J/A+A/459/307   Fe XVIII Benchmarking atomic data            (Del Zanna+, 2006)

Benchmarking atomic data for astrophysics: Fe XVIII. Del Zanna G. <Astron. Astrophys., 459, 307-316 (2006)> =2006A&A...459..307D 2006A&A...459..307D
ADC_Keywords: Atomic physics Keywords: atomic data - X-rays: stars - techniques: spectroscopic Abstract: Fe XVIII produces, in the X-ray and extreme ultraviolet, L-shell (n=2,3,4->2) spectral lines which are among the brightest ones in e.g. solar flares and in Chandra, XMM-Newton spectra of active stars. Recent R-matrix scattering calculations of Witthoeft et al. (2006A&A...446..361W 2006A&A...446..361W) produce theoretical intensities for some of the brightest transitions increased by large factors (2-3), so it is timely to use these calculations to review and assess all previous line identifications on a quantitative basis. This paper discusses only the most important lines for laboratory and astrophysical applications. Many previous identifications are revised and some tentative ones finally confirmed. Many lines are found to be significantly blended. A considerable number of new identifications are proposed. Excellent agreement between observed and predicted intensities is found in the majority of cases for the first time. It is therefore now possible to use Fe XVIII L-shell lines to measure electron densities in laboratory plasmas and temperatures for a wide range of astrophysical sources. Description: ************************************************************************** * * * Sorry, but the author(s) never supplied the tabular material * * (full table 2 and table A1) announced in the paper * * * ************************************************************************** File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 14 23 The configurations used to calculate the energy levels and the radiative data table2.dat 107 128 The details of some of the levels in the most important configurations in Fe XVIII table3.dat 120 71 Line identifications -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/A+A/433/731 : Fe XII Benchmarking atomic data (Del Zanna+, 2005) J/A+A/422/731 : Fe X Benchmarking atomic data (Del Zanna+, 2004) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 A3 --- Code Configuration code 5- 14 A10 --- Conf Configuration -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- Index Energy level index 5- 64 A60 --- Conf Configuration and percentage mixing 66- 77 A12 --- Level Level 79- 87 F9.1 cm-1 E Energy (best estimate) 89- 92 I4 cm-1 e_E rms uncertainty on Ebest (1) 94- 99 I6 cm-1 E-Enist ?=- Best energy minus NIST v.3 energy Enist: energy as in the NIST database 102-107 I6 cm-1 E-Ecc ?=- Best energy minus CC energy (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): The uncertainties in the energies reflect the estimated errors in the wavelength measurements. Levels with uncertain identification are assigned an uncertainty of 5000cm-1. Note (2): Ecc: energy from the scattering calculation from Witthoeft et al., 2006A&A...446..361W 2006A&A...446..361W -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 I1 --- i i level 2 A1 --- --- [-] 3- 5 I3 --- j j level 7- 12 E6.2 ph RInt12 Relative intensity at 1012cm-3 (1) 14- 19 E6.2 ph RInt19 Relative intensity at 1019cm-3 (1) 21- 27 F7.3 0.1nm LambdaB Best wavelength 29- 30 I2 0.1pm e_LambdaB ? rms uncertainty on LambdaBest 33 A1 --- --- [?] 34- 40 F7.3 0.1nm LambdaO Observed wavelength 42- 44 I3 0.1pm e_LambdaO rms uncertainty on LambdaObs 47- 51 A5 --- Ref Reference (3) 52- 65 A14 --- Blend Blend (2) 69- 98 A30 --- SameID Reference for same identification (3) 99-120 A22 --- DiffID Reference for different identification (3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): The relative intensities (in photons, at densities 1012, 1019cm-3) were scaled to the strong 1-56+1-55 14.204Å blend, and calculated at logT=6.8 Note (2): Some blends are indicated as follows: bl = blend bl u = blend with an unidentified line Note (3): References as follows: Bo70 = Boiko et al., 1970, Opt. Spectrosc., 29, 1023 Bo78 = Boiko et al., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Rad. Trans., 19, 11 Br77a = Bromage et al., 1977, MNRAS, 178, 599 Br77 = Bromage et al., 1977, RAL Report, 170 Co68 = Cohen et al., 1968 J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1917-1983), 58, 331 Co92 = Cornille et al., 1992, A&A, 259, 669 Dere78 = Dere, 1978ApJ...221.1062D 1978ApJ...221.1062D Do75 = Doschek et al., 1975, ApJ, 196, L83 Fa67 = Fawcett et al., 1967, Proc. Phys. Soc., 89, 863 Fe73 = Feldman et al., 1973, J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1917-1983), 63, 1445 Fe73b = Feldman et al., 1973, ApJ, 183, L43 P84 = Peacock et al., 1984, Phys. Scri. T, 8, 10 Ph82 = Phillips et al., 2001MNRAS.325.1500P 2001MNRAS.325.1500P -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 11-May-2007
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line