 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 361, 465-479 (2000)
2. Data-models comparison method
2.1. Determination of the underlying population properties
The optical-near-infrared colors measured for the underlying
stellar component (see Sects. 5 and 6.1 in Paper I) have
been compared with those predicted by the Bruzual & Charlot (priv.
comm.) evolutionary synthesis models. We have obtained the
best-fitting model for each point in the color profiles (see
Fig. 6 of Paper I) using a maximum likelihood estimator.
This maximum likelihood estimator is defined as,
![[EQUATION]](img7.gif)
where (with n=1-5) are the
, ,
,
and colors measured, and
are those predicted by the
evolutionary synthesis models. The colors measured were corrected for
Galactic extinction using an extinction in the B-band of
(Burstein & Heiles 1982).
We have studied different star formation histories for the
formation of this component. In particular, we have considered
instantaneous and 1, 3 and 7 Gyr duration bursts and continuous
star formation models. This comparison has been restricted to models
with metallicity lower than the solar value. We are confident with
this assumption since the gas metallicities derived in Sect. 3.4
for the galaxy star-forming regions are lower than one tenth
solar.
2.2. Determination of the star-forming regions properties
A more elaborated comparison method has been used in the case of
the galaxy star-forming regions. This comparison method is fully
described in Gil de Paz et al. (2000b). Briefly, it combines Monte
Carlo simulations and a maximum likelihood estimator with Cluster and
Principal Component Analysis.
The maximum likelihood estimator employed is very similar to that
described in Sect. 2.1, but replacing the
and
colors by the
and
colors. In addition, since these
regions have intense H emission, we
have included a new term, defined as
+2.5 log( ).
This term is equivalent to the H
equivalent width (EW hereafter) term,
2.5 log EW(H ),
used in Gil de Paz et al. (2000b). The
magnitudes are those measured within
the apertures given in Paper I.
In order to properly derive this new term, we have computed the
fraction of H flux, i.e. the fraction
of Lyman photons, due to the stellar continuum measured within the
apertures. Two different approaches can be followed. First, we could
measure the H fluxes using these
apertures. However, since the H
emission is usually more extended than the continuum emisson, this
procedure would sistematically underestimate the
H flux (see, e.g. #8, #13, #18, #50,
#70 and #80 regions). Therefore, we have used an alternative method.
We measured the total H using the
COBRA program (see Paper I). Then, we assumed that
the fraction of photons emitted within the apertures relative to the
total emission is equivalent for the Lyman and R-band
continuum. Thus, considering that the apertures were obtained at e-,
e2- or e3-folding radii and assuming gaussian
ligth profiles, this light fraction can be computed for each region.
The values obtained for this fraction, f, are given in
Table 3.
Then, multiplying these flux ratios by the total
H fluxes given in Table 4 of
Paper I, we derive the H
luminosities due to the continuum emission measured within the
apertures.
The H fluxes were corrected for
extinction using the color excesses
provided by the
H -H ,
H -H
Balmer decrements. In addition, the broad-band magnitudes and colors
were corrected for extinction assuming that the extinction affecting
the stellar continuum and the gas extinction are related via
=0.44![[FORMULA]](img2.gif)
(Calzetti et al. 1996). In those regions where Balmer line ratios were
not measurable we assumed an average extinction of
= .
This value was obtained as the mean of the color excesses given in
Table 5 of Paper I for those regions with accessible Balmer
line ratios.
Thus, each star-forming region has a point associated in the
, ,
, ,
,
+2.5 log( )
six-dimensional space. However, the corresponding uncertainties
transform these points into probability distributions. Using a Monte
Carlo method with 103 points and assuming gaussian errors
we reconstructed these probability distributions. Then, we compared
each of these 103 points with our models using the maximuum
likelihood estimator described above. Since these models are
parametrized in age, t; burst strength, b; and
metallicity, Z, of the burst stellar population, this method
effectively provides the (t,b,Z) probability
distribution for each input region (see Table 3).
Finally, we studied the clustering pattern present in these
distributions using a hierarchical clustering method (see Murtagh
& Heck 1987). This method allows to isolate different solutions in
the (t,b,Z) space. We grouped the 103
(t,b,Z) points in three clusters of solutions.
Then, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (see Morrison 1976)
for each individual solution (see Gil de Paz et al. 2000b for a more
complete description of this procedure).
For the central starburst component we used a similar procedure.
However, since no H emission was
detected for this component, the
+2.5 log( )
term was not included in the maximum likelihood estimator. In
addition, we introduced the continuum color excess
as a free parameter. Color excesses
in the range 0.0- were studied, where
is the Galactic color excess. For
each of the 103 Monte Carlo particles the full range was
explored, obtaining the best-fitting color excess and
(t,b,Z) array.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: October 2, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |