J/AJ/167/271      List of 213 planetary systems architectures      (Volk+, 2024)
================================================================================
Differences between Stable and Unstable Architectures of Compact Planetary
Systems.
    Volk K., Malhotra R.
   <Astron. J., 167, 271 (2024)>
   =2024AJ....167..271V
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Exoplanets; Stars, double and multiple
Keywords: Exoplanets ; Exoplanet dynamics ; Exoplanet systems ; Orbital
          evolution

Abstract:
    We present a stability analysis of a large set of simulated planetary
    systems of three or more planets based on architectures of multiplanet
    systems discovered by Kepler and K2. We propagated 21400 simulated
    planetary systems up to 5 billion orbits of the innermost planet;
    approximately 13% of these simulations ended in a planet-planet
    collision within that time span. We examined trends in dynamical
    stability based on dynamical spacings, orbital period ratios, and mass
    ratios of nearest-neighbor planets as well as the system-wide planet
    mass distribution and the spectral fraction describing the system's
    short-term evolution. We find that instability is more likely in
    planetary systems with adjacent planet pairs that have period ratios
    less than 2 and in systems of greater variance of planet masses.
    Systems with planet pairs at very small dynamical spacings (less than
    ~10-12 mutual Hill radii) are also prone to instabilities, but
    instabilities also occur at much larger planetary separations. We find
    that a large spectral fraction (calculated from short integrations) is
    a reasonable predictor of longer-term dynamical instability; systems
    that have a large number of Fourier components in their eccentricity
    vectors are prone to secular chaos and subsequent eccentricity growth
    and instabilities.

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl  Records  Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80        .  This file
table2.dat     380      213 *List of system architectures in this work
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note on table2.dat: In all cases except one (Kepler-271; see notes for
    that system), the orbital periods for all planets were taken to be the
    default value and uncertainties in the Exoplanet Archive composite
    planet table
    (http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/TblView/
    nph-tblView?app=ExoTbls&config=PSCompPars). In almost all cases, the
    orbital periods for each planet from different lightcurve analyses
    agree within uncertainties. Unless otherwise indicated in the notes
    column, inclinations and eccentricities for all planets were assigned
    from the Rayleigh distributions described in Section 2. MR masses are
    generated from the statistical mass-radius relationship from Wolfgang
    et al. (2016) for planets with radii of 4R_Earth_ or smaller. For
    planets exceeding that size limit, we either use a TTV/RV mass
    measurement (indicated in the notes column) or we use the mass and
    uncertainty given in the Exoplanet Archive Composite data table, which
    is based on the mass-radius relationship from Chen & Kipping (2017),
    see http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/docs/composite_calc.html.
    For systems where we used this mass estimate, the specific planet is
    indicated in the notes column as coming from an alternate MR
    relationship.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
 J/ApJS/197/8   : Keplers candidate multiple transiting planet (Lissauer+, 2011)
 J/ApJ/750/114  : Kepler TTVs. IV. 4 multiple-planet systems (Fabrycky+, 2012)
 J/ApJ/750/113  : Kepler TTVs. II. Confirmed multiplanet systems (Ford+, 2012)
 J/ApJS/204/24  : Kepler planetary candidates. III. (Batalha+, 2013)
 J/ApJ/767/127  : Asteroseismic solutions for 77 Kepler stars (Huber+, 2013)
 J/ApJS/208/22  : Transit timing variation for 12 planetary pairs (Xie, 2013)
 J/ApJ/790/146  : Planets in Kepler's multi-transiting systems (Fabrycky+, 2014)
 J/ApJ/787/80   : 139 Kepler planets transit time variations (Hadden+, 2014)
 J/ApJS/210/20  : Small Kepler planets radial velocities (Marcy+, 2014)
 J/ApJ/784/45   : Kepler's multiple planet candidates. III. (Rowe+, 2014)
 J/ApJ/795/167  : Transits of PH3 b, c, & d through January 19 (Schmitt+, 2014)
 J/ApJ/783/4    : Properties Kepler multi-planet candidate systems (Wang+, 2014)
 J/ApJS/210/25  : Transit timing variation for 15 planetary pairs II (Xie, 2014)
 J/MNRAS/452/2127 : Fundamental parameters Kepler stars (Silva Aguirre+, 2015)
 J/AJ/152/160   : HARPS-N radial velocities of KOI-70 (Buchhave+, 2016)
 J/AJ/152/105   : Kepler-80 transit timing observations (MacDonald+, 2016)
 J/A+A/587/A64  : Physical properties of giant exoplanets (Santerne+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/834/17   : Mass & radius of planets, moons, low mass stars (Chen+, 2017)
 J/AJ/154/207   : K2 planetary systems orbiting low-mass stars (Dressing+, 2017)
 J/AJ/154/5     : Transit timing variations 145 Kepler planets (Hadden+, 2017)
 J/AJ/153/136   : Planets & host stars with Gaia parallaxes (Stassun+, 2017)
 J/ApJ/866/99   : Radii of KIC stars & planets using Gaia DR2 (Berger+, 2018)
 J/A+A/615/A69  : K2-3 system characterized with HARPSN & HARPS (Damasso+, 2018)
 J/AJ/155/136   : Planets orbiting bright stars K2 campaigns 0-10 (Mayo+, 2018)
 J/A+A/628/A108 : Photometry of Kepler-82b and c transits (Freudenthal+, 2019)
 J/AJ/157/97    : Radial velocity measurements K2-3 & GJ3470 (Kosiarek+, 2019)
 J/A+A/631/A90  : K2-138 HARPS radial velocities (Lopez+, 2019)
 J/AJ/157/145   : HIRES RVs of three compact, multiplanet systems (Mills+, 2019)
 J/A+A/624/A15  : Kepler-411 mid-transit times (Sun+, 2019)
 J/A+A/640/A48  : K2-32 and K2-233 light and RV curves (Lillo-Box+, 2020)
 J/AJ/159/2     : K2-19b & c transit times & radial velocities (Petigura+, 2020)
 J/AJ/161/246   : Transit time variations 12 exoplanets (Jontof-Hutter+, 2021)
 J/A+A/670/A68  : Architecture of exoplanetary systems (Mishra+, 2023)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Bytes Format Units  Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 11 A11    ---     Name   System name
  13- 13 I1     ---     Npl    [3/8] Number of planets in simulation
  15- 15 A1     ---   f_Npl    Flag on Npl (1)
  17- 19 I3     ---     Num    [0/100] Number of unstable simulations
  21- 21 I1     ---     MMR    [0/2]? Mean Motion Resonances (2)
  23-380 A358   ---     notes  Additional notes (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Flag as follows:
    * = At least one additional planet was detected in that system since its
        data was queried for the initial set of simulations. In these cases
        the system has a second entry in the table/simulation set with the
        additional planet included. (3 occurrences)
Note (2): MMR as follows:
    0 = no planets are near strong MMRs (mean motion resonances);
    1 = one or more pair of planets is in or very close to a strong MMR;
    2 = one or more pair of planets is close enough to a strong MMR that
        resonant interactions cannot entirely be ruled out (especially if
        simulated planets evolve to large eccentricities).
Note (3): Note as follows:
         Santerne et al. (2016) = 2016A&A...587A..64S
          Cabrera et al. (2014) = 2014ApJ...781...18C
    Shallue & Vanderburg (2018) = 2018AJ....155...94S
            Lopez et al. (2019) = 2019A&A...631A..90L
     Christiansen et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....155...57C
         Lissauer et al. (2013) = 2013ApJ...770..131L
         Buchhave et al. (2016) = 2016AJ....152..160B
           Morton et al. (2016) = 2016ApJ...822...86M
        MacDonald et al. (2016) = 2016AJ....152..105M
          de Leon et al. (2021) = 2021MNRAS.508..195D
     Christiansen et al. (2022) = 2022AJ....163..244C
            Marcy et al. (2014) = 2014ApJS..210...20M
             Wang et al. (2014) = 2014ApJ...783....4W
             Rowe et al. (2014) = 2014ApJ...784...45R
           Torres et al. (2015) = 2015ApJ...800...99T
                     Xie (2014) = 2014ApJS..210...25X
          Barclay et al. (2015) = 2015ApJ...809....7B
         Fabrycky et al. (2012) = 2012ApJ...750..114F
       Hadden & Lithwick (2014) = 2014ApJ...787...80H
       Hadden & Lithwick (2016) = 2016ApJ...828...44H
         Lissauer et al. (2012) = 2012ApJ...750..112L
         Campante et al. (2015) = 2015ApJ...799..170C
          Steffen et al. (2013) = 2013MNRAS.428.1077S
          Borucki et al. (2013) = 2013Sci...340..587B
      Freudenthal et al. (2019) = 2019A&A...628A.108F
           Berger et al. (2018) = 2018ApJ...866...99B
                     Xie (2013) = 2013ApJS..208...22X
             Mayo et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....155..136M
        Rodriguez et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....156..245R
            Palle et al. (2019) = 2019A&A...623A..41P
        Lillo-Box et al. (2020) = 2020A&A...640A..48L
         Dressing et al. (2017) = 2017AJ....154..207D
    Van Eylen & Albrecht (2015) = 2015ApJ...808..126V
           Bonomo et al. (2019) = 2019NatAs...3..416B
          Kipping et al. (2016) = 2016ApJ...820..112K
            Mills et al. (2016) = 2016Natur.533..509M
           Torres et al. (2017) = 2017AJ....154..264T
             Ford et al. (2012) = 2012ApJ...750..113F
    Jontof-Hutter et al. (2016) = 2016ApJ...820...39J
          Batalha et al. (2013) = 2013ApJS..204...24B
      Valizadegan et al. (2022) = 2022ApJ...926..120V
    Jontof-Hutter et al. (2021) = 2021AJ....161..246J
          Stassun et al. (2017) = 2017AJ....153..136S
              Sun et al. (2019) = 2019A&A...624A..15S
            Mills et al. (2019) = 2019AJ....157..145M
          Chaplin et al. (2013) = 2013ApJ...766..101C
    Jontof-Hutter et al. (2014) = 2014ApJ...785...15J
       Hadden & Lithwick (2017) = 2017AJ....154....5H
            Weiss et al. (2013) = 2013ApJ...768...14W
         Albrecht et al. (2013) = 2013ApJ...771...11A
            Wells et al. (2018) = 2018MNRAS.473L.131W
             Mann et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....155....4M
           Hirano et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....155..127H
      Diez Alonso et al. (2018) = 2018MNRAS.476L..50D
         Petigura et al. (2020) = 2020AJ....159....2P
         Sinukoff et al. (2016) = 2016ApJ...827...78S
            David et al. (2018) = 2018AJ....155..222D
          Damasso et al. (2018) = 2018A&A...615A..69D
       Crossfield et al. (2016) = 2016ApJS..226....7C
         Kosiarek et al. (2019) = 2019AJ....157...97K
    Silva Aguirre et al. (2015) = 2015MNRAS.452.2127S
    Jontof-Hutter et al. (2015) = 2015Natur.522..321J
        Malavolta et al. (2017) = 2017AJ....153..224M
          Ballard et al. (2011) = 2011ApJ...743..200B
          Schmitt et al. (2014) = 2014ApJ...795..167S
    Sanchis-Ojeda et al. (2012) = 2012Natur.487..449S
         Muirhead et al. (2012) = 2012ApJ...747..144M
          Everett et al. (2015) = 2015AJ....149...55E
         Muirhead et al. (2015) = 2015ApJ...801...18M
            Huber et al. (2013) = 2013ApJ...767..127H
           Holman et al. (2010) = 2010Sci...330...51H
           Torres et al. (2011) = 2011ApJ...727...24T
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    From electronic version of the journal

================================================================================
(End)                          Prepared by [AAS], Coralie Fix [CDS], 23-Aug-2024
