J/ApJS/228/7 Multi-wavelength data in CANDELS COSMOS field (Nayyeri+, 2017)
CANDELS multi-wavelength catalogs: source identification and photometry in the
CANDELS COSMOS Survey Field.
Nayyeri H., Hemmati S., Mobasher B., Ferguson H.C., Cooray A., Barro G.,
Faber S.M., Dickinson M., Koekemoer A.M., Peth M., Salvato M.,
Ashby M.L.N., Darvish B., Donley J., Durbin M., Finkelstein S., Fontana A.,
Grogin N.A., Gruetzbauch R., Huang K., Khostovan A.A., Kocevski D.,
Kodra D., Lee B., Newman J., Pacifici C., Pforr J., Stefanon M.,
Wiklind T., Willner S.P., Wuyts S., Castellano M., Conselice C., Dolch T.,
Dunlop J.S., Galametz A., Hathi N.P., Lucas R.A., Yan H.
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 228, 7-7 (2017)>
=2017ApJS..228....7N 2017ApJS..228....7N (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Photometry, ugriz ; Photometry, infrared
Keywords: catalogs; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: photometry;
methods: data analysis; techniques: image processing
Abstract:
We present a multi-wavelength photometric catalog in the COSMOS field
as part of the observations by the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep
Extragalactic Legacy Survey. The catalog is based on Hubble Space
Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 (HST/WFC3) and Advanced Camera for
Surveys observations of the COSMOS field (centered at RA:10:00:28,
DEC:+02:12:21). The final catalog has 38671 sources with photometric
data in 42 bands from UV to the infrared (∼0.3-8µm). This includes
broadband photometry from HST, CFHT, Subaru, the Visible and Infrared
Survey Telescope for Astronomy, and Spitzer Space Telescope in the
visible, near-infrared, and infrared bands along with intermediate-
and narrowband photometry from Subaru and medium-band data from Mayall
NEWFIRM. Source detection was conducted in the WFC3 F160W band (at
1.6µm) and photometry is generated using the Template FITting
algorithm. We further present a catalog of the physical properties of
sources as identified in the HST F160W band and measured from the
multi-band photometry by fitting the observed spectral energy
distributions of sources against templates.
Description:
The COSMOS field (Scoville+ 2007ApJS..172....1S 2007ApJS..172....1S) has been observed in
many different wavelengths from the X-ray to the far-infrared. Section
2 presents the data used to compile the catalog.
We used the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy
Survey (CANDELS) HST/WFC3 and ACS observations over a 216arcmin2
area of the COSMOS field to construct a multi-wavelength catalog of
galaxies that is selected in the WFC3 F160W band.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table9.dat 1001 38671 Photometry catalog entries
table10.dat 230 38671 Photometric redshift catalog
table11.dat 262 38671 *Stellar mass and main physical properties catalog
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note on table11.dat: Summary of the SED Fitting Codes Used in Estimating the
Stellar Mass detailed in Table 8 in Appendix B, excerpt below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ID PI Code Template IMF References
Set
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M2 Barro FAST BC03 Chabrier Kriek+ 2008ApJ...682..896K 2008ApJ...682..896K
Barro+ 2013ApJ...765..104B 2013ApJ...765..104B
M4 Finkelstein own code Salpeter CB07 Bruzual 2007ASPC..374..303B 2007ASPC..374..303B
Finkelstein+ 2012ApJ...756..164F 2012ApJ...756..164F
M6 Fontana zphot BC03 Chabrier Giallongo+ 1998AJ....115.2169G 1998AJ....115.2169G
Fontana+ 2000AJ....120.2206F 2000AJ....120.2206F
Fontana+ 2006A&A...459..745F 2006A&A...459..745F
M14 Lee SpeedyMC BC03 Chabrier Acquaviva+ 2012IAUS..284...42A 2012IAUS..284...42A
M10 Pforr HyperZ M05 Chabrier Bolzonella+ 2000A&A...363..476B 2000A&A...363..476B
Maraston 2005MNRAS.362..799M 2005MNRAS.362..799M
Maraston+ 2006ApJ...652...85M 2006ApJ...652...85M
Daddi+ 2005ApJ...626..680D 2005ApJ...626..680D
Pforr+ 2012MNRAS.422.3285P 2012MNRAS.422.3285P
Pforr+ 2013MNRAS.435.1389P 2013MNRAS.435.1389P
M11 Salvato LePhare BC03 Chabrier Arnouts & Ilbert
2011ascl.soft08009A
M12 Wiklind WikZ BC03 Chabrier Wiklind+ 2008ApJ...676..781W 2008ApJ...676..781W
M13 Wuyts FAST BC03 Chabrier Kriek+ 2009ApJ...700..221K 2009ApJ...700..221K
Wuyts+ 2011ApJ...742...96W 2011ApJ...742...96W
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
II/317 : The CFHTLS Survey (T0007 release) (Hudelot+ 2012)
II/319 : UKIDSS-DR9 LAS, GCS and DXS Surveys (Lawrence+ 2012)
II/284 : COSMOS Multi-Wavelength Photometry Catalog (Capak+, 2007)
II/261 : GOODS initial results (Giavalisco+, 2004)
J/ApJ/819/62 : The COSMOS-Legacy Survey (CLS) catalog (Civano+, 2016)
J/ApJ/810/71 : UV mag of candidate galaxies at 3~<z~<8.5 (Finkelstein+, 2015)
J/ApJS/218/33 : Spitzer-CANDELS catalog within 5 deep fields (Ashby+, 2015)
J/ApJ/805/121 : Overdensities of 0<z<3 COSMOS galaxies (Darvish+, 2015)
J/ApJ/803/34 : z∼4-10 galaxies from HST legacy fields (Bouwens+, 2015)
J/ApJ/801/97 : GOODS-S+UDS stellar masses from CANDELS (Santini+, 2015)
J/ApJS/214/24 : 3D-HST+CANDELS catalog (Skelton+, 2014)
J/ApJ/777/18 : Stellar mass functions of galaxies to z=4 (Muzzin+, 2013)
J/ApJ/775/106 : CANDELS passive & massive early-type galaxies (Cassata+, 2013)
J/ApJS/207/24 : GOODS-S CANDELS multiwavelength catalog (Guo+, 2013)
J/A+A/556/A55 : Multi-color photom. of star-forming galaxies (Ilbert+, 2013)
J/ApJS/206/10 : CANDELS multiwavelength catalog (Galametz+, 2013)
J/ApJ/769/80 : Spitzer/IRAC observations of five deep fields (Ashby+, 2013)
J/MNRAS/427/1666 : Massive galaxies in CANDELS-UDS field (Bruce+, 2012)
J/ApJ/756/164 : UV galaxies in CANDELS from z=8 to z=4 (Finkelstein+, 2012)
J/A+A/544/A156 : UltraVISTA Catalogue Release DR1 (McCracken+, 2012)
J/ApJS/203/24 : Structural param. of galaxies in CANDELS (van der Wel+, 2012)
J/ApJ/735/86 : NEWFIRM MBS: photometric catalogs (Whitaker+, 2011)
J/ApJS/193/13 : Spitzer/IRAC sources in the EGS I. SEDs (Barro+, 2011)
J/ApJ/716/348 : The XMM-Newton survey of the COSMOS field (Brusa+, 2010)
J/ApJS/184/218 : The zCOSMOS 10k-bright spectroscopic sample (Lilly+, 2009)
J/ApJS/184/158 : Chandra COSMOS survey I. (Elvis+, 2009)
J/ApJ/675/234 : Stellar mass functions for gal. 0<z<4 (Perez-Gonzalez+, 2008)
J/ApJS/172/70 : zCOSMOS-bright catalog (Lilly+, 2007)
J/ApJS/172/46 : VLA-COSMOS survey. II. (Schinnerer+, 2007)
J/ApJS/172/29 : XMM-Newton survey in COSMOS field. I. (Hasinger+, 2007)
J/ApJ/663/81 : SED of hard X-ray selected AGN in XMDS (Polletta+, 2007)
J/ApJ/655/51 : HDFS IRAC observations of 2<z<3.5 galaxies (Wuyts+, 2007)
J/PASJ/58/313 : Lyα emitters in the SUBARU Deep Field (Shimasaku+, 2006)
J/ApJ/612/L93 : Candidates of z∼5.5-7 galaxies in the HST-UDF (Yan+, 2004)
J/AJ/120/2206 : NTT, HDF-S and HDF-N photometric redshifts (Fontana+, 2000)
J/ApJ/519/1 : Lyman-break galaxies at z ≳ 4 (Steidel+, 1999)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- Seq SExtractor identifier from F160W image
(<[NHM2017] NNNNN> in Simbad)
7- 27 A21 --- --- [CANDELSCOSMOSF160W_]
28- 46 A19 --- ID IAU designation (1)
48- 57 F10.6 deg RAdeg Right Ascension in decimal degrees (J2000)
59- 66 F8.6 deg DEdeg Declination in decimal degrees (J2000)
68- 77 F10.3 uJy APCOR [-19091/102557] Aperture correction (2)
79- 88 E10.3 uJy uCFHT [-6.1/5239] CFHT/MegaCam u band flux density
90- 98 E9.3 uJy e_uCFHT [0.0006/1.5] Uncertainty in uCFHT
100- 109 E10.3 uJy gCFHT [-10.1/3489] CFHT/MegaCam g band flux density
111- 119 E9.3 uJy e_gCFHT [0.0003/1.1] Uncertainty in gCFHT
121- 130 E10.3 uJy rCFHT [-11.1/3520] CFHT/MegaCam r band flux density
132- 140 E9.3 uJy e_rCFHT [0.0004/1.2] Uncertainty in rCFHT
142- 151 E10.3 uJy iCFHT [-4.7/2560] CFHT/MegaCam i band flux density
153- 161 E9.3 uJy e_iCFHT [0.0006/1.2] Uncertainty in iCFHT
163- 172 E10.3 uJy zCFHT [-13.5/8024] CFHT/MegaCam z band flux density
174- 182 E9.3 uJy e_zCFHT [0.001/3] Uncertainty in zCFHT
184- 193 E10.3 uJy BSub [-0.05/199] Subaru/Suprime-Cam B band flux
density
195- 203 E9.3 uJy e_BSub [0.0001/0.3] Uncertainy in BSub
205- 214 E10.3 uJy gSub [-0.3/317] Subaru/Suprime-Cam g band flux
density
216- 224 E9.3 uJy e_gSub [0.0009/0.7] Uncertainy in gSub
226- 235 E10.3 uJy VSub [-0.2/314.1] Subaru/Suprime-Cam V band flux
density
237- 245 E9.3 uJy e_VSub [0.0005/0.4] Uncertainy in VSub
247- 256 E10.3 uJy rSub [-0.2/447.5] Subaru/Suprime-Cam r band flux
density
258- 266 E9.3 uJy e_rSub [0.0004/0.5] Uncertainy in rSub
268- 277 E10.3 uJy iSub [-0.2/667] Subaru/Suprime-Cam i band flux
density
279- 287 E9.3 uJy e_iSub [0.0004/1.2] Uncertainy in iSub
289- 298 E10.3 uJy zSub [-0.8/1000] Subaru/Suprime-Cam z band flux
density
300- 308 E9.3 uJy e_zSub [0.002/0.9] Uncertainy in zSub
310- 319 E10.3 uJy F606W [-3980/21960]?=-99 HST/ACS F606W band flux
density
321- 330 E10.3 uJy e_F606W [0/252]?=-99 Uncertainy in F606W
332- 341 E10.3 uJy F814W [-6487/31500]?=-99 HST/ACS F814W band flux
density
343- 352 E10.3 uJy e_F814W [0/386]?=-99 Uncertainy in F814W
354- 363 E10.3 uJy F125W [/14590]?=-99 HST/WFC3 F125W band flux
density
365- 374 E10.3 uJy e_F125W [0/13]?=-99 Uncertainy in F125W
376- 385 E10.3 uJy F160W [/27850]?=-99 HST/WFC3 F160W band flux
density
387- 396 E10.3 uJy e_F160W [0/13]?=-99 Uncertainy in F160W
398- 407 E10.3 uJy YVISTA [-6.3/24760] UltraVISTA Y band flux density
409- 417 E9.3 uJy e_YVISTA [0.003/1.4] Uncertainty in YVISTA
419- 428 E10.3 uJy JVISTA [-1.8/12180] UltraVISTA J band flux density
430- 438 E9.3 uJy e_JVISTA [0.004/0.8] Uncertainty in JVISTA
440- 449 E10.3 uJy HVISTA [-2.7/19080] UltraVISTA H band flux density
451- 459 E9.3 uJy e_HVISTA [0.005/1.4] Uncertainty in HVISTA
461- 470 E10.3 uJy KsVISTA [-2.2/14520] UltraVISTA Ks band flux density
472- 480 E9.3 uJy e_KsVISTA [0.007/0.9] Uncertainty in KsVISTA
482- 491 E10.3 uJy 3.4IRAC [-147/8816] Spitzer/IRAC 3.4um band flux
density
493- 501 E9.3 uJy e_3.4IRAC [0.01/2] Uncertainty in 3.4IRAC
503- 512 E10.3 uJy 4.5IRAC [-93/5790] Spitzer/IRAC 4.5um band flux
density
514- 522 E9.3 uJy e_4.5IRAC [0.01/1.7] Uncertainty in 4.5IRAC
524- 533 E10.3 uJy 5.8IRAC [-151/5548] Spitzer/IRAC 5.8um band flux
density
535- 544 E10.3 uJy e_5.8IRAC [0.3/39]?=-99 Uncertainty in 5.8IRAC
546- 555 E10.3 uJy 8.0IRAC [-151/3038] Spitzer/IRAC 8.0um band flux
density
557- 566 E10.3 uJy e_8.0IRAC [0.3/45]?=-99 Uncertainty in 8.0IRAC
568- 577 E10.3 uJy J1NFIRM [-224/12030] NEWFIRM J1 band flux density
579- 587 E9.3 uJy e_J1NFIRM [0.005/1.5] Uncertainty in J1NFIRM
589- 598 E10.3 uJy J2NFIRM [-159/11400] NEWFIRM J2 band flux density
600- 608 E9.3 uJy e_J2NFIRM [0.008/2.2] Uncertainty in J2NFIRM
610- 619 E10.3 uJy J3NFIRM [-165/9385] NEWFIRM J3 band flux density
621- 629 E9.3 uJy e_J3NFIRM [0.009/4] Uncertainty in J3NFIRM
631- 640 E10.3 uJy H1NFIRM [-144/16760] NEWFIRM H1 band flux density
642- 650 E9.3 uJy e_H1NFIRM [0.01/6.3] Uncertainty in H1NFIRM
652- 661 E10.3 uJy H2NFIRM [-309/18360] NEWFIRM H2 band flux density
663- 671 E9.3 uJy e_H2NFIRM [0.02/5] Uncertainty in H2NFIRM
673- 682 E10.3 uJy KNFIRM [-214/18980] NEWFIRM K band flux density
684- 692 E9.3 uJy e_KNFIRM [0.02/17] Uncertainty in KNFIRM
694- 703 E10.3 uJy Sub427 [-1/1967] Subaru IB427 (4263Å) band flux
density
705- 713 E9.3 uJy e_Sub427 [0.0009/1.1] Uncertainty in Sub427
715- 724 E10.3 uJy Sub464 [-1.7/2521] Subaru IB464 (4635Å) band flux
density
726- 734 E9.3 uJy e_Sub464 [0.002/1.4] Uncertainty in Sub464
736- 745 E10.3 uJy Sub484 [-0.5/665] Subaru IA484 (4849Å) band flux
density
747- 755 E9.3 uJy e_Sub484 [0.0008/0.8] Uncertainty in Sub484
757- 766 E10.3 uJy Sub505 [-1.1/1724] Subaru IB505 (5062Å) band flux
density
768- 776 E9.3 uJy e_Sub505 [0.001/1] Uncertainty in Sub505
778- 787 E10.3 uJy Sub527 [-0.2/747] Subaru IA527 (5261Å) band flux
density
789- 797 E9.3 uJy e_Sub527 [0.0007/0.8] Uncertainty in Sub527
799- 808 E10.3 uJy Sub574 [-3.2/1584] Subaru IB574 (5764Å) band flux
density
810- 818 E9.3 uJy e_Sub574 [0.002/1.1] Uncertainty in Sub574
820- 829 E10.3 uJy Sub624 [-1.7/903] Subaru IA624 (6232Å) band flux
density
831- 839 E9.3 uJy e_Sub624 [0.0008/0.8] Uncertainty in Sub624
841- 850 E10.3 uJy Sub679 [-3/1456] Subaru IA679 (6780Å) band flux
density
852- 860 E9.3 uJy e_Sub679 [0.001/1] Uncertainty in Sub679
862- 871 E10.3 uJy Sub709 [-1.3/933] Subaru IB709 (7073Å) band flux
density
873- 881 E9.3 uJy e_Sub709 [0.001/0.8] Uncertainty in Sub709
883- 892 E10.3 uJy Sub711 [-1.8/2031] Subaru NB711 (7120Å) band flux
density
894- 902 E9.3 uJy e_Sub711 [0.001/1.2] Uncertainty in Sub711
904- 913 E10.3 uJy Sub738 [-2/978] Subaru IA738 (7361Å) band flux
density
915- 923 E9.3 uJy e_Sub738 [0.001/0.9] Uncertainty in Sub738
925- 934 E10.3 uJy Sub767 [-1.9/1485] Subaru IA767 (7684Å) band flux
density
936- 944 E9.3 uJy e_Sub767 [0.002/1] Uncertainty in Sub767
946- 955 E10.3 uJy Sub816 [-2/1537] Subaru NB816 (8149Å) band flux
density
957- 965 E9.3 uJy e_Sub816 [0.001/1] Uncertainty in Sub816
967- 976 E10.3 uJy Sub827 [-4.6/1307] Subaru IB827 (8244Å) band flux
density
978- 986 E9.3 uJy e_Sub827 [0.002/1] Uncertainty in Sub827
988- 994 F7.3 pix FWHM [-2.3/444] SExtractor F160W image Full-Width
at Half-Maximum
996- 996 I1 --- Flag [0/2]? Photometry flag (0=good) (3)
998-1001 F4.2 --- G/S SExtractor stellar classification; 1=Star
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Warning: the format should be JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s but 6491 names
have a format JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMS.ss with a missing "0" in arcseconds
(format should be JHHMMSS.ss+DDMM0S.s). Note added by CDS (a column with
corrected names is added in VizieR).
Note (2): F160W FLUX AUTO/FLUX ISO, applied to ACS and WFC3 bands.
Note (3): Photometry flag as follows:
0 = good photometry
1 = bright stars and spikes associated with those stars; photometry for
objects contaminated by this would be unreliable
2 = edges of the image as measured from the F160W rms maps.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table10.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- Seq SExtractor identifier from F160W image
(<[NHM2017] NNNNN> in Simbad)
7- 14 F8.4 --- zspec [0.0027/2.5]?=-99 Spectroscopic redshift
16- 18 I3 --- q_zspec [-99/3] Quality flag on zspec (1)
20- 26 F7.3 --- Wuyts [0/10]?=-99 Wuyts photometric redshift (2)
28- 34 F7.3 --- 68lWuyts ?=-99 Lower 68% confidence level in 68lWuyts
36- 42 F7.3 --- 68uWuyts ?=-99 Upper 68% confidence level in 68uWuyts
44- 50 F7.3 --- 95lWuyts ?=-99 Lower 95% confidence level in 95lWuyts
52- 58 F7.3 --- 95uWuyts ?=-99 Upper 95% confidence level in 95uWuyts
60- 65 F6.3 --- Pforr [0.001/10] Pforr photometric redshift (2)
67- 71 F5.3 --- 68lPforr Lower 68% confidence level in 68lPforr
73- 78 F6.3 --- 68uPforr Upper 68% confidence level in 68uPforr
80- 84 F5.3 --- 95lPforr Lower 95% confidence level in 95lPforr
86- 91 F6.3 --- 95uPforr Upper 95% confidence level in 95uPforr
93- 98 F6.3 --- Wiklind [0.05/10] Wiklind photometric redshift (2)
100-104 F5.3 --- 68lWiklind Lower 68% confidence level in 68lWiklind
106-111 F6.3 --- 68uWiklind Upper 68% confidence level in 68uWiklind
113-117 F5.3 --- 95lWiklind Lower 95% confidence level in 95lWiklind
119-124 F6.3 --- 95uWiklind Upper 95% confidence level in 95uWiklind
126-130 F5.3 --- Finkel [0/10] Finkelstein photometric redshift (2)
132-136 F5.3 --- 68lFinkel Lower 68% confidence level in 68lFinkel
138-142 F5.3 --- 68uFinkel Upper 68% confidence level in 68uFinkel
144-148 F5.3 --- 95lFinkel Lower 95% confidence level in 95lFinkel
150-154 F5.3 --- 95uFinkel Upper 95% confidence level in 95uFinkel
156-162 F7.3 --- Gruetz [0/10]?=-99 Gruetz photometric redshift (2)
164-170 F7.3 --- 68lGruetz ?=-99 Lower 68% confidence level in 68lGruetz
172-178 F7.3 --- 68uGruetz ?=-99 Upper 68% confidence level in 68uGruetz
180-186 F7.3 --- 95lGruetz ?=-99 Lower 95% confidence level in 95lGruetz
188-194 F7.3 --- 95uGruetz ?=-99 Upper 95% confidence level in 95uGruetz
196-202 F7.3 --- Salvato [0.03/10]?=-99 Salvato photometric
redshift (2)
204-210 F7.3 --- 68lSalvato ?=-99 Lower 68% confidence level in 68lSalvato
212-218 F7.3 --- 68uSalvato ?=-99 Upper 68% confidence level in 68uSalvato
220-224 F5.3 --- 95lSalvato Lower 95% confidence level in 95lSalvato
226-230 F5.3 --- 95uSalvato Upper 95% confidence level in 95uSalvato
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Quality flag as follows:
1 = secure (418 occurrences),
2 = intermediate (114 occurrences),
3 = uncertain (116 occurrences),
-99 = no value (38023 occurrences).
Note (2): References for each of these model codes are provided in Table 7
in Appendix B, excerpt below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PI Code Template Set References
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finkelstein EAZY EAZY+BX418 Brammer+ 2008ApJ...686.1503B 2008ApJ...686.1503B
Erb+ 2010ApJ...719.1168E 2010ApJ...719.1168E
Gruetzbauch EAZY EAZY Brammer+ 2008ApJ...686.1503B 2008ApJ...686.1503B
Pforr HyperZ Maraston05 Bolzonella+ 2000A&A...363..476B 2000A&A...363..476B
Maraston 2005MNRAS.362..799M 2005MNRAS.362..799M
Salvato LePhare BC03+Polletta Arnouts & Ilbert 2011ascl.soft08009A
Bruzual & Charlot 2003MNRAS.344.1000B 2003MNRAS.344.1000B
Polletta+ 2007ApJ...663...81P 2007ApJ...663...81P
Wiklind WikZ BC03 Wiklind+ 2008ApJ...676..781W 2008ApJ...676..781W
Wuyts EAZY EAZY Brammer+ 2008ApJ...686.1503B 2008ApJ...686.1503B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table11.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- Seq SExtractor identifier from F160W image
(<[NHM2017] NNNNN> in Simbad)
7- 12 F6.3 mag Hmag [12.7/32.6]?=99 F160W SExtractor MAG AUTO
for convenience
14- 14 I1 --- PFlag [0/2] Photometry flag (0=good; otherwise
use with caution or bad)
16- 19 F4.2 --- G/S SExtractor stellar classification; 1=Star
21- 21 I1 --- AGN AGN flag; 1=AGN
23- 30 F8.4 --- zbest [0/10]?=-99 Best phot or spectroscopic
redshift; used in SED-fitting
32- 39 F8.4 --- zspec [0/5.7]?=-99 Spectroscopic redshift
41- 43 I3 --- q_zspec [-99/3] Quality of zspec; 1=good
45- 49 F5.3 --- zphot [0/10] Photometric redshift
51- 56 F6.2 --- zphotl68 ?=-99 Lower 68% confidence level in zphot
58- 62 F5.2 --- zphotu68 Upper 68% confidence level in zphot
64- 69 F6.2 --- zphotl95 ?=-99 Lower 95% confidence level in zphot
71- 75 F5.2 --- zphotu95 Upper 95% confidence level in zphot
77- 82 F6.2 --- zCOSMOS [0/10]?=-99 COSMOS catalog photometric
redshift
84- 91 E8.2 [Msun] Mass [4.2/14] Log CANDELS reference median stellar
mass
93-100 E8.2 [Msun] e_Mass [0.006/6] Standard deviation on Mass
102-109 E8.2 [Msun] Mneb [3.4/13.6] Log median stellar mass include
nebular component
111-119 E9.2 [Msun] e_Mneb [0/4]?=-99 Standard deviation on Mneb
121-126 F6.2 [Msun] M14cons [-43/12.1] Log stellar mass from
Method 14_cons
128-133 F6.2 [Msun] M11tau [7/12]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 11_taus
135-139 F5.2 [Msun] M6tauNEB [1.5/14] Log stellar mass from
Method 6tauNEB
141-146 F6.2 [Msun] M13tau [3.9/14.4]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 13_tau
148-152 F5.2 [Msun] M12 [-9/13.1] Log stellar mass from Method 12
154-158 F5.2 [Msun] M6tau [1.5/13.7] Log stellar mass from Method 6_tau
160-164 F5.2 [Msun] M2tau [3.7/14] Log stellar mass from Method 2_tau
166-170 F5.2 [Msun] M6deltau [1.7/13.5] Log stellar mass from
Method 6_deltau
172-176 F5.2 [Msun] M6invtau [1.5/13.4] Log stellar mass from
Method 6_invtau
178-183 F6.2 [Msun] M10 [2.6/14]?=-99 Log stellar mass from Method 10
185-190 F6.2 [Msun] M4 [1.3/14]?=-99 Log stellar mass from Method 4
192-197 F6.2 [Msun] M14lin [6.3/12]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 14_lin
199-204 F6.2 [Msun] M14deltau [6.3/12]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 14_deltau
206-211 F6.2 [Msun] M14tau [6.3/11.8]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 14_tau
213-218 F6.2 [Msun] M14inctau [6.3/12.1]?=-99 Log stellar mass from
Method 14_inctau
220-225 F6.2 [Msun] M14 [6.3/11.7]?=-99 Log stellar mass
from Method 14
227-234 E8.2 [Msun] Mneblin [3.4/13.6] Log median stellar mass (1)
236-244 E9.2 [Msun] e_Mneblin [0/194]?=-99 Standard deviation
in Mneblin
246-253 E8.2 [Msun] Mlin [4.5/13.8] Log median stellar mass (2)
255-262 E8.2 [Msun] e_Mlin [0.006/102000] Standard deviation in Mlin
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Including nebular component calculated by the Hodges-Lehmann
estimator in the linear space and standard deviation.
Note (2): With no nebular component calculated by the Hodges-Lehmann estimator
in the linear space and standard deviation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 08-Mar-2017