J/A+A/688/A34          Strong lenses KiDS DR4                   (Grespan+, 2024)

TEGLIE: Transformer encoders as strong gravitational lens finders in KiDS. From simulations to surveys. Grespan M., Thuruthipilly H., Pollo A., Lochner M., Biesiada M., Etsebeth V. <Astron. Astrophys. 688, A34 (2024)> =2024A&A...688A..34G 2024A&A...688A..34G (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Gravitational lensing ; Redshifts Keywords: gravitational lensing: strong - methods: data analysis - catalogs Abstract: We applied a state-of-the-art transformer algorithm to the 221deg2 of the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) to search for new strong gravitational lenses (SGLs). We tested four transformer encoders trained on simulated data from the Strong Lens Finding Challenge on KiDS data. The best performing model was fine-tuned on real images of SGL candidates identified in previous searches. To expand the dataset for fine-tuning, data augmentation techniques were employed, including rotation, flipping, transposition, and white noise injection. The network fine-tuned with rotated, flipped, and transposed images exhibited the best performance and was used to hunt for SGLs in the overlapping region of the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) and KiDS surveys on galaxies up to z=0.8. Candidate SGLs were matched with those from other surveys and examined using GAMA data to identify blended spectra resulting from the signal from multiple objects in a GAMA fiber. Fine-tuning the transformer encoder to the KiDS data reduced the number of false positives by 70%. Additionally, applying the fine-tuned model to a sample of ∼5000000 galaxies resulted in a list of ∼51000 SGL candidates. Upon visual inspection, this list was narrowed down to 231 candidates. Combined with the SGL candidates identified in the model testing, our final sample comprises 264 candidates, including 71 high-confidence SGLs; of these 71, 44 are new discoveries. We propose fine-tuning via real augmented images as a viable approach to mitigating false positives when transitioning from simulated lenses to real surveys. While our model shows improvement, it still does not achieve the same accuracy as previously proposed models trained directly on galaxy images from KiDS with added simulated lensing arcs. This suggests that a larger fine- tuning set is necessary for a competitive performance. Additionally, we provide a list of 121 false positives that exhibit features similar to lensed objects, which can be used in the training of future machine learning models in this field. Description: The KiDS (de Jong et al. (2013Msngr.154...44D 2013Msngr.154...44D); de Jong, Jelte T. A. et al. (2015A&A...582A..62D 2015A&A...582A..62D, 2017A&A...604A.134D 2017A&A...604A.134D ); Kuijken et al. (2019A&A...625A...2K 2019A&A...625A...2K )) is a European Southern Observatory (ESO) public wide-field medium-deep optical four-band imaging survey with the main aim of investigating weak lensing. It is carried out with an OmegaCAM camera (Kuijken, 2011Msngr.146....8K 2011Msngr.146....8K) mounted on the VST (Capaccioli & Schipani, 2011Msngr.146....2C 2011Msngr.146....2C) at the Paranal Observatory in Chile. We use the data from the KiDS Data Release 4 (DR4). List of the strong lenses found, divided by grade, found during the testing of the models and on the 221deg2 of KiDS overlapping with GAMA. All_graded.dat file contains all the machine learning candidates from the 221deg2 of KiDS overlapping with GAMA with respective grade given by the visual inspector. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file tablea1.dat 116 71 List of the strong lenses, grade 1 tablec1.dat 51 193 List of the strong lenses, grade 2 table6.dat 76 51627 Machine learning candidates -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/344 : KiDS-ESO-DR2 multi-band source catalog (de Jong+, 2015) II/347 : KiDS-ESO-DR3 multi-band source catalog (de Jong+, 2017) https://kids.strw.leidenuniv.nl/DR4 : KiDS DR4 Home Page Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 --- ID [0/70] Object Identifier in the publication 4- 19 A16 --- KiDSTile Pointing in AW convention in which the object has been observed in KiDS DR4 21- 41 A21 --- KiDSID Object ID (JHHMMSS.sss+DDMMSS.ss, ICR coordinates) 43- 50 F8.4 deg RAdeg Centroid sky position right ascension (J2000) 52- 59 F8.4 deg DEdeg Centroid sky position declination (J2000) 61- 64 F4.2 --- zphot BPZ photometric redshift estimation from BPZ code from KiDS DR4 66- 69 F4.2 --- zspec ? AUTOZ spectroscopic redshift estimate of the blended spectra of the first correlation peak from GAMA DR4 (AATSpecAutozAllv27_DR4 catalog) 71- 74 F4.2 --- zspec2 ? AUTOZ spectroscopic redshift estimate of the blended spectra from GAMA DR4 of the second correlation peak (AATSpecAutozAllv27_DR4 catalog) 76- 79 A4 --- test Identifier of the paper section in which the candidate has been detected 81-116 A36 --- Crosscheck Additional comments on previous detections of the object -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablec1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- ID [0/192] Object Identifier in the publication 5- 25 A21 --- KiDSID Object ID (JHHMMSS.sss+DDMMSS.ss, ICR coordinates) 27- 34 F8.4 deg RAdeg Centroid sky position right ascension (J2000) 36- 43 F8.4 deg DEdeg Centroid sky position declination (J2000) 45- 48 F4.2 --- zphot BPZ photometric redshift estimation from BPZ code from KiDS DR4 50- 51 A2 --- test Identifier of the paper section in which the candidate has been detected -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 I5 --- ID [0/51626] Object Identifier in the publication 7- 22 A16 --- KiDSTile Pointing in AW convention in which the object has been observed in KiDS DR4 24- 44 A21 --- KiDSID Object ID (JHHMMSS.sss+DDMMSS.ss, ICR coordinates) 46- 53 F8.4 deg RAdeg Centroid sky position right ascension (J2000) 55- 62 F8.4 deg DEdeg Centroid sky position declination (J2000) 64- 67 F4.2 --- zphot BPZ photometric redshift estimation from BPZ code from KiDS DR4 69- 71 F3.1 --- Grade [0/3] Object grade after visual inspection (1) 73- 76 F4.2 --- Prob Predicition probability given by the model -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Grade as follows: 1 = Most likely a Strong lens 2 = Possibly a Strong Lens 3 = Object exhibiting lensing-like features, 0No lensing features are present -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Margherita Grespan, margherita.grespan(at)ncbj.gov.pl
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 12-Jun-2024
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line