J/ApJS/257/61      X-ray spectral study of 57 local U/LIRGs      (Yamada+, 2021)

Comprehensive broadband X-ray and multiwavelength study of active galactic nuclei in 57 local luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies observed with NuSTAR and/or Swift/BAT. Yamada S., Ueda Y., Tanimoto A., Imanishi M., Toba Y., Ricci C., Privon G.C. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 257, 61 (2021)> =2021ApJS..257...61Y 2021ApJS..257...61Y
ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, IR; Active gal. nuclei; X-ray sources; Optical; Radio sources Keywords: Black hole physics ; Active galactic nuclei ; X-ray active galactic nuclei ; Infrared galaxies ; Supermassive black holes ; Observational astronomy Abstract: We perform a systematic X-ray spectroscopic analysis of 57 local luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxy systems (containing 84 individual galaxies) observed with the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array and/or Swift/BAT. Combining soft X-ray data obtained with Chandra, XMM-Newton, Suzaku, and/or Swift/XRT, we identify 40 hard (>10keV) X-ray-detected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and constrain their torus parameters with the X-ray clumpy torus model XCLUMPY. Among the AGNs at z<0.03, for which sample biases are minimized, the fraction of Compton-thick (NH≥1024cm-2) AGNs reaches 64-15+14% (6/9 sources) in late mergers, while it is 24-10+12% (3/14 sources) in early mergers, consistent with the tendency reported by Ricci+ (2017MNRAS.468.1273R 2017MNRAS.468.1273R). We find that the bolometric AGN luminosities derived from the infrared data increase but the X-ray to bolometric luminosity ratios decrease with merger stage. The X-ray-weak AGNs in late mergers ubiquitously show massive outflows at subparsec to kiloparsec scales. Among them, the most luminous AGNs (Lbol,AGN∼1046erg/s) have relatively small column densities of ≲1023cm-2 and almost super-Eddington ratios (λEdd∼1.0). Their torus covering factors (CT(22)∼0.6) are larger than those of Swift/BAT-selected AGNs with similarly high Eddington ratios. These results suggest a scenario where, in the final stage of mergers, multiphase strong outflows are produced due to chaotic quasi-spherical inflows, and the AGN becomes extremely X-ray weak and deeply buried due to obscuration by inflowing and/or outflowing material. Description: For the 49 U/LIRG systems other than the eight systems mentioned in Section 2.5 (NGC 1068, NGC 1275, NGC 1365, Mrk 266, NGC 6240, UGC2608, NGC 5135, and NGC 7469), we analyzed all of the available data of NuSTAR (Section 3.1), Chandra (Section 3.2), XMM-Newton (Section 3.3), and Suzaku (Section 3.4) observed by 2020 April. We also analyzed their Swift/XRT data when no other soft X-ray data were available and utilized the Swift/BAT spectra in the 105 month catalog if detected (Section 3.5). For the other eight systems, we reduced the same data as used in their references (see Section 2.5) and obtained the count rates in order to treat the results in a uniform manner for all 57 systems. A log of the X-ray observations of our sample is provided in Table 3. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 103 84 Basic information of our sample table3.dat 94 281 X-ray observation log table4.dat 113 84 X-ray count rates and NuSTAR band ratios in our sample table5.dat 519 33 Summary of the best-fit spectral parameters for AGNs table6.dat 277 29 Summary of the X-ray results for starburst-dominant or hard X-ray undetected sources tableb1.dat 94 84 Summary of the AGN signatures obtained by multiwavelength observations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: B/chandra : The Chandra Archive Log (CXC, 1999-2014) B/xmm : XMM-Newton Obs. Log (XMM-Newton Science Operation Center, 2012) B/swift : Swift Master Catalog (HEASARC, 2004-) VII/85 : Hickson Compact Groups of Galaxies (Hickson 1982) VII/157 : The Extended 12um galaxy sample (Rush+ 1993) VII/213 : Hickson's Compact groups of Galaxies (Hickson+ 1982-1994) VII/233 : The 2MASS Extended sources (IPAC/UMass, 2003-2006) VII/248 : Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (12th Ed.) (Veron+ 2006) VII/258 : Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (13th Ed.) (Veron+ 2010) J/ApJS/143/315 : IRAS 1Jy sample of ultraluminous gal. II. (Veilleux+, 2002) J/AJ/126/1607 : IRAS Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (Sanders+, 2003) J/AJ/127/3235 : HIRES atlas of all RBGS galaxies (Surace+, 2004) J/ApJS/172/29 : XMM-Newton survey in COSMOS field. I. (Hasinger+, 2007) J/ApJ/666/806 : SED of Spitzer quasars (QUEST) (Netzer+, 2007) J/ApJ/685/773 : X-ray-UV relations in SDSS DR5 QSOs (Gibson+, 2008) J/ApJ/704/1570 : Fitting LINERs (Gonzalez-Martin+, 2009) J/ApJ/701/587 : Deep HST H-band survey. II. QUEST QSOs (Veilleux+, 2009) J/ApJS/182/628 : Spitzer quasar and ULIRG evolution study (Veilleux+, 2009) J/A+A/521/A55 : The mass function of nearby black holes (Caramete+, 2010) J/ApJ/715/572 : GOALS UV and FIR properties (Howell+, 2010) J/ApJ/721/98 : Morphology of 70um COSMOS galaxies (Kartaltepe+, 2010) J/ApJ/725/2270 : Mid-IR emission lines in AGNs (Pereira-Santaella+, 2010) J/ApJ/709/884 : Starburst-AGN composites in LIRG mergers (Yuan+, 2010) J/MNRAS/413/1206 : XMM survey of 12um selected galaxies (Brightman+, 2011) J/MNRAS/414/3084 : Multi-waveband analysis of 12um galaxies (Brightman+, 2011) J/ApJ/728/58 : Swift-BAT survey of AGNs (Burlon+, 2011) J/ApJ/739/57 : Ultra hard X-ray AGNs in the Swift/BAT survey (Koss+, 2011) J/ApJ/746/L22 : Dual AGNs in the nearby Universe (Koss+, 2012) J/AJ/144/125 : Phot. & spectroscopy of Markarian 266 (Mazzarella+, 2012) J/MNRAS/419/2095 : HMXBs in nearby galaxies (Mineo+, 2012) J/ApJ/777/156 : Spitzer/IRS sp. of GOALS luminous IR galaxies (Inami+, 2013) J/ApJS/206/1 : Mid-IR properties of GOALS nearby LIRGs (Stierwalt+, 2013) J/MNRAS/439/1648 : Subarcsecond mid-infrared atlas of local AGN (Asmus+, 2014) J/A+A/565/A25 : Hickson compact groups Herschel obs. (Bitsakis+, 2014) J/A+A/562/A21 : AGN feedback from CO observations (Cicone+, 2014) J/MNRAS/454/766 : Mid-infrared-X-ray correlation for local AGNs (Asmus+, 2015) J/ApJ/813/82 : z<0.06 broad-line AGN emission-line measures (Reines+, 2015) J/ApJ/815/L13 : Compton-thick AGNs from 70-month Swift/BAT (Ricci+, 2015) J/A+A/574/A4 : Radio image of LIRGs (Vardoulaki+, 2015) J/ApJ/825/7 : Evolution of ∼6Ms CDF-S galaxies (Lehmer+, 2016) J/ApJS/229/25 : GOALS sample PACS and SPIRE fluxes (Chu+, 2017) J/ApJ/836/99 : NuSTAR serendipitous survey: 40-month cat. (Lansbury+, 2017) J/ApJ/846/32 : Herschel FIR spectra of GOALS galaxies (Diaz-Santos+, 2017) J/A+A/602/A28 : IR signature of CMBH in nearby dwarf gal. (Marleau+, 2017) J/ApJS/233/17 : Swift/BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. V. X-ray (Ricci+, 2017) J/ApJ/850/140 : SDSS spectral analysis of IR-bright DOGs (Toba+, 2017) J/A+A/607/A43 : NGC 4418/VV 655 HI images (Varenius+, 2017) J/A+A/609/A9 : Local Swift-BAT AGN observed with Herschel (Lutz+, 2018) J/ApJS/235/4 : 105-month Swift-BAT all-sky hard X-ray survey (Oh+, 2018) J/ApJ/869/171 : Chandra observations of NuSTAR sources (Tomsick+, 2018) J/ApJ/870/104 : 1-500um obs. of nearby luminous IR gal. (Shangguan+, 2019) J/A+A/633/A79 : NGC 6240 MUSE observations (Kollatschny+, 2020) J/AJ/159/167 : AMUSING++ nearby galaxy compilation. I. (Lopez-Coba+, 2020) J/ApJS/255/7 : X-ray monitoring of 1ES 1927+654 (Ricci+, 2021) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 11 A11 --- IRAS IRAS Name 13- 14 A2 --- m_IRAS Component identifier on IRAS name 16- 37 A22 --- Name Common object Name 39- 40 I2 h RAh Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) (1) 42- 43 I2 min RAm Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) (1) 45- 49 F5.2 s RAs Second of Right Ascension (J2000) (1) 51 A1 --- DE- Sign of the Declination (J2000)(1) 52- 53 I2 deg DEd Degree of Declination (J2000) (1) 55- 56 I2 arcmin DEm Arcminute of Declination (J2000) (1) 58- 62 F5.2 arcsec DEs Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) (1) 64 A1 --- Flag [a-f] Position flag (2) 66- 71 F6.4 --- z [0.0038/0.09] Spectroscopic redshift from NED 73 A1 --- f_z [d] Flag on z (2) 75 A1 --- M Merger state (G1) 77- 81 F5.1 arcsec aD12 [0.7/270]? Angular separation between two nuclei 83 A1 --- f_aD12 Flag on aD12 (2) 85- 88 F4.1 kpc pD12 [0.3/94]? Physical separation between two nuclei 90 A1 --- f_pD12 Flag on pD12 (2) 92- 96 F5.2 [Lsun] logLIR [11/12.57] log Armus+ 2009PASP..121..559A 2009PASP..121..559A total IR luminosity 97- 98 A2 --- l_logLIR [>: ] Flag on logLIR (3) 100-103 A4 --- IRS Spitzer/IRS detection (4) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): The best available source position from Simbad. Note (2): Position flag as follows: a = Haan et al. (2011AJ....141..100H 2011AJ....141..100H); b = Zezas et al. (2003ApJ...594L..31Z 2003ApJ...594L..31Z); c = Alonso-Herrero et al. (2020A&A...639A..43A 2020A&A...639A..43A); d = Scoville et al. (2017ApJ...836...66S 2017ApJ...836...66S); e = Puccetti et al. (2016A&A...585A.157P 2016A&A...585A.157P); f = NED; g = Kunth et al. (2003ApJ...597..263K 2003ApJ...597..263K); h = Ricci et al. (2017MNRAS.468.1273R 2017MNRAS.468.1273R); i = Imanishi et al. (2020ApJ...891..140I 2020ApJ...891..140I); j = Imanishi & Saito (2014ApJ...780..106I 2014ApJ...780..106I); k = Scoville et al. (2000AJ....119..991S 2000AJ....119..991S); l = Zenner & Lenzen (1993A&AS..101..363Z 1993A&AS..101..363Z). S = Single nucleus is observed in a merging U/LIRG. n = Signle nucleus is observed in a nonmerging U/LIRG. Note (3): An upper limit flag due to contamination from nearby much brighter (or equally bright with the suffix ":") IR sources. Note (4): Y and n mark detection and nondetection with Spitzer/IRS in the 10-20 micron (SH) or 19-38 micron (LH) band, respectively (Alonso-Herrero+ 2012ApJ...744....2A 2012ApJ...744....2A ; Mazzarella+ 2012, J/AJ/144/125 ; Inami+ 2013, J/ApJ/777/156). The (u) means that the two nuclei are not clearly divided. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 18 A18 --- Name Galaxy name 20- 42 A23 --- OName Other name(s) of the system 44- 53 A10 --- Inst Satellite name 55- 65 I11 --- ObsID Observation identifier 67- 76 A10 "Y/M/D" Date Observation date (UT) 78- 94 A17 --- Exp Net exposure (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Net exposure (FPMA and FPMB for NuSTAR; ACIS-S or ACIS-I for Chandra; MOS1, MOS2, and PN for XMM-Newton; each of available XIS-0, 1, 2, 3, and HXD-PIN for Suzaku; and XRT for Swift). The "u" means that the data are unused due to large time variability among the soft X-ray observations (time-v), too-faint source or short exposure time (faint), contamination from brighter nearby sources (cont), or data with high background flaring throughout the observation (highbg). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 A5 --- Seq Internal index number(s) 7- 28 A22 --- Name Object identifier 30 A1 --- f_Name Flag on Name (5) 32 A1 --- f_F2-7 The 3σ limit flag on F2-7 (6) 34- 40 E7.1 mW/m2 F2-7 [4.1e-15/3.4e-11]? Observed 2-7keV flux (7) 42- 44 A3 --- Inst Soft X-ray data facility code (8) 46 A1 --- f_CR3-24 The 3σ limit flag on CR3-24 (6) 48- 53 F6.2 mct/s CR3-24 [0.03/906]? Background-substracted full 3-24keV net count rates 55- 58 F4.2 mct/s e_CR3-24 [0.06/3.8]? The 1σ uncertainty in CR3-24 60 A1 --- f_CR3-8 The 3σ limit flag on CR3-8 (6) 62- 67 F6.2 mct/s CR3-8 [0.03/638]? Background-substracted soft 3-8keV net count rates 69- 72 F4.2 mct/s e_CR3-8 [0.04/3.1]? The 1σ uncertainty in CR3-8 74 A1 --- f_CR8-24 The 3σ limit flag on CR8-24 (6) 76- 81 F6.2 mct/s CR8-24 [0.01/266]? Background-substracted hard 8-24keV net count rates 83- 86 F4.2 mct/s e_CR8-24 [0.04/2.3]? The 1σ uncertainty in CR8-24 88 A1 --- f_BR The 3σ limit flag on BR 90- 93 F4.2 --- BR [0.07/4]? NuSTAR band ratio (9) 95- 98 F4.2 --- e_BR [0.01/2.2]? The 1σ uncertainty in BR 100 A1 --- FDet A NuSTAR full 3-24keV 3σ detection? 102 A1 --- SDet A NuSTAR soft 3-8keV 3σ detection? 104 A1 --- HDet A NuSTAR hard 8-24keV 3σ detection? 106 A1 --- Det [b] Detection flag (10) 108- 113 F6.3 10+20/cm2 NH [0.9/36.1] Galactic hydrogen column density -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (5): Flag as follows: a = NuSTAR has not observed NGC 235, but Swift/BAT detects it in the 14-195keV band at a 25.51σ level (Oh+, 2018, J/ApJS/235/4). c = The system hosting two bright AGNs whose emissions could not be spatially resolved with NuSTAR. Note (6): If the flag is "c" then the value is smaller than that of the interacting galaxy, and is difficult to estimate due to its contamination. Note (7): Corrected for Galactic absorption in units of erg/s/cm2. Note (8): Facility code as follows: C = Chandra (61 occurrences); X = XMM-Newton/MOS (14 occurrences); XPN = XMM-Newton/pn (3 occurrences); FI = Suzaku/XIS-FI (1 occurrence); XRT = Swift/XRT (5 occurrences). Note (9): The ratio of 8-24keV and 3-8keV count rates. Note (10): For MCG+12-02-001 and IRAS F14348-1447, the NuSTAR net count rates in the 8-24keV band are 2.98σ and 2.08σ levels, while those in the 10-40keV band are 3.37σ and 3.06σ levels, respectively. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 --- Seq [1/84] Internal index number 4- 21 A18 --- Name Common object identifier 23 A1 --- M Merger stage (G1) 25 A1 --- l_NHLOS The 3σ limit flag on NHLOS 27- 35 E9.3 10+22/cm2 NHLOS [3e-07/1000] Line-of-sight hydrogen column density 37- 42 F6.1 10+22/cm2 E_NHLOS [0/1660]? Upper uncertainty in NHLOS 44- 48 F5.1 10+22/cm2 e_NHLOS [0.1/643.5]? Lower uncertainty in NHLOS 50- 53 F4.2 10+22/cm2 NHHost [0.1/0.5]? Target host galaxy hydrogen column density 55- 58 F4.2 10+22/cm2 E_NHHost [0.05/0.15]? Upper uncertainty in NHHOST 60- 63 F4.2 10+22/cm2 e_NHHost [0.05/0.18]? Lower uncertainty in NHHOST 65- 69 F5.1 10+24/cm2 NHEqu [0.1/100]? Equatorial hydrogen column density 71- 74 F4.1 10+24/cm2 E_NHEqu [0/68]? Upper uncertainty in NHEqu 76- 79 F4.1 10+24/cm2 e_NHEqu [0/84.4]? Lower uncertainty in NHEqu 81- 83 A3 --- f_sigma Flag on sigma when fixed 85- 88 F4.1 deg sigma [10/60.2] Torus angular width 90- 93 F4.1 deg E_sigma [0.7/43.4]? Upper uncertainty in sigma 95- 98 F4.1 deg e_sigma [0/35.2]? Lower uncertainty in sigma 100- 102 A3 --- f_Inc Flag on Inc when fixed 104- 107 F4.1 deg Inc [30/84.1] Inclination angle 109- 112 F4.1 deg E_Inc [2.9/21.1]? Upper uncertainty in Inc 114- 117 F4.1 deg e_Inc [6.1/15.4]? Lower uncertainty in Inc 119- 121 A3 --- f_Gamma Flag on Gamma when fixed 123- 126 F4.2 --- Gamma [1.5/2.3] AGN-transmitted component power-law photon index 128- 131 F4.2 --- E_Gamma [0.02/0.8]? Upper uncertainty in Gamma 133- 136 F4.2 --- e_Gamma [0/0.22]? Lower uncertainty in Gamma 138- 143 F6.2 10-4/keV/cm/s AAGN [0.24/127] AGN-transmitted component at 1keV power-law normalization 145- 150 F6.2 10-4/keV/cm/s E_AAGN [0.04/203] Upper uncertainty in AAGN 152- 156 F5.2 10-4/keV/cm/s e_AAGN [0.03/58] Lower uncertainty in AAGN 158- 169 A12 --- f_GBin Flag on GBin when fixed 171- 174 F4.2 --- GBin [1.5/3]? XRB & scattered components power-law photon index 176- 179 F4.2 --- E_GBin [0/0.5]? Upper uncertainty in GBin 181- 184 F4.2 --- e_GBin [0/1.1]? Lower uncertainty in GBin 186- 188 A3 --- f_FScat Flag on FScat when fixed 190- 193 F4.1 % FScat [0.5/20]? Scattering fraction relative to transmitted component at 1keV 195- 198 F4.1 % E_FScat [0/10.3]? Upper uncertainty in FScat 200- 203 F4.1 % e_FScat [0.1/12.2]? Lower uncertainty in FScat 205- 209 F5.1 10+22/cm2 NHT1 [2.7/299.3]? 1st Time variable line-of-sight hydrogen column density 211- 215 F5.1 10+22/cm2 E_NHT1 [0.9/701]? Upper uncertainty in NHT1 217- 220 F4.1 10+22/cm2 e_NHT1 [0.6/61]? Lower uncertainty in NHT1 222- 226 A5 --- FacNHT1 Facility in first observing epoch (1) 228- 232 F5.1 10+22/cm2 NHT2 [10/173]? 2nd Time variable line-of-sight hydrogen column density 234- 238 F5.1 10+22/cm2 E_NHT2 [3/976]? Upper uncertainty in NHT2 240- 243 F4.1 10+22/cm2 e_NHT2 [2.4/28]? Lower uncertainty in NHT2 245- 247 A3 --- FacNHT2 Facility in second observing epoch (1) 249- 252 F4.2 keV KT1 [0.26/1.93]? 1st APEC component temperature 254- 257 F4.2 keV E_KT1 [0.03/0.5]? Upper uncertainty in KT1 259- 262 F4.2 keV e_KT1 [0.03/0.3]? Lower uncertainty in KT1 264- 267 F4.2 keV KT2 [0.1/0.82]? 2nd APEC component temperature 269- 272 F4.2 keV E_KT2 [0.01/0.5]? Upper uncertainty in KT2 274- 277 F4.2 keV e_KT2 [0.01/0.2]? Lower uncertainty in KT2 279- 282 F4.2 keV KT3 [0.04/0.12]? 3rd APEC component temperature 284- 287 F4.2 keV E_KT3 [0.01]? Upper uncertainty in KT3 289- 292 F4.2 keV e_KT3 [0.01]? Lower uncertainty in KT3 294- 296 A3 --- f_CACIS Flag on CACIS when fixed 298- 301 F4.2 --- CACIS [0.8/1.2]? Chandra/ACIS instrumental cross normalization 303- 306 F4.2 --- E_CACIS [0/0.21]? Upper uncertainty in CACIS 308- 311 F4.2 --- e_CACIS [0/0.3]? Lower uncertainty in CACIS 313- 315 A3 --- f_Cpn Flag on Cpn when fixed 317- 320 F4.2 --- Cpn [0.9/1.2]? XMM-Newton/pn instrumental cross normalization 322- 325 F4.2 --- E_Cpn [0/0.15]? Upper uncertainty in Cpn 327- 330 F4.2 --- e_Cpn [0.01/0.2]? Lower uncertainty in Cpn 332- 334 A3 --- f_CFI Flag on CFI when fixed 336- 339 F4.2 --- CFI [0.88/1.2]? Suzaku/XIS-FI instrumental cross normalization 341- 344 F4.2 --- E_CFI [0/0.14]? Upper uncertainty in CFI 346- 349 F4.2 --- e_CFI [0.03/0.3]? Lower uncertainty in CFI 351- 357 A7 --- f_CBI Flag on CBI when fixed 359- 362 F4.2 --- CBI [0.93/1.2]? Suzaku/XIS-BI instrumental cross normalization 364- 367 F4.2 --- E_CBI [0/0.12]? Upper uncertainty in CBI 369- 372 F4.2 --- e_CBI [0.03/0.21]? Lower uncertainty in CBI 374- 376 A3 --- f_CXRT Flag on CXRT when fixed 378- 381 F4.2 --- CXRT [0.8/1.1]? Swift/XRT instrumental cross normalization 383- 386 F4.2 --- E_CXRT [0.01/0.15]? Upper uncertainty in CXRT 388- 391 F4.2 --- e_CXRT [0/0.14]? Lower uncertainty in CXRT 393- 395 A3 --- f_CBAT Flag on CBAT when fixed 397- 400 F4.2 --- CBAT [0.8/1.2]? Swift/BAT instrumental cross normalization 402- 405 F4.2 --- E_CBAT [0/0.15]? Upper uncertainty in CBAT 407- 410 F4.2 --- e_CBAT [0/0.32]? Lower uncertainty in CBAT 412- 415 F4.2 --- CTime1 [0.16/3.6]? 1st Time variability constant 417- 420 F4.2 --- E_CTime1 [0.01/0.8]? Upper uncertainty in CTime1 422- 425 F4.2 --- e_CTime1 [0.01/0.6]? Lower uncertainty in CTime1 427- 429 A3 --- FacT1 First CTime1 facility (1) 431- 434 F4.2 --- CTime2 [0.1/5.5]? 2nd Time variability constant 436- 439 F4.2 --- E_CTime2 [0.02/0.7]? Upper uncertainty in CTime2 441- 444 F4.2 --- e_CTime2 [0.01/0.6]? Lower uncertainty in CTime2 446 A1 --- FacT2 Second CTime2 facility (1) 448- 453 F6.2 [mW/m2] logF0.5-2 [-14.31/-10.5] Log 0.5-2keV observed flux (2) 455- 460 F6.2 [mW/m2] logF2-10 [-13.8/-10.5] Log 2-10keV observed flux (2) 462- 467 F6.2 [mW/m2] logF10-50 [-13.01/-10.4] Log 10-50keV observed flux (2) 469- 473 F5.2 [10-7W] logLA0.5-2 [39.5/42.1]? Log 0.5-2keV APEC luminosity (3) 475- 479 F5.2 [10-7W] logLb0.5-2 [39.67/41.54]? Log 0.5-2keV unabsorbed X-ray emission luminosity (3) 481- 485 F5.2 [10-7W] logLo0.5-2 [39.9/43.24] Log 0.5-2keV observed luminosity (3) 487- 491 F5.2 [10-7W] logLo2-10 [40.8/43.3] Log 2-10keV observed luminosity (3) 493- 497 F5.2 [10-7W] logLo10-50 [41.17/43.5] Log 10-50keV observed luminosity (3) 499- 502 I4 eV EW [11/2520] Equivalent width of Fe Ka line 504- 509 F6.1 --- Chi2C [18.4/3523] Value of Cash or chi2 statistic 511- 514 F4.2 --- RChi2C [0.8/1.2] Reduced statistics divided by degrees of freedom 516- 519 A4 --- Stat Statistics type; (C)ash or (Chi2) chi2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Facility code as follows: C = Chandra; X = XMM-Newton; S = Suzaku, XRT = Swift/XRT; B = Swift/BAT. Note (2): In units of erg/s/cm2. Note (3): In units of erg/s. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 --- Seq [2/75] Internal index number 4- 22 A19 --- Name Common object identifier 24 A1 --- M Merger stage (G1) 26- 29 F4.2 10+22/cm2 NHHost [0.18]? Target host galaxy hydrogen column density 31- 34 F4.2 10+22/cm2 E_NHHost [0.04]? Upper uncertainty in NHHOST 36- 39 F4.2 10+22/cm2 e_NHHost [0.03]? Lower uncertainty in NHHOST 41- 43 A3 --- f_GBin Flag on Gamma when fixed 45- 48 F4.2 --- GBin [1.5/2.7] XRB & scattered component power-law photon index 50- 53 F4.2 --- E_GBin [0.01/0.9]? Upper uncertainty in GBin 55- 58 F4.2 --- e_GBin [0/0.6]? Lower uncertainty in GBin 60- 64 F5.1 10-6/keV/cm2/s ABin [1.5/236] XRB & scattered component at 1keV power-law normalization 66- 69 F4.1 10-6/keV/cm2/s E_ABin [0.9/19.7] Upper uncertainty in ABin 71- 74 F4.1 10-6/keV/cm2/s e_ABin [0.8/13.1] Lower uncertainty in ABin 76- 79 F4.1 keV Ecut [4.7/16.1]? Cutoff energy 81- 84 F4.1 keV E_Ecut [0.7/11.1]? Upper uncertainty in Ecut 86- 88 F3.1 keV e_Ecut [0.6/5]? Lower uncertainty in Ecut 90- 93 F4.2 keV KT1 [0.27/1.1]? 1st APEC component temperature 95- 98 F4.2 keV E_KT1 [0.02/0.7]? Upper uncertainty in KT1 100- 103 F4.2 keV e_KT1 [0.02/0.4]? Lower uncertainty in KT1 105- 108 F4.2 keV KT2 [0.98]? 2nd APEC component temperature 110- 113 F4.2 keV E_KT2 [0.03]? Upper uncertainty in KT2 115- 118 F4.2 keV e_KT2 [0.03]? Lower uncertainty in KT2 120- 122 A3 --- f_CACIS Flag on CACIS when fixed 124- 127 F4.2 --- CACIS [0.8/1.2]? Chandra/ACIS instrumental cross normalization 129- 132 F4.2 --- E_CACIS [0/0.1]? Upper uncertainty in CACIS 134- 137 F4.2 --- e_CACIS [0.03/0.8]? Lower uncertainty in CACIS 139- 141 A3 --- f_CMOS Flag on CMOS when fixed 143- 146 F4.2 --- CMOS [0.95/1.2]? XMM-Newton/MOS instrumental cross normalization 148- 151 F4.2 --- E_CMOS [0/0.2]? Upper uncertainty in CMOS 153- 156 F4.2 --- e_CMOS [0.07/0.2]? Lower uncertainty in CMOS 158- 160 A3 --- f_Cpn Flag on Cpn when fixed 162- 165 F4.2 --- Cpn [0.8/1.2]? XMM-Newton/pn instrumental cross normalization 167- 170 F4.2 --- E_Cpn [0.03/0.3]? Upper uncertainty in Cpn 172- 175 F4.2 --- e_Cpn [0.02/0.8]? Lower uncertainty in Cpn 177- 180 F4.2 --- CFI [1.2]? Suzaku/XIS-FI instrumental cross normalization 182- 185 F4.2 --- E_CFI [0]? Upper uncertainty in CFI 187- 190 F4.2 --- e_CFI [0.08/0.11]? Lower uncertainty in CFI 192- 198 A7 --- f_CBI Flag on CBI when fixed 200- 203 F4.2 --- CBI [1.2]? Suzaku/XIS-BI instrumental cross normalization 205- 208 F4.2 --- E_CBI [0]? Upper uncertainty in CBI 210- 213 F4.2 --- e_CBI [0.14]? Lower uncertainty in CBI 215- 217 A3 --- f_CXRT Flag on CXRT when fixed 219- 222 F4.2 --- CXRT [1]? Swift/XRT instrumental cross normalization 224- 229 F6.2 [mW/m2] logF0.5-2 [-14.1/-12] Log 0.5-2keV observed flux in units of erg/s/cm2 231- 236 F6.2 [mW/m2] logF2-10 [-14.3/-12.3] Log 2-10keV observed flux in units of erg/s/cm2 238- 242 F5.2 [10-7W] logLA0.5-2 [38.4/41.6]? Log 0.5-2keV APEC luminosity (in erg/s) 244- 248 F5.2 [10-7W] logLb0.5-2 [39/41.2] Log 0.5-2keV unabsorbed X-ray emission luminosity (in erg/s) 250- 254 F5.2 [10-7W] logLo0.5-2 [39/41.8] Log 0.5-2keV observed luminosity (in erg/s) 256- 260 F5.2 [10-7W] logLo2-10 [39.4/41.5] Log 2-10keV observed luminosity (in erg/s) 262- 267 F6.1 --- Chi2C [23/2207] Value of Cash or chi2 statistic 269- 272 F4.2 --- RChi2C [0.7/1.2] Reduced statistics divided by degrees of freedom 274- 277 A4 --- Stat Statistics type; (C)ash or (Chi2) chi2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 22 A22 --- Name Common object identifier 24- 33 A10 --- W1-W2 AGN signature based on WISE color (11) 35- 38 A4 --- Gam2.5-5 AGN signature based on 2.5-5um continuum slope (11) 40- 40 A1 --- tau AGN signature based on 3.1um and 3.4um absorption features (11) 42- 45 A4 --- PAH3.3 AGN signature based on EW of 3.3um line (11) 47- 55 A9 --- PAH6.2 AGN signature based on EW of 6.2um line (11) 57- 63 A7 --- NeV AGN signature based on [Ne V] 14.32um line (11) 65- 68 A4 --- Radio AGN signature based on radio spectral index maps (11) 70- 75 A6 --- Opt AGN signature based on optical spectroscopy and BPT diagram (12) 77- 82 A6 --- C-GOALS AGN selection criteria in the C-GOALS sample (1)(13) 84- 88 A5 --- Class X-ray classification based on this work for hard X-ray detected AGNs (14) 90- 94 A5 --- Ref Reference of the optical classification (15) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (11): Where "Y" is yes, "n" is no, and the values inside the parentheses is the measured value of AGN signature. An "u" indicates an uncertain classification. A "dg" indicates the results of [NeV] detection on IC 4518A/IC 4518B are referred from Pereira-Santaella+ (2010, J/ApJ/725/2270). Note (12): Abbreviations are: Sy = Seyfert with subcategories 1, 1.5, 1.8 and 2. L = LINERs. Cp = AGN/starburst composite (e.g., Yuan+ 2010, J/ApJ/709/884). HII = HII regions. Note (13): C = the 0.5-2keV to 2-7 keV color; L = detection of 6.4keV line; A = absorbed AGN feature. Note (14): Classification as follows: Unobs = unobscured AGN (2 occurrences); Obs = obscured AGN (22 occurrences); CT = Compton-thick (CT) AGN (15 occurrences); Jet = a jet-dominant AGN (1 occurrence); Y? = good candidate hosting an AGN based on the 8-24keV upper limits (1 occurrence); n? = a possible AGN based on the 8-24keV upper limits (6 occurrences); n = no sign of the AGN emission in the hard X-ray band (37 occurrences). see also Section 6.2. Note (15): Reference as follows: 1 = Yuan et al. (2010ApJ...709..884Y 2010ApJ...709..884Y); 2 = Lopez-Coba et al. (2020AJ....159..167L 2020AJ....159..167L); 3 = Veron-Cetty & Veron (2006A&A...455..773V 2006A&A...455..773V); 4 = Alonso-Herrero et al. (2009A&A...506.1541A 2009A&A...506.1541A); 5 = Veron-Cetty & Veron (2010A&A...518A..10V 2010A&A...518A..10V); 6 = Vogt et al. (2013ApJ...768..151V 2013ApJ...768..151V); 7 = Brightman & Nandra (2011MNRAS.414.3084B 2011MNRAS.414.3084B); 8 = Alonso-Herrero et al. (2013ApJ...765...78A 2013ApJ...765...78A); 9 = Arribas et al. (2008A&A...479..687A 2008A&A...479..687A); 10 = Lipari et al. (2004MNRAS.348..369L 2004MNRAS.348..369L); 11 = Rich et al. (2015ApJS..221...28R 2015ApJS..221...28R); 12 = Lipari et al. (2000AJ....120..645L 2000AJ....120..645L); 13 = Veilleux et al. (1995ApJS...98..171V 1995ApJS...98..171V); 14 = Garcia-Marin et al. (2006ApJ...650..850G 2006ApJ...650..850G); 15 = Duc et al. (1997A&AS..124..533D 1997A&AS..124..533D); 16 = Masetti et al. (2008A&A...482..113M 2008A&A...482..113M); 17 = Koss et al. (2016ApJ...824L...4K 2016ApJ...824L...4K); 18 = Masetti et al. (2006A&A...455...11M 2006A&A...455...11M); 19 = Lipari et al. (2003MNRAS.340..289L 2003MNRAS.340..289L); 20 = Huchra & Burg (1992ApJ...393...90H 1992ApJ...393...90H); a = Bauer et al. (2015ApJ...812..116B 2015ApJ...812..116B); b = Yamada et al. (2020ApJ...897..107Y 2020ApJ...897..107Y); c = Rani et al. (2018ApJ...866L..13R 2018ApJ...866L..13R); d = Rivers et al. (2015ApJ...804..107R 2015ApJ...804..107R); e = Iwasawa et al. (2020A&A...640A..95I 2020A&A...640A..95I); f = Puccetti et al. (2016A&A...585A.157P 2016A&A...585A.157P); g = Ogawa et al. (2021ApJ...906...84O 2021ApJ...906...84O); -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global notes: Note (G1): As classified from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and IRAC 3.6 micron imaging (Stierwalt+ 2013, J/ApJS/206/1). Stage as follows: A = galaxy pairs prior to a first encounter (18 occurrences) B = post-first encounter with galaxy disks that are still symmetric and intact but with signs of tidal tails (19 occurrences) C = showing amorphous disks, tidal tails, and other signs of merger activity (13 occurrences) D = two nuclei in a common envelop (22 occurrences) N = no signs of merger activity or massive neighbors (12 occurrences) See Section 2.2. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 08-Apr-2022
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line