B0039-407 Iovino, Clowes & Shaver (1996, Cat. <J/A+AS/119/265>) estimated the 
B0039-407  redshift as z=2.37 from an objective prism measurement. 
B0039-407  We now measure z=2.478.
B0138-097 Stocke & Rector (1997ApJ...489L..17S) give z=0.733 for this BL source.
B0138-097  Despite high signal-to-noise in the range 4000-7000{AA}, our spectrum
B0138-097  does not confirm their MgII emission-line redshift of z=0.733. 
B0138-097  We classify this source as a BL with undetermined redshift.
B0357-264 Drinkwater et al. (1997, Cat. <VIII/34>) give "z=1.47?" for this 
B0357-264  source. Their spectrum does not show any strong features and it is 
B0357-264  not clear from their paper which features this redshift is based on. 
B0357-264  Our spectrum covers a similar wavelength range to that of the 
B0357-264  Drinkwater et al. (1997, Cat. <VIII/34>) spectrum but does not show 
B0357-264  sufficient features to measure a redshift. We therefore classify this
B0357-264  source as a BL.
B0646-306 Veron-Cetty & Veron (1993ESOSR..13....1V, See Cat. <VII/207>) give 
B0646-306  z=0.455 for this object whereas we find z=1.153. It is likely that 
B0646-306  the previous redshift determination was the result of misidentifying 
B0646-306  the CIII] line at ~4100{AA} with MgII.
B1136-156 The emission lines of CIV and Ly{alpha} are affected by absorption.
B1251-407 The previously published redshift of 4.458 (Shaver et al., 
B1251-407  1996MNRAS.278L..11S) was derived using different assumptions for the 
B1251-407  rest-frame wavelengths of the emission-lines. Using values corrected 
B1251-407  for systematic shifts (Tytler & Fan, 1992ApJS...79....1T) 
B1251-407  we derive a redshift of 4.464.
B2303-656 PKSCAT90 lists this object at a redshift of z=0.47. Our spectrum, 
B2303-656  which starts at 6000{AA}, does not show any clear features to 
B2303-656  confirm this.
B2224+006 The emission lines of CIV and Ly{alpha} are affected by absorption.