J/ApJ/801/143     Extrasolar Kuiper belts from Herschel    (Moro-Martin+, 2015)

Does the presence of planets affect the frequency and properties of extrasolar Kuiper Belts? Results from the Herschel DEBRIS and DUNES surveys. Moro-Martin A., Marshall J.P., Kennedy G., Sibthorpe B., Matthews B.C., Eiroa C., Wyatt M.C., Lestrade J.-F., Maldonado J., Rodriguez D., Greaves J.S., Montesinos B., Mora A., Booth M., Duchene G., Wilner D., Horner J. <Astrophys. J., 801, 143 (2015)> =2015ApJ...801..143M 2015ApJ...801..143M (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Stars, double and multiple ; Stars, nearby ; Photometry, infrared ; Surveys ; Planets Keywords: circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; interplanetary medium; Kuiper Belt: general; planet-disk interactions; planetary systems Abstract: The study of the planet-debris disk connection can shed light on the formation and evolution of planetary systems and may help "predict" the presence of planets around stars with certain disk characteristics. In preliminary analyses of subsamples of the Herschel DEBRIS and DUNES surveys, Wyatt et al. (2012MNRAS.424.1206W 2012MNRAS.424.1206W) and Marshall et al. (2014A&A...565A..15M 2014A&A...565A..15M) identified a tentative correlation between debris and the presence of low-mass planets. Here we use the cleanest possible sample out of these Herschel surveys to assess the presence of such a correlation, discarding stars without known ages, with ages <1Gyr, and with binary companions <100AU to rule out possible correlations due to effects other than planet presence. In our resulting subsample of 204 FGK stars, we do not find evidence that debris disks are more common or more dusty around stars harboring high-mass or low-mass planets compared to a control sample without identified planets. Description: In this paper, we revisit the planet-debris disk correlation (or lack thereof) in the Herschel DEBRIS and DUNES surveys (Eiroa et al. 2010A&A...518L.131E 2010A&A...518L.131E; 2013, J/A+A/555/A11; Matthews et al. 2010A&A...518L.135M 2010A&A...518L.135M; B. C. Matthews et al. 2015, in preparation) to assess whether the frequency and properties of debris disks around a control sample of stars are statistically different from those around stars with high-mass or low-mass planets. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table2.dat 104 204 Stellar properties table3.dat 120 204 Observed fluxes and excess properties -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/A+A/555/A11 : DUNES survey observational results (Eiroa+, 2013) J/ApJ/768/25 : Spitzer and Herschel obs. of debris disks (Gaspar+, 2013) J/A+A/551/A79 : RV periodic variations in τ Ceti (Tuomi+, 2013) J/ApJ/759/19 : Precise radial velocities of ρ1 Cancri (Endl+, 2012) J/other/Nat/486.375 : Stellar parameters of KOI stars (Buchhave+, 2012) J/AJ/143/135 : Ages of A-K type stars in DEBRIS survey (Vican, 2012) J/A+A/541/A40 : Metallicity of solar-type stars (Maldonado+, 2012) J/ApJ/745/147 : Binaries among debris disk stars (Rodriguez+, 2012) J/AJ/141/11 : Spitzer obs. of planet-host stars (Dodson-Robinson+, 2011) J/A+A/534/A58 : HD20794, HD85512, HD192310 HARPS RVs (Pepe+, 2011) J/ApJ/734/67 : Keck circumstellar emission measures (Millan-Gabet+, 2011) J/ApJ/720/1290 : Abundances of stars hosting planets (Ghezzi+, 2010) J/MNRAS/403/1089 : SUNS and DEBRIS surveys target selection (Phillips+, 2010) J/ApJS/188/242 : Variations on debris disks. II. (Kenyon+, 2010) J/ApJ/709/L114 : Protoplanetary disks in PMS binaries (Duchene, 2010) J/ApJ/708/1366 : Radial velocities for 61 Vir (Vogt+, 2010) J/ApJ/705/1226 : Planet-bearing stars in Spitzer (Bryden+, 2009) J/ApJ/700/L73 : Photospheric fluxes at 24 and 70µm (Kospal+, 2009) J/ApJS/182/97 : Radial velocities of multi-planet systems (Wittenmyer+, 2009) J/ApJ/693/1084 : Ten new and updated multiplanet systems (Wright+, 2009) J/A+A/493/639 : Velocity curves of HD 40307 (Mayor+, 2009) J/ApJS/179/451 : Predicted IR excesses for protoplanetary disks (Kenyon+, 2008) J/ApJ/660/1556 : Characterization of dusty debris disks (Rhee+, 2007) J/ApJ/654/625 : Radial velocities of 9 long-period objects (Wittenmyer+, 2007) J/ApJ/646/505 : Catalog of nearby exoplanets (Butler+, 2006) J/ApJ/636/1098 : Debris disks around solar-type stars (Bryden+, 2006) J/ApJ/622/1102 : The planet-metallicity correlation. (Fischer+, 2005) http://www.exoplanets.org/ : Exoplanet orbit database Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 6 I6 --- HIP [544/120005]? Hipparcos star number 8- 13 I6 --- HD [166/234677]? HD star number 15- 21 A7 --- Gl Gliese (GJ) star name 23- 28 A6 --- UNS UNS system designation (see Phillips+, 2010, J/MNRAS/403/1089) 30- 35 A6 --- Survey Survey name (DEBRIS or DUNES) 37- 41 F5.2 pc Dist [3.2/20] Star distance 43- 60 A18 --- SpT MK spectral type 62- 65 I4 K Teff [2541/9506]? Star effective temperature 67- 71 F5.2 [Sun] [Fe/H] [-1.5/0.5]? Star metallicity 73- 74 A2 --- f_[Fe/H] [**] Unexplained flag [Fe/H] 76- 81 F6.3 Lsun Lbol [0/11.3]? Bolometric luminosity 83 A1 --- l_Age Limit flag on Age 84- 88 F5.2 Gyr Age [0/11.2]? Age 90- 91 A2 --- f_Age [**] Unexplained flag on Age 93- 96 A4 --- Comp Designation of components (1) 98-104 F7.1 AU Sep ? Binary separation between components (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Projected binary separation from D. R. Rodriguez et al. (2015, in preparation). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 6 I6 --- HIP [544/120005]? Hipparcos star number 8- 13 I6 --- HD [166/234677]? HD star number 15- 21 A7 --- Gl Gliese (GJ) number 23- 28 A6 --- UNS UNS system designation (see Phillips+, 2010, J/MNRAS/403/1089) 30- 36 F7.2 mJy F100o [-6/2000] F100obs, observed Herschel/PACS flux at 100um 38- 43 F6.2 mJy e_F100o [0.7/200] 1σ uncertainty on F100o 45- 49 F5.2 mJy F100s [0/92] Estimated photospheric prediction at 100um (F100star) 51- 55 F5.2 mJy e_F100s [0/66.3] 1σ uncertainty on F100s 57- 61 F5.2 --- Sig [-2/30.3] Significance of F100o (2) 63 A1 --- l_obs/s Limit flag on obs/s (3) 65- 72 F8.2 --- obs/s [0.4/13843] Observed flux ratio (F100o/F100s) 74 A1 --- l_dust/s Limit flag on dust/s (3) 76- 83 F8.2 --- dust/s [-1/13843] Dust excess flux ratio (F100dust/F100star) (4) 85 A1 --- l_Ld/L* Limit flag on Ld/L* 87- 95 E9.3 --- Ld/L* [-1.e6/0.012]? Fractional luminosity of the dust excess emission 96 A1 --- f_Ld/L* [h] excess emission at 8-35um (5) 98-102 F5.2 --- SNR [-9/17] SNRdust signal-to-noise ratio (6) 104 A1 --- D [Y/N] Dust detection? 106-120 A15 --- Set Set, as defined in Table 1 (7) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (2): Significance defined as F100o/e_F100o, stars with significant detected emission have Sig>3. Note (3): The 3σ upper limits are given for stars without significant detected emission: * for 0<SNR<3, the upper limit are calculated assuming the observed flux is F100o+3σ * for SNR<0, the 3σ (3*e_F100o) is given. Note (4): Dust excess flux ratio, where F100dust=F100obs-F100star. Note (5): h = Note that this upper limit is based on the nondetection at 100um; this star, however, has an excess emission at 8-35um with an inferred fractional luminosity of Ld/L*=2x10-4 (Lisse et al. 2007ApJ...658..584L 2007ApJ...658..584L). Note (6): Signal-to-noise ratio of the excess emission, given by SNRdust = (F100o-F100s)/sqrt(eF100o2+eF100s2). Note (7): Systems that may be subject to confusion are labeled as "(conf.?)." The "set" classifications of the systems with unconfirmed planetary systems are indicated in parentheses: HIP 16537 (ε Eri), HIP 8102 (τ Cet), and HIP 98959. Labels are defined in table 1 as: 1 = FGK stars in DEBRIS and DUNES with distances <20pc, ages>100Myr, and no binary companions at <100AU. 2 = Subset from Set 1 without known planets. 3 = Subset from Set 1 harboring high-mass planets with masses >30M 3a = for planets at >0.1AU 3b = for planets at 0.1AU 4 = Subset from Set 1 harboring low-mass planets with masses <30M 5 = Subset from Set 1 harboring excess emission at 100um, i.e., with (F100-F*,100)/σ100>3) 6 = Subset from Set 1 with single planets 7 = Subset from Set1 with multiple planets -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 06-Jul-2015
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line