J/A+A/693/A268  Hot sub-luminous and binaries variability (Ranaivomanana+, 2025)

Variability of hot sub-luminous stars and binaries: Machine learning analysis of Gaia DR3 multi-epoch photometry. Ranaivomanana P., Uzundag M., Johnston C., Groot P.J., Kupfer T., Aerts C. <Astron. Astrophys. 693, A268 (2025)> =2025A&A...693A.268R 2025A&A...693A.268R (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Stars, variable ; Stars, subdwarf ; Binaries, orbits ; Optical Keywords: methods: data analysis - methods: statistical - techniques: photometric - surveys - subdwarfs - stars: variables: general Abstract: Hot sub-luminous stars represent a population of stripped and evolved red giants located at the Extreme Horizontal Branch (EHB). Since they exhibit a wide range of variability due to pulsations or binary interactions, unveiling their intrinsic and extrinsic variability is crucial for understanding the physical processes responsible for their formation. In the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, they overlap with interacting binaries such as Cataclysmic Variables (CVs). By leveraging cutting-edge clustering algorithm tools, we investigate the variability of 1,576 hot subdwarf variable candidates using comprehensive data from Gaia DR3 multi-epoch photometry and Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) observations. We present a novel approach that utilises the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and the Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) dimensionality reduction algorithms to facilitate the identification and classification of different populations of variable hot subdwarfs and Cataclysmic Variables in a large dataset. In addition to the publicly available Gaia time-series statistics table, we adopt extra statistical features that enhance the performance of the algorithms. The clustering results lead to the identification of 85 new hot subdwarf variables based on Gaia and TESS lightcurves and 108 new variables based on Gaia lightcurves alone, including reflection-effect systems, HW Vir, ellipsoidal variables, and high-amplitude pulsating variables. A significant number of known Cataclysmic Variables (140) distinctively cluster in the 2-D feature space among an additional 152 objects that we consider new Cataclysmic Variable candidates. This study paves the way for more efficient and comprehensive analyses of stellar variability from both ground and space-based observations, as well as the application of machine learning classifications of variable star candidates in large surveys. Description: Catalogue consisting of new and previously known variables identified from 1576 candidate and known hot subdwarfs. The variability type classification is based on Gaia light curves and, where available, confirmed by TESS light curves for identified variable hot subdwarfs. For cataclysmic variables (CVs), the classification relies on existing classifications from the literature. New CV candidates are presented for objects in Cluster 2 that have no matches in the literature. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file tablea4.dat 91 63 Variability of 63 confirmed hot subdwarfs identified from Gaia and TESS tablea5.dat 93 78 Variability of 78 candidate hot subdwarfs identified from Gaia and TESS tablea6.dat 76 134 New variables (134) identified from candidate hot subdwarfs with Gaia lightcurves alone tablea7.dat 76 15 New variables (15) identified from known hot subdwarfs with Gaia lightcurves alone tablea8.dat 83 140 List of 140 known CVs from Cluster 2 tablea9.dat 57 152 List of 152 candidate CVs from Cluster 2 identified in this work -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: I/355 : Gaia DR3 Part 1. Main source (Gaia Collaboration, 2022) Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea4.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 49 F9.6 d PerG Gaia G-band period 51- 57 E7.2 10-2d e_PerG Gaia G-band period uncertainty 59- 67 F9.6 d PerT TESS period 69- 75 E7.2 10-2d e_PerT TESS period uncertainty 77- 88 A12 --- Type Variability type 90- 91 A2 --- Ref Reference (G1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea5.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 49 F9.6 d PerG Gaia G-band period 51- 57 E7.2 10-2d e_PerG Gaia G-band period uncertainty 59- 68 F10.6 d PerT TESS period 70- 76 E7.2 10-2d e_PerT TESS period uncertainty 78- 90 A13 --- Type Variability type 92- 93 A2 --- Ref Reference (g1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea6.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 50 F10.6 d PerG Gaia G-band period 52- 58 E7.2 10-2d e_PerG Gaia G-band period uncertainty 60- 76 A17 --- Type Variability type -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea7.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 49 F9.6 d PerG Gaia G-band period 51- 57 E7.2 10-2d e_PerG Gaia G-band period uncertainty 59- 74 A16 --- Type Variability type 76 A1 --- Ref Reference (G1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea8.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 48 F8.6 d PerT ?=- TESS period 50- 57 F8.6 10-2d e_PerT ?=- TESS period uncertainty 59- 66 F8.6 d Porb ?=- Orbital period from the literature 68- 81 A14 --- Type CV type 83 A1 --- Ref Reference (G1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tablea9.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source ID 21- 29 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 31- 39 F9.5 deg DEdeg Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 41- 48 F8.6 d PerT ?=- TESS period 50- 57 E8.6 10-2d e_PerT ?=- TESS period uncertainty -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global notes: Note (G1): References as follows: 2 = Uzundag at al., 2024A&A...684A.118U 2024A&A...684A.118U 3 = Schaffenroth et al., 2019A&A...630A..80S 2019A&A...630A..80S 4 = Barlow et al., 2022ApJ...928...20B 2022ApJ...928...20B 5 = Canbay et al., 2023AJ....165..163C 2023AJ....165..163C 6 = hou et al., 2023AJ....165..148H 2023AJ....165..148H 7 = Culpan et al., 2022A&A...662A..40C 2022A&A...662A..40C 8 = Geier et al., 2017A&A...600A..50G 2017A&A...600A..50G 9 = Krzesinski et al. (in prep) TW = This Work -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Princy Ranaivomanana, rtprincy(at)gmail.com
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 06-Dec-2024
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line