Astron. Astrophys. 363, 825-836 (2000)
2. Oscillations of degenerated neutrinos
The neutrino oscillations take place due to the fact that neutrino
mass eigenstate components propagate differently because they have
different energies, momenta and masses. In the standard assumption of
the mixing of massive neutrinos, the neutrino flavor eigenstates are
described by a superposition of the mass eigenstate components
(Particle Data Group 1998). For oscillations occurring in vacuum
between two neutrino flavors and
the mixing can be written as:
![[EQUATION]](img57.gif)
where and
are the mass eigenstate components
and is the vacuum mixing angle. The
mixing of antineutrinos can be obtained from Eq. (1) by
performing the transformations and
. It is usual to consider that each
neutrino/antineutrino of a definite flavor is dominantly one mass
eigenstate (Particle Data Group 1998). In this circumstance we refer
to the dominant mass eigenstate component of
/ as
, that of
/ as
and to their difference of the
squared masses as .
The mixing of the mass eigenstate components are modified in the
presence of the asymmetric background. The background mixing angle and
the vacuum mixing angle are related through (see e.g. Foot et al.
1996):
![[EQUATION]](img66.gif)
Here
( ),
is the averaged neutrino momentum and
is the neutrino effective potential
due to the interaction with the asymmetric background (Enqvist et al.
1992; Foot et al. 1996):
![[EQUATION]](img71.gif)
where is a numerical factor
( ),
is the neutrino temperature, is the
Fermi constant ( )
is the mass of Z boson,
( GeV),
is the photon number density
( ),
and are the neutrino and
antineutrino number densities.
The functions are defined as
(Foot et al. 1996; Foot & Volkas 1997):
![[EQUATION]](img83.gif)
Here is approximately equal to
the baryon to photon ratio, and s are
the lepton asymmetries defined as:
![[EQUATION]](img86.gif)
where s are the number
densities.
For the purpose of this work we consider large neutrino asymmetries
( ). Also, we consider that
is non-degenerated and consequently
. In this case the functions
may be written as:
![[EQUATION]](img91.gif)
The effective potentials of antineutrinos can be obtained by
replacing with
in Eq. (3).
The neutrino flavor eigenstates oscillate via weak interaction
processes. The average oscillation probability
of a flavor eigenstate
( )
is defined as (see e.g.: Raffelt 1996; Foot et al.1996; Enqvist et al.
1992):
![[EQUATION]](img95.gif)
where is the neutrino averaged
elastic collision rate, is the mean
distance between interactions (Foot et al. 1996), and the neutrino
oscillation length is given by (see
e.g. Raffelt 1996):
![[EQUATION]](img99.gif)
where is the neutrino energy. We
will consider the and then
(Foot et al. 1996). The averaged
collision rate is given by (Enqvist et al. 1992):
![[EQUATION]](img103.gif)
where is the number density of
massless non-degenerated neutrino species.
Eq. (7) together with Eqs. (2), (8), (9) gives the
averaged oscillation probability
used in the next section to evolve in time the neutrino distribution
functions. The oscillation probabilities of antineutrinos can be
obtained by performing the transformations
and
in Eqs. (7)-(9).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |