/BAT AGN Spectroscopic Survey. I. (Koss+, 2017)
http://swift.gsfc.nasa.gov/results/bs70mon/ : Swift BAT 70-month hard X-ray
survey online catalog
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source
name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 21 A1 --- DZ [ab] Distance identifier (2)
23- 47 A25 --- OName Counterpart source name
49- 57 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension, decimal degrees (J2000)
59- 67 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination, decimal degrees (J2000)
69- 75 F7.5 --- z [0.0001/3.7]? Redshift of the counterpart (3)
77- 81 F5.3 --- b_zphot [0.002/0.7]? Lower boundary of the
photometric redshift (4)
83- 87 F5.3 --- B_zphot [0.003/0.9]? Upper boundary of the
photometric redshift (4)
89- 95 F7.1 Mpc Dist [3.7/32342]? Distance of the source (5)
97- 99 A3 --- BZ Blazar flag (6)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): Distance identifier as follows:
a = sources with photometric redshifts (27 occurrences);
b = sources with redshift-independent distances (43 occurrences).
Note (3): Redshifts are spectroscopic unless DZ = a (photometric).
Note (4): Bounds on the photometric redshifts are given when DZ = a.
Note (5): For sources with DZ = b we report the redshift-independent distances.
Note (6): We flagged all blazars in our sample according to the latest release
(5.0.0; Massaro+ 2015, VII/274) of the Roma BZCAT catalog (Massaro+
2009, J/A+A/495/691) and using the results of recent works on
BAT-detected blazars (Ajello+ 2009, J/ApJ/699/603 ;
Maselli+ 2013, J/ApJS/206/17). Flag as follows:
BZB = BL Lacs (26 occurrences)
BZQ = Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (53 occurrences)
BZU = blazars of uncertain type (26 occurrences)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source
name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 38 A18 --- XObs X-ray observatory used for the soft X-ray
(0.3-10keV) spectrum
40- 49 A10 --- ObsID Observation ID
51- 55 F5.1 ks Exp1 [0.7/249]? Exposure of the observations carried out
by Swift/XRT, XMM-Newton EPIC/PN, Chandra/ACIS,
Suzakus front-illuminated cameras, and ASCA/SIS
57- 60 F4.1 ks Exp2 [21/34]? Exposure of the observations carried out
by ASCA/GIS
62- 68 I7 ct Cts1 [3/2111120]? Number of counts of Swift/XRT,
XMM-Newton EPIC/PN, Chandra/ACIS, Suzaku
front-illuminated cameras, and ASCA/SIS0
70- 74 I5 ct Cts2 [566/82047]? Number of counts of Suzaku
back-illuminated cameras and ASCA/SIS1
76- 79 I4 ct Cts3 [1250/7594]? Number of counts of ASCA/GIS2
81- 84 I4 ct Cts4 [1629/9334]? Number of counts of ASCA/GIS3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source
name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 25 F5.2 [cm-2] logNH [19/25] Column density of the neutral
obscuring material, in logarithm (1)
27- 31 F5.2 [cm-2] b_logNH Lower bound, 90% confidence interval for logNH
33- 37 F5.2 [cm-2] B_logNH Upper bound, 90% confidence interval for logNH
39- 39 A1 --- f_logNH [f] Flag on logNH (G1)
41- 44 F4.2 --- Gamma [0.5/3.2] Photon index of the primary
X-ray continuum
46- 49 F4.2 --- E_Gamma [0.01/2]? Upper error (90%) for Gamma
51- 54 F4.2 --- e_Gamma ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma
56- 56 A1 --- f_Gamma [f] Flag on Gamma (G1)
58- 60 A3 --- l_Ecut [<≥ ] Limit flag for Ecut
62- 64 I3 keV Ecut [11/655]? Energy of the cutoff
66- 66 A1 --- f_Ecut Flag on Ecut (G1)
68- 70 I3 keV E_Ecut [5/492]? Upper error (90%) for Ecut
72- 74 I3 keV e_Ecut ? Lower error (90%) for Ecut
76- 78 A3 --- l_R [<≥ ] Limit flag for R
80- 84 F5.2 --- R [0.01/26]? Reflection parameter
86- 86 A1 --- f_R [f] Flag on R (G1)
88- 92 F5.2 --- E_R [0.02/14]? Upper error (90%) for R
94- 97 F4.2 --- e_R ? Lower error (90%) for R
99-103 F5.2 --- CBAT [0.2/27] Cross-calibration constant
105-105 A1 --- f_CBAT [f] Flag on CBAT (G1)
107-111 F5.2 --- E_CBAT [0.02/39]? Upper error (90%) for CBAT
113-117 F5.2 --- e_CBAT ? Lower error (90%) for CBAT
119-121 A3 --- l_fscatt [≤ ] Upper limit flag on fscatt
123-127 F5.2 % fscatt [0.01/80]? Fraction of scattered radiation
129-133 F5.2 % E_fscatt [0.03/52]? Upper error (90%) fscatt
135-139 F5.2 % e_fscatt ? Lower error (90%) fscatt
141-145 F5.3 keV Temp [0.02/4.1]? Temperature of the blackbody or
thermal plasma component (2)
147-151 F5.3 keV E_Temp [0.001/1.2]? Upper error (90%) for Temp (2)
153-157 F5.3 keV e_Temp ? Lower error (90%) for Temp (2)
159-162 F4.2 keV Temp2 [0.07/9]? Temperature of the second thermal
plasma component
164-167 F4.2 keV E_Temp2 [0.01/1]? Upper error (90%) for Temp2
169-172 F4.2 keV e_Temp2 ? Lower error (90%) for Temp2
174-177 F4.2 keV Temp3 [0.83]? Temperature of the third thermal
plasma component
179-182 F4.2 keV E_Temp3 [0.02]? Upper error (90%) for Temp3
184-187 F4.2 keV e_Temp3 [0.02]? Lower error (90%) for Temp3
189-190 A2 --- Model Spectral model used for the spectral fitting
(see table 4)
192-192 A1 --- f_Model [G] Flag for the model (3)
194-200 F7.2 --- Stat [4/3526] Value of the statistic
202-205 I4 --- DOF [7/3354] Number of degrees of freedom
207-210 A4 --- f_Stat Statistic used (4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Sources with logNH=20.00 are completely unobscured.
Note (2): Temperature of the blackbody component (for unobscured objects) or of
the thermal plasma component (for obscured objects).
Note (3): Flag for the model:
G = a Gaussian line was added to the model
Note (4): Statistic used as follows:
chi2 = chi-squared;
C = Cash statistic
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source
name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA)
21- 25 F5.2 --- Gamma2 [-2.2/3.6] Value of the second photon index of
the broken power law (1)
27- 30 F4.2 --- E_Gamma2 [0.02/2.2] Upper error (90%) for Gamma2
32- 35 F4.2 --- e_Gamma2 Lower error (90%) for Gamma2
37- 39 A3 --- l_Ebkn [≤ ] Upper limit flag for Ebkn
41- 45 F5.2 keV Ebkn [1.4/88] Energy of the break (1)
47- 51 F5.2 keV E_Ebkn [0.02/32]? Upper error (90%) for Ebkn
53- 58 F6.2 keV e_Ebkn ? Lower error (90%) for Ebkn
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): For SWIFTJ1256.2-0551 two sets of values are reported since the source
was fitted using model C8, which considers a double broken power-law.
For this object the second line reports the value of Gamma2 and E2bkn.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table7.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey source
name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA)
21- 26 F6.2 10+22cm-2 NHw [0.1/181] Column density of the warm
absorbers
28- 33 F6.2 10+22cm-2 E_NHw [0.02/163] Upper error (90%) for NHw
35- 39 F5.2 10+22cm-2 e_NHw Lower error (90%) for NHw
41- 43 A3 --- l_logXi [≤ ] Upper limit flag for logXi
45- 49 F5.2 [10-9W.m] logXi [-2/72]? Log of ionization parameter, erg*cm/s
51- 54 F4.2 [10-9W.m] E_logXi ? Upper error (90%) for logXi
56- 60 F5.2 [10-9W.m] e_logXi [0.02/33]? Lower error (90%) for logXi
62- 64 A3 --- l_fwcov [<≥ ] Limit flag for fwcov
66- 69 F4.1 % fwcov [1.6/100]? Covering factor of the warm absorber
71- 75 F5.2 % E_fwcov ? Upper error (90%) for fwcov
77- 82 F6.2 % e_fwcov [0.1/38]? Lower error (90%) for fwcov
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table8.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 25 F5.3 keV Ekalpha [5.4/7.7]? Energy of the Kalpha line
27- 31 F5.3 keV e_Ekalpha [0.002/2]? Lower error (90%) for Ekalpha
33- 37 F5.3 keV E_Ekalpha ? Upper error (90%) for Ekalpha
39- 39 A1 --- f_Ekalpha Flag for EKalpha (G1)
41- 43 A3 --- l_EW [<≥ ] Limit flag for EW
45- 48 I4 eV EW [9/7300]? Equivalent width of the
Kalpha line
50- 53 I4 eV E_EW ? Upper error (90%) for EW
55- 58 I4 eV e_EW [2/5641]? Lower error (90%) for EW
60- 62 I3 eV sigma [12/237]? Width of the line
64- 66 I3 eV E_sigma [4/258]? Upper error (90%) for sigma
68- 70 I3 eV e_sigma ? Lower error (90%) for sigma
72- 74 A3 --- l_nKalpha [≤ ] Limit flag for nKalpha
76- 81 F6.2 10-6ph/cm2/s nKalpha [0.07/587]? Normalization of the
Kalpha line, 1e-6photons/cm2/s
83- 88 F6.2 10-6ph/cm2/s e_nKalpha [0.03/303]? Lower error (90%) for nKalpha
90- 96 F7.2 10-6ph/cm2/s E_nKalpha ? Upper error (90%) for nKalpha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMA)
21- 23 A3 --- l_thetaOA [<≥ ] Limit flag for thetaOA
25- 26 I2 deg thetaOA [31/82] Half-opening angle of the torus
28- 29 I2 deg E_thetaOA ? Upper error (90%) for thetaOA
31- 32 I2 deg e_thetaOA [2/25]? Lower error (90%) for thetaOA
34- 34 A1 --- f_thetaOA [f] Flag on thetaOA (G1)
36- 40 F5.2 [cm-2] logNH-tor [23.3/25.6] Log of the column density of
the neutral obscuring material obtained
with the torus model
42- 46 F5.2 [cm-2] b_logNH-tor [22.9/25.1] Lower bound of the 90%
confidence interval for logNH-tor
48- 52 F5.2 [cm-2] B_logNH-tor [23.4/26] Upper bound of the 90% confidence
interval for logNH-tor (1)
54- 57 F4.2 --- Gamma-tor [1.2/3] Photon index of the primary X-ray
continuum obtained with the torus model
59- 62 F4.2 --- E_Gamma-tor Upper error (90%) for Gamma-tor
64- 67 F4.2 --- e_Gamma-tor [0.01/1] Lower error (90%) for Gamma-tor
69- 71 A3 --- l_fscatt-tor [≤ ] Upper limit Flag for Gamma-tor
73- 77 F5.2 % fscatt-tor [0.01/18.3]? Fraction of scattered
radiation obtained with the torus model
79- 83 F5.2 % E_fscatt-tor [0.01/20]? Upper error (90%) for fscatt-tor
85- 88 F4.2 % e_fscatt-tor ? Lower error (90%) for fscatt-tor
90- 93 F4.2 keV Temp-tor [0.03/1.3]? Temperature of the thermal
plasma component obtained with the
torus model
95- 98 F4.2 keV E_Temp-tor [0.01/8]? Upper error (90%) for Temp-tor
100-103 F4.2 keV e_Temp-tor ? Lower error (90%) for Temp-tor
105-108 F4.2 keV Temp2-tor [0.6/1.1]? Temperature of the second thermal
plasma component obtained with the
torus model
110-113 F4.2 keV E_Temp2-tor [0.03/0.4]? Upper error (90%) for Temp2-tor
115-118 F4.2 keV e_Temp2-tor ? Lower error (90%) for Temp2-tor
120-123 F4.2 --- CBAT-tor [0.3/8]? Cross-calibration constant obtained
with the torus model
125-128 F4.2 --- E_CBAT-tor [0.08/9]? Upper error (90%) for CBAT-tor
130-133 F4.2 --- e_CBAT-tor ? Lower error (90%) for CBAT-tor
135-135 A1 --- f_CBAT-tor [f] Flag for CBAT-tor (G1)
137-142 F6.1 --- Stat-tor [6/1958] Value of the statistic obtained
with the torus model
144-147 I4 --- DOF-tor [12/1463] Number of degrees of freedom
for the torus model
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Entries with upper bounds of "26.00" should be considered
as lower limits.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table12.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 26 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10obs [0.1/1283] Observed flux in the 2-10keV
range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s
28- 33 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-195obs [3/1389] Observed flux in the 14-195keV
range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s
35- 40 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10int [0.2/1280] Intrinsic flux in the 2-10keV
range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s
42- 46 F5.1 10-12mW/m2 F20-50int [1/522] Intrinsic flux in the 20-50keV
range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s
48- 53 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-150int [2.9/1471] Intrinsic flux in the
14-150keV range, in units of 1e-12erg/cm2/s
55- 60 F6.1 10-12mW/m2 F14-195int [3/1681] Intrinsic flux in the 14-195keV
range, in units of 1e-12 erg/cm2/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table13.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 25 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10obs [38.3/47.6] Observed log of luminosity in
the 2-10keV range, in units of erg/s
27- 31 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-195obs [38.5/48.2] Observed log of luminosity in
the 14-195keV range, in units of erg/s
33- 37 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10int [38.3/47.6] Intrinsic log of luminosity in
the 2-10keV range, in units of erg/s
39- 43 F5.2 [10-7W] logL20-50int [38.1/47.6] Intrinsic log of luminosity in
the 20-50keV range, in units of erg/s
45- 49 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-150int [38.5/48.1] Intrinsic log of luminosity in
the 14-150keV range, in units of erg/s
51- 55 F5.2 [10-7W] logL14-195int [38.5/48.2] Intrinsic log of luminosity in
the 14-195keV range, in units of erg/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table14.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 25 F5.1 10-12mW/m2 F2-10 [4/624] Extrapolated intrinsic flux in
the 2-10 keV range for the CT AGN,
in units of 1e-12 erg/s/cm2 (2)
27- 31 F5.2 [10-7W] logL2-10 [41.6/44.9] Extrapolated lof of intrinsic
luminosity in the 2-10keV range for
the CT AGN, in units of erg/s (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): The intrinsic flux and luminosity in the 2-10keV range are
extrapolated from the intrinsic 14-150keV flux or luminosity,
respectively.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table15.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 A5 --- --- [SWIFT]
6- 19 A14 --- SWIFT Swift-BAT 70-month hard X-ray survey
source name (JHHMM.m+DDMMAN)
21- 27 F7.5 --- Gamma-nEc [0.8/3.1]? Photon index fixing the energy
of the cutoff to 500keV
29- 37 F9.7 --- e_Gamma-nEc ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma-nEc
39- 47 F9.7 --- E_Gamma-nEc [0.01/4.4]? Upper error (90%) for Gamma-nEc
49- 58 F10.7 --- Gamma-0310 [-1.5/4.2]? Photon index fixing the energy
of the cutoff and removing the reflection
component (2)
60- 68 F9.7 --- e_Gamma-0310 ? Lower error (90%) for Gamma-0310 (2)
70- 78 F9.7 --- E_Gamma-0310 [0.01/5.3]? Upper error (90%)
for Gamma-0310 (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): Photon index obtained fixing the energy of the cutoff to 500keV,
removing the reflection component and fitting in the 0.3-10keV range
only.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global notes:
Note (G1): "f" for sources for which the value was fixed during the fitting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
References:
Koss et al. Paper I. 2017ApJ...850...74K 2017ApJ...850...74K Cat. J/ApJ/850/74
Berney et al. Paper II. 2015MNRAS.454.3622B 2015MNRAS.454.3622B
Oh et al. Paper III. 2017MNRAS.464.1466O 2017MNRAS.464.1466O
Lamperti et al. Paper IV. 2017MNRAS.467..540L 2017MNRAS.467..540L Cat. J/MNRAS/467/540
Ricci et al. Paper V. 2017ApJS..233...17R 2017ApJS..233...17R This catalog
Trakhtenbrot et al. Paper VI. 2017MNRAS.470..800T 2017MNRAS.470..800T
Ricci et al. Paper VII. 2017Natur.549..488R 2017Natur.549..488R
Shimizu et al. Paper VIII. 2018ApJ...856..154S 2018ApJ...856..154S
Powell et al. Paper IX. 2018ApJ...858..110P 2018ApJ...858..110P
Oh et al. Paper X. 2018ApJS..235....4O 2018ApJS..235....4O Cat. J/ApJS/235/4
Ichikawa et al. Paper XI. 2019ApJ...870...31I 2019ApJ...870...31I Cat. J/ApJ/870/31
Ricci et al. Paper XII. 2018MNRAS.480.1819R 2018MNRAS.480.1819R
Bar et al. Paper XIII. 2019MNRAS.489.3073B 2019MNRAS.489.3073B
Koss et al. Paper XIV. 2018Natur.563..214K 2018Natur.563..214K
Smith et al. Paper XV. 2020MNRAS.492.4216S 2020MNRAS.492.4216S
Paliya et al. Paper XVI. 2019ApJ...881..154P 2019ApJ...881..154P Cat. J/ApJ/881/154
Baek et al. Paper XVII. 2019MNRAS.488.4317B 2019MNRAS.488.4317B
Liu et al. Paper XVIII. 2020ApJ...896..122L 2020ApJ...896..122L
Rojas et al. Paper XIX. 2020MNRAS.491.5867R 2020MNRAS.491.5867R
Koss et al. Paper XX. 2021ApJS..252...29K 2021ApJS..252...29K Cat. J/ApJS/252/29
Koss et al. Paper XXI. 2022ApJS..261....1K 2022ApJS..261....1K
Koss et al. Paper XXII. 2022ApJS..261....2K 2022ApJS..261....2K Cat. J/ApJS/261/2
Pfeifle et al. Paper XXIII. 2022ApJS..261....3P 2022ApJS..261....3P
Oh et al. Paper XXIV. 2022ApJS..261....4O 2022ApJS..261....4O Cat. J/ApJS/261/4
Mejia-Restrepo et al. Paper XXV. 2022ApJS..261....5M 2022ApJS..261....5M Cat. J/ApJS/261/5
Koss et al. Paper XXVI. 2022ApJS..261....6K 2022ApJS..261....6K Cat. J/ApJS/261/6
Gupta et al. Paper XXVII. 2021MNRAS.504..428G 2021MNRAS.504..428G
den Brok et al. Paper XXVIII. 2022ApJS..261....7D 2022ApJS..261....7D Cat. J/ApJS/261/7
Ricci et al. Paper XXIX. 2022ApJS..261....8R 2022ApJS..261....8R Cat. J/ApJS/261/8
Ananna et al. Paper XXX. 2022ApJS..261....9A 2022ApJS..261....9A
Kakkad et al. Paper XXXI. 2022MNRAS.511.2105K 2022MNRAS.511.2105K
Kawamuro et al. Paper XXXII. 2022ApJ...938...87K 2022ApJ...938...87K
Marcotulli et al. Paper XXXIII. 2022ApJ...940...77M 2022ApJ...940...77M Cat. J/ApJ/940/77
Kawamuro et al. Paper XXXIV. 2023ApJS..269...24K 2023ApJS..269...24K Cat. J/ApJS/269/24
Caglar et al. Paper XXXV. 2023ApJ...956...60C 2023ApJ...956...60C
Powell et al. Paper XXXVI. 2022ApJ...938...77P 2022ApJ...938...77P
Ricci et al. Paper XXXVII. 2022ApJ...938...67R 2022ApJ...938...67R
Ananna et al. Paper XXXVIII. 2022ApJ...939L..13A 2022ApJ...939L..13A
Temple et al. Paper XXXIX. 2023MNRAS.518.2938T 2023MNRAS.518.2938T
Tortosa et al. Paper XL. 2023MNRAS.526.1687T 2023MNRAS.526.1687T
Ricci et al. Paper XLII. 2023ApJ...959...27R 2023ApJ...959...27R
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 13-Feb-2018