 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 332, 877-903 (1998)
Appendix A: setting up a photometric index probing the chemical peculiarities in barium stars
To be able to compare in a homogeneous way the level of chemical
peculiarities in different barium stars is clearly of paramount
importance when trying to identify the mass transfer scenario that
operated in these stars. A key constraint may indeed be obtained by
assessing whether or not there is a correlation between the level of
chemical peculiarities and some dynamical parameter like the orbital
period. As detailed abundance analyses are only available for a small
subset of barium stars, the aim of this Appendix is to design a
photometric index available for (nearly) all barium stars and probing
their chemical peculiarities.
Lü et al. (1983) and Lü (1991) pointed out that barium
stars segregate according to their Ba index (as defined in the scale
of Warner 1965 from visual inspection of the strength of the Ba
line) in the
color-color diagram constructed from DDO photometric indices (see
McClure & van den Bergh 1968). This segregation is caused by the
so-called Bond-Neff depression, a broad absorption feature present in
the spectrum of barium stars and extending from about 350 to
450 nm (Bond & Neff 1969; Lü & Sawyer 1979). A veil
of many heavy-element lines has been proposed as the origin of this
broad feature (McWilliam & Smith 1984; Wing 1985, and references
therein), though that issue is still controversial as CN bands are
also important contributors in this spectral region (Tripicco &
Bell 1991).
According to these findings, it may be expected that a photometric
index of the form be related to the level of
chemical peculiarities in barium stars (see Fig. 4 of Lü
1991). The m and n parameters in the above relation may
actually be chosen so as to yield the maximum correlation between
and some given abundance indicator. McWilliam
(1988, 1990) showed that the abundance ratio YII/TiII, derived from
the YII and TiII
lines, is a powerful indicator for detecting heavy-element abundance
peculiarities in red giants, since (i) that abundance ratio is
relatively insensitive to the atmospheric parameters, and (ii) the
distribution of YII/TiII ratios in a sample of about 600 G - K giants
is very narrow, with a FWHM of only 0.3 dex centered at
log(YII/TiII) (adopted as normalization value
for [YII/TiII] in the following).
The index has therefore been calibrated in
terms of [YII/TiII] abundances, using 131 G and K giants for which
both DDO colors (McClure & Forrester 1981) and abundances
(McWilliam 1990) are available.
The value is obtained by requiring maximum
linear correlation between [Y/Ti] and for that
sample, and ensures that barium stars have
, whereas nearly all normal giants have
(Fig. A.1).
![[FIGURE]](img244.gif) |
Fig. A.1.
The color index vs. [YII/TiII] for 131 G - K giants with DDO colors from McClure & Forrester (1981) and abundances from McWilliam (1990). Typical error bars have been indicated. Double-circled triangles identify the barium stars HD 116713, HD 139195, HD 204075, HD 202109 and HD 212320, whereas squares correspond to heavy element-rich stars according to McWilliam (1990), not previously reported as barium stars (see text). Strong CN stars from the list of Keenan, Yorka & Wilson (1987) have been represented by single-circled triangles
|
Although the expected trend is clearly present (taking into account
the dex uncertainty on [Y/Ti]), there
are a few stars in `forbidden' regions [namely (i) non-barium stars
[Y/Ti] with , or (ii)
possible barium stars [Y/Ti] with
], degrading the ability of the
index to identify barium stars. The two stars
(HR 7754 and HR 8590) in region (ii) were not
previously identified as barium stars. HR 7754 is in fact present
in the list of MK standards provided by Keenan & McNeil (1989),
and there is no mention whatsoever of the barium nature of that star,
classified as G9III. Apart from the fact that HR 7754 is member
of a complex multiple visual system, there is currently no clue as to
the origin of this discrepancy.
Stars in region (i) ([Y/Ti] ,
) may actually be bright giants or CN-strong
stars, spilling somewhat over into the region of barium stars. It is
indeed clear from the [ ] diagram
(Fig. A.2), where the fiducial loci of dwarfs, giants and Ib
supergiants from McClure & Forrester (1981) have been indicated,
that Ib supergiants with may be found among
barium stars. As CN bands are strong contributors to the the
index (Tripicco & Bell 1991), CN-strong
stars tend to have indices smaller than average
as well, and some (like HR 3905) may also contaminate region (i)
(Fig. A.2).
![[FIGURE]](img252.gif) |
Fig. A.2.
The color index vs. for barium stars (open squares: Ba0 - Ba1, open triangles: Ba2 - Ba3, filled circles: Ba4 - Ba5). The loci of main sequence stars (class V), subgiant stars (class IV), giant stars (class III) and supergiant stars (class Ib), as provided by McClure & Forrester (1981), are indicated by the various lines. Small dots correspond to 131 G - K giants common to the samples of McClure & Forrester (1981) and McWilliam (1990), as plotted in Fig. A.1. Double-circled and single-circled symbols identify the same stars as in Fig A.1. The arrow corresponds to a reddening by
|
No reddening correction has been applied to the stars plotted in
Fig. A.2. According to the reddening correction factors provided
by McClure (1979), reddening is expected to have a very limited impact
on the index, as the de-reddened index writes
.
Despite ambiguities in identifying barium stars when
is close to 0, smaller values of that index
correlate fairly well with heavy-element overabundances, as indicated
by the barium stars present in Fig. A.1. In fact, a similar
correlation was already obtained for the closely-related
index defined by Jorissen et al. (1992b) from
Strömgren photometry.
With the adopted normalization, mild barium stars typically have
while strong barium stars (with Ba4 and Ba5
indexes) have .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: March 30, 1998
helpdesk@link.springer.de  |