J/A+A/609/A17 AMIGA XIII. HI properties (Jones+, 2018)
The AMIGA sample of isolated galaxies.
XIII. The HI content of an almost "nurture free" sample.
Jones M.G., Espada D., Verdes-Montenegro L., Huchtmeier W.K., Lisenfeld U.,
Leon S., Sulentic J., Sabater J., Jones D.E., Sanchez S., Garrido J.
<Astron. Astrophys. 609, A17 (2018)>
=2018A&A...609A..17J 2018A&A...609A..17J (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Galaxy catalogs ; Galaxies, spectra ; H I data ; Radio lines ;
Radial velocities ; Redshifts ; Galaxies, nearby
Keywords: galaxies: evolution - galaxies: interactions - radio lines: ISM -
surveys
Abstract:
We present the largest catalogue of HI single dish observations of
isolated galaxies to date, as part of the multi-wavelength compilation
being performed by the AMIGA project (Analysis of the interstellar
Medium in Isolated GAlaxies). Despite numerous studies of the HI
content of galaxies, no revision has been made for the most isolated
L* galaxies since Haynes & Giovanelli (1984AJ.....89..758H 1984AJ.....89..758H).
The AMIGA sample has been demonstrated to be almost "nurture free",
therefore, by creating scaling relations for the HI content of these
galaxies we will define a metric of HI normalcy in the absence of
interactions.
The catalogue comprises of our own HI observations with Arecibo,
Effelsberg, Nancay and GBT, and spectra collected from the literature.
In total we have measurements or constraints on the HI masses of 844
galaxies from the Catalogue of Isolated Galaxies (CIG). The
multi-wavelength AMIGA dataset includes a revision of the B-band
luminosities, optical diameters, morphologies, and isolation. Due to
the large size of the catalogue, these revisions permit cuts to be
made to ensure isolation and a high level of completeness, which was
not previously possible. With this refined dataset we fit HI scaling
relations based on luminosity, optical diameter and morphology. Our
regression model incorporates all the data, including upper limits,
and accounts for uncertainties in both variables, as well as distance
uncertainties.
The HI scaling relations of the AMIGA sample define an up-to-date
metric of the HI content of almost "nurture free" galaxies. These
relations allow the expected HI mass, in the absence of interactions,
of an individual galaxy to be predicted to within 0.25dex (for
typical measurement uncertainties). These relations are thus suitable
for use as statistical measures of the impact of interactions on the
neutral gas content of galaxies.
Description:
We present our compilation of global HI properties of CIG galaxies
from single dish 21cm observations. The data are approximately 50%
our own observations and 50% data from the literature, as indicated in
the tables themselves. All spectra were re-processed to produce a data
set that is as uniform as possible. The data (including literature
data) were collected with Arecibo, Effelsberg, Jodrell Bank, Nancay,
Parkes, and various Green Bank telescopes.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
tableb1.dat 124 844 The observed HI properties of CIG galaxies
tableb2.dat 49 844 Derived HI properties of CIG galaxies
tableb3.dat 29 844 Flags
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
VII/82 : Catalogue of Isolated Galaxies (Karachentseva+ 1986)
J/A+A/411/391 : AMIGA project. Revised positions for CIG galaxies (Leon+ 2003)
J/A+A/449/937 : AMIGA II. Morphological refinement (Sulentic+, 2006)
J/A+A/462/507 : AMIGA III. IRAS data (Lisenfeld+, 2007)
J/A+A/470/505 : AMIGA IV. Neighbours around CIG galaxies (Verley+, 2007)
J/A+A/472/121 : AMIGA V. Isolation parameters (Verley+, 2007)
J/A+A/485/475 : AMIGA VI. Radio fluxes of the isolated galaxies (Leon+ 2008)
J/A+A/486/73 : AMIGA VII. FIR and radio study (Sabater+, 2008)
J/A+A/532/A117 : AMIGA VIII. Flux ratio asymmetry parameter (Espada+, 2011)
J/A+A/534/A102 : AMIGA IX. Molecular gas properties (Lisenfeld+, 2011)
J/A+A/540/A47 : AMIGA X. Isolated galaxy colors (Fernandez Lorenzo+, 2012)
J/A+A/545/A15 : AMIGA XI. Optical nuclear activity (Sabater+, 2012)
J/A+A/560/A9 : AMIGA XII. Revision of isolation (Argudo-Fernandez+, 2013)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- CIG [1-1051] CIG (VII/82), <K73 NNNN> in Simbad
6- 10 F5.1 mJy Speak ? Peak 21cm flux density
12- 15 F4.1 mJy rms Root mean squared noise of spectrum
17- 20 F4.1 mJy rms10 Root mean squared noise scaled to 10km/s
channels
22- 25 F4.1 km/s dv Spectral channel width
27- 28 I2 --- Nsmo ? Number of channels smoothed over
30- 34 F5.1 --- snrp ? Peak signal-to-noise ratio
36- 40 F5.1 --- snri ? Integrated signal-to-noise ratio
42- 47 F6.2 Jy.km/s Sint ? Integrated 21cm flux
49- 52 F4.2 Jy.km/s e_Sint ? Random error in integrated 21cm flux
54- 57 F4.2 --- cbeam ? Estimated beam correction factor
59- 64 F6.2 Jy.km/s Sintc ? Corrected integrated 21cm flux
66- 72 F7.1 km/s V50 ? Heliocentric velocity measured at 50% level
74- 78 F5.1 km/s e_V50 ? Error in heliocentric velocity
80- 83 F4.2 --- z50 ? Heliocentric redshift
85- 89 F5.1 km/s W50 ? Velocity width measured at 50% level
91- 95 F5.1 km/s e_W50 ? Error in velocity width
97-100 F4.1 km/s cinst ? Estimated instrumental broadening
102-105 F4.2 --- ccosmo ? Inverse cosmological broadening factor
107-111 F5.1 km/s W50c ? Corrected velocity width
113 I1 --- Det [0/2]? Detection code (1)
115 I1 --- Qual [0/1]? Spectrum quality code (2)
117-119 A3 --- Tel Telescope code of observation
121-124 A4 --- Ref ? Reference code of spectrum (If blank the
observation was performed by AMIGA team) (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Detection code as follows:
0 = detection
1 = non-detections
2 = marginal
Note (2): Spectrum quality code as follows:
0 = OK
1 = Caution (see tableb3.dat)
Note (3): Reference code of spectrum as follows:
BC81 = Balkowski & Chamaraux (1981A&A....97..223B 1981A&A....97..223B)
Bi86 = Bicay & Giovanelli (1986AJ.....91..705B 1986AJ.....91..705B)
Bo85 = Bothun et al. (1985AJ.....90.2487B 1985AJ.....90.2487B)
Co09 = Courtois et al. (2009, Cat. J/AJ/138/1938)
HG80 = Haynes & Giovanelli (1980ApJ...240L..87H 1980ApJ...240L..87H)
HG84 = Haynes & Giovanelli (1984AJ.....89..758H 1984AJ.....89..758H)
HG91 = Haynes & Giovanelli (1991ApJS...77..331H 1991ApJS...77..331H)
Ha11 = Haynes et al. (2011, Cat. J/AJ/142/170)
He83 = Hewitt et al. (1983AJ.....88..272H 1983AJ.....88..272H)
Hu95 = Huchtmeier et al. (1995A&A...300..675H 1995A&A...300..675H)
KLUN = Kinematics of the Local Universe, long term project with the data
compiled in many papers (Bottinelli et al. 1992A&AS...93..173B 1992A&AS...93..173B,
1993, Cat. J/A+AS/102/57; Theureau et al. 1998, Cat. J/A+AS/130/333,
2005, Cat. J/A+A/430/373, 2007, Cat. J/A+A/465/71)
Le83 = Lewis et al. (1983AJ.....88.1695L 1983AJ.....88.1695L)
Le85 = Lewis et al. (1985ApJS...59..161L 1985ApJS...59..161L)
Lu93 = Lu et al. (1993ApJS...88..383L 1993ApJS...88..383L)
MS88 = Mirabel & Sanders (1988ApJ...335..104M 1988ApJ...335..104M)
Ma14 = Masters et al. (2014, Cat. J/MNRAS/443/1044)
Me04 = Meyer et al. (2004MNRAS.350.1195M 2004MNRAS.350.1195M, Cat. VIII/73)
RH87 = Richter & Huchtmeier (1987A&AS...68..427R 1987A&AS...68..427R)
Ru76 = Rubin et al. (1976AJ.....81..687R 1976AJ.....81..687R)
SD87 = Staveley-Smith & Davies (1987MNRAS.224..953S 1987MNRAS.224..953S)
Sc92 = Schneider et al. (1992, Cat. J/ApJS/81/5)
Sp05 = Springob et al. (2005ApJS..160..149S 2005ApJS..160..149S, Cat. VIII/77)
TC88 = Tifft & Cocke (1988ApJS...67....1T 1988ApJS...67....1T)
Th05 = Theureau et al. (2005, Cat. J/A+A/430/373)
Th98 = Theureau et al. (1998, Cat. J/A+AS/130/333)
vD95 = van Driel et al. (1995ApJ...444...80V 1995ApJ...444...80V)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 4 I4 --- CIG [1-1051] CIG (VII/82), <K73 NNNN> in Simbad
6- 10 I5 km/s HRV Heliocentric velocity
12- 16 I5 km/s Vmod Recession velocity corrected with Mould+2000
flow model
18- 22 F5.1 Mpc Dmod Distance = Vmod/70 (we assume h70=1)
24- 26 F3.1 Mpc e_Dmod Error in distance (including H0 uncertainty)
28- 32 F5.2 [Msun] log(MHI) ? log(HI mass) (we assume h70=1)
34- 37 F4.2 [Msun] e_log(MHI) ? Error in log(HI mass)
39- 41 I3 km/s WTFR Velocity width estimated from Tully-Fisher
relation of Torres-Flores+2010
43- 47 F5.2 [Msun] log(MHI)l 5-sigma limit on log(HI mass)
49 I1 --- l_log(MHI) [0/1] Limit code (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Limit code as follows:
1 = log(MHI)l should be used
0 = log(MHI) value should be used
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2- 5 I4 --- CIG [1-1051] CIG (VII/82), <K73 NNNN> in Simbad
8 A1 --- Iso [0/1] Isolation flag (1)
11 A1 --- Comp [0/1] Completeness flag (2)
14 I1 --- Interp [0/1]? Interpolation flag (3)
17 I1 --- Singpeak [0/1]? Single peak flag (4)
20 I1 --- Midpeak [0/1]? Middle peak flag (5)
23 I1 --- Offspike [0/1]? Offset spike flag (6)
26 I1 --- Radvel [0/1]? Radio velocity flag (7)
29 I1 --- Digit [0/1]? Digitisation flag (8)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Isolation flag as follows:
0 = isolated
1 = not isolated
Note (2): Completeness flag as follows:
0 = in complete sample
1 = not in complete sample
Note (3): Interpolation flag as follows:
0 = spectrum fit without interpolating
1 = spectrum interpolated during fit
Note (4): Single peak flag as follows:
0 = profile is double horned
1 = profile has single peak
Note (5): Middle peak flag as follows:
0 = profile max is in one of the horns
1 = profile max occurs between the two horns
Note (6): Offset spike flag as follows:
0 = normal spectral profile
1 = (noise) spike near profile
Note (7): Radio velocity flag as follows:
0 = no correction
1 = original spectrum was deemed to be recorded in radio velocity and was
corrected
Note (8): Digitisation flag as follows:
0 = digital spectrum used
1 = no digital spectrum was available and a spectrum image was digitised
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acknowledgements:
Michael Jones, mjones(at)iaa.es
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 01-Dec-2017