J/MNRAS/489/5900    Extremely metal-poor stars in SkyMapper DR1.1    (Da+, 2019)

The SkyMapper DR1.1 search for extremely metal-poor stars. Da Costa G.S., Bessell M.S., Mackey A.D., Nordlander T., Asplund M., Casey A.R., Frebel A., Lind K., Marino A.F., Murphy S.J., Norris J.E., Schmidt B.P., Yong D. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 489, 5900-5918 (2019)> =2019MNRAS.489.5900D 2019MNRAS.489.5900D (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Abundances, [Fe/H] ; Stars, metal-deficient ; Stars, population II ; Milky Way ; Photometry, ugriz ; Spectra, optical Keywords: stars: abundances - stars: Population II - Galaxy: halo - Galaxy: stellar content Abstract: We present and discuss the results of a search for extremely metal-poor stars based on photometry from data release DR1.1 of the SkyMapper imaging survey of the southern sky. In particular, we outline our photometric selection procedures and describe the low-resolution (R∼3000) spectroscopic follow-up observations that are used to provide estimates of effective temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity ([Fe/H]) for the candidates. The selection process is very efficient: of the 2618 candidates with low-resolution spectra that have photometric metallicity estimates less than or equal to -2.0, 41 per cent have [Fe/H]=←2.75 and only approximately seven per cent have [Fe/H]>-2.0dex. The most metal-poor candidate in the sample has [Fe/H]←4.75 and is notably carbon rich. Except at the lowest metallicities ([Fe/H]←4), the stars observed spectroscopically are dominated by a 'carbon-normal' population with [C/Fe]1D,LTE=<+1dex. Consideration of the A(C)1D,LTE versus [Fe/H]1D,LTE diagram suggests that the current selection process is strongly biased against stars with A(C)1D,LTE>7.3 (predominantly CEMP-s) while any bias against stars with A(C)1D,LTE<7.3 and [C/Fe]1D,LTE>+1 (predominantly CEMP-no) is not readily quantifiable given the uncertainty in the SkyMapper v-band DR1.1 photometry. We find that the metallicity distribution function of the observed sample has a power-law slope of Δ(LogN)/Δ[Fe/H]=1.5±0.1dex per dex for -4.0=<[Fe/H]=←2.75, but appears to drop abruptly at [Fe/H]~-4.2, in line with previous studies. Description: We have used a combination of SkyMapper DR1.1 photometry (Wolf et al. 2018PASA...35...10W 2018PASA...35...10W, Cat. II/358) and low-resolution spectroscopic follow-up with the ANU 2.3m telescope to identify EMP stars in the Galactic halo. Commencing in 2016 February we have observed SkyMapper photometric EMP candidates with the ANU 2.3m telescope at Siding Spring Observatory on a regular basis. The program has been allocated approximately six nights per month and useful data have been obtained for ∼60 per cent of the time. By deliberate choice of the colour range for the candidate stars, the survey targets EMP giants. It has proved to be a very efficient approach with over 40 per cent of the photometric candidates having [Fe/H]=←2.75 as derived from the low-resolution spectra. The low-resolution spectra allow the identification of 142 stars within the selection window boundaries that have [Fe/H]fitter←3.0 and which, to our knowledge, have not been previously studied. The parameters for these stars are given in Table 2 while Table 3 gives the same data for a further 29 candidates whose DR1.1 photometry falls outside the selection window or which fail the adopted DR1.1 photometric selection criteria (see Section 2 for the photometric selection). File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 79 30 Comparison of [Fe/H]fitter values with those from high-dispersion spectroscopy literature values table2.dat 124 142 Details of the derived parameters for the observed stars with [Fe/H]fitter←3.0 table3.dat 92 29 Details of the derived parameters for additional candidates with [Fe/H]fitter←3.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/358 : SkyMapper Southern Sky Survey. DR1.1 (Wolf+, 2018) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 24 A24 --- Name Star name 26- 30 F5.2 [-] [Fe/H]hd Fe/H abundance ratio from high-dispersion spectroscopy from literature 32- 36 F5.2 [-] [Fe/H]f Fe/H abundance ratio from the spectrophotometric fits to the 2.3m low-resolution WiFeS spectroscopy 38- 77 A40 --- r_[Fe/H]hd References for [Fe/H]hd 79 A1 --- f_Name Flag on Name (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flag as follows: 1 = Star has [C/Fe]~+2.6, 2.3m spectroscopic fits modified to exclude strong CH features 2 = Star has [C/Fe]~+2.3, 2.3m spectroscopic fits modified to exclude strong CH features -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 24 A24 --- Name Star name (SMSS JHHMMSS.ss-DDMMSS.s) 26- 27 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 29- 30 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 32- 36 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 38 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 39- 40 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 42- 43 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 45- 48 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 50- 55 F6.3 mag gmag SkyMapper DR1.1 g-band magnitude 57- 61 F5.3 mag g-i SkyMapper DR1.1 (g-i)0 colour index 63- 68 F6.3 mag mi Metallicity index (G1) 70- 74 F5.2 0.1nm EW(G) G-band equivalent width 76- 79 I4 K Teff Effective temperature from FITTER 81- 85 F5.3 [cm/s2] logg Surface gravity from FITTER 87- 91 F5.2 [-] [Fe/H]f Fe/H abundance ratio from the spectrophotometric fits to the 2.3m low-resolution WiFeS spectroscopy 93- 95 A3 --- f_Name Flag on Name (1) 97-124 A28 --- OName Alternative name -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flag as follows: 1 = High dispersion spectroscopic follow-up in Nordlander et al. (2019MNRAS.488L.109N 2019MNRAS.488L.109N) 2 = High dispersion spectroscopic follow-up in Yong et al. (2019, in preparation) 3 = Alternative ID for this star is given in column OName -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 24 A24 --- Name Star name (SMSS JHHMMSS.ss-DDMMSS.s) 26- 27 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 29- 30 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 32- 36 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 38 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 39- 40 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 42- 43 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 45- 48 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 50- 55 F6.3 mag gmag SkyMapper DR1.1 g-band magnitude 57- 61 F5.3 mag g-i SkyMapper DR1.1 (g-i)0 colour index 63- 68 F6.3 mag mi Metallicity index (G1) 70- 73 F4.2 0.1nm EW(G) G-band equivalent width 75- 78 I4 K Teff Effective temperature from FITTER 80- 84 F5.3 [cm/s2] logg Surface gravity from FITTER 86- 90 F5.2 [-] [Fe/H]f Fe/H abundance ratio from the spectrophotometric fits to the 2.3m low-resolution WiFeS spectroscopy 92 I1 --- f_Name Flag on Name (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): 1 = Fails one of more DR1.1 photometric selection criteria 2 = Lies outside selection window (may also have failed photometric selection criteria) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global Notes: Note (G1): The metallicity index is computed as mi=(v-g)0-1.5(g-i)0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Ana Fiallos [CDS] 20-Jan-2023
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line