J/A+A/677/A144  RoboPol sample of optical polarimetric standards (Blinov+, 2023)

The RoboPol sample of optical polarimetric standards. Blinov D., Maharana S., Bouzelou F., Casadio C., Gjerlow E., Jormanainen J., Kiehlmann S., Kypriotakis J.A., Liodakis I., Mandarakas N., Markopoulioti L., Panopoulou G.V., Pelgrims V., Pouliasi A., Romanopoulos S., Skalidis R., Anche R.M., Angelakis E., Antoniadis J., Medhi B.J., Hovatta T., Kus A., Kylafis N., Mahabal A., Myserlis I., Paleologou E., Papadakis I., Pavlidou V., Papamastorakis I., Pearson T.J., Potter S.B., Ramaprakash A.N., Readhead A.C.S., Reig P., Slowikowska A., Tassis K., Zensus J.A. <Astron. Astrophys., 677, A144 (2023)> =2023A&A...677A.144B 2023A&A...677A.144B (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Stars, standard ; Polarization ; Optical Keywords: polarization - techniques: polarimetric - standards Abstract: Optical polarimeters are typically calibrated using measurements of stars with known and stable polarization parameters. However, there is a lack of such stars available across the sky. Many of the currently available standards are not suitable for medium and large telescopes due to their high brightness. Moreover, as we find, some of the polarimetric standards used are in fact variable or have polarization parameters that differ from their cataloged values. Our goal is to establish a sample of stable standards suitable for calibrating linear optical polarimeters with an accuracy down to 10-3 in fractional polarization. For 4yr, we have been running a monitoring campaign of a sample of standard candidates comprised of 107 stars distributed across the northern sky. We analyzed the variability of the linear polarization of these stars, taking into account the non-Gaussian nature of fractional polarization measurements. For a subsample of nine stars, we also performed multiband polarization measurements. We created a new catalog of 65 stars (see table 2) that are stable, have small uncertainties of measured polarimetric parameters, and can be used as calibrators of polarimeters at medium and large telescopes. Description: We obtained 1044 polarization measurements of 107 stars using two different polarimeters. Most observations were performed in the Cousins R-band and the SDSS r'-band with the RoboPol polarimeter along a 4-yr time interval. After applying a variability analysis to these monitoring data, we selected 65 stars that have five or more measurements and do not demonstrate significant variability in linear polarization in the red bands. These stars are listed in Table 2, and they can be used as optical polarimetric standards for calibration of instrumental polarization. For 24 stars, we did not have enough data to conclude whether they are variable or stable, while the remaining 18 stars were found to exhibit significant variability in polarization. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table2.dat 94 65 Average polarization parameters of stable (2σ S.L.) stars in the established standards sample tablea1.dat 110 107 Standards candidates sample information tablea3.dat 89 53 Multiband single epoch measurements with ALFOSC/NOT for 9 stars tablea4.dat 86 107 Average polarization parameters of the sample stars -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 15 A15 --- ID Star identifier 17- 18 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 20- 21 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 23- 27 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 29 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 30- 31 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 33- 34 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 36- 39 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 41- 49 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) 51- 58 F8.5 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) 60- 66 F7.4 --- q Weighted average Q/I relative Stokes parameter corrected for the instrumental polarization and EVPA zero-point 68- 73 F6.4 --- e_q Error on weighted average Q/I relative Stokes parameter 75- 81 F7.4 --- u Weighted average U/I relative Stokes parameter corrected for the instrumental polarization and EVPA zero-point 83- 88 F6.4 --- e_u Error on eighted average U/I relative Stokes parameter 90- 94 F5.2 mag Gmag Gaia DR3 G magnitude -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 15 A15 --- ID Star identifier 18- 32 A15 --- OName Alternative identifier 34- 35 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 37- 38 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 40- 44 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 46 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 47- 48 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 50- 51 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 53- 57 F5.2 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 59- 77 I19 --- GaiaEDR3 Gaia EDR3 id 79- 83 F5.2 mag rpmag ?=- Synthetic SDSS r' magnitude from Gaia Collaboration et al. (2022) 85- 89 F5.2 mag Gmag Gaia EDR3 G-band magnitude 91-103 A13 --- SpType Spectral type 105 A1 --- Sample [BLHZ] Sample 107 I1 --- Nrband Number of observations in the SDSS-r band 109-110 I2 --- NRband Number of observations in the Cousins-R band -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 18 A18 --- ID Star identifier 20 A1 --- Band [UBVRgri] Observed band 22- 28 F7.5 --- q Relative Stokes parameter Q/I 30- 36 F7.5 --- e_q Relative Stokes parameter Q/I error 38- 46 F9.5 --- u Relative Stokes parameter U/I 48- 55 F8.5 --- e_u Relative Stokes parameter U/I error 57- 64 F8.5 % PD Fractional polarization 66- 72 F7.5 % e_PD Fractional polarization error 74- 81 F8.5 deg EVPA Electric vector position angle 83- 89 F7.5 deg e_EVPA Electric vector position angle error -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 15 A15 --- ID Star identifier 17- 18 I2 --- Nmeas Number of measurements 20- 24 F5.3 % PD Mean of the fractional polarization 26- 30 F5.3 % e_PD Mean of the fractional polarization error 32- 36 F5.1 deg EVPA Mean of the electric vector position angle 38- 41 F4.1 deg e_EVPA Mean of the electric vector position angle error 43- 50 F8.5 --- q Relative Stokes parameter Q/I 52- 58 F7.5 --- e_q Relative Stokes parameter Q/I error 60- 67 F8.5 --- u Relative Stokes parameter U/I 69- 75 F7.5 --- e_u Relative Stokes parameter U/I error 77- 78 A2 --- VarFlag Variability flag for 2σ S.L. (1) 80- 86 F7.5 --- pvalue ?=- p value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Variability flag as follows: NV = stands for non-variable V = variable UN = uncertain -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: Copied at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/IV9TXX
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 23-Nov-2023
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line