GRB960916B at 03:56:20 may be the same event as GRB960916A in the BeppoSAX 
GRB960916B  catalog (Frontera et al., 2009, Cat. J/ApJS/180/192). GRB960916A 
GRB960916B  occurred 312s earlier, at 03:51:08, and it was detected by 
GRB960916B  Konus-Wind, but not by Ulysses. This non-detection is consistent
GRB960916B  with the fact that the earlier event was weaker. The Konus ecliptic
GRB960916B  latitudes for these two events are consistent with a single origin,
GRB960916B  i.e., a very long burst.
GRB970315B at 22:09:19 may be from the same source as BATSE 6125 at 22:13:42.19
GRB970315B  The IPN annulus passes through the BATSE error circle, and the 
GRB970315B  duration of the BATSE event is given as 1307s. BeppoSAX entered the
GRB970315B  SAA at 22:10:09, so it could not observe the BATSE event, and the 
GRB970315B  BATSE position of the event was Earth-occulted to BATSE at the time
GRB970315B  of the BeppoSAX event. If these are indeed from a single source, the
GRB970315B  total duration would have been around 1570s. Ulysses did not 
GRB970315B  observe any emission which would be consistent with the BATSE burst,
GRB970315B  but this is consistent with its lower intensity.
GRB970415  was observed as a very weak event by Ulysses, and reliable 
GRB970415   triangulation of it is not possible.
GRB970518  has a duration of approximately 370s. The GRBM observed only the 
GRB970518   later part of the event, at 07:12:12. However, the burst started at 
GRB970518   07:06:23, and this is the time given in Tables 1, 5, and 6.
GRB971228B at 14:53:52 was observed as very weak events by Ulysses, and reliable
GRB971228B  triangulation is not possible.
GRB990516A at 20:55:15 was observed as very weak events by Ulysses, and reliable
GRB990516A  triangulation is not possible.
GRB990905  at 22:38:55 was observed as very weak events by Ulysses, and reliable
GRB990905    triangulation is not possible.
GRB991026B has an IPN localization which is inconsistent with the final BeppoSAX
GRB991026B  WFC localization in Vetere et al. (2007, Cat. J/A+A/473/347). The 
GRB991026B  minimum distance between the IPN annulus and the WFC position is 
GRB991026B  about 4.8{deg} (no uncertainty is given for the WFC localization). 
GRB991026B  The WFC position given in Table 5 is from J. in't Zand (2004, 
GRB991026B  private communication), and is consistent with the IPN localization.
GRB991030  has an IPN localization which is inconsistent with the BeppoSAX WFC 
GRB991030   localization in Vetere et al. (2007, Cat. J/A+A/473/347). The 
GRB991030   minimum distance between the IPN annulus and the WFC position is 
GRB991030   about 5.9{deg} (no uncertainty is given for the WFC localization). 
GRB991030   The WFC position given in Table 5 is from J. in't Zand (2004, 
GRB991030   private communication), and is consistent with the IPN localization.
GRB000629B does not appear in the BeppoSAX catalog, because it was initially 
GRB000629B  thought to be solar. Analysis of the Konus-Wind data, however, 
GRB000629B  points to a likely cosmic origin.
GRB011221  triggered the GRBM just prior to entry into the South Atlantic 
GRB011221   Anomaly. All GRBM data were lost, and this burst does not appear in
GRB011221   the BeppoSAX catalog.