AzLOCK1 A robust single ID (category 1). The spectroscopic mid-IR PAH redshift AzLOCK1 from Coppin et al. (2010ApJ...713..503C) was adopted. AzLOCK2 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK3 This source has two category 1 radio IDs, but the high-resolution submm AzLOCK3 imaging obtained by Younger et al. (2008MNRAS.387..707Y) revealed that AzLOCK3 the first one (the northern, 24um faint ID) is the correct ID. This is AzLOCK3 the SCUBA source LOCK850.02 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK3 J/MNRAS/380/199). The same IDs were selected. AzLOCK4 Three candidate category 1 radio IDs. The one with the lowest p value, AzLOCK4 and confirmation at low radio frequency and 24um was adopted. AzLOCK5 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK5 The spectroscopic mid-IR PAH redshift from Coppin et al. AzLOCK5 (2010ApJ...713..503C) was adopted. AzLOCK6 A robust single radio and 8um ID (category 1). AzLOCK7 A possible blend of two radio/24um sources and an additional red i-K AzLOCK7 source (category 1) at the same redshift as the first ID. This is the AzLOCK7 SCUBA source LOCK850.04 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). AzLOCK7 The faintest radio ID considered by Ivison et al. (2007, Cat. AzLOCK7 J/MNRAS/380/199) is not in the catalogue used here, as it is blended AzLOCK7 with the brighter object. The spectroscopic redshift from Ivison et AzLOCK7 al. (2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199) was adopted for the second ID, but AzLOCK7 the first ID is the one adopted here. AzLOCK8 A robust single ID (category 1). This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.01 AzLOCK8 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same ID was selected. AzLOCK8 The spectroscopic mid-IR PAH redshift from Coppin et al. AzLOCK8 (2010ApJ...713..503C) was adopted. AzLOCK9 A robust ID (category 1) with two possible weaker IDs (category 3). AzLOCK9 This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.34 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK9 J/MNRAS/380/199). We did not select their fainter radio counterpart AzLOCK9 due to its low significance and we also considered one additional AzLOCK9 24um candidate. AzLOCK10 A robust ID (category 1) with a possible weaker ID (category 3). The AzLOCK10 spectroscopic mid-IR PAH redshift from Coppin et al. AzLOCK10 (2010ApJ...713..503C) was adopted for the robust ID. AzLOCK11 A robust ID (category 1) with a possible radio companion (category 1). AzLOCK12 A robust ID (category 1) with a possible radio companion (category 3). AzLOCK13 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK14 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK15 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK16 A robust single ID (category 1) with a possible 8.0um companion AzLOCK16 (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK17 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK17 This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.15 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK17 J/MNRAS/380/199). We selected only their second radio IDs as the AzLOCK17 remaining two are too far away from the AzTEC position. AzLOCK18 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK19 A robust ID (category 1) with a possible red i-K companion AzLOCK19 (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK20 Two robust IDs (category 1) with a possible weaker radio companion AzLOCK20 (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK21 A single ID (category 2). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. This AzLOCK21 is the SCUBA source LOCK850.13 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK21 J/MNRAS/380/199). We only selected the brighter (southern) out of AzLOCK21 their two 24um IDs, because of low significance of the other one. AzLOCK22 A blend of four radio sources (category 1 and 3). This is the SCUBA AzLOCK22 source LOCK850.43 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). We AzLOCK22 selected two out of three of their radio IDs and selected two AzLOCK22 additional IDs. The inconsistency can be explained by the fact that AzLOCK22 the radio image is severely blended at this position. AzLOCK23 A robust single ID (category 1) with a possible weaker red i-K AzLOCK23 companion (category 3). AzLOCK24 A blend of three radio sources (category 1 and 2). This is the SCUBA AzLOCK24 source LOCK850.03 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). We AzLOCK24 selected both of their radio IDs and an additional faint radio ID. The AzLOCK24 spectroscopic redshift from Ivison et al. (2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199) AzLOCK24 was adopted. AzLOCK25 A robust ID (category 1) with a possible radio companion (category 3). AzLOCK26 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK27 Three robust IDs (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK27 This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.71 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK27 J/MNRAS/380/199). The same IDs were selected. AzLOCK28 No IDs obtained (but only the radio selection could yield IDs due to AzLOCK28 lack of coverage at other wavelengths). AzLOCK29 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK30 No IDs obtained. AzLOCK31 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK32 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK33 Two robust IDs (category 1). This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.52 AzLOCK33 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same ID was selected. AzLOCK34 No IDs obtained. AzLOCK35 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK36 A single ID (category 2). AzLOCK37 Three IDs (category 2 and 3). AzLOCK38 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK39 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK40 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK41 A single ID (category 2). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK42 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK43 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK43 This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.79 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK43 J/MNRAS/380/199). We selected the same IDs. AzLOCK44 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzLOCK44 sources. AzLOCK45 A single ID (category 2). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK46 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK47 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK48 No IDs obtained (but the 8.0um and i-K methods could not be used due to AzLOCK48 lack of coverage at these wavelengths). AzLOCK49 No IDs obtained. AzLOCK50 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK51 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK52 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK53 No IDs obtained. AzLOCK54 Four IDs (category 1, 2 and 3). AzLOCK55 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK56 Three IDs (category 2). This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.06 (Ivison et AzLOCK56 al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same IDs were selected. AzLOCK57 A single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK58 Two IDs (category 1). AzLOCK59 No IDs obtained (but the 8.0um and i-K methods could not be used due to AzLOCK59 lack of coverage at these wavelengths). AzLOCK60 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK61 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK62 A robust single ID (category 1). The spectroscopic mid-IR PAH redshift AzLOCK62 from Coppin et al. (2010ApJ...713..503C) was adopted. AzLOCK63 Two IDs (category 2 and 3). AzLOCK64 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK65 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzLOCK65 sources. AzLOCK66 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK67 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK68 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK69 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK70 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK71 A tentative single ID (category 3). AzLOCK72 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzLOCK72 sources. AzLOCK73 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK74 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK75 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK76 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzLOCK76 sources. AzLOCK77 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK78 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK79 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzLOCK79 sources. AzLOCK80 Two IDs (category 1) at similar redshifts. AzLOCK81 Two IDs (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK82 Five IDs (category 1 and 3). AzLOCK83 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK84 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK85 Four IDs (category 1 and 2). AzLOCK86 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK86 This is the SCUBA source LOCK850.14 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. AzLOCK86 J/MNRAS/380/199). We only selected the closer out of their two radio AzLOCK86 IDs, because of low significance of the other one. The spectroscopic AzLOCK86 redshift from Ivison et al. (2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199) was adopted. AzLOCK87 A robust single ID (category 1). AzLOCK88 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzLOCK89 Two robust IDs (category 1) at low redshift (0.14). A possible blend of AzLOCK89 weak 24um sources. Its 1.1mm-to-1.4 GHz flux density ratio is also AzLOCK89 consistent with z<~0.5. AzLOCK90 No IDs obtained. AzLOCK91 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS1 No IDs obtained (but the 8.0um and i-K methods could not be used due to AzUDS1 lack of coverage at these wavelengths). AzUDS2 A tentative single ID (category 3). AzUDS3 Two robust IDs (category 1). AzUDS4 No IDs obtained (but the i-K method could not be used due to lack of AzUDS4 coverage at these wavelengths). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS5 A robust single ID (category 1). This is the SCUBA source SXDF850.03 AzUDS5 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same ID was selected. AzUDS5 The optical counterpart and the radio ID may correspond to a possible AzUDS5 lensing galaxy and a lensed source (see Section 'IDENTIFICATIONS'). AzUDS6 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS7 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS8 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS9 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS10 A robust single ID (category 1). A very close star makes the photometry AzUDS10 difficult to obtain. This is the SCUBA source SXDF850.29 (Ivison et AzUDS10 al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same ID was selected. AzUDS11 A tentative single ID (category 3). A possible blend of weak 24um AzUDS11 sources. AzUDS12 A tentative single ID (category 3). AzUDS13 A tentative single ID (category 3). AzUDS14 No IDs obtained. AzUDS15 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS16 A single ID (category 2). AzUDS17 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS18 No IDs obtained (but the 8.0um and i-K methods could not be used due to AzUDS18 lack of coverage at these wavelengths). AzUDS19 No IDs obtained (but the i-K methods could not be used due to lack of AzUDS19 coverage at these wavelengths). AzUDS20 No IDs obtained. AzUDS21 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS22 No IDs obtained (but the i-K methods could not be used due to lack of AzUDS22 coverage at these wavelengths). AzUDS23 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS24 No IDs obtained (but the i-K methods could not be used due to lack of AzUDS24 coverage at these wavelengths). AzUDS25 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS26 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS27 Three IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS28 Two IDs (category 1 and 3) at similar redshifts. A possible blend of AzUDS28 weak 24um sources. AzUDS29 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS30 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS31 No IDs obtained. AzUDS32 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS33 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). This is the SCUBA source SXDF850.01 AzUDS33 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). We selected an additional AzUDS33 category 3 ID. AzUDS34 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS35 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS36 A single ID (category 3). AzUDS37 No IDs obtained. AzUDS38 Five IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS39 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS40 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). AzUDS41 No IDs obtained. AzUDS42 Five IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS43 Two robust IDs (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS43 The first and second IDs may correspond to a possible lensing galaxy AzUDS43 and a lensed source (see Section 'IDENTIFICATIONS'). The redshift of AzUDS43 the second ID was used in the analysis of the redshift distribution. AzUDS44 No IDs obtained. AzUDS45 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS46 No IDs obtained. AzUDS47 Five IDs (category 1). The high-resolution submm imaging revealed that AzUDS47 the second one (the most northern with z=~2.48) is the correct ID AzUDS47 (Hatsukade et al. 2010ApJ...711..974H). This is the SCUBA source AzUDS47 SXDF850.06 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). The same radio AzUDS47 IDs were selected. AzUDS48 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS49 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS50 Two IDs (category 1 and 3). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS51 No IDs obtained. This is the SCUBA source SXDF850.5 (Ivison et al. AzUDS51 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). Their 3{sigma} radio ID is not selected AzUDS51 as it is too far away from the AzTEC position, which is offset from AzUDS51 the SCUBA position by =~5arcsec. AzUDS52 Four tentative IDs (category 3). AzUDS53 A tentative ID (category 3). AzUDS54 A robust single ID (category 1). AzUDS55 A robust single ID (category 1). A possible blend of weak 24um sources. AzUDS56 No IDs obtained. A possible blend of weak 24um sources. This is the AzUDS56 SCUBA source SXDF850.18 (Ivison et al. 2007, Cat. J/MNRAS/380/199). AzUDS56 Their radio ID was not selected due to its low significance. AzUDS57 A tentative single ID (category 3).