J/ApJ/883/105   PA & angular separation measurements of 80 Tau   (Torres, 2019)
================================================================================
Dynamical masses for the Hyades binary 80 Tauri.
    Torres G.
   <Astrophys. J., 883, 105 (2019)>
   =2019ApJ...883..105T
================================================================================
ADC_Keywords: Stars, double and multiple
Keywords: Visual binary stars

Abstract:
    The empirical mass-luminosity relation in the Hyades cluster rests on
    dynamical mass determinations for five binary systems, of which one is
    eclipsing and the other four are visual or interferometric binaries.
    The last one was identified and first measured more than 20yr ago.
    Here we present dynamical mass measurements for a new binary system in
    the cluster, 80 Tau, which is also a visual pair with a much longer
    orbital period of about 170yr. Although we lack the radial-velocity
    information that has enabled the individual mass determinations in all
    of the previous binaries, we show that it is still possible to derive
    the component masses for 80 Tau using only astrometric observations.
    This is enabled by the accurate proper motion measurements from the
    Hipparcos and Gaia missions, which constrain the orbital acceleration
    in the plane of the sky. Separate proper motion values from Gaia for
    the primary and secondary provide a direct constraint on the mass
    ratio. Our mass measurements, M_A_=1.63_-0.13_^+0.30^M_{sun}_ and
    M_B_=1.11_-0.14_^+0.21^M_{sun}_, are consistent with the
    mass-luminosity relation defined by the five previously known systems,
    which in turn is in good agreement with current models of stellar
    evolution.

Description:
    The discovery of 80 Tau as a visual binary is credited to Struve
    (1837AN.....14..249S). Some 180 measurements of the position angle and
    angular separation ({theta}, {rho}) have been recorded in the 180yrs
    since, the latest one in 2015. They cover a full orbital cycle, with a
    periastron passage around 1892.

    A listing of these measurements as contained in the Washington Double
    Star Catalog (WDS) was kindly provided by Brian Mason (U.S. Naval
    Observatory, Washington D.C.), with the dates of observation uniformly
    transformed from Besselian years to Julian years. To these we have
    added one observation from 1897 that was not included in the WDS
    listing, which was made by Burnham (1906gcds.book.....B) very close to
    periastron, and one from the Gaia/DR2 Catalog (I/345) that we
    constructed by differencing the positions of the two components
    measured separately by the mission.

    In all we used 177 measures of the angular separation and 183 of the
    position angle. See Section 2 and Table 1.

Objects:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
        RA   (ICRS)    DE        Designation(s)
    ----------------------------------------------------------
     04 30 08.60   +15 38 16.2   80 Tau  = ** STF 554
    ----------------------------------------------------------

File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName    Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe          80        .   This file
table1.dat      59      184   Visual observations of 80 Tau
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

See also:
 B/wds : The Washington Visual Double Star Catalog (Mason+ 2001-2020)
 I/259 : The Tycho-2 Catalogue (Hog+ 2000)
 I/345 : Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration, 2018)
 J/A+AS/101/551 : Optical polarization of 1000 stars (Leroy 1993)
 J/A+A/331/81   : Hyades membership (Perryman+ 1998)
 J/A+A/341/121  : Visual binary orbits and masses (Soederhjelm 1999)
 J/AJ/120/2638  : CCD speckle obs. of binary stars. II. (Horch+, 2000)
 J/A+A/381/446  : Astrometric Radial Velocities. III. (Madsen+, 2002)
 J/A+A/393/897  : Rotational velocities of A-type stars II. (Royer+, 2002)
 J/ApJS/159/100 : Temperatures and Rc photometry in the Hyades (Taylor+, 2005)
 J/AJ/131/3008  : Double star speckle measures (Horch+, 2006)
 J/ApJS/176/262 : VRI photometry & theta values in open clusters (Taylor+, 2008)
 J/A+A/493/1099 : CaII HK emission in rapidly rotating stars (Schroeder+, 2009)
 J/other/Ser/180.71 : Masses of visual binaries (Cvetkovic+, 2010)
 J/A+A/531/A92  : Deep all-sky census of the Hyades (Roeser+, 2011)
 J/A+A/546/A69  : Orbits of visual binaries and dynamical masses (Malkov+, 2012)
 J/A+A/559/A43  : Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) observations of the Hyades (Goldman+, 2013)
 J/ApJ/776/67   : Rotational tracks (van Saders+, 2013)
 J/ApJ/795/161  : Activity & rotation in Praesepe & Hyades (Douglas+, 2014)
 J/ApJ/804/146  : Atmospheric parameters for nearby B-F stars (David+, 2015)
 J/ApJ/826/171  : IR data of debris disk vs metallicity of stars (Gaspar+, 2016)
 J/MNRAS/456/2070 : Eccentricity distribution of wide bin. (Tokovinin+, 2016)
 J/ApJ/856/23   : BANYAN. XI. The BANYAN {Sigma} algorithm (Gagne+, 2018)
 J/A+A/623/A72  : Binarity of HIP stars from Gaia pm anomaly (Kervella+, 2019)
 J/PAZh/45/35   : Orbits of 451 wide visual double stars (Izmailov, 2019)

Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units    Label         Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  9 F9.4   yr       Year          [1831.18/2015.846] Year of observation
                                        in Julian years
  11- 16 F6.3   deg      PA            [1.7/78.2]? Position angle {theta} (1)
  18- 22 F5.3   arcsec e_PA            [0.012/0.15]? Position angle
                                        uncertainty along tangential direction
                                        {sigma}_t_ (2)
  24- 28 F5.2   deg      (O-C)t        [-8.4/22.2]? Position angle
                                        (O-C)_{theta}_ value
  30- 34 F5.2   ---      (O-C)t/sig    [-2.7/3.1]? Position angle
                                        (O-C)_{theta}_ value divided by
                                        uncertainty in theta {sigma}_{theta}_
  36- 40 F5.3   arcsec   rho           [0.4/1.9]? Angular separation {rho}
  42- 46 F5.3   arcsec e_rho           [0.012/0.2]? Uncertainty in rho
                                        {sigma}_{rho}_ (2)
  48- 53 F6.3   arcsec   (O-C)rho      [-0.4/0.4]? Angular separation
                                        (O-C)_{rho}_ value
  55- 59 F5.2   ---      (O-C)rho/sig  [-2.2/2.7]? Angular separation
                                        (O-C)_{rho}_ divided by uncertainty in
                                        rho {sigma}_{rho}_
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The position angles listed are the original ones; precession
    corrections were applied internally during the orbital analysis.
Note (2): The uncertainties listed in the table correspond to the e_rho and
    e_PA values given in the text multiplied by the scaling factors
    f_{rho}_ and f_{theta}_ reported in Section 3, and represent the final
    errors used in the solution described there. We also list the
    residuals in angular separation and position angle normalized to their
    uncertainties e_rho and {sigma}_{theta}_=e_PA/rho.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History:
    From electronic version of the journal

================================================================================
(End)                  Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS]    05-Mar-2021
