J/MNRAS/416/3138 SN 2009jf light curves (Valenti+, 2011)
SN 2009jf: a slow-evolving stripped-envelope core-collapse supernova.
Valenti S., Fraser M., Benetti S., Pignata G., Sollerman J., Inserra C.,
Cappellaro E., Pastorello A., Smartt S.J., Ergon M., Botticella M.T.,
Brimacombe J., Bufano F., Crockett M., Eder I., Fugazza D., Haislip J.B.,
Hamuy M., Harutyunyan A., Ivarsen K.M., Kankare E., Kotak R.,
Lacluyze A.P., Magill L., Mattila S., Maza J., Mazzali P.A., Reichart D.E.,
Taubenberger S., Turatto M., Zampieri L.
<Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 416, 3138-3159 (2011)>
=2011MNRAS.416.3138V 2011MNRAS.416.3138V
ADC_Keywords: Supernovae ; Photometry, UBVRI ; Photometry, SDSS ;
Photometry, infrared
Keywords: supernovae: general - supernovae: individual: SN 2009jf -
galaxies: individual: NGC 7479
Abstract:
We present an extensive set of photometric and spectroscopic data for
SN 2009jf, a nearby Type Ib supernova (SN), spanning from ∼20d
before B-band maximum to 1yr after maximum. We show that SN 2009jf is
a slowly evolving and energetic stripped-envelope SN and is likely
from a massive progenitor (25-30M☉). The large progenitor's mass
allows us to explain the complete hydrogen plus helium stripping
without invoking the presence of a binary companion.
Description:
Our photometric and spectroscopic monitoring campaign for SN 2009jf
began on 2009 October 1, just 7 days after explosion.
Objects:
-------------------------------------------------
RA (2000) DE Designation(s)
-------------------------------------------------
23 04 52.98 +12 19 59.5 SN 2009jf = SN 2009jf
-------------------------------------------------
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
tablec1.dat 62 19 Optical UBVRI photometry of reference stars
tablec2.dat 62 10 Optical ugriz photometry of reference stars
tablec3.dat 103 69 Optical UBVRI photometry of SN 2009jf
tablec4.dat 100 29 Optical ugriz photometry of SN 2009jf
tablec5.dat 72 15 IR JHK photometry of SN 2009jf
tablec6.dat 78 14 Swift UVW1UBV photometry of SN 2009jf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 2 I2 --- Seq Sequential number
4- 9 F6.3 mag Umag ?=- U magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
11- 14 F4.3 mag e_Umag ? rms uncertainty on Umag (1)
16- 21 F6.3 mag Bmag B magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
23- 26 F4.3 mag e_Bmag rms uncertainty on Bmag (1)
28- 33 F6.3 mag Vmag V magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
35- 38 F4.3 mag e_Vmag rms uncertainty on Vmag (1)
40- 45 F6.3 mag Rmag R magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
47- 50 F4.3 mag e_Rmag rms uncertainty on Rmag (1)
52- 57 F6.3 mag Imag I magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
59- 62 F4.3 mag e_Imag rms uncertainty on Imag (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The uncertainties are the standard deviation of the mean of the
selected measurements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 2 I2 --- Seq Sequential number
4- 9 F6.3 mag umag ?=- u magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
11- 14 F4.3 mag e_umag ? rms uncertainty on umag (1)
16- 21 F6.3 mag gmag ?=- g magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
23- 26 F4.3 mag e_gmag ? rms uncertainty on gmag (1)
28- 33 F6.3 mag rmag r magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
35- 38 F4.3 mag e_rmag rms uncertainty on rmag (1)
40- 45 F6.3 mag imag i magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
47- 50 F4.3 mag e_imag rms uncertainty on imag (1)
52- 57 F6.3 mag zmag z magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
59- 62 F4.3 mag e_zmag rms uncertainty on zmag (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The uncertainties are the standard deviation of the mean of the
selected measurements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 "YYYY-MM-DD" Date Observation date
12- 21 F10.2 d JD Julian date
23- 27 F5.1 d Phase Phase, relative to the B-band maximum
(JD=2455119.4)
29 A1 --- l_Umag Limit flag on Umag
30- 35 F6.3 mag Umag ? U magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
37- 41 F5.3 mag e_Umag ? rms uncertainty on Umag (G1)
43 A1 --- l_Bmag Limit flag on Bmag
44- 49 F6.3 mag Bmag ? B magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
51- 55 F5.3 mag e_Bmag ? rms uncertainty on Bmag (G1)
57 A1 --- l_Vmag Limit flag on Vmag
58- 63 F6.3 mag Vmag ? V magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
65- 69 F5.3 mag e_Vmag ? rms uncertainty on Vmag (G1)
71 A1 --- l_Rmag Limit flag on Rmag
72- 77 F6.3 mag Rmag ? R magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
79- 83 F5.3 mag e_Rmag ? rms uncertainty on Rmag (G1)
85- 90 F6.3 mag Imag ? I magnitude (Vega, in Landolt system)
92- 96 F5.3 mag e_Imag ? rms uncertainty on Imag (G1)
98-103 A6 --- Source Source (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): Sources as follows:
IAUC = IAU Circular 8232
A1.82 = Asiago 1.82-m telescope and AFOSC; pixel scale=0.473arcsec/pix
NOT = Nordic Optical Telescope and ALFOSC; pixel scale=0.188arcsec/pix
TNG = Telescopio Nazionale Galileo and DOLORES; pixel scale=0.25arcsec/pix
PROMPT = PROMPT telescopes and CCD camera Alta U47UV E2V CCD47-10;
pixel scale=0.590arcsec/pix
FORS2 = 8.2-m ESO-VLT Telescope and FORS2, pixel scale=0.124arcsec/pix
CA = Calar Alto 2.2-m Telescope + CAFOS; pixel scale=0.53arcsec/pix
LT = Liverpool Telescope and RATCam; pixel scale=0.279arcsec/pix
NTT = New Technology telescope and EFOSC2; pixel scale=0.24arcsec/pix
NAR = Newtonian Astrograph Reflector and Canon EOS 350D camera
AN1 = AlbaNova 1-m telescope and DV438. RCOS20=20 arcsec RCOS and STL11K;
pixel scale=0.9arcsec/pix.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 "YYYY-MM-DD" Date Observation date
12- 21 F10.2 d JD Julian date
23- 28 F6.2 d Phase Phase, relative to the B-band maximum
(JD=2455119.4)
30- 35 F6.3 mag umag ? u magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
37- 41 F5.3 mag e_umag ? rms uncertainty on umag (G1)
43- 48 F6.3 mag gmag ? g magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
50- 54 F5.3 mag e_gmag ? rms uncertainty on gmag (G1)
56- 61 F6.3 mag rmag ? r magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
63- 67 F5.3 mag e_rmag ? rms uncertainty on rmag (G1)
69- 74 F6.3 mag imag ? i magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
76- 80 F5.3 mag e_imag ? rms uncertainty on imag (G1)
82- 87 F6.3 mag zmag ? z magnitude (AB, in Sloan system)
89- 93 F5.3 mag e_zmag ? rms uncertainty on zmag (G1)
95-100 A6 --- Source Source (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): Sources as follows:
PROMPT = Prompt telescopes and CCD camera Alta U47UV E2V CCD47-10;
pixel scale=0.590arcsec/pix
LT = Liverpool Telescope and RATCam; pixel scale=0.279arcsec/pix
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 "YYYY-MM-DD" Date Observation date
12- 21 F10.2 d JD Julian date
23- 27 F5.1 d Phase Phase, relative to the B-band maximum
(JD=2455119.4)
29- 34 F6.3 mag Jmag ? J magnitude
36- 40 F5.3 mag e_Jmag ? rms uncertainty on Jmag (G1)
42- 47 F6.3 mag Hmag ? H magnitude
49- 53 F5.3 mag e_Hmag ? rms uncertainty on Hmag (G1)
55 A1 --- l_Kmag Limit flag on Kmag
56- 61 F6.3 mag Kmag ? K magnitude
63- 67 F5.3 mag e_Kmag ? rms uncertainty on Kmag (G1)
69- 72 A4 --- Source Source (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (2): Sources as follows:
NICS = Telescopio Nazionale Galileo and NICS; pixel scale =0.25arcsec/pix
LT = Liverpool Telescope and SupIRCam near-IR camera;
pixel scale=0.41arcsec/pix
REM = Rapid Eye Mount 60-cm telescope and REMIR; pixel scale=1.2arcsec/pix
SOFI = NTT telescope and SOFI; pixel scale=0.29arcsec/pix.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec6.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 10 A10 "YYYY-MM-DD" Date Observation date
12- 21 F10.2 d JD Julian date
23- 27 F5.1 d Phase Phase, relative to the B-band maximum
(JD=2455119.4)
29- 33 F5.2 mag UVW1 ? Swift/UVOT UVW1 magnitude (2)
35- 38 F4.2 mag e_UVW1 ? rms uncertainty on UVW1 (1)
40- 44 F5.2 mag Umag ? Swift/UVOT U magnitude (2)
46- 49 F4.2 mag e_Umag ? rms uncertainty on Umag (1)
51- 56 F6.3 mag Bmag ? Swift/UVOT B magnitude (2)
58- 61 F4.2 mag e_Bmag ? rms uncertainty on Bmag (1)
63- 67 F5.2 mag Vmag ? Swift/UVOT V magnitude (2)
69- 72 F4.2 mag e_Vmag ? rms uncertainty on Vmag (1)
74- 78 A5 --- Source [Swift] Source
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The errors have been computed taking into account both the
uncertainty of the PSF fitting of the SN magnitude and the uncertainty due
to the background contamination (computed by an artificial-star experiment).
Note (2): The U-band data have been reduced using the template-subtraction
technique within the quba pipeline. The S-correction has been applied.
The UVW1, B and V bands have been reduced using the Swift pipeline.
The UVM2 and UVW2 bands have been measured with the Swift pipeline but are
not reported as they are strongly contaminated by the nearby cluster.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global notes:
Note (G1): The errors are computed taking into account both the uncertainty
of the PSF fitting of the SN magnitude and the uncertainty due to the
background contamination (computed by an artificial-star experiment).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 13-Apr-2012