J/MNRAS/478/5473    X-ray-selected galaxy clusters BCG offsets    (Lopes+, 2018)

Optical substructure and BCG offsets of Sunyaev-Zel'dovich and X-ray-selected galaxy clusters. Lopes P.A.A., Trevisan M., Lagana T.F., Durret F., Ribeiro A.L.B., Rembold S.B. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 478, 5473-5490 (2018)> =2018MNRAS.478.5473L 2018MNRAS.478.5473L (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, galaxy ; X-ray sources Keywords: galaxies: clusters: general - galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium - X-rays: galaxies: clusters Abstract: We used optical imaging and spectroscopic data to derive substructure estimates for local Universe (z<0.11) galaxy clusters from two different samples. The first was selected through the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect by the Planck satellite, and the second is an X-ray-selected sample. In agreement to X-ray substructure estimates, we found that the SZ systems have a larger fraction of substructure than the X-ray clusters. We have also found evidence that the higher mass regime of the SZ clusters, compared to the X-ray sample, explains the larger fraction of disturbed objects in the Planck data. Although we detect a redshift evolution in the substructure fraction, it is not sufficient to explain the different results between the higher-z SZ sample and the X-ray one. We have also verified a good agreement (∼60 per cent) between the optical and X-ray substructure estimates. However, the best level of agreement is given by the substructure classification given by measures based on the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG), either the BCG-X-ray centroid offset, or the magnitude gap between the first and second BCGs. We advocate the use of those two parameters as the most reliable and cheap way to assess cluster dynamical state. We recommend an offset cut-off ∼0.01xR500 to separate relaxed and disturbed clusters. Regarding the magnitude gap, the separation can be done at Δm12=1.0. The central galaxy paradigm (CGP) may not be valid for ∼20 per cent of relaxed massive clusters. This fraction increases to ∼60 per cent for disturbed systems. Description: This work is based on the two samples presented by Andrade-Santos et al. (2017ApJ...843...76A 2017ApJ...843...76A, Cat. J/ApJ/843/76). The first is based on the Planck Early Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (ESZ) sample of 189 SZ clusters, containing 164 clusters at z<0.35. These clusters have been followed up in X-rays by the Chandra-Planck Legacy Program for Massive Clusters of Galaxies (hea-www.cfa.harvard.edu/CHANDRAPLANCKCLUSTERS). The second data set is composed of 100 clusters from a flux-limited X-ray sample for which Chandra data are also available. Most (∼90 per cent) of the clusters in this data set are located below z=0.1, with the remaining objects spread up to z∼0.2. The Planck ESZ and X-ray samples have 49 clusters in common. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file tablea1.dat 125 72 Main properties of the 72 clusters tablea2.dat 113 72 Substructure measures, BCG coordinates, offsets and magnitude gaps for the 72 clusters -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Name 17- 25 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) 27- 35 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) 37- 42 F6.4 --- z Heliocentric redshift 44- 49 F6.1 km/s sigmaP Velocity dispersion 51- 55 F5.1 km/s E_sigmaP Error on sigmaP, upper value 57- 61 F5.1 km/s e_sigmaP Error on sigmaP, lower value 63- 66 F4.2 Mpc R500 Radius within which the matter density is 500 times the critical density for the total and dark matter profiles 68- 71 F4.2 Mpc E_R500 Error on R500, upper value 73- 76 F4.2 Mpc e_R500 Error on R500, lower value 78- 82 F5.2 10+14Msun M500 Mass of the cluster within R200 84- 87 F4.2 10+14Msun E_M500 Error on M500, upper value 89- 92 F4.2 10+14Msun e_M500 Error on M500, lower value 94- 97 F4.2 Mpc R200 Radius within which the matter density is 200 times the critical density for the total and dark matter profiles 99-103 F5.2 Mpc E_R200 Error on R200, upper value 105-108 F4.2 Mpc e_R200 Error on R200, lower value 110-114 F5.2 10+14Msun M200 Mass of the cluster within R500 116-120 F5.2 10+14Msun E_M200 Error on M200, upper value 122-125 F4.2 10+14Msun e_M200 Error on M200, lower value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Name 16- 20 F5.1 --- beta Symmetry (beta) test (1) 22- 26 F5.3 --- betas beta test significance (1) 28- 32 F5.1 --- DELTA Dressler & Shectman ({DELTA}) test (1) 34- 38 F5.3 --- DELTAs DELTA test significance (1) 40- 42 F3.1 --- L3D Dressler & Shectman (DS) and Lee 3D tests (1) 44- 48 F5.3 --- L3Ds DS and Lee 3D tests significance (1) 50- 52 F3.1 --- AD Anderson-Darling (AD) statistic 54- 60 E7.2 --- pAD p-value associated to AD statistic 62- 70 F9.5 deg RAdeg BCG right ascension (J2000) 72- 80 F9.5 deg DEdeg BCG declination (J2000) 82- 87 F6.2 --- rMAG BCG r absolute magnitude 89- 93 F5.2 --- Dm12 Luminosity gap, {DELTA}m12 95- 99 F5.1 kpc Offset Offset to the X-ray centre (in kpc) 101-105 F5.3 --- Offset2 Offset to the X-ray centre (in R500) 107-113 F7.1 --- DVBGC BCG velocity offset -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Values of the three substructure tests from Pinkney et al. (1996ApJS..104....1P 1996ApJS..104....1P). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 28-Oct-2021
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line