J/A+A/677/A35           15 SMC cluster VI photometry             (Saroon+, 2023)

The VISCACHA survey. VIII. Chemical evolution history of Small Magellanic Cloud west halo clusters. Saroon S., Dias B., Tsujimotto T., Parisi M.C., Maia F., Kerber L., Bekki K., Minniti D., Oliveira R.A.P., Westera P., Katime Santrich O.J., Bica E., Sanmartim D., Correa Quint B., Fraga L. <Astron. Astrophys. 677, A35 (2023)> =2023A&A...677A..35S 2023A&A...677A..35S (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Magellanic Clouds ; Associations, stellar ; Photometry, CCD ; Optical Keywords: galaxies: dwarf - galaxies : interactions - Magellanic Clouds - galaxies: clusters: general Abstract: The chemical evolution history of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) has been a matter of debate for decades. The challenges in understanding the SMC chemical evolution are related to a very slow star formation rate (SFR) combined with bursts triggered by the multiple interactions between the SMC and the Large Magellanic Cloud, a significant (∼0.5dex) metallicity dispersion for the SMC cluster population younger than about 7.5Gyr, and multiple chemical evolution models tracing very different paths through the observed age-metallicity relation of the SMC. There is no doubt that these processes were complex. Therefore, a step-by-step strategy is required in order to better understand the SMC chemical evolution. We adopted an existing framework to split the SMC into regions on the sky, and we focus on the west halo in this work, which contains the oldest and most metal-poor stellar populations and is moving away from the SMC, that is, in an opposite motion with respect to the Magellanic Bridge. We present a sample containing ∼60% of all west halo clusters to represent the region well, and we identify a clear age-metallicity relation with a tight dispersion that exhibits a 0.5dex metallicity dip about 6Gyr ago. We ran chemical evolution models and discuss possible scenarios to explain this metallicity dip, the most likely being a major merger accelerating the SFR after the event. This merger should be combined with inefficient internal gas mixing within the SMC and different SFRs in different SMC regions because the same metallicity dip is not seen in the AMR of the SMC combining clusters from all regions. We try to explain the scenario to better understand the SMC chemo-dynamical history. Description: Photometric parameters for 15 clusters in the SMC west halo region is given. The following clusters have been observed using the the 4.1 m Southern Astronomical Research (SOAR) telescope, which has a Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) module. The data is collected based on observations obtained at SOAR (projects SO2016B-018, SO2017B-014, CN2018B-012, SO2019B-019, SO2020B-019, SO2021B-017) for the VISCACHA survey. Objects: ----------------------------------------------------------- RA (2000) DE Designation(s) ----------------------------------------------------------- 00 52 37.99 -72 48 01.0 SMC = Small Magellanic Cloud ----------------------------------------------------------- File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 61 15 Best fitted parameters for the 15 SMC west halo clusters analysed in this work k9.dat 83 3656 K9 cluster positions and magnitudes b1.dat 83 1143 B1 cluster positions and magnitudes ngc152.dat 83 5408 NGC152 cluster positions and magnitudes b2.dat 83 730 B2 cluster positions and magnitudes k6.dat 83 1500 K6 cluster positions and magnitudes k8.dat 83 2047 K8 cluster positions and magnitudes b4.dat 83 1891 B4 cluster positions and magnitudes k7.dat 83 2804 K7 cluster positions and magnitudes l14.dat 83 3393 L14 cluster positions and magnitudes k11.dat 83 1413 K11 cluster positions and magnitudes l2.dat 83 771 L2 cluster positions and magnitudes hw1.dat 83 1531 HW1 cluster positions and magnitudes am3.dat 83 327 AM3 cluster positions and magnitudes hw5.dat 83 1996 HW5 cluster positions and magnitudes ngc121.dat 83 5697 NGC121 cluster positions and magnitudes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 6 A6 --- Cluster Cluster name 8- 12 F5.2 Gyr Age Age of the cluster derived from the best fitted isochrone 14- 17 F4.2 Gyr e_Age Error in the age estimate 19- 23 F5.2 --- [Fe/H] Metallicity of the cluster derived from the best fitted isochrone 25- 29 F5.3 --- e_[Fe/H] Error in the metallicity estimate 31- 34 F4.1 kpc D Distance of the cluster derived from the best fitted isochrone 36- 39 F4.2 kpc e_D Error in the distance estimate 41- 44 F4.2 mag Av Reddening value of the cluster derived from the best fitted 46- 50 F5.3 mag e_Av Error in the reddening estimate 52- 61 A10 --- Table Name of the table with VI photometry -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: am*.dat b*.dat hw*.dat k*.dat ngc*.dat l*.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 18 F18.14 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (J2000) 20- 37 F18.14 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) 39- 47 F9.6 mag Vmag ?=- V magnitude 49- 60 F12.10 mag e_Vmag ?=- Error in V magnitude 62- 70 F9.6 mag Imag ?=- I magnitude 72- 83 F12.10 mag e_Imag ?=- Error in I magnitude -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: S. Saroon, saroonsasi19(at)gmail.com References: Maia et al., Paper I 2019MNRAS.484.5702M 2019MNRAS.484.5702M Santos et al., Paper II 2020MNRAS.498..205S 2020MNRAS.498..205S Dias et al., Paper III 2021A&A...647L...9D 2021A&A...647L...9D Dias et al., Paper IV 2022MNRAS.512.4334D 2022MNRAS.512.4334D Bica et al., Paper V 2022MNRAS.517L..41B 2022MNRAS.517L..41B Rodriguez et al., Paper VI 2023MNRAS.519.3357R 2023MNRAS.519.3357R
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 15-Jul-2023
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line