J/ApJ/812/89        Environmental COntext (ECO) catalog        (Moffett+, 2015)

ECO and RESOLVE: galaxy disk growth in environmental context. Moffett A.J., Kannappan S.J., Berlind A.A., Eckert K.D., Stark D.V., Hendel D., Norris M.A., Grogin N.A. <Astrophys. J., 812, 89 (2015)> =2015ApJ...812...89M 2015ApJ...812...89M (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, optical ; Morphology ; Redshifts ; Galaxy catalogs Keywords: galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: evolution; ultraviolet: galaxies Abstract: We study the relationships between galaxy environments and galaxy properties related to disk (re)growth, considering two highly complete samples that are approximately baryonic mass limited into the high-mass dwarf galaxy regime, the Environmental COntext (ECO) catalog (data release herein) and the B-semester region of the REsolved Spectroscopy Of a Local VolumE (RESOLVE) survey. We quantify galaxy environments using both group identification and smoothed galaxy density field methods. We use by-eye and quantitative morphological classifications plus atomic gas content measurements and estimates. We find that blue early-type (E/S0) galaxies, gas-dominated galaxies, and UV-bright disk host galaxies all become distinctly more common below group halo mass ∼1011.5M, implying that this low group halo mass regime may be a preferred regime for significant disk growth activity. We also find that blue early-type and blue late-type galaxies inhabit environments of similar group halo mass at fixed baryonic mass, consistent with a scenario in which blue early-types can regrow late-type disks. In fact, we find that the only significant difference in the typical group halo mass inhabited by different galaxy classes is for satellite galaxies with different colors, where at fixed baryonic mass red early- and late-types have higher typical group halo masses than blue early- and late-types. More generally, we argue that the traditional morphology-environment relation (i.e., that denser environments tend to have more early-types) can be largely attributed to the morphology-galaxy mass relation for centrals and the color-environment relation for satellites. Description: The ECO catalog represents a cross match between sources with measured redshifts found in the UZC (Updated Zwicky Catalog, Falco et al. 1999, J/PASP/111/438), SDSS (including data releases 6, 7, and 8; see II/294 and V/139), HyperLEDA (VII/237), RESOLVE (S. J. Kannappan et al. 2015, in preparation), GAMA (Driver et al. 2011, J/MNRAS/413/971), 2dF (Colless et al. 2001, VII/250), and 6dF (Jones et al. 2009, VII/259) catalogs with a 15" matching radius on sky. See section 2.1. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 115 12681 ECO sample properties -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: V/139 : The SDSS Photometric Catalog, Release 9 (Adelman-McCarthy+, 2012) VII/259 : 6dF galaxy survey final redshift release (Jones+, 2009) II/294 : The SDSS Photometric Catalog, Release 7 (Adelman-McCarthy+, 2009) VII/237 : HYPERLEDA. I. Catalog of galaxies (Paturel+, 2003) VII/250 : The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) (2dFGRS Team, 1998-2003) J/ApJ/810/166 : RESOLVE survey photometry catalog (Eckert+, 2015) J/ApJ/777/42 : Kinematic and HI data for the NFGS (Kannappan+, 2013) J/ApJ/769/82 : H2 masses in a broad sample of galaxies (Stark+, 2013) J/A+A/540/A106 : SDSS-DR8 groups and clusters of galaxies (Tempel+, 2012) J/AJ/142/170 : ALFALFA survey: α.40 HI source catalog (Haynes+, 2011) J/MNRAS/413/971 : Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) DR1 (Driver+, 2011) J/MNRAS/410/166 : Morphological types from Galaxy Zoo 1 (Lintott+, 2011) J/ApJS/186/427 : Detailed morphology of SDSS galaxies (Nair+, 2010) J/ApJ/708/841 : Star formation in E/S0 galaxies (Wei+, 2010) J/MNRAS/396/818 : Blue early-type galaxies in Galaxy Zoo (Schawinski+, 2009) J/ApJS/173/538 : XUV-Disk galaxies in the Local Universe (Thilker+, 2007) J/ApJS/167/1 : Galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS (Berlind+, 2006) J/ApJ/549/172 : X-ray-detected, poor groups galaxy populations (Tran+, 2001) J/AJ/118/2561 : Survey of gal. within prominent nearby voids (Grogin+, 1999) J/ApJS/122/51 : Spectrosc. cat. of 10 rich galaxy clusters (Dressler+ 1999) J/PASP/111/438 : Updated Zwicky catalog (UZC) (Falco+, 1999) J/ApJ/497/188 : A103, A118 and A114 morphological studies (Couch+ 1998) http://www.sdss3.org/ : SDSS-III home page Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 3 A3 --- --- [ECO] 4- 8 I5 --- ECO Galaxy identifier 10- 16 F7.3 deg RAdeg Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000) 18- 23 F6.3 deg DEdeg Declination in decimal degrees (J2000) 25- 30 F6.1 km/s cz [2532.8/7470] Velocity given in local group corrected form 32- 37 F6.2 mag rMag [-23.9/-17.3] Absolute SDSS r band magnitude corrected for foreground extinction 39- 43 F5.2 [Msun] logM [6.3/11.8] Log stellar mass (1) 45- 50 F6.2 mag u-r [0.4/3.2]?=-99.99 Internal extinction corrected (u-r) color index (1) 52- 57 F6.2 mag u-J [-16.3/20.2]?=-99.99 Model (u-J) color index (1) 59- 63 F5.1 arcsec R50 [1/210]?=-99.9 Radius at which 50% of the light falls 65- 69 F5.1 arcsec R90 [2.5/221.1]?=-99.9 Radius at which 90% of the light falls 71 A1 --- M [EL-] Morphology flag (2) 73 I1 --- FM [0/2] Morphology classification source flag (3) 75- 78 I4 --- Grp [1/8865] Group identifier 80- 85 F6.1 km/s Grpcz [2532.8/7470] Group center velocity 87 I1 --- FC [0/1] Central, 1, or satellite,0, designation 89- 93 F5.2 [Msun] logMh [10.7/14.5] Log group halo mass of Grp 95- 99 F5.2 --- Den [0/27.8] Normalized environmental density (4) 101 I1 --- FA [0/1]? The ECO+A membership flag (5) 103 I1 --- FHI [0/2] H I source flag (6) 105 I1 --- FG [0/1]? The ECO+G membership flag (5) 107-110 F4.2 --- CCr [1/1.7] Membership completeness correction factor (7) 112-115 F4.2 --- CCb [1/1.5] Additional completeness correction factor (8) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): The colors and stellar masses were derived from a SED fitting procedure as described in section 3.2. Note (2): Morphology flag as follows: E = early; L = late; - = the radius measurement(s) have failed and do not allow the quantitative morphology cut to be applied. Note (3): Morphology classification source flag as follows: 1 = quantitative cut; 2 = by eye from Lintott et al. (2011, J/MNRAS/410/166). Note (4): Smoothed on 1 Mpc/h scale including corrections for finger of God effects as described in section 3.6.2. Note (5): ECO+G membership flag as follows: 1 = source belongs to the sample; 0 = source does not belong to the sample. Note (6): H I source flag as follows: 1 = photometric gas estimate as described in section 3.7; 2 = gas measurement from the ALFALFA α.40 catalog (Haynes et al. 2011, J/AJ/142/170). Note (7): That accounts for redshift catalog incompleteness. Note (8): That counts for incompleteness due to boundary effects. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 04-Feb-2016
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line