 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 363, 984-990 (2000)
2. The probability of observing YSO occultation
2.1. Disk model
The basic accretion disk model used in this investigation was
described and used extensively earlier (e.g., Bertout et al. 1988;
Basri & Bertout 1989). The main modification introduced for the
present study concerns the disk's vertical structure. Local
hydrostatic equilibrium is assumed at each disk radius, and
reprocessing of stellar and accretion radiation is taken into account
when computing the local disk temperature and the disk "flaring".
Instead of calculating the disk vertical structure in full detail
(e.g., Bell et al. 1997) we follow here the more tractable approach
advocated by Hartmann & Kenyon (1987) and recently by Chiang &
Goldreich (1997) (hereafter CG97); that is, we assume that the disk is
isothermal at each radius, with the disk temperature
resulting from balancing the locally
dissipated and emitted energy fluxes. While this is a good
approximation for optically thin and passive disks, it can be
questioned for the optically thick disks envisioned here, since the
disk equatorial temperature is
expected to be given in the grey approximation by
![[EQUATION]](img6.gif)
where is the frequency-integrated
optical depth, the energy flux due to
accretion and the flux of reprocessed
radiation (Malbet & Bertout 1992; Dubus et al. 1999). However, one
finds that departures from isothermality are much more important in
the inner disk, where most of the accretion energy is deposited, than
in the outer parts of the disk. Since we are primarily interested here
in the disk flaring produced at a large distance from the star, the
assumption of isothermality thus does not appear critical. We
nevertheless monitored the ratio of height scales given by
and
throughout the computation as a check on this hypothesis'
consistency.
The treatment of flaring basically follows CG97, but with two
differences. First, the computation of the angle of incident stellar
light on the disk allows for the fact that physical quantities
describing an accretion disk vary as a function of
radius 2. Second,
we explicitly take into account the effect of accretion luminosity on
the flaring, assuming that half of the accretion luminosity is
radiated away in an optically thick, axially symmetric fraction
f of the stellar surface (here 1%). The `equivalent effective
temperature' which replaces the
stellar effective temperature in the
expression giving the flaring angle is then
![[EQUATION]](img12.gif)
where , and
and
are the stellar mass and radius,
respectively.
The vertical frequency-integrated optical
depth 3
at height x is given by
![[EQUATION]](img17.gif)
where is the disk surface
density, is the Rosseland opacity
and x is the height in units of
, h being the local scale
height. This expression is used to find the photospheric height
which enters the equation giving the
angle of incident stellar radiation (Eq. (5) in CG97). In writing
Eq. (3), we assumed that is a
function of temperature only, which is true as long as dust dominates
the opacity, i.e., for K. The
temperature, opacity, mean molecular weight, and angle of incident
stellar radiation are found iteratively, using a Newton-Raphson
scheme. In the horizontal plane, the disk is assumed to extend up to
the radius where the temperature goes down to 10K. Fig. 1 shows
the resulting disk profile for a mass accretion rate of 3
![[FORMULA]](img23.gif) yr-1
(valid for a typical CTTS) and for a viscosity parameter
.
This value of is currently favored
in theoretical work on accretion disk MHD turbulence (cf. Balbus &
Hawley 1998). Stellar parameters entering the computation represent a
typical CTTS:
,
, and K7 spectral type. The dark area
shows the optically thick disk (in the vertical direction) while the
thin dotted lines delineate levels of constant vertical optical depths
in the disk atmosphere, corresponding to
and
.
![[FIGURE]](img41.gif) |
Fig. 1. CTTS disk profile. The dark-shaded (dark red) area shows the vertical disk photosphere ( ) while the thin dotted lines show contours of equal vertical optical depth with values ranging from 10-1 down to 10 The medium-shaded (yellow) area indicated the range of view angles over which the central star is totally obscured by the disk. The light-shaded (light blue) area indicates the range of view angles where partial occultation of the star can be expected. The thick dotted (red) line, corresponding to , shows how deep into the disk an outside observer sees at each view angle s.
|
Once the disk structure is computed, we set up a grid of sight
lines and compute the total optical depth through the disk
as a function of view angle
s. It is then straightforward to estimate the probability
![[EQUATION]](img44.gif)
to observe the central star through the optically thick disk, in
which case the YSO will be completely obscured, and the probability
![[EQUATION]](img45.gif)
to observe the central star through the disk outer layers.
In these definitions, and
are respectively the minimum view
angle at which the disk is still optically thick and the maximum view
angle for seeing the star free from disk obscuration (see
Fig. 1). If the disk atmosphere is inhomogeneous, a likely
possibility, we then expect variable occultation of the star by disk
matter when the system is viewed between
and
. The recurrence time-scale of
occultations will depend on both the size of obscuring clumps and
their location in the disk.
For the sake of illustration, we define
somewhat arbitrarily by the range of
view angles over which the disk has frequency-integrated optical
depths ranging from 0.1 to 10
(light-shaded area in Fig. 1). We should mention here that the
exact values of the integration limits are not critical in
Eqs. (4) and (5) above for and
. For the example shown in
Fig. 1, the view angle for is
while it is
for
, and the difference in
for these two values of the
integration limit is only 0.03. Similarly,
would be larger by 0.05 if the lower
limit of integration were 0.01 instead of 0.1.
Note that could be determined
empirically from the observed number of stars displaying occultations
in a statistically significant sample of young stars.
2.2. Results
Fig. 2 displays three different observation probabilities as a
function of mass accretion rate for the stellar parameters given
above. They are , which represents
the fraction of CTTSs that are missed in optical surveys since they
are extincted by more than
magnitudes, which is the probability
of observing occultation events with the assumptions discussed above,
and , the probability to view a disk
either edge-on or through its atmosphere. In order to bracket the
plausible range of observation probabilities, we consider two cases:
(a) reprocessing due to stellar luminosity only, and (b) reprocessing
due to both stellar and accretion luminosity, in the approximation
explained above. These two values bracket the plausible range of
probabilities, shown as shaded (colored) areas in Fig. 2. We
consider two values of the (uncertain) viscosity parameter
, which controls the disk density.
The left panel of 2 is for , while
the right papel is for . Typical
values of and
are 0.1-0.15 and 0.3-0.35 for
moderately active CTTSs with
![[FORMULA]](img62.gif) /yr
and , while the fraction of
(optically) unseen stars is At these
accretion rates, the accretion luminosity is smaller than the stellar
luminosity and does not play an important role in the disk flaring
properties. At the highest accretion rates envisioned here, the
accretion luminosity is larger than the stellar luminosity and the
disk mass becomes comparable to the mass of the central object.
![[FIGURE]](img72.gif) |
Fig. 2. Probabilities , , and as a function of mass accretion rate for computation parameters appropriate for a typical CTTS, shown for two values of . The shaded (colored) areas indicate the range of probabilities obtained when reprocessing only the stellar luminosity (lower values) and when both the stellar and the accretion luminosities are taken into account in the flaring computation (upper values).
|
Fig. 2 shows that all probabilities increase with the
accretion rate, or more precisely with the ratio
, which determines the disk surface
density. This is because the outer radius of the optically thick disk
(and consequently the extent of flaring, which goes approximately as
) increases with disk surface
density. Additionally, the flaring increases with increasing
reprocessed accretion luminosity. When
decreases, the outer disk regions
are less dense and flaring increases accordingly.
We now turn to stellar parameters representative of the UX Ori
class:
,
,
K (Natta et al. 1999).
Fig. 3 displays the results; typical values of
and
are 0.2 and 0.45 for
![[FORMULA]](img79.gif) /yr
and , while the fraction of optically
unseen stars is close to . Note that
for a given mass accretion rate, the occultation probability is
somewhat lower for UX Ori than for a CTTS. This is because the
gravitational pull exerted by the star on the disk is stronger
(stellar radius does not increase as fast as mass), resulting in a
smaller extent of the flare. In the framework of our simple model, the
frequency of Type III variability is thus controlled primarily by the
mass accretion rate. The different frequencies of Type III variability
observed in HAEBESs and CTTSs (Herbst et al. 1994) then implies that
mass accretion rates in UX Ori stars must be larger by one to two
orders of magnitude than in CTTSs, in rough agreement with current
estimates.
![[FIGURE]](img81.gif) |
Fig. 3. Same as Fig. 2, but for computation parameters appropriate for UX Ori.
|
Summarizing, we find that the probability of observing occultation
events in YSOs is typically 0.10-0.15 in late-type, low-mass CTTSs and
0.15-0.25 in higher mass UX Ori objects. These results suggest
that direct observational study of the disk structure may be possible
for a sizable fraction of YSOs and that stellar occultations by
flaring circumstellar disks might be the only physical process needed
to account for CTTS Type III and UX Ori variability. This last
conclusion, however, needs to be confirmed by detailed studies of
UX Ori objects in the light of the occultation model, as well as
by statistical studies of the occultation occurrences.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 2000
Online publication: December 5, 2000
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |