J/ApJS/265/37 Multiwavelength SED analysis of GOALS ULIRGs (Yamada+, 2023)
Hard X-ray to radio multiwavelength SED analysis of local U/LIRGs in the GOALS
sample with a self-consistent AGN model including a polar-dust component.
Yamada S., Ueda Y., Herrera-Endoqui M., Toba Y., Miyaji T., Ogawa S.,
Uematsu R., Tanimoto A., Imanishi M., Ricci C.
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 265, 37 (2023)>
=2023ApJS..265...37Y 2023ApJS..265...37Y
ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, IR; Active gal. nuclei; X-ray sources; Radio sources;
Photometry, infrared; Extinction; Photometry, ultraviolet;
Photometry, ugriz
Keywords: Infrared galaxies ; Active galactic nuclei ; X-ray active
galactic nuclei ; Optical observation ; Infrared photometry ;
Radio continuum emission
Abstract:
We conduct hard X-ray to radio multiwavelength spectral energy
distribution (SED) decomposition for 57 local luminous and
ultraluminous infrared galaxies observed with the Nuclear
Spectroscopic Telescope Array and/or Swift/Burst Alert Telescope in
the GOALS sample. We modify the latest SED-fitting code X-CIGALE by
implementing the infrared (IR) CLUMPY model, allowing us to conduct
the multiwavelength study with the X-ray torus model XCLUMPY self-
consistently. Adopting the torus parameters obtained by the X-ray
fitting, we estimate the properties of the host galaxies, active
galactic nucleus (AGN) tori, and polar dust. The star formation rates
(SFRs) become larger with merger stage and most of them are above the
main sequence. The SFRs are correlated with radio luminosity,
indicating starburst emission is dominant in the radio band. Although
polar-dust extinction is much smaller than torus extinction, the
UV-to-IR (mainly IR) polar dust luminosities are ∼2 times larger than
the torus ones. The polar-dust temperature decreases while the
physical size, estimated by the temperature and dust sublimation
radius, increases with AGN luminosity from a few tens of parsec (early
mergers) to kiloparsec scales (late mergers), where the polar dust
likely comes from expanding (i.e., evolving) dusty outflows. A
comparison between the SFRs and intrinsic AGN luminosities suggests
that starbursts occur first and AGNs arise later, and overall their
growth rates follow the simultaneous coevolution local galaxy-SMBH
mass relation. We confirm the coexistence of intense starbursts, AGNs,
and large-scale outflows in late mergers, supporting a standard AGN
feedback scenario.
Description:
For the 57 local luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies
(U/LIRGs; containing 84 individual sources in Yamada+ 2021, J/ApJS/257/61),
we compiled multiwavelength data from hard X-ray to radio bands.
See Section 3.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table1.dat 107 85 *Basic information of our sample
table5.dat 56 71375 Averaged SED templates in our targets
tablea1.dat 91 85 Best-fitting parameters of the UV-to-IR SED
decomposition
tablea2.dat 122 85 Properties of host galaxies and WISE color
tablea3.dat 94 85 Results of the radio fitting
tablea4.dat 110 51 Summary of the logarithmic AGN luminosities
tablea5.dat 162 51 Summary of the extinction, AGN luminosities, and
polar dust sizes
tablee1.dat 175 85 *Photometries of our targets in mJy (λ<1um)
tablee2.dat 192 85 Photometries of our targets in mJy (λ=1-200um)
tablee3.dat 219 85 Photometries of our targets in mJy (λ>200um)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note on table1.dat: All information are referred from
Yamada+ 2021, J/ApJS/257/61
Note on tablee1.dat: The flux densities are corrected for the Galactic
extinction of E(B-V). The Pan-STARRS photometries of g-y bands are
converted from the original Kron magnitudes by multiplying 100/90 (for
10% missing fluxes or 0.115mag). The SkyMapper photometries of u-z
bands are converted from the original Petrosian magnitudes by
multiplying 1.127 (e.g., 0.13mag in case of typical Sersic index of 3;
Graham+ 2005AJ....130.1535G 2005AJ....130.1535G and Haan+ 2011AJ....141..100H 2011AJ....141..100H).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VIII/65 : 1.4GHz NRAO VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) (Condon+ 1998)
VII/233 : The 2MASS Extended sources (IPAC/UMass, 2003-2006)
VIII/78 : Sydney University Molonglo Sky Survey (SUMSS) (Mauch+ 2006)
VIII/79 : The VLA Low-frequency Sky Survey at 74MHz (Cohen+ 2007)
VIII/81 : Sydney University Molonglo Sky Survey (SUMSS V2.1) (Mauch+ 2008)
II/297 : AKARI/IRC mid-IR all-sky Survey (ISAS/JAXA, 2010)
II/312 : GALEX-DR5 (GR5) sources from AIS and MIS (Bianchi+ 2011)
II/311 : WISE All-Sky Data Release (Cutri+ 2012)
II/328 : AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013)
VIII/97 : 74MHz VLA Low-frequency Sky Survey Redux (VLSSr) (Lane+, 2014)
VIII/92 : The FIRST Survey Catalog, Version 2014Dec17 (Helfand+ 2015)
VIII/100 : GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky MWA survey (Hurley-Walker+, 2016)
II/335 : Revised cat. of GALEX UV sources (GUVcat_AIS GR6+7) (Bianchi+ 2017)
II/358 : SkyMapper Southern Sky Survey. DR1.1 (Wolf+, 2018)
VIII/102 : GLEAM II. Galactic plane (Hurley-Walker+, 2019)
VIII/104 : SPECFIND V3.0 Catalog of radio continuum spectra (Stein+, 2021)
J/ApJ/378/65 : 8.4GHz observations of compact starbursts (Condon+ 1991)
J/A+AS/124/259 : Westerbork Northern Sky Survey I. (Rengelink+ 1997)
J/ApJ/554/803 : New VLA Sky Survey (NVSS) cat. of IRAS 2Jy Gal. (Yun+ 2001)
J/ApJS/143/277 : IRAS 1Jy sample of ultraluminous galaxies. I. (Kim+, 2002)
J/ApJ/586/794 : Multiwavelength luminosities of galaxies (Bell, 2003)
J/AJ/126/1607 : IRAS Revised Bright Galaxy Sample (Sanders+, 2003)
J/A+A/423/867 : Abundances of distant luminous IR galaxies (Liang+, 2004)
J/A+A/418/465 : Mid-infrared and hard X-ray emission in AGN (Lutz+, 2004)
J/ApJ/666/806 : SED of Spitzer quasars (QUEST) (Netzer+, 2007)
J/ApJ/663/81 : SED of hard X-ray selected AGN in XMDS (Polletta+, 2007)
J/ApJ/674/172 : Oxygen abundances of LIRGs and ULIRGs (Rupke+, 2008)
J/ApJ/701/587 : A deep HST H-band imaging survey. II. (Veilleux+, 2009)
J/ApJS/182/628 : Spitzer quasar and ULIRG evolution study (Veilleux+, 2009)
J/ApJ/713/970 : Low-resolution SED templates for AGNs & gal. (Assef+, 2010)
J/A+A/521/A55 : The mass function of nearby black holes (Caramete+, 2010)
J/ApJ/723/993 : Spatial extent of (U)LIRGs in MIR. I. (Diaz-Santos+, 2010)
J/A+A/512/A34 : XMM-COSMOS Type 1 AGNs (Lusso+, 2010)
J/MNRAS/427/3103 : COSMOS field supermassive black holes (Bongiorno+, 2012)
J/A+A/545/A141 : UV selected sources in the GOODS-S field (Buat+, 2012)
J/ApJ/745/95 : Herschel FIR & submm phot. of KINGFISH sample (Dale+, 2012)
J/ApJ/754/45 : IR properties of Swift/BAT X-ray AGNs (Ichikawa+, 2012)
J/ApJ/746/L22 : Dual AGNs in the nearby Universe (Koss+, 2012)
J/AJ/144/125 : Phot. and spectroscopy of Markarian 266 (Mazzarella+, 2012)
J/MNRAS/419/2095 : HMXBs in nearby galaxies (Mineo+, 2012)
J/ApJ/772/26 : AGN with WISE. II. The NDWFS Bootes field (Assef+, 2013)
J/ApJ/774/68 : [CII]157.7um feature in LIRGs (Diaz-Santos+, 2013)
J/ApJ/777/156 : Spitzer/IRS sp. of GOALS luminous IR galaxies (Inami+, 2013)
J/ApJS/206/1 : Mid-IR properties of GOALS nearby LIRGs (Stierwalt+, 2013)
J/MNRAS/440/696 : HI absorption in nearby radio galaxies (Allison+, 2014)
J/MNRAS/439/1648 : Subarcsecond mid-infrared atlas of local AGN (Asmus+, 2014)
J/A+A/562/A21 : AGN feedback from CO observations (Cicone+, 2014)
J/A+A/565/A71 : NGC1068 MIDI/VLTI observations (Lopez-Gonzaga+, 2014)
J/MNRAS/454/766 : Mid-infrared-X-ray correlation for local AGNs (Asmus+, 2015)
J/MNRAS/453/1079 : Sub-mJy radio sources SF properties (Bonzini+, 2015)
J/MNRAS/449/1422 : 2XMM AGN X-ray and mid-IR luminosities (Mateos+, 2015)
J/ApJ/813/82 : z<0.06 broad-line AGN emission-line measures (Reines+, 2015)
J/ApJS/221/12 : AGNs in the MIR using AllWISE data (Secrest+, 2015)
J/ApJ/807/129 : X-ray to MIR luminosities relation of AGNs (Stern, 2015)
J/A+A/574/A4 : Radio image of Luminous IR Galaxies (Vardoulaki+, 2015)
J/ApJ/822/109 : MIR view of polar dust emission in local AGNs (Asmus+, 2016)
J/A+A/593/A30 : Detection of fast HI outflow in Mrk231 (Morganti+, 2016)
J/ApJ/817/118 : SFR-M* relation from ZFOURGE (Tomczak+, 2016)
J/ApJ/819/L27 : Stellar masses of optical & IR QSO hosts (Zhang+, 2016)
J/ApJS/229/25 : GOALS sample PACS and SPIRE fluxes (Chu+, 2017)
J/ApJ/846/32 : Herschel FIR spectra of GOALS galaxies (Diaz-Santos+, 2017)
J/MNRAS/464/3431 : Extremely red quasars in BOSS (Hamann+, 2017)
J/ApJ/835/74 : IR phot. of AGNs in Swift/BAT 70mth cat. (Ichikawa+, 2017)
J/A+A/598/A78 : The GMRT 150MHz all-sky radio survey (Intema+, 2017)
J/ApJS/230/1 : Herschel 194-671um survey of GOALS LIRGs (Lu+, 2017)
J/ApJS/233/17 : Swift/BAT AGN sp. survey. V. X-ray data (Ricci+, 2017)
J/ApJ/850/140 : SDSS spectral analysis of IR-bright DOGs (Toba+, 2017)
J/MNRAS/464/3882 : Mergers and galaxy-galaxy interactions (Weston+, 2017)
J/ApJS/234/23 : The WISE AGN candidates catalogs (Assef+, 2018)
J/A+A/619/A95 : X-ray/UV ratio of AGN (Chiaraluce+, 2018)
J/A+A/617/A130 : Luminous infrared galaxies AKARI 2.5-5um data (Inami+, 2018)
J/ApJS/235/4 : 105-month Swift-BAT all-sky hard X-ray survey (Oh+, 2018)
J/MNRAS/486/4917 : Torus properties of 24 X-ray gal. (Garcia-Bernete+, 2019)
J/ApJ/870/31 : BAT AGN spectroscopic survey. XI. IR phot. (Ichikawa+, 2019)
J/ApJ/870/104 : 1-500um obs. of nearby luminous IR gal. (Shangguan+, 2019)
J/A+A/622/A1 : LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey DR1 source cat. (Shimwell+, 2019)
J/ApJS/243/15 : WERGS. II. SED fitting with opt., IR & radio (Toba+, 2019)
J/A+A/635/A157 : QSO J1538+0855 MUSE datacube (Travascio+, 2020)
J/A+A/654/A93 : Polar dust obscuration in broad-line AGN (Buat+, 2021)
J/ApJS/255/30 : VLASS QL Ep.1 Catalog, CIRADA version (Gordon+, 2021)
J/ApJ/912/126 : B and JHKL light curves of NGC 4151 (Lyu+, 2021)
J/ApJ/912/91 : A value-added cat. for SDSS DR16 QSOs at z<0.7 (Toba+, 2021)
J/ApJ/910/124 : Star formation rates of low-z QSOs from 1-500um (Xie+, 2021)
J/ApJS/257/61 : X-ray spectral study of 57 local U/LIRGs (Yamada+, 2021)
J/A+A/663/A35 : Circinus galaxy N-band VLTI/MATISSE images (Isbell+, 2022)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier (IDNN,
with NN between 01 and 85)
6- 16 A11 --- IRAS IRAS name
18- 19 A2 --- m_IRAS Component identifier on IRAS name
21 A1 --- f_IRAS [ab] Flag on IRAS (1)
23- 61 A39 --- Name Object name
63- 69 F7.5 --- z [0.0038/0.09] NED redshift
71 A1 --- f_z [D] Flag on z (1)
73 A1 --- M Merger stage (2)
75- 79 A5 arcsec D12ang Angular projected separation (3)
81- 84 A4 kpc D12phy Physical projected separation (3)
86- 87 A2 --- AGN Hard X-ray-detected AGN? (4)
89- 94 A6 --- Type X-ray classification (5)
96-100 F5.2 [Lsun] logLIR [11/12.6]? log total IR luminosity
from Armus+ 2009PASP..121..559A 2009PASP..121..559A
101-102 A2 --- f_logLIR Flag on logLIR (6)
104-107 A4 --- IRS Spitzer/IRAS detection? (7)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Flag as follows:
a = the 13 systems of resolved pairs to our targets.
b = the 12 U/LIRGs (24 individual galaxies) that are too close to be
separated by the Hershel PACS 70 micron images or UV-to-near-IR images.
D = Throughout the paper, redshift-independent measurements of the
luminosity distance are utilized for the multiwavelength results
(e.g., luminosities) of the closest objects at z<0.01,
NGC1068 (14.4Mpc; Tully (1988ngc..book.....T 1988ngc..book.....T);
Bauer+ 2015ApJ...812..116B 2015ApJ...812..116B), NGC1365 (17.3Mpc;
Venturi+ 2018A&A...619A..74V 2018A&A...619A..74V), and NGC4418/MCG+00-32-013
(34Mpc; e.g., Ohyama+ 2019ApJ...871..191O 2019ApJ...871..191O).
Note (2): based on the high-spatial-resolution images
(e.g., Stierwalt+ 2013, J/ApJS/206/1). Code as follows:
A = pre-merger (26 occurrences)
B = early stage merger (18 occurrences)
C = mid-stage merger (8 occurrences)
D = late stage merger (20 occurrences)
N = non-merger (13 occurrences)
Note (3): S and n mean that a single nucleus is observed in merging and
nonmerging U/LIRGs, respectively.
Note (4): Y and n mark the presence of a hard X-ray-detected AGN or not,
respectively. Y? marks AGN candidates among the hard
X-ray-undetected sources identified by the multiwavelength SED
analysis (see Section 4.2.4).
Note (5): X-ray classification as follows:
Unobs = unobscured AGN,
Obs = obscured AGN,
CT = CT AGN,
Jet = jet-dominant AGN,
n = hard X-ray-undetected source.
Note (6): A end bracket indicates an upper limit due to contamination from
nearby much brighter (or equally bright with the suffix ":") IR sources.
Note (7): Y and n mark detection and nondetection with Spitzer/IRS in
the 10-20 micron (SH) or 19-38 micron (LH) band, respectively
(Alonso-Herrero+ 2012ApJ...744....2A 2012ApJ...744....2A ; Mazzarella+ 2012, J/AJ/144/125 ;
Inami+ 2013, J/ApJ/777/156). The (u) means that the two nuclei are
not divided.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 12 A12 --- Class Classification (1)
14- 23 E10.4 um lambda [6.2e-6/10000000] Wavelength
25- 34 E10.4 Hz Freq [29979000/4.83e+19] Frequency
36- 45 E10.4 --- Flux [1e-12/8778.7] Flux density normalized at Ks band
47- 56 E10.4 --- Lum [0/463.5] Luminosity normalized at Ks band
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Classification as follows:
Early (AGN) = 14569 occurrences
Early (NonX) = 13867 occurrences
Early (SB) = 14185 occurrences
Late (AGN) = 14569 occurrences
Late (SB) = 14185 occurrences
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name(s)
46- 49 F4.2 --- fAGN [0/0.8] Fraction of AGN luminosity in IR band
51- 54 F4.2 --- e_fAGN [0.01/0.11]? Uncertainty in fAGN
56 A1 --- f_fAGN [f] f=the fAGN value is fixed
58- 60 I3 --- tauV [40/117]? Optical depth at V band
62- 63 I2 --- e_tauV [3/33]? Uncertainty in tauV
65- 66 I2 deg sigma [15/60]? Torus angular width
68- 69 I2 deg i [30/80]? Torus Inclination
71- 74 F4.2 mag E(B-V) [0.05/0.8]? Polar dust (B-V) color excess
76- 79 F4.2 mag e_E(B-V) [0.01/0.4]? Uncertainty in E(B-V)
81- 83 I3 K Tpolar [100/250]? Polar dust temperature
85- 86 I2 K e_Tpolar [1/75]? Uncertainty in Tpolar
88- 91 F4.1 --- chi2 [0.3/12] Reduced χ2 for UV-to-IR SED
decomposition
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46- 50 F5.2 [Lsun] logM* [7.3/11.3] Log stellar mass
52- 55 F4.2 [Lsun] e_logM* [0.02/0.5] Uncertainty in logM*
57- 61 F5.2 [Lsun/yr] logSFR [-1.8/2.5] Log star formation rate
63- 66 F4.2 [Lsun/yr] e_logSFR [0.02/0.5] Uncertainty in logSFR
68- 73 F6.2 [yr] logsSFR [-12.6/-7.2] Log specific star formation
rate
75- 78 F4.2 [yr] e_logsSFR [0.04/0.5] Uncertainty in logsSFR
80- 84 F5.2 mag W1mag [6.3/14.11]? WISE 3.37 micron band
apparent Vega magnitude (8)
86- 89 F4.2 mag e_W1mag [0.01/0.03]? Uncertainty in W1mag
91- 95 F5.2 mag W2mag [5.9/14]? WISE 4.62 micron band apparent
Vega magnitude (8)
97- 100 F4.2 mag e_W2mag [0.01/0.04]? Uncertainty in W2mag
102- 106 F5.2 mag W3mag [2.3/10.34]? WISE 12.08 micron band
apparent Vega magnitude (8)
108- 111 F4.2 mag e_W3mag [0.01/0.08]? Uncertainty in W3mag
113- 117 F5.2 mag W4mag [-0.5/7.8]? WISE 22.19 micron band
apparent Vega magnitude (8)
119- 122 F4.2 mag e_W4mag [0.01/0.2]? Uncertainty in W4mag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (8): From the ALLWISE catalog (Section 3.5 and 5.3). The W1 and W2
magnitudes are corrected for Galactic extinction (Section 3.8).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46- 49 F4.2 --- alpha [0.09/0.9] Radio spectral index of power-law
synchrotron emission
51- 54 F4.2 --- e_alpha [0.02/0.2]? Uncertainty in alpha
56 A1 --- f_alpha [f] f=the alpha value is fixed
58- 62 F5.2 --- qir [-0.6/3.5] Far-IR/radio correlation
coefficient
64- 67 F4.2 --- e_qir [0.03/0.2] Uncertainty in qir
69- 73 F5.2 [10-7W] logL1.4 [35.9/41.3] Log rest-frame 1.4GHz
luminosity; erg/s
75- 78 F4.2 [10-7W] e_logL1.4 [0.02/0.2] Uncertainty in logL1.4
80- 84 F5.2 --- qex [20.6/24.3] Radio-excess parameter;
logL1.4/SFR
86- 89 F4.2 --- e_qex [0.04/0.5] Uncertainty in qex
91- 94 F4.1 --- chi2R [0.3/11.3] Reduced χ2 for combination
of radio fitting and UV-to-IR SED
decomposition
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46 A1 --- f_Name [d] Flag on Name (G1)
48- 52 F5.2 [10-7W] L6AGN [41/44.6] Log rest-frame 6um AGN
(torus+polar) luminosity
54- 58 F5.2 [10-7W] L12t [41.9/45.2] Log rest-frame 12um torus
luminosity
60- 64 F5.2 [10-7W] L12p [41.9/45]? Log rest-frame 12um polar
luminosity
66- 70 F5.2 [10-7W] L12AGN [41.9/45.4] Log rest-frame 12um AGN
(torus+polar) luminosity
72- 76 F5.2 [10-7W] L12nuc [42.5/45.2]? Log nuclear 12um luminosity (1)
78- 82 F5.2 [10-7W] LXun [40.9/43.6]? Log unabsorbed rest-frame
2-10keV AGN luminosity
84- 87 F4.2 [10-7W] e_LXun [0.01/0.5]? Lower uncertainty in LXun
89- 92 F4.2 [10-7W] E_LXun [0.01/1.3]? Upper uncertainty in LXun
94- 98 F5.2 [10-7W] L2keVun [40.6/43.6]? Log unabsorbed rest-frame 2keV
AGN luminosity
100- 104 F5.2 [10-7W] L2500d [41.5/44.8] Log rest-frame 2500Å band AGN
disk luminosity (2)
106- 110 F5.2 --- alphaOX [-2.2/-0.8]? X-ray to optical spectral index
(3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Referred from Asmus+ 2014, J/MNRAS/439/1648 and 2015, J/MNRAS/454/766)
Note (2): extinction-corrected intrinsic AGN disk luminosity.
Note (3): computed by
alphaOX=log(L"2keV /L"2500)/log(nu2keV/nu2500),
where L"2keV=L2keV,unabs/nu2keV and
L"2500=L2500,disk/nu2500.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46 A1 --- f_Name [d] Flag on Name (G1)
48 A1 --- f_NH Flag on NH (5)
49- 55 F7.2 10+22/cm2 NH [0.01/1000]? Line-of-sight hydrogen column
density (6)
57- 61 F5.1 10+22/cm2 e_NH [0.1/644]? Lower uncertainty in NH
63- 68 F6.1 10+22/cm2 E_NH [0.1/1660]? Upper uncertainty in NH
70- 74 F5.1 mag AVt [0/992] Line-of-sight V band extinction
due to torus
76- 80 F5.1 mag e_AVt [0.1/293] Uncertainty in AVt
82- 84 F3.1 mag AVp [0/2.5]? Line-of-shight V band extinction
due to polar dust
86- 88 F3.1 mag e_AVp [0.1/1.1]? Uncertainty in AVp
90- 94 F5.2 [10-7W] logLt [41.9/45.3] Log torus UV-IR luminosity;
erg/s
96- 99 F4.2 [10-7W] e_logLt [0.02/0.3] Uncertainty in logLt
101- 105 F5.2 [10-7W] logLp [43/45.3]? Log polar dust UV-IR
luminosity; erg/s
107- 110 F4.2 [10-7W] e_logLp [0.02/0.3]? Uncertainty in logLp
112- 116 F5.2 [10-7W] logLAGN [42/45.5] Log AGN disk component UV-IR
luminosity; erg/s
118- 121 F4.2 [10-7W] e_logLAGN [0.02/0.3] Uncertainty in logLAGN
123- 126 F4.2 [Msun] logMBH [6.7/8.7]? Log SMBH mass (7)
128- 132 F5.2 --- logEdd [-4.5/-0.19]? Log Eddington ratio (8)
134- 137 F4.2 --- e_logEdd [0.02/0.3]? Uncertainty in logEdd
139- 142 F4.2 [pc] logRp [1/3.1]? Log polar dust radius (9)
144- 147 F4.2 [pc] e_logRp [0.01/0.6]? Uncertainty in logRp
149- 152 F4.2 [pc] logRMIR [1.7/2.6]? Log polar dust radius from
mid-IR band (Asmus 2019MNRAS.489.2177A 2019MNRAS.489.2177A)
154- 157 F4.2 [pc] logRio [2.4/3.6]? Log ionized outflow radius
(Fluetsch+ 2021MNRAS.505.5753F 2021MNRAS.505.5753F)
159- 162 F4.2 [pc] logRmo [2/3]? Log molecular outflow radius
(Fluetsch+ 2019MNRAS.483.4586F 2019MNRAS.483.4586F)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (5): Indicates if the NH value is a limit or an approximation.
Note (6): Derived from X-ray spectral analysis (Section 3.1;
Yamada+ 2021, J/ApJS/257/61).
Note (7): Estimated from the averaged value of four independent measurements
in Yamada+ (2021, J/ApJS/257/61).
Note (8): The Eddington luminosity is defined as
LEdd=1.26e38 MBH (solMass).
Note (9): Estimated by the polar dust temperature and
dust sublimation radius (Section 6.5.1).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablee1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46- 51 F6.4 mag E(B-V) [0.008/0.7] Galactic extinction from
Schlegel+ 1998ApJ...500..525S 1998ApJ...500..525S
53- 57 F5.3 mJy FFUV [0.02/8.1]? GALEX FUV band, 152.8nm, flux
density (1)
59- 63 F5.3 mJy e_FFUV [0.002/0.1]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FFUV
65- 70 F6.3 mJy FNUV [0.05/16.2]? GALEX NUV band, 231.0nm, flux
density (1)
72- 76 F5.3 mJy e_FNUV [0.002/0.2]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FNUV
78- 82 F5.2 mJy Fu [0.1/95.1]? u-band flux density
84- 87 F4.2 mJy e_Fu [0.01/10]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fu
89- 94 F6.2 mJy Fv [0.6/129]? v-band flux density
96- 100 F5.2 mJy e_Fv [0.14/13.5]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fv
102- 103 A2 mJy FacUV Facility code for u and v-band data (2)
105- 110 F6.2 mJy Fg [0.4/518]? g-band flux density
112- 116 F5.2 mJy e_Fg [0.05/52]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fg
118- 123 F6.2 mJy Fr [0.6/776]? r-band flux density
125- 129 F5.2 mJy e_Fr [0.07/78]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fr
131- 137 F7.2 mJy Fi [1.1/1159]? i-band flux density
139- 144 F6.2 mJy e_Fi [0.1/116]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fi
146- 152 F7.2 mJy Fz [0.9/1346]? z-band flux density
154- 159 F6.2 mJy e_Fz [0.09/135]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fz
161- 162 A2 mJy FacOpt Facility code for griz-band data (2)
164- 169 F6.2 mJy Fy [0.5/494]? Pan-STARRS y-band flux density
171- 175 F5.2 mJy e_Fy [0.06/49.4]? The 1sigma uncertainty in Fy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): From the GALEX database (GR6plus7; Bianchi+ 2017, II/335)
Note (2): Facility code as follows:
P = Pan-STARRS DR2 (see II/349);
SK = SkyMapper DR1 and DR2 (see II/358);
SD = SDSS DR16 (SD; Ahumada+ 2020, V/154).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablee2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46- 51 F6.2 mJy FJ [1/347]? 2MASS extended catalog J band flux
density (3)
53- 56 F4.2 mJy e_FJ [0.16/4.2]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FJ
58- 63 F6.2 mJy FH [1/435.1]? 2MASS extended catalog H band flux
density (3)
65- 68 F4.2 mJy e_FH [0.2/5.3]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FH
70- 75 F6.2 mJy FKs [0.8/394]? 2MASS extended catalog Ks band flux
density (3)
77- 80 F4.2 mJy e_FKs [0.3/7]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FKs
82- 87 F6.2 mJy FW1 [0.6/912]? ALLWISE catalog W1 (3.35um) band
flux density (4)
89- 92 F4.2 mJy e_FW1 [0.02/5.1]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FW1
94- 99 F6.2 mJy FW2 [0.4/697]? ALLWISE catalog W2 (4.6um) band flux
density (4)
101- 104 F4.2 mJy e_FW2 [0.02/4]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FW2
106- 110 I5 mJy FS9W [98/24920]? AKARI/IRC all-sky survey 8.23um
band flux density
112- 114 I3 mJy e_FS9W [0/188]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FS9W
116- 122 F7.2 mJy FW3 [2.2/3652]? ALLWISE catalog W3 (11.56um) band
flux density (4)
124- 128 F5.2 mJy e_FW3 [0.1/20.2]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FW3
130- 134 I5 mJy FL18W [156/72280]? AKARI/IRC all-sky survey 17.6um
band flux density
136- 138 I3 mJy e_FL18W [6/415]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FL18W
140- 147 F8.2 mJy FW4 [6.3/12191]? ALLWISE catalog W4 (22.1um) band
flux density (4)
149- 153 F5.2 mJy e_FW4 [0.7/68]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FW4
155- 160 I6 mJy FPACSb [134/285800] Herschel/PACS blue 70um band
flux density
162- 166 I5 mJy e_FPACSb [18/14300] The 1sigma uncertainty in FPACSb
168- 173 I6 mJy FPACSg [235/221500]? Herschel/PACS blue 100um
band flux density
175- 179 I5 mJy e_FPACSg [16/11100]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FPACSg
181- 186 I6 mJy FPACSr [320/290900]? Herschel/PACS blue 160um
band flux density
188- 192 I5 mJy e_FPACSr [18/14500]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FPACSr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (3): Except for IRAS F17138-1017 from point-source catalog
Note (4): Updated version on February 16, 2021; Cutri+ (II/328)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablee3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 A4 --- ID Target identifier
6- 44 A39 --- Name Object name (s)
46- 51 I6 mJy FPSW [184/117900]? Herschel/SPIRE 250um band flux
density
53- 56 I4 mJy e_FPSW [13/7700]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FPSW
58- 62 I5 mJy FPMW [97/45720]? Herschel/SPIRE 350um band flux
density
64- 67 I4 mJy e_FPMW [7/2970]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FPMW
69- 73 I5 mJy FPLW [42/15630]? Herschel/SPIRE 500um band flux
density
75- 78 I4 mJy e_FPLW [6/1020]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FPLW
80- 86 F7.1 mJy FNVSS [4/22830]? NVSS (VIII/65) catalog 1.4GHz flux
density
88- 92 F5.1 mJy e_FNVSS [0.4/685]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FNVSS
94- 99 F6.1 mJy FSUMSS [14/1081]? SUMSS (Sydney University Molonglo
Sky Survey v2.1r; Mauch+ 2003,
2008) catalog 843MHz flux density
101- 104 F4.1 mJy e_FSUMSS [1/33]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FSUMSS
106- 112 F7.1 mJy FWENSS [22/42800]? WENSS (Westerbork Northern Sky
Survey; Rengelink+ 1997, J/A+AS/124/259)
catalog 325.2MHz flux density
114- 119 F6.1 mJy e_FWENSS [2/4280]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FWENSS
121- 127 F7.1 mJy FGLEAM1 [36/15211]? GLEAM (GaLactic and Extragalactic
All-sky MWA; Hurley-Walker+ 2017, VIII/100)
catalog 200.5MHz flux density (5)
129- 132 F4.1 mJy e_FGLEAM1 [6/44]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FGLEAM1
134- 140 F7.1 mJy FGLEAM2 [91/17886]? GLEAM catalog 150.5MHz flux
density (5)
142- 145 F4.1 mJy e_FGLEAM2 [16/74]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FGLEAM2
147 A1 --- l_FTGSS Limit flag on FTGSS
148- 154 F7.1 mJy FTGSS [24/49310]? TGSS (TIFR GMRT Sky Survey;
Intema+ 2017, J/A+A/598/A78) catalog 147.5MHz
flux density
156- 161 F6.1 mJy e_FTGSS [6/4932]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FTGSS
163- 169 F7.1 mJy FGLEAM3 [508/24400]? GLEAM catalog 76MHz flux density
(5)
171- 175 F5.1 mJy e_FGLEAM3 [66/289]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FGLEAM3
177- 183 F7.1 mJy FVLSSr [380/81110]? VLSSr (VLA Low-frequency Sky
Survey Redux; Cohen+ 2007, VIII/79 ;
Lane+ 2014, VIII/97) catalog 73.8MHz flux
density
185- 189 F5.1 mJy e_FVLSSr [60/290]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FVLSSr
191 A1 --- l_FVLASS Limit flag on FVLASS
192- 198 F7.2 mJy FVLASS [0.4/4260]? VLASS (Very Large Array Sky Survey;
Gordon+ 2021, J/ApJS/255/30) catalog 3GHz
flux density (6)
200- 203 F4.1 mJy e_FVLASS [0.2/13]? The 1sigma uncertainty in FVLASS
204 A1 --- f_FVLASS [n] Flag on FVLASS (7)
206 A1 --- l_FFIRST Limit flag on FFIRST
207- 212 F6.1 mJy FFIRST [0.9/4025]? FIRST (Faint Images of the Radio
Sky at Twenty-centimeters;
Helfand+ 2015) catalog 1.4GHz flux density (8)
214- 218 F5.1 mJy e_FFIRST [0.1/403]? The 10% uncertainty in FFIRST
219 A1 --- f_FFIRST [n] Flag on FFIRST (7)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (5): The values of <5σ of GLEAM catalog are removed.
Note (6): With the high angular resolution (2.5").
Note (7): Flag as follows:
n = data not utilized in the radio fits (see Section 3.7 for details).
Note (8): With the high angular resolution (5").
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global notes:
Note (G1): Flag as follows:
d = Large fractions of the mid-IR and X-ray luminosities in NGC 1275 could
be explained by the jet emission (e.g.,
Hitomi Collaboration+ 2018PASJ...70...13H 2018PASJ...70...13H and Rani+ 2018ApJ...866L..13R 2018ApJ...866L..13R).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 05-May-2023