J/A+A/695/A48    Young stellar pop. in Carina nebula and Car OB1 (Goeppl+, 2025)

Spatial distribution and clustering properties of the young stellar populations in the Carina Nebula complex and Car OB1. Goeppl C., Preibisch T. <Astron. Astrophys. 695, A48 (2025)> =2025A&A...695A..48G 2025A&A...695A..48G (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, open ; Associations, stellar ; Stars, O ; Stars, B-type Keywords: stars: formation - stars: kinematics and dynamics - stars: pre-main sequence Abstract: We use Gaia DR3 astrometry and photometry to analyze the spatial distribution of the young stellar populations and stellar clusters, and to search for new OB star candidates in the Carina Nebula Complex and the full extent (∼5°, corresponding to ∼200pc) of the Car OB1 association. First, we perform a new census of high-mass stars in Car OB1 and compile a comprehensive catalog of 517 stars with known spectral types (128 O-type, WR, and supergiant stars, and 389 B-type stars) which have Gaia DR3 parallaxes consistent with membership in the association. We apply the clustering algorithm DBSCAN on the Gaia DR3 data of the region to find stellar clusters, determine their distances and kinematics, and estimate ages. We also use Gaia astrometry and the additional astrophysical_parameterstable to perform a spatially unbiased search for further high-mass members of Car OB1 over the full area of the association. Our DBSCAN analysis finds 15 stellar clusters and groups in Car OB1, four of which were not known before. Most clusters (80%) show signs of expansion/contraction, four of them with >2σ significance. We find a global expansion of the Car OB1 association with a velocity of vout=5.25±0.02km/s. A kinematic traceback of the high-mass stars shows that the spatial extent of the association was at a minimum 3-4 Myr ago. Using astrophysical parameters by Gaia DR3, we identify 15 new O-type and 589 new B-type star candidates in Car OB1. The majority (>54%) of the high-mass stars constitutes a non-clustered, distributed stellar population. Based on our sample of high-mass stars we estimate a total stellar population of at least ∼8*104stars in Car OB1. Our study is the first systematic astrometric analysis that covers the full spatial extent of the Car OB1 association, and therefore substantially increases the knowledge of the distributed stellar population and spatial evolution of the whole association. It suggests Car OB1 to be the most massive known star-forming complex in our Galaxy. Description: Table B1 contains the mean astrometric parameters for all clusters found with DBSCAN. Table B2 contains the astrometric parameters, spectral type, effective temperature, to which population (clustered or distributed) a star belongs, and how the star was selected, for all Car OB1 high-mass stars and OB candidates. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file tableb1.dat 242 462 Mean astrometric parameters for all clusters found with DBSCAN tableb2.dat 205 1374 Astrometric parameters, spectral type, effective temperature, to which population (clustered or distributed) a star belongs, and how the star was selected, for all Car OB1 high-mass stars and OB candidates -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: I/355 : Gaia DR3 (Gaia Collaboration, 2022) Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 I3 --- Seq Cluster number 5- 7 I3 --- NMem Number of cluster members 9- 26 F18.14 deg RAdeg Weighted mean of right ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 28- 46 F19.15 deg DEdeg Weighted mean of declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 48- 66 F19.16 mas/yr pmRA Weighted mean of proper motion in right ascension 68- 85 F18.16 mas/yr pmDE Weighted mean of proper motion in declination 87-105 F19.17 mas plx Weighted parallax mean 107-127 F21.19 mas e_plx Standard deviation of weighted parallax mean 129-132 I4 kpc Dist ? Kalkayotl mean distance 134-137 I4 kpc b_Dist ? 16th percentile Kalkayotl distance confidence interval 139-142 I4 kpc B_Dist ? 84th percentile Kalkayotl distance confidence interval 144-201 A58 --- OName Cluster counterpart in literature 203-220 A18 --- Ref ? Reference for counterpart (1) 222 A1 --- CarOB1 [Y/N] Cluster part of Car OB1 224-242 A19 --- subclusters Subcluster associated with each other reference -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): References as follows: B19 = Bica et al., 2019AJ....157...12B 2019AJ....157...12B, Cat. J/AJ/157/12 C18 = Cantat-Gaudin et al., 2018A&A...618A..93C 2018A&A...618A..93C, Cat. J/A+A/618/A93 C20 = Cantat-Gaudin et al., 2020A&A...640A...1C 2020A&A...640A...1C, Cat. J/A+A/640/A1 CJ20 = Castro-Ginard et al., 2020A&A...635A..45C 2020A&A...635A..45C. Cat. J/A+A/635/A45 C22 = Castro-Ginard et al., 2022A&A...661A.118C 2022A&A...661A.118C. Cat. J/A+A/661/A118 D03 = Dutra et al., 2003A&A...400..533D 2003A&A...400..533D, Cat. J/A+A/400/533 D14 = Dias et al., 2014A&A...564A..79D 2014A&A...564A..79D, Cat. J/A+A/564/A79 F11 = Feigelson et al., 2011ApJS..194....9F 2011ApJS..194....9F, Cat. J/ApJS/194/9 H22 = Hao et al., 2022A&A...660A...4H 2022A&A...660A...4H, J/A+A/660/A4 H23 = Hunt & Reffert, 2023A&A...673A.114H 2023A&A...673A.114H, Cat. J/A+A/673/A114 K05 = Kharchenko et al., 2005A&A...440..403K 2005A&A...440..403K, Cat. J/A+A/440/403 K06 = Kronberger et al., 2006A&A...447..921K 2006A&A...447..921K, Cat. J/A+A/447/921 K13 = Kharchenko et al., 2013A&A...558A..53K 2013A&A...558A..53K, Cat. J/A+A/558/A53 K14 = Kuhn et al., 2014ApJ...787..107K 2014ApJ...787..107K, Cat. J/ApJ/787/107 O18 = Oliveira et al., 2018MNRAS.476..842O 2018MNRAS.476..842O P11 = Preibisch et al., 2011A&A...530A..34P 2011A&A...530A..34P S10 = Smith et al., 2010MNRAS.406..952S 2010MNRAS.406..952S T21 = Tarricq et al., 2021A&A...647A..19T 2021A&A...647A..19T, Cat. J/A+A/647/A19 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: tableb2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 8 A8 --- --- [Gaia DR3] 10- 28 I19 --- GaiaDR3 ? Gaia DR3 Designation 30- 59 A30 --- Name Star Name 61- 78 F18.14 deg RAdeg Gaia DR3 Right Ascension (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (1) 80- 98 F19.15 deg DEdeg Gaia DR3 Declination (ICRS) at Ep=2016.0 (1) 100-120 F21.18 mas plx ? Offset corrected Gaia DR3 parallax (2) 122-141 F20.18 mas e_plx ? Gaia DR3 parallax error 143-158 F16.10 K Teff-esphs ? Gaia DR3 effective temperature, teff_esphs 160-180 A21 --- SpType ? Spectral type 182-200 A19 --- r_SpType Reference for spectral type 202 A1 --- Pop [C/D] Star part of clustered (C) or distributed (D) population 204-205 A2 --- Selection High-mass star selection criteria (3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Star [AHP2016] OBc 59 has no Gaia DR3 counterpart, the right ascension and declination are taken from Alexander et al. (2016AJ....152..190A 2016AJ....152..190A). Note (2): The parallax offset was calculated with the algorithm provided by Lindegren et al. (2021A&A...649A...4L 2021A&A...649A...4L). Note (3): Selection criteria code as follows: L = literature TD = temperature plus DBSCAN T = temperature -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Acknowledgements: Christiane Goeppl, cgoeppl(at)usm.uni-muenchen.de
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 23-Jan-2025
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line