![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 319, 669-672 (1997) 4. Discussion and conclusionWhen interpreting the observed prominence emission lines, one has
to consider that theoretical models generally assume they are
optically thin. Thicker prominences are modelled by superpositions of
several intrinsically thin slabs, the number of threads along the
line-of-sight then determining the final brightness. However, the
physical slab width influences e.g. the He singlet-to-triplet ratio.
The calculations by Heasley et al. (1974) and by Heasley & Milkey
(1976) show that this ratio is sensitive to the optical thickness in
the He 584 Å resonance line. In the optically thin
case, photons escape in the He 584 line leading to a depopulation
of the lower level of the He 6678 transition. In the optically
thick case, this depopulation is reduced and the
He 6687-to-He 4471 emission ratio increases. Higher
non-thermal line broadening, Comparing our quasi-simultaneous, high resolution obervations with
the model calculations by Heasley & Milkey (1976), we find that
our largest singlet-to-triplet ratios of 0.25 (filled squares in
Fig. 1) require thicker slabs than assumed in the models,
explaining the increase of the singlet-to-triplet ratios. Indeed,
The high slab widths are also required to explain the significantly
low He-D3 -to- The faint isolated knots at the top of the prominences (ejecta)
which exhibit high He-D3 / Besides the line ratios, the absolute line emissions, E, of our
prominences are much higher than the values calculated by Heasley
& Milkey (1976; Tables 1, 2). The theoretical models could
achieve higher emissions via larger optical thickness
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1997 Online publication: July 3, 1998 ![]() |