A 370 1z(photo) = .138; observed redshift is suprisingly large. However, A 370 2photometric redshift formula probably can not be extrapolated to red- A 370 3shifts this large. A 465 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .155. A 480 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .132. A 509 1Alternative redshift is z = .0836 (KUC) for one galaxy; chosen value A 509 2agrees slightly better with z(photo) = .147. A 514 1z = .0348 radio galaxy (N) is probably foreground; chosen value agrees A 514 2better with z(photo) = .066. A 680 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .172. A 695 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .152. A1216 1z = .0237 radio galaxy (N) is probably foreground; chosen value agrees A1216 2better with z(photo) = .070. A1232 1Alternative redshift is z = .1997 (HGT) for one galaxy; chosen value A1232 2agrees better with z(photo) = .148. A1246 1Incorrectly identified as A1245 in (N). A1254 1This cluster is in a confused region. Alternative redshift is z = .0439 A1254 2(HSM) for one galaxy; chosen value agrees better with z(photo) = .123, A1254 3although both may be foreground galaxies. The HGT galaxy is 30 arcmin A1254 4from cluster center. Note that the m1 given by LvdB is probably for a A1254 5foreground galaxy, and that Abell (1982) has revised his m10 upward, A1254 6suggesting that the cataloged cluster is more distant that the fore- A1254 7ground groups. z(photo) is from equation 4. A1318 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .038. A1337 1Alternative redshift is z = .0826 (PL) for two galaxies; chosen value A1337 2agrees better with z(photo) = .130. A1342 1Alternative redshift is z = .1516 (PL) for two galaxies; chosen value A1342 2agrees better with z(photo) = .110. A1354 1z = .0201 galaxy (N) is probably foreground; chosen value agrees A1354 2better with z(photo) = .131. A1356 1Alternative redshift is z = .0699 (PL) for two galaxies; chosen value A1356 2agrees better with z(photo) = .132. A1385 1Alternative redshift is z = .0832 (PL) for two galaxies; z(photo) = .113 A1385 2does not usefully discriminate between the two values. A1399 1Confused with poor cluster MKW-3 by N. A1541 1The LvdB z(photo) = .047 is low because their m1 is a foreground galaxy. A1631 1The LvdB z(photo) = .034 is low because their m1 is probably a fore- A1631 2ground galaxy. A1667 1Alternative redshift z = .0951 (N) for 5 galaxies probably applies to A1667 2the group around B264; chosen value agrees better with z(photo) = .161. A1759 1Two cluster centers (A1759, A1760) are only 3.5 arcmin apart; probably A1759 2only one cluster. A1760 1Two cluster centers (A1759, A1760) are only 3.5 arcmin apart; probably A1760 2only one cluster. A1878 1z(photo) = .138; observed redshift is surprisingly large. However, A1878 2photometric redshift formula probably can not be extrapolated to A1878 3redshifts this large. A2001 1Alternative redshift is z = .1755 (Mea) for two galaxies; chosen value A2001 2agrees better with z(photo) = .125. A2084 1z(photo) = .157; observed redshift is surprisingly large. However, A2084 2photometric redshift formula probably can not be extrapolated to A2084 3redshifts this large. A2151 1Probably two clusters. Mean redshift is given; individual redshifts A2151 2are .0383 and .0365. A2152 1Part of Hercules supercluster, a very confused region. Alternative A2152 2redshift for only two brightest galaxies is z = .0448 (HSM); chosen A2152 3value agrees better with z(photo) = .030. A2177 1Alternative redshift is z = .0769 (KUC) for one galaxy; chosen value A2177 2agrees better with z(photo) = .133. A2241 1Two clusters; smaller redshift, which agrees better with photometric A2241 2redshift z = .056, is given. Larger redshift is z = .1021 for three A2241 3galaxies. A2255 1May be two clusters (see Tarenghi and Scott 1976, Astrophys. J. 207, L9) A2319 1Probably two clusters; the lower redshift is given. Larger redshift is A2319 2z = .0634 (N) for 9 galaxies. A2355 1Alternative redshift is z = .1244 (KUC) for two galaxies; chosen value A2355 2agrees better with z(photo) = .219. A2440 1Alternative redshifts are z = .057 for the radio galaxy 3C 445 (C) which A2440 2may be a foreground galaxy, and z = .1121 (HSM) based on only one line A2440 3from one galaxy; z(photo) = .069 does not usefully discriminate between A2440 4the two lower values. A2638 1May be foreground galaxy; z(photo) = .184. A2645 1Alternative redshift is z = .186 (N) for two galaxies; chosen value A2645 2agrees better with z(photo) = .238.