J/A+A/688/A159      Blueberry galaxies up to 200Mpc     (Kouroumpatzakis+, 2024)

Blueberry galaxies up to 200 Mpc and their optical/infrared properties, Kouroumpatzakis K., Svoboda J., Zezas A., Borkar A., Kyritsis E., Boorman P.G., Daoutis C., Adamcova B., Grossova R. <Astron. Astrophys. 688, A159 (2024)> =2024A&A...688A.159K 2024A&A...688A.159K (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, optical ; Galaxies, IR ; Equivalent widths ; Optical Keywords: galaxies: dwarf - galaxies: general - galaxies: ISM - galaxies: starburst - galaxies: star formation - galaxies: stellar content Abstract: Dwarf highly star-forming galaxies dominated the early Universe and are considered the main driver of its reionization. Direct observations of these very distant galaxies are limited mainly to rest-frame ultraviolet and visible wavelengths, and as a result, some of their properties are out of reach. Therefore, the study of their local analogs, the Green Pea (GP) and Blueberry (BB) galaxies is still of paramount importance. This work aims to expand the number of known BBs to smaller distances and the south equatorial sky. In addition to the already known, this new sample of BBs allows for a statistically significant study of their properties probed by visible and infrared (IR) light. We utilize HECATE, a catalog of galaxies up to 200Mpc, which provides optical/IR photometry and characterization of the sources. To select and analyze the sample, we adopt the Pan-STARSS and SDSS optical photometries, and MPA-JHU analysis for sources having spectroscopic observations. Benefited by the multiwavelength coverage, we perform spectral energy distribution fitting to provide homogeneous star-formation rates and stellar masses. The selected BBs are compared with GPs and other dwarf star- forming galaxies (SFGs). This work has identified 48 BBs out of which 40 are newly discovered. The nearest BB lies at 19Mpc while 14 BBs are in the south equatorial sky. The BBs tend to be extremely IR red in both WISE W1-W2 and W2-W3 colors, located in different positions in this diagram compared to typical SFGs. Overall, dwarf SFGs with higher specific star-formation rates tend to have redder IR colors. Although GPs and BBs share many similarities, the latter are the most intensively star-forming sources of the local Universe among dwarf galaxies. Overall BBs are intrinsically bluer in visible light, redder in the IR, less massive, have higher specific star-formation rates and equivalent widths, lower metallicities, and have the most strongly ionized interstellar medium compared to typical SFGs and GPs. Description: table23.dat combines Tables 2, and 3 shown in the paper. It also includes alternative SFR, and stellar mass measurements by MPA-JHU and HECATE, and the emission-line fluxes measured with FADO. Table 2: The observed g-r, and r-i colors of the BBs of this work from the different photometries. The sources are arranged in ascending order based on their weighted average g-r color. Table 3: Redshift, distances, sizes, stellar masses, sSFR, metallicities, EWs, and the HeII lambda4684 of the proposed BBs. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table23.dat 714 48 Observed g-r, and r-i colors from the different photometries, redshift, distances, sizes, stellar masses, sSFR, metallicities, EWs of the proposed Blueberry galaxies (BBs) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table23.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 --- BB [1/48] In-text identification (ID) 6- 12 I7 --- PGC PGC ID (PGC) 16- 25 F10.6 deg RAdeg Right ascension (J2000) (RAdeg) 27- 36 F10.6 deg DEdeg Declination (J2000) (DEdeg) 38- 42 F5.2 mag rmagcMod SDSS MPA-JHU r magnitude (cModelMag_r) 44- 47 F4.2 mag e_rmagcMod SDSS MPA-JHU model r magnitude error (cModelMagre) 49- 53 F5.2 mag g-rcMod ? SDSS MPA-JHU model g-r colour (cModelMag_(g-r)) 55- 58 F4.2 mag e_g-rcMod ? SDSS MPA-JHU g-r colour error (cModelMag(g-r)e) 60- 79 F20.17 mag g-rPetro ? SDSS MPA-JHU Petro g-r colour (Petro_(g-r)) 81- 84 F4.2 mag e_g-rPetro ? SDSS MPA-JHU Petro g-r colour error (Petro(g-r)e) 86- 90 F5.2 mag g-rKron ? Pan-STARRS Kron g-r colour (Kron_(g-r)) 92- 95 F4.2 mag e_g-rKron ? Pan-STARRS Kron g-r colour error (Kron(g-r)e) 97-101 F5.2 mag g-rPSF ? Pan-STARRS PSF g-r colour (PSF_(g-r)) 103-106 F4.2 mag e_g-rPSF ? Pan-STARRS PSF g-r colour error (PSF(g-r)e) 108-112 F5.2 mag r-icMod ? SDSS MPA-JHU model r-i colour (cModelMag_(r-i)) 114-117 F4.2 mag e_r-icMod ? SDSS MPA-JHU model r-i colour error (cModelMag(r-i)e) 119-139 F21.18 mag r-iPetro ? SDSS MPA-JHU Petro r-i colour (Petro_(r-i)) 141-144 F4.2 mag e_r-iPetro ? SDSS MPA-JHU Petro r-i colour error (Petro(r-i)e) 146-150 F5.2 mag r-iKron ? Pan-STARRS Kron r-i colour (Kron_(r-i)) 152-155 F4.2 mag e_r-iKron ? Pan-STARRS Kron r-i colour error (Kron(r-i)e) 157-161 F5.2 mag r-iPSF ? Pan-STARRS PSF r-i colour (PSF_(r-i)) 163-166 F4.2 mag e_r-iPSF ? Pan-STARRS PSF r-i colour error (PSF(r-i)e) 168-187 F20.18 --- z ? Redshift SDSS MPA-JHU (z) 189-193 F5.1 Mpc Dist ? Distance based on redshift or HECATE (Dist) 195-197 F3.1 kpc Size ? Size based on distance and major axis size (Size) 199-202 F4.2 [Msun] logMstarSED ? SED fitting stellar mass (logMstarSED) 204-207 F4.2 [Msun] e_logMstarSED ? SED fitting stellar mass lower error (logMstarSED_el) 209-212 F4.2 [Msun] E_logMstarSED ? SED fitting stellar mass upper error (logMstarSED_eu) 214-217 F4.2 [Msun] logMstarHEC ? HECATE stellar mass (logMstarHEC) 219-235 F17.15 [Msun] logMstarMPA-JHU ? SDSS MPA-JHU stellar mass (logMstarMPA-JHU) 237-240 F4.2 [Msun] e_logMstarMPA-JHU ? SDSS MPA-JHU stellar mass error (logMstarMPA-JHU_e) 242-246 F5.2 [Msun/yr] logSFRSED ? SED fitting star formation rate (logSFRSED) 248-251 F4.2 [Msun/yr] e_logSFRSED ? SED fitting star formation rate lower error (logSFRSED_el) 253-256 F4.2 [Msun/yr] E_logSFRSED ? SED fitting star formation rate upper error (logSFRSED_eu) 258-262 F5.2 [Msun/yr] logSFRHEC ? HECATE star formation rate (logSFRHEC) 264-283 F20.17 [Msun/yr] logSFRMPA-JHU ? SDSS MPA-JHU star formation rate (logSFRMPA-JHU) 285-288 F4.2 [Msun/yr] e_logSFRMPA-JHU ? SDSS MPA-JHU star formation rate error (logSFRMPA-JHU_e) 290-310 F21.15 --- 12+log(O/H) ? SDSS MPA-JHU 12+log(O/H) abundance (12+log(O/H)) 312-315 F4.2 --- e_12+log(O/H) ? SDSS MPA-JHU 12+log(O/H) abundance error (12+log(O/H)_e) 317-335 F19.15 0.1nm EWOII ? SDSS MPA-JHU OII_3726 equivalent width (OII3726EQW) 337-355 F19.16 0.1nm e_EWOII ? SDSS MPA-JHU OII_3726 equivalent width error (OII3726EQW_e) 357-377 F21.14 0.1nm EWHb ? SDSS MPA-JHU Hβ equivalent width (HBETAEQW) 379-396 F18.16 0.1nm e_EWHb ? SDSS MPA-JHU Hβ equivalent width error ( eHBETAEQWe) 398-417 F20.14 0.1nm EWOIII ? SDSS MPA-JHU OIII_5007 equivalent width (OIII5007EQW) 419-436 F18.15 0.1nm e_EWOIII ? SDSS MPA-JHU OIII_5007 equivalent width error (OIII5007EQW_e) 438-457 F20.14 0.1nm EWHa ? SDSS MPA-JHU Hα equivalent width (HALPHAEQW) 459-477 F19.16 0.1nm e_EWHa ? SDSS MPA-JHU Hα equivalent width error (HALPHAEQW_e) 479-484 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFHeIIFADO ? FADO HeII_4686 flux (FADOlogHeII4686f) 486-489 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFHeIIFADO ? FADO HeII_4686 flux error (FADOlogHeII4686f_e) 491-496 F6.1 0.1nm EWHeIIFADO ? FADO HeII_4686 equivalent width (FADOHeII4686_EW) 498-503 F6.1 0.1nm e_EWHeIIFADO ? FADO HeII_4686 equivalent width error (FADOHeII4686EWe) 505-510 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFHbFADO ? FADO Hβ flux (FADOlogHBETAf) 512-515 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFHbFADO ? FADO Hβ flux error (FADOlogHBETAf_e) 517-521 F5.1 0.1nm EWHbFADO ? FADO Hβ flux equivalent width (FADOHBETA_EW) 523-528 F6.1 0.1nm e_EWHbFADO ? FADO Hβ flux equivalent width error (FADOHBETAEWe) 530-535 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFOIII1FADO ? FADO OIII_4959 flux (FADOlogOIII4959f) 537-540 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFOIII1FADO ? FADO OIII_4959 flux error (FADOlogOIII4959f_e) 542-546 F5.1 0.1nm EWOIII1FADO ? FADO OIII_4959 equivalent width (FADOOIII4959_EW) 548-551 F4.1 0.1nm e_EWOIII1FADO ? FADO OIII_4959 equivalent width error (FADOOIII4959EWe) 553-558 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFOIII2FADO ? FADO OIII_5007 flux (FADOlogOIII5007f) 560-563 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFOIII2FADO ? FADO OIII_5007 flux error (FADOlogOIII5007f_e) 565-570 F6.1 0.1nm EWOIII2FADO ? FADO OIII_5007 equivalent width (FADOOIII5007_EW) 572-576 F5.1 0.1nm e_EWOIII2FADO ? FADO OIII_5007 equivalent width error (FADOOIII5007EWe) 578-583 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFOIFADO ? FADO OI_6300 flux (FADOlogOI6300f) 585-588 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFOIFADO ? FADO OI_6300 flux error (FADOlogOI6300f_e) 590-592 F3.1 0.1nm EWOIFADO ? FADO OI_6300 equivalent width (FADOOI6300_EW) 594-596 F3.1 0.1nm e_EWOIFADO ? FADO OI_6300 equivalent width error (FADOOI6300EWe) 598-603 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFNII1FADO ? FADO NII_6548 flux (FADOlogNII6548f) 605-613 F9.2 [mW/m2] e_logFNII1FADO ? FADO NII_6548 flux error (FADOlogNII6548f_e) 615-618 F4.1 0.1nm EWNII1FADO ? FADO NII_6548 equivalent width (FADONII6548_EW) 620-622 F3.1 0.1nm e_EWNII1FADO ? FADO NII_6548 equivalent width error (FADONII6548EWe) 624-629 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFHaFADO ? FADO Hα flux (FADOlogHALPHAf) 631-634 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFHaFADO ? FADO Hα flux error (FADOlogHALPHAf_e) 636-641 F6.1 0.1nm EWHaFADO ? FADO Hα equivalent width (FADOHALPHA_EW) 643-647 F5.1 0.1nm e_EWHaFADO ? FADO Hα equivalent width error (FADOHALPHAEWe) 649-654 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFNII2FADO ? FADO NII_6583 flux (FADOlogNII6583f) 656-659 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFNII2FADO ? FADO NII_6583 flux error (FADOlogNII6583f_e) 661-664 F4.1 0.1nm EWNII2FADO ? FADO NII_6583 equivalent width (FADONII6583_EW) 666-668 F3.1 0.1nm e_EWNII2FADO ? FADO NII_6583 equivalent width error (FADONII6583EWe) 670-675 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFSII1FADO ? FADO SII_6716 flux (FADOlogSII6716f) 677-680 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFSII1FADO ? FADO SII_6716 flux error (FADOlogSII6716f_e) 682-685 F4.1 0.1nm EWSII1FADO ? FADO SII_6716 equivalent width (FADOSII6716_EW) 687-689 F3.1 0.1nm e_EWSII1FADO ? FADO II_6716 equivalent width error (FADOSII6716EWe) 691-696 F6.2 [mW/m2] logFSII2FADO ? FADO SII_6731 flux (FADOlogSII6731f) 698-701 F4.2 [mW/m2] e_logFSII2FADO ? FADO SII_6731 flux error (FADOlogSII6731f_e) 703-706 F4.1 0.1nm EWSII2FADO ? FADO SII_6731 equivalent width (FADOSII6731_EW) 708-710 F3.1 0.1nm e_EWSII2FADO ? FADO SII_6731 equivalent width error (FADOSII6731EWe) 712-714 F3.1 --- Compact [0/1] Compact? No (0) or Yes (1) by visual inspection (Compact) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Konstantinos Kouroumpatzakis, konstantinos.koouroumpatzakis(at)asu.cas.cz References: Kovlakas et al., 2021MNRAS.506.1896K 2021MNRAS.506.1896K
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 06-May-2024
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line