J/ApJ/950/163 PANDISC. I. HI model applied to ALFAFA & SPARC gal. (Peng+, 2023)

Parameterized Asymmetric Neutral hydrogen Disk Integrated Spectrum Characterization (PANDISC). I. Introduction to a physically motivated HI model. Peng Bo, Haynes M.P., Ball C.J., Jones M.G. <Astrophys. J., 950, 163 (2023)> =2023ApJ...950..163P 2023ApJ...950..163P
ADC_Keywords: H I data; Models; Surveys; Galaxies, radio; Velocity dispersion Keywords: H I line emission ; Astronomy data analysis ; Galaxy dynamics ; Galaxy rotation Abstract: Modeling the integrated HI spectra of galaxies has been a difficult task, due to their diverse shapes, but more dynamical information is waiting to be explored in HI line profiles. Based on simple assumptions, we construct a physically motivated model for the integrated HI spectra: Parameterized Asymmetric Neutral hydrogen Disk Integrated Spectrum Characterization (PANDISC). The model shows great flexibility in reproducing the diverse HI profiles. We use Monte Carlo Markov Chain for fitting the model to global HI profiles and produce statistically robust quantitative results. Comparing with several samples of HI data available in the literature, we find the model-fitted widths agree with cataloged velocity widths (e.g., W50) down to S/N≲6. While dynamical information can only be extracted reliably from spectra with S/N>8. The model is also shown to be useful for applications like the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) and profile-based sample control. By comparing the model parameter vr to vflat, we uncover how the HI width is affected by the structure of the rotation curve, following a trend consistent with the difference in the BTFR slope. We also select a sample of spectra with broad wing-like features suggestive of a population of galaxies with unusual gas dynamics. The PANDISC model bears both promise and limitations for potential use beyond HI lines. Further application on the whole ALFALFA sample will enable us to perform large-scale ensemble studies of the HI properties and dynamics in nearby galaxies. Description: In this paper, we introduce PANDISC (Parameterized Asymmetric Neutral hydrogen Disk Integrated Spectrum Characterization), a physically motivated parameterized model for global HI line profiles. The model is based on simple physical assumptions that combine an asymmetric corotating disk component with a Gaussian component. The model consists of seven parameters, with five of them controlling the shape of the profile (vr, k, vsigma, vg and r) and the other two setting the line center (vc) and total flux (F). See Section 2. The Arecibo Legacy Fast ALFA Survey (ALFALFA; Haynes+ 2018, J/ApJ/861/49) produced a final catalog (a.100) of ∼31500 extragalactic HI detections in the local Universe. For the purposes of demonstration and application, we selected subsamples from the ALFALFA data and literature as described in Section 3.1. To demonstrate the application of the line model in Baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) and sample control, we applied it on the galaxy sample selected in Papastergis+ (2016A&A...593A..39P 2016A&A...593A..39P). To test the physical assumption of the "projected corotating velocity" for vr, we apply the line model to the galaxies with rotation curves presented in Lelli+ (2016, J/AJ/152/157), hereafter known as the SPARC galaxies. We did an extensive literature search for integrated, single-dish HI observations for the SPARC sample. A total of 158 galaxies with HI spectra available were cross-matched with sample. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table2.dat 266 911 Model fitted parameter of all the spectra used in the paper -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/276 : The SDSS Photometric Catalog, Release 5 (Adelman-McCarthy+, 2007) VIII/77 : HI spectral properties of galaxies (Springob+, 2005) J/A+A/3/765 : HI synthesis observations in UMa cluster (Verheijen+, 2001) J/AJ/128/16 : HIPASS Bright Galaxy Catalog (Koribalski+, 2004) J/ApJ/669/821 : CO Tully-Fisher relation for host galaxies of QSOs (Ho+, 2007) J/AJ/138/1938 : EDD: All Digital HI profile catalog (Courtois+, 2009) J/A+A/532/A117 : AMIGA VIII. Flux ratio asymmetry parameter (Espada+, 2011) J/AJ/152/157 : Mass models for 175 disk galaxies with SPARC (Lelli+, 2016) J/ApJ/861/49 : ALFALFA extragalactic HI source catalog (Haynes+, 2018) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 16 A16 --- Name Common name used in paper and figure set (UGC for numbers<12943 or AGC numbers) 18- 38 A21 --- AName Alternative name in sample or reference paper 40- 53 A14 --- Sample Sample in paper using the spectrum (1) 55- 60 A6 --- Ref Reference of integrated HI spectra (2) 62- 67 F6.2 km/s vr [5/451] Model projected co-rotating velocity 69- 74 F6.2 km/s E_vr [0.01/104] Upper uncertainty in vr 76- 81 F6.2 km/s e_vr [0.01/218] Lower uncertainty in vr 83- 88 F6.3 --- k [-0.64/0.64] Model gradient of angular density 90- 94 F5.3 --- E_k [0/1.2] Upper uncertainty in k 96- 100 F5.3 --- e_k [0/0.9] Lower uncertainty in k 102- 106 F5.2 km/s vsigma [3/25] Model velocity dispersion 108- 112 F5.2 km/s E_vsigma [0/15.3] Upper uncertainty in vsigma 114- 118 F5.2 km/s e_vsigma [0/13] Lower uncertainty in vsigma 120- 125 F6.2 km/s vg [8.5/200] Model std of gaussian component 127- 132 F6.2 km/s E_vg [0.01/105] Upper uncertainty in vg 134- 139 F6.2 km/s e_vg [0/104] Lower uncertainty in vg 141- 145 F5.3 --- r [0.059/1] Model disk flux fraction 147- 151 F5.3 --- E_r [0/0.54] Upper uncertainty in r 153- 157 F5.3 --- e_r [0/0.72] Lower uncertainty in r 159- 165 F7.2 Jy.km/s F [0.3/2055] Model integrated line flux 167- 171 F5.2 Jy.km/s E_F [0.05/13.3] Upper uncertainty in F 173- 177 F5.2 Jy.km/s e_F [0.04/13.2] Lower uncertainty in F 179- 186 F8.2 km/s vc [-233/17469] Model heliocentric velocity of line center 188- 192 F5.2 km/s E_vc [0.01/92] Upper uncertainty in vc 194- 199 F6.2 km/s e_vc [0.01/132] Lower uncertainty in vc 201- 206 F6.2 km/s W50mod [21/937] Model based W50 (the width at 50% of the peak flux) 208- 213 F6.2 km/s E_W50mod [0.02/192] Upper uncertainty in W50mod 215- 220 F6.2 km/s e_W50mod [0.02/179] Lower uncertainty in W50mod 222- 227 F6.1 --- SRD [3/3650] Model based Square Root Deviance 229- 234 F6.2 --- rmsBl [1.2/118] RMS of blank (line-free) channels 236- 241 F6.2 --- rmsRes [1.3/630] RMS of residual spectrum 243- 246 A4 --- Fqual Flagged by low model fitting quality 248- 251 A4 --- Fasym Flagged by asymmetry 253- 256 A4 --- Fdisk Flagged by low disk fit quality 258- 261 A4 --- FW50 Flagged by W50 to W50_model>2σ discrepancy 263- 266 A4 --- FBroad Flagged as a broad wing candidate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Sample as follows: P16 = Papastergis+ 2016A&A...593A..39P 2016A&A...593A..39P (93+4 occurrences) SPARC = Lelli+ 2016, J/AJ/152/157 (135+23 occurrences) demo = ALFALFA demonstration sample (296+4 occurrences) high S/N = ALFALFA high S/N sample (356+31 occurrences) Note (2): Reference codes as follows: a.100 = ALFALFA; Haynes+ 2018, J/ApJ/861/49 (804 occurrences) S05 = Springob+ 2005, VIII/77 (56 occurrences) T88 = Tifft & Cocke, 1988ApJS...67....1T 1988ApJS...67....1T (27 occurrences) EDD = Courtois+ 2009, J/AJ/138/1938 (11 occurrences) HIPASS = Koribalski+ 2004, J/AJ/128/16 (10 occurrences) R80 = Rots A.H. 1980A&AS...41..189R 1980A&AS...41..189R (3 occurrences) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 19-Aug-2025
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line