J/ApJ/797/116      Chemical properties of M31 star clusters     (Colucci+, 2014)
The detailed chemical properties of M31 star clusters.
I. Fe, alpha and light elements.
    Colucci J.E., Bernstein R.A., Cohen J.G.
   <Astrophys. J., 797, 116 (2014)>
   =2014ApJ...797..116C 2014ApJ...797..116C    (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Clusters, globular ; Equivalent widths ; Abundances, [Fe/H]
Keywords: galaxies: halos - galaxies: individual (M31) -
          galaxies: star clusters: general - Local Group - stars: abundances
Abstract:
    We present ages, [Fe/H] and abundances of the α elements CaI,
    SiI, TiI, TiII, and light elements MgI, NaI, and AlI for 31 globular
    clusters (GCs) in M31, which were obtained from high-resolution, high
    signal-to-noise ratio >60 echelle spectra of their integrated light
    (IL). All abundances and ages are obtained using our original
    technique for high-resolution IL abundance analysis of GCs. This
    sample provides a never before seen picture of the chemical history of
    M31. The GCs are dispersed throughout the inner and outer halo, from
    2.5kpc<RM31<117kpc.
Description:
    Our GC targets were chosen from the Revised Bologna Catalog (Galleti
    et al. 2004, Cat. J/A+A/416/917), and have all been previously
    spectroscopically confirmed as members of the M31 GC system. Our
    selection criteria required that the GCs be more luminous than
    V∼17mag, but less luminous than V∼15mag.
    We obtained high-resolution IL spectra of the M31 GCs using the HIRES
    echelle spectrograph on the Keck I telescope. The data were taken over
    several observing runs from 2008 to 2012. In all observing runs, we
    used identical setups that utilized the D3 decker, which has a slit
    size of 1.7"x7.0" and spectral resolution of R=24,000, which is
    sufficient to resolve individual spectral lines of GCs with
    vσ≥7km/s.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FileName      Lrecl  Records   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe            80        .   This file
table1.dat        71       32   Observations and cluster properties
table2.dat        61       26   Velocity dispersions and radial velocities
table3.dat        37       14   EW versus synthesis analysis
table4.dat       109      164   M31 GC FeI equivalent widths
table5.dat        63       83   M31 GC FeI synthesis abundances
table6.dat        50       31   M31 GC ages and FeI abundances
table7.dat       182      100   M31 GC line abundances
table8.dat        82       31   M31 GC mean abundances
table9.dat        84       31   M31 GC abundances continued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
  V/143           : Revised Bologna Catalog of M31 clusters V.5 (Galleti+, 2012)
  VII/195         : Globular Clusters in the Milky Way (Harris, 1996)
  J/AJ/119/727    : M31 globular clusters photometry (Barmby+, 2000)
  J/AJ/123/2490   : RV and [Fe/H] of M31 globular cluster system (Perrett+ 2002)
  J/A+A/416/917   : Rev. Bologna Cat. of M31 globular clusters (Galleti+, 2004)
  J/ApJS/161/304  : Star clusters in the MW and satellites (McLaughlin+, 2005)
  J/AJ/130/2140   : Abundances and velocities in GCs (Pritzl+, 2005)
  J/AJ/133/2764   : M31 GCs structural parameters (Barmby+, 2007)
  J/ApJ/704/385   : M31 integrated light abundances (Colucci+, 2009)
  J/A+A/508/1285  : Metallicity estimates of M31 GCs (Galleti+, 2009)
  J/MNRAS/402/803 : M31 globular cluster system (Peacock+, 2010)
  J/AJ/141/61     : Star clusters in M31. II. (Caldwell+, 2011)
  J/ApJ/735/55    : High-resolution GCs abundances. III. LMC (Colucci+, 2011)
  J/ApJ/746/29    : High-resolution GC abundances. IV. 8 LMC GCs (Colucci+ 2012)
  J/ApJS/199/37   : GALEX catalog of star clusters in M31 (Kang+, 2012)
  J/AJ/146/20     : Structural parameters for 79 GCs in M31 (Wang+, 2013)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---       Name      Cluster name
      11  A1    ---     f_Name      [*] Indicates a cluster analyzed in
                                     Colucci et al. 2009, Cat. J/ApJ/704/385 (1)
  13- 14  I2    h         RAh       Hour of Right Ascension (J2000)
  16- 17  I2    min       RAm       Minute of Right Ascension (J2000)
  19- 22  F4.1  s         RAs       Second of Right Ascension (J2000)
      24  A1    ---       DE-       Sign of the Declination (J2000)
  25- 26  I2    deg       DEd       Degree of Declination (J2000)
  28- 29  I2    arcmin    DEm       Arcminute of Declination (J2000)
  31- 34  F4.1  arcsec    DEs       Arcsecond of Declination (J2000)
  36- 40  F5.2  mag       Vmag      [14.15/16.91]? V band magnitude
  42- 45  F4.2  mag       E(B-V)    [0.05/0.46]? Reddening
      46  A1    ---     f_E(B-V)    [a-d] Flag on E(B-V) (2)
  48- 53  F6.2  kpc       RM31      [1.77/117.05]? Projected galactocentric
                                     radius from M31
  55- 58  I4    yr        Obs.Y     Year of Observation
  60- 62  A3    "month"   Obs.M     Month of Observation
  64- 66  F3.1  h         Texp      [1/6] Exposure time
  68- 70  I3    ---       S/N       [54/114]? Signal-to-Noise ratio
      71  A1    ---     f_S/N       [e] Indicates S/N of combined 2009 and 2011
                                     spectrum
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Results from Colucci et al. 2009 (Cat. J/ApJ/704/385) are reproduced
          here for completeness.
Note (2): Reddening values are taken from Caldwell et al. (2011, J/AJ/141/61),
          with exceptions defined as follows:
  a = Fan et al. (2008MNRAS.385.1973F 2008MNRAS.385.1973F),
  b = Mackey et al. (2007ApJ...655L..85M 2007ApJ...655L..85M),
  c = Barmby et al. (2007, Cat. J/AJ/133/2764),
  d = Mackey et al. (2010MNRAS.401..533M 2010MNRAS.401..533M)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units     Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---       Name     Cluster name
  12- 16  F5.2  km/s      sigma    [4.73/25.73] Velocity dispersion
  18- 21  F4.2  km/s    e_sigma    [0.37/1.24] Error on sigma
  23- 28  F6.1  km/s      RV       [-555.5/-53.1] Heliocentric radial velocity
  30- 32  F3.1  km/s    e_RV       [0.1/0.6] Error on RV
  34- 37  F4.1  km/s      sigmal   [6.8/27.2]? Velocity dispersion
                                    from the literature
  39- 41  F3.1  km/s    e_sigmal   [0.3/2.2]? Error on sigmal
  43- 48  F6.1  km/s      RVl      [-539/-55.8] Radial velocity
                                    from the literature
  50- 53  F4.1  km/s    e_RVl      [0.3/48] Error on RVl
  55- 61  A7    ---       Refs     References (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Where two references are listed, we have calculated the average of
          the two results and an error equal to the standard deviation in the
          mean. The references are defined as follows:
  1 = Strader et al. 2011AJ....142....8S 2011AJ....142....8S.
  2 = Galleti et al. 2004A&A...416..917G 2004A&A...416..917G.
  3 = Dubath & Grillmair 1997A&A...321..379D 1997A&A...321..379D.
  4 = Alves-Brito et al. 2009MNRAS.395L..34A 2009MNRAS.395L..34A.
  5 = Djorgovski et al. 1997ApJ...474L..19D 1997ApJ...474L..19D.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label     Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---     Name      Cluster Name
  12- 16  F5.2  ---     [Fe/H]    [-1.74/-0.26] [Fe/H] from the equivalent width
  18- 21  F4.2  ---   e_[Fe/H]    [0.15/0.4] Error on [Fe/H]
  23- 27  F5.2  ---     [Fe/H]s   [-1.81/-0.16] [Fe/H] from line synthesis
  29- 32  F4.2  ---   e_[Fe/H]s   [0.1/0.2] Error on [Fe/H]s
  34- 37  F4.1  km/s    v         [6.5/19.5] Velocity dispersion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units  Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  8  F8.3  0.1nm   lambda   [4005.25/8239.13] Wavelength in Angstroms (1)
  10- 14  F5.3  eV      EP       [0/4.77] Excitation potential
  16- 21  F6.3  [-]     log(gf)  [-5.28/0.65] Log oscillator strength times
                                  degeneracy
  23- 27  F5.1  10-13m  EWB006   [35.7/149.2]? FeI equivalent width in B006 (2)
  29- 33  F5.1  10-13m  EWB048   [34.1/148.9]? FeI equivalent width in B048 (2)
  35- 39  F5.1  10-13m  EWB088   [45.4/150.1]? FeI equivalent width in B088 (2)
  41- 45  F5.1  10-13m  EWB232   [50.5/149.6]? FeI equivalent width in B232 (2)
  47- 51  F5.1  10-13m  EWB235   [27.3/144.6]? FeI equivalent width in B235 (2)
  53- 57  F5.1  10-13m  EWB240   [32.1/146.8]? FeI equivalent width in B240 (2)
  59- 63  F5.1  10-13m  EWB311   [41.5/139.8]? FeI equivalent width in B311 (2)
  65- 69  F5.1  10-13m  EWB312   [40.3/199.7]? FeI equivalent width in B312 (2)
  71- 75  F5.1  10-13m  EWB383   [22.4/146.4]? FeI equivalent width in B383 (2)
  77- 81  F5.1  10-13m  EWB403   [37.2/189.7]? FeI equivalent width in B403 (2)
  83- 87  F5.1  10-13m  EWB514   [38.5/143.6]? FeI equivalent width in B514 (2)
  89- 93  F5.1  10-13m  EWG002   [35.9/143.5]? FeI equivalent width in G002 (2)
  95- 98  F4.1  10-13m  EWG327   [34.1/99.2]? FeI equivalent width in G327 (2)
 100-104  F5.1  10-13m  EWMCGC5  [36.4/144.3]? FeI equivalent width in MCGC5 (2)
 106-109  F4.1  10-13m  EWMGC1   [47.7/97.8]? FeI equivalent width in MGC1 (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Lines listed twice were measured in two orders with overlapping
          wavelength coverage.
Note (2): In units of milli-Angstroms.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units Label   Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  8  F8.3  0.1nm lambda  [4294.14/7583.79] Wavelength (in Angstroms)
  10- 13  F4.2  [-]   AB012   [5.2/6.2]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B012 (1)
  15- 18  F4.2  [-]   AB029   [6.7/7.4]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B029 (1)
  20- 23  F4.2  [-]   AB034   [6.3/7.1]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B034 (1)
  25- 28  F4.2  [-]   AB110   [6.5/7.1]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B110 (1)
  30- 33  F4.2  [-]   AB163   [6.5/7.3]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B163 (1)
  35- 38  F4.2  [-]   AB171   [6.8/7.9]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B171 (1)
  40- 43  F4.2  [-]   AB182   [5.9/7.0]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B182 (1)
  45- 48  F4.2  [-]   AB193   [6.8/7.6]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B193 (1)
  50- 53  F4.2  [-]   AB225   [6.6/7.3]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B225 (1)
  55- 58  F4.2  [-]   AB384   [6.5/7.1]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B384 (1)
  60- 63  F4.2  [-]   AB457   [5.8/6.9]? FeI synthesis log abundance in B457 (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Abundances for individual lines are measured in steps of 0.1dex from
          the mean abundance using all lines. The typical statistical
          measurement uncertainty of individual lines is 0.05dex. Note that
          these statistical uncertainties do not dominate the total uncertainty.
          See text for further discussion. Abundances for each GC are calculated
          using its CMD solution that has the oldest age.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---     Name     Cluster name
      11  A1    ---   f_Name     [*] Indicates a cluster analyzed in Colucci
                                  et al. 2009, Cat. J/ApJ/704/385 (1)
  13- 16  F4.1  Gyr     Age      Age
  18- 20  F3.1  Gyr     DAge     Delta Age
  22- 26  F5.2  [-]     [FeI/H]  Abundance [FeI/H]
  28- 29  I2    ---     N        Number of FeI lines measured
  31- 34  F4.2  ---   e_N        Statistical error of the mean FeI abundance (2)
  36- 39  F4.2  ---     sAge     Uncertainty due to the dependence of the final
                                  abundance on the age of the CMD (2)
  41- 44  F4.2  ---     sT       Final total uncertainty in abundance (2)
  46- 48  A3    ---     Fin      Final analysis performed with GETJOB (EW)
                                  or line synthesis (SYN)
      50  A1    ---     Com      Denotes whether solar-scaled (S) or
                                 α-enhanced (A) isochrones and stellar
                                 atmospheres were used in the final analysis.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Results from Colucci et al. 2009 (Cat. J/ApJ/704/385) are reproduced
          here for completeness.
Note (2): Final total uncertainty in abundance:
          σT=((σN/sqrt(N-1))2+σAge2)(1/2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file:table7.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units  Label    Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1-  5  A5    ---    Species  Species identifier
   7- 14  F8.3  0.1nm  lambda   [4122.66/7932.35] Wavelength in Angstroms
  16- 20  F5.3  eV     EP       [0/5.96] Excitation potential
  22- 27  F6.3  [-]    log(gf)  [-5.569/0.504]? Log of oscillator strength
                                 times degeneracy
  29- 32  F4.2  [-]    B006     [4.33/7.48]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B006
  34- 37  F4.2  [-]    B012     [3.51/7.59]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B012
  39- 42  F4.2  [-]    B029     [4.25/7.3]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B029
  44- 47  F4.2  [-]    B034     [3.99/7.57]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B034
  49- 52  F4.2  [-]    B045     [4.14/7.25]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B045
  54- 57  F4.2  [-]    B048     [3.79/7.2]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B048
  59- 62  F4.2  [-]    B088     [2.81/7.15]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B088
  64- 67  F4.2  [-]    B110     [4.04/7.19]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B110
  69- 72  F4.2  [-]    B163     [4.28/7.63]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B163
  74- 77  F4.2  [-]    B171     [3.99/7.73]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B171
  79- 82  F4.2  [-]    B182     [3.85/7.65]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B182
  84- 87  F4.2  [-]    B193     [4.33/7.82]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B193
  89- 92  F4.2  [-]    B225     [4.65/7.93]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B225
  94- 97  F4.2  [-]    B232     [3/7.41]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B232
  99-102  F4.2  [-]    B235     [3.96/6.81]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B235
 104-107  F4.2  [-]    B240     [3.34/7.22]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B240
 109-112  F4.2  [-]    B311     [3.16/6.5]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B311
 114-117  F4.2  [-]    B312     [3.75/6.99]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B312
 119-122  F4.2  [-]    B358     [2.64/6.91]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B358
 124-127  F4.2  [-]    B381     [3.92/6.77]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B381
 129-132  F4.2  [-]    B383     [4.17/7.22]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B383
 134-137  F4.2  [-]    B384     [4.17/7.23]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B384
 139-142  F4.2  [-]    B386     [3.71/7.33]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B386
 144-147  F4.2  [-]    B403     [3.83/7.08]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B403
 149-152  F4.2  [-]    B405     [3.49/7.48]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B405
 154-157  F4.2  [-]    B457     [3.57/6.52]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B457
 159-162  F4.2  [-]    B514     [3.2/6.51]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in B514
 164-167  F4.2  [-]    G002     [2.77/6.12]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in G002
 169-172  F4.2  [-]    G327     [3.36/6.32]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in G327
 174-177  F4.2  [-]    MCGC5    [3.21/6.67]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in MCGC5
 179-182  F4.2  [-]    MGC1     [3.36/6.42]? 12+log(X/H) abundance in MGC1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table8.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units    Label       Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---      Name        Cluster name
  12- 16  F5.2  [-]      [FeII/H]    Mean [FeII/H] abundance (G1)
  18- 21  F4.2  [-]    e_[FeII/H]    Statistical error on [FeII/H] (G2)
  23- 24  I2    ---    o_FeII        Number of FeII lines
  26- 29  F4.2  [-]      eA[FeII/H]  Uncertainy on [FeII/H] due to age (G3)
  31- 35  F5.2  [-]      [NaI/Fe]    ? Mean abundance ratio [NaI/FeI] (G1)
  37- 40  F4.2  [-]    e_[NaI/Fe]    ? Statistical error on NaI (G2)
      42  I1    ---    o_NaI         ? Number of NaI lines
  44- 47  F4.2  [-]      eA[NaI/Fe]  ? Uncertainy on [NaI/Fe] due to age (G3)
  49- 53  F5.2  [-]      [MgI/Fe]    Mean abundance ratio [MgI/Fe] (G1)
  55- 58  F4.2  [-]    e_[MgI/Fe]    Statistical error on [MgI/Fe] (G2)
      60  I1    ---    o_MgI         Number of MgI lines
  62- 65  F4.2  [-]      eA[MgI/Fe]  Uncertainy on [MgI/Fe] due to age (G3)
  67- 70  F4.2  [-]      [AlI/Fe]    ? Mean abundance ratio [AlI/Fe] (G1)
  72- 75  F4.2  [-]    e_[AlI/Fe]    ? Statistical error on AlI (G2)
      77  I1    ---    o_AlI         ? Number of AlI lines
  79- 82  F4.2  [-]      eA[AlI/Fe]  ? Uncertainy on [AlI/Fe] due to age (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Bytes Format Units   Label         Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   1- 10  A10   ---     Name          Cluster name
  12- 16  F5.2  [-]     [CaI/Fe]      Mean [CaI/Fe] abundance (G1)
  18- 21  F4.2  [-]   e_[CaI/Fe]      Statistical error on [CaI/Fe] (G2)
  23- 24  I2    ---   o_Ca1           Number of CaI lines
  26- 29  F4.2  [-]     eACa1         Uncertainy on [CaI/Fe] due to age (G3)
  31- 34  F4.2  [-]     [SiI/Fe]      ? Abundance [SiI/Fe] abundance (G1)
  36- 39  F4.2  [-]   e_[SiI/Fe]      ? Statistical error on [SiI/Fe] (G2)
      41  I1    ---   o_Si1           ? Number of Si1 lines
  43- 46  F4.2  [-]     eA[SiI/Fe]    ? Uncertainy on [SiI/Fe] due to age  (G3)
  48- 52  F5.2  [-]     [TiI/FeI]     ? Abundance [TiI/FeI] abundance (G1)
  54- 57  F4.2  [-]   e_[TiI/FeI]     ? Statistical error on [TiI/FeI] (G2)
  59- 60  I2    ---   o_TiI           ? Number of TiI lines
  62- 65  F4.2  [-]     eA[TiI/FeI]   ? Uncertainy on [TiI/FeI] due to age (G3)
  67- 71  F5.2  [-]     [TiII/FeII]   Abundance [TiII/FeII] abundance (G1)
  73- 76  F4.2  [-]   e_[TiII/FeII]   Statistical error on [TiII/FeII] (G2)
  78- 79  I2    ---   o_TiII          Number of TiII lines
  81- 84  F4.2  [-]     eA[TiII/FeII] Uncertainy on [TiII/FeII] due to age (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global Notes:
Note (G1): All abundances are obtained from line synthesis.
Note (G2): Statistical error in the mean for each species
           σX=σ/sqrt(NX-1).
           For species with only one line measurement σX is set to a
           value of 0.1dex, which is a typical line-to-line uncertainty in our
           analysis.
Note (G3): Uncertainty in the abundance due to the age of the CMD
           (σA,X).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
    From electronic version of the journal
(End)                                       Marianne Brouty [CDS]    22-Feb-2017