J/ApJS/243/5     The ELQS in the PS1 footprint (PS-ELQS)     (Schindler+, 2019)

The Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey in the Pan-STARRS 1 footprint (PS-ELQS). Schindler J.-T., Fan X., Huang Y.-H., Yue M., Yang J., Hall P.B., Wenzl L., Hughes A., Litke K.C., Rees J.M. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 243, 5-5 (2019)> =2019ApJS..243....5S 2019ApJS..243....5S (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: QSOs; Redshifts; Photometry, ugriz; Photometry, ultraviolet; Spectra, optical; X-ray sources; Surveys Keywords: galaxies: nuclei; quasars: general Abstract: We present the results of the Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey in the 3π survey of the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS; PS1). This effort applies the successful quasar selection strategy of the Extremely Luminous Survey in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey footprint (∼12000deg2) to a much larger area (∼21486deg2). This spectroscopic survey targets the most luminous quasars (M1450≤-26.5; mi≤18.5) at intermediate redshifts (z≥2.8). Candidates are selected based on a near-infrared JKW2 color cut using WISE AllWISE and 2MASS photometry to mainly reject stellar contaminants. Photometric redshifts (zreg) and star-quasar classifications for each candidate are calculated from near-infrared and optical photometry using the supervised machine learning technique random forests. We select 806 quasar candidates at zreg≥2.8 from a parent sample of 74318 sources. After exclusion of known sources and rejection of candidates with unreliable photometry, we have taken optical identification spectra for 290 of our 334 good PS-ELQS candidates. We report the discovery of 190 new z≥2.8 quasars and an additional 28 quasars at lower redshifts. A total of 44 good PS-ELQS candidates remain unobserved. Including all known quasars at z≥2.8, our quasar selection method has a selection efficiency of at least 77%. At lower declinations, -30≤DEC≤0, we approximately treble the known population of extremely luminous quasars. We provide the PS-ELQS quasar catalog with a total of 592 luminous quasars (mi≤18.5, z≥2.8). This unique sample will not only be able to provide constraints on the volume density and quasar clustering of extremely luminous quasars, but also offers valuable targets for studies of the intergalactic medium. Description: Dedicated observational campaigns for the Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey in the Pan-STARRS 1 Footprint (PS-ELQS) began in fall 2017 after the candidate selection was frozen in. Observations were completed in 2018 June. The majority of our observations were carried out with the Goodman High Throughput Spectrograph (Goodman HTS) on the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) Telescope (4.1m). Spectra were taken in 2017 October 6-10, 2018 January 22-24, 2018 April 4-6, and 2018 June 2-4. The spectra have a wavelength coverage of ∼4000-8000 and ∼5300-9300Å for the two different central wavelengths; resulting in spectral resolutions of R∼830 and R∼690, respectively. Identification spectroscopy in the northern hemisphere was carried out with the VATTSpec spectrograph on the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope (VATT). Targeted PS-ELQS observations were conducted in 2017 November 7-12, 2018 March 19-21, and 2018 May 17-18; with a resolution of R∼1000. We followed up our newly discovered quasars with the Red Channel Spectrograph on the MMT. Observations were taken in 2017 October 20-21, 2017 November 16, and 2018 May 14; with a resolution of R∼400 to 300. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table7.dat 451 592 Full Pan-STARRS 1 Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey (PS-ELQS) quasar catalog table8.dat 98 190 Newly discovered quasars at z≥2.8 in the PS-ELQS sample table9.dat 98 28 Newly discovered quasars at z<2.8 in the PS-ELQS sample table10.dat 59 44 Properties of the remaining good PS-ELQS candidates -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: II/246 : 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+, 2003) VII/260 : The SDSS-DR7 quasar catalog (Schneider+, 2010) VII/269 : SDSS Quasar Catalog, DR9Q (Paris+, 2012) II/328 : AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+, 2013) VII/273 : The Half Million Quasars (HMQ) catalogue (Flesch, 2015) II/349 : The Pan-STARRS release 1 (PS1) Survey - DR1 (Chambers+, 2016) VII/279 : SDSS quasar catalog: twelfth data release (Paris+, 2017) II/335 : Revised cat. of GALEX UV sources (GUVcat_AIS GR6+7) (Bianchi+ 2017) VII/283 : The Million Quasars (Milliquas) catalog (6.3) (Flesch, 2019) J/ApJ/635/123 : The SDSS-DR3 damped Lyα survey (Prochaska+, 2005) J/AJ/133/2222 : Clustering of high-redshift QSOs from SDSS (Shen+, 2007) J/MNRAS/406/1583 : Quasar from SDSS and UKIDSS (Wu+, 2010) J/ApJ/728/23 : GALEX UV-bright high-redshift quasars (Worseck+, 2011) J/MNRAS/414/2602 : Automated classification of HIP variables (Dubath+, 2011) J/AJ/144/49 : Quasars from SDSS-DR7, WISE and UKIDSS surveys (Wu+, 2012) J/ApJ/768/105 : QSO luminosity function from SDSS Stripe 82 (McGreer+, 2013) J/ApJ/773/14 : BOSS: quasar luminosity function (Ross+, 2013) J/ApJS/219/39 : QSOs selection from SDSS and WISE (Richards+, 2015) J/A+A/584/A44 : Photometric classification of QSO from RCS-2 (Carrasco+, 2015) J/A+A/588/A103 : 2nd ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalog (Boller+, 2016) J/ApJS/227/11 : PS1 z>5.6 quasars follow-up (Banados+, 2016) J/MNRAS/473/4937 : AllWISE ctp to ROSAT/2RXS+XMMSLEW2 catalogs (Salvato+, 2018) J/ApJ/863/144 : ELQS in SDSS footprint. II. North Gal. Cap (Schindler+, 2018) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table7.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 19 A19 --- WISEA WISE AllWISE survey designation (JHHMMSS.ss+DDMMSS.s) 21- 32 F12.8 deg RAdeg PS1 Right Ascension, decimal degrees (J2000) 34- 45 F12.8 deg DEdeg PS1 Declination, decimal degrees (J2000) 47- 48 I2 h RAPh PS1 Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) 50- 51 I2 min RAPm PS1 Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) 53- 58 F6.3 s RAPs PS1 Second of Right Ascension (J2000) 60- 60 A1 --- DEP- PS1 Sign of the Declination (J2000) 61- 62 I2 deg DEPd PS1 Degree of Declination (J2000) 64- 65 I2 arcmin DEPm PS1 Arcminute of Declination (J2000) 67- 71 F5.2 arcsec DEPs PS1 Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) 73- 83 F11.7 deg RAAdeg ALLWISE Right Ascension (J2000) 85- 95 F11.7 deg DEAdeg ALLWISE Declination (J2000) 97-106 A10 --- Ref Reference, quasar classification (1) 108-112 F5.3 --- z [2.8/5.1] Best redshift of the quasar, from Ref 114-120 F7.3 mag 1450Mag [-30.7/-26.7] Absolute magnitude, 1450Å (G1) 122-127 F6.3 mag gmag [16.3/22.2] Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 g band 129-134 F6.3 mag rmag Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 r band 136-141 F6.3 mag imag Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 i band 143-148 F6.3 mag zmag Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 z band 150-155 F6.3 mag ymag Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 y band 157-162 F6.3 mag Jmag [14.2/18.4] Dereddened AB magnitude, 2MASS J band 164-169 F6.3 mag Hmag Dereddened AB magnitude, 2MASS H band 171-176 F6.3 mag Ksmag Dereddened AB magnitude, 2MASS Ks band 178-183 F6.3 mag W1mag [13.7/18.4] Dereddened AB magnitude, WISE W1 band 185-190 F6.3 mag W2mag Dereddened AB magnitude, WISE W2 band 192-199 F8.6 mag e_gmag [0.002/0.1] 1σ uncertainty in gmag 201-208 F8.6 mag e_rmag 1σ uncertainty in rmag 210-217 F8.6 mag e_imag 1σ uncertainty in imag 219-226 F8.6 mag e_zmag 1σ uncertainty in zmag 228-235 F8.6 mag e_ymag 1σ uncertainty in ymag 237-241 F5.3 mag e_Jmag [0.02/0.3]? 1σ uncertainty in Jmag 243-247 F5.3 mag e_Hmag ? 1σ uncertainty in Hmag 249-253 F5.3 mag e_Ksmag ? 1σ uncertainty in Ksmag 255-259 F5.3 mag e_W1mag [0.02/0.3] 1σ uncertainty in W1mag 261-265 F5.3 mag e_W2mag 1σ uncertainty in W2mag 267-275 F9.7 mag E(B-V) [0.006/1] E(B-V) color excess 277-281 A5 --- GALEX Boolean, successful match with GALEX GR6/7 283-289 F7.5 arcsec SepG [0.19/1.8]? Match distance, GALEX GR6/7 to SDSS 291-298 F8.3 mag NUVmag [19.6/23.8]? GALEX near-UV magnitude (G2) 300-310 F11.6 mag e_NUVmag [0.01/0.6]? Error on NUVmag 312-319 F8.3 mag FUVmag [20.5/23.5]? GALEX far-UV magnitude (G2) 321-331 F11.6 mag e_FUVmag [0.03/0.7]? Error on FUVmag 333-337 A5 --- TRXS Boolean, successful match with ROSAT 2RXS AllWISE 339-348 E10.4 arcsec SepT [0/5.6e-14]? Match distance, ELQS AllWISE to ROSAT 2RXS AllWISE (2) 350-352 F3.1 --- f_TRXS [1/2]? TRXS-match flag (3) 354-363 E10.4 mW/m2 F2RXS [1.7e-13/3.7e-12]? 2RXS flux, in erg/s/cm2 units 365-374 E10.4 mW/m2 e_F2RXS ? Error on F2RXS 376-380 A5 --- XMM Boolean, successful match with XMMSL2 AllWISE 382-391 E10.4 arcsec SepX [0/3e-14]? Match distance, ELQS AllWISE to XMMSL2 AllWISE 393-395 F3.1 --- f_XMM [1]? XMM-match flag (4) 397-405 F9.6 10-15W/m2 FB8 [0.6/13]? Total band (0.2-12.0keV) flux, in 10-12erg/s/cm2 units 407-415 F9.6 10-15W/m2 FB7 [24.562504]? Hard band (2.0-12.0keV) flux, in 10-12erg/s/cm2 units 417-424 F8.6 10-15W/m2 FB6 [0.2/2.3]? Soft band (0.2-2.0keV) flux, in 10-12erg/s/cm2 units 426-433 F8.6 10-15W/m2 e_FB8 [0.3/4]? Error on FB8 435-442 F8.6 10-15W/m2 e_FB7 [8.582023]? Error on FB7 444-451 F8.6 10-15W/m2 e_FB6 [0.1/1]? Error on FB6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Reference, quasar classification as follows: DR7Q = SDSS DR7; Schneider+ (2010, VII/260); DR14Q = SDSS DR14; Paris et al. (2018A&A...613A..51P 2018A&A...613A..51P); ELQS = Extremely Luminous Quasar Survey; Schindler et al. (2017ApJ...851...13S 2017ApJ...851...13S); MQ = Million Quasar Catalog, version 5.7b; Flesch (2015PASA...32...10F 2015PASA...32...10F ; Cat. VII/273 see also VII/283); PS-ELQS = this work; other_qsos = Yang et al. (2019ApJ...871..199Y 2019ApJ...871..199Y). Note (2): The distance values are often 0 or otherwise extremely small, because the positions match to numerical accuracy. Note (3): A flag indicating the most probable AllWISE ROSAT 2RXS cross-match with 1. This is the case for all matched objects. Note (4): A flag indicating the most probable AllWISE XMMSL2 cross-match with 1. This is the case for all matched objects -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table[89].dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 h RAh Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) 4- 5 I2 min RAm Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) 7- 12 F6.3 s RAs Second of Right Ascension (J2000) 14- 14 A1 --- DE- Sign of the Declination (J2000) 15- 16 I2 deg DEd Degree of Declination (J2000) 18- 19 I2 arcmin DEm Arcminute of Declination (J2000) 21- 25 F5.2 arcsec DEs Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) 27- 32 F6.3 mag imag [16.4/18.5] Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 i band 34- 41 F8.6 mag e_imag [0/0.04] 1σ uncertainty in imag-PS 43- 49 F7.3 mag 1450Mag [-29.4/-22.3] Absolute magnitude, 1450Å (G1) 51- 55 F5.3 --- zspec [0.3/4.9] Spectroscopic redshift, this work 57- 62 F6.3 mag NUVmag [20.1/23]? GALEX near-UV magnitude (G2) 64- 70 F7.5 mag e_NUVmag [0.09/0.5]? Error on NUVmag 72- 77 F6.3 mag FUVmag [20.5/22.6]? GALEX far-UV magnitude (G2) 79- 85 F7.5 mag e_FUVmag [0.1/0.6]? Error on FUVmag 87- 96 A10 "Y/M/D" Date Observation date 98- 98 A1 --- Flag [cd] Flag (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flag as follows: c = This object has been classified as a BAL, LoBAL or FeLoBAL quasar. Details are discussed in Section 7.2; d = These objects were also independently discovered by Yang+ (2019ApJ...871..199Y 2019ApJ...871..199Y). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table10.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 h RAh Hour of Right Ascension (J2000) 4- 5 I2 min RAm Minute of Right Ascension (J2000) 7- 12 F6.3 s RAs Second of Right Ascension (J2000) 14 A1 --- DE- Sign of the Declination (J2000) 15- 16 I2 deg DEd Degree of Declination (J2000) 18- 19 I2 arcmin DEm Arcminute of Declination (J2000) 21- 25 F5.2 arcsec DEs Arcsecond of Declination (J2000) 27- 32 F6.3 mag imag [17.2/18.5] Dereddened AB magnitude, PS1 i band 34- 41 F8.6 mag e_imag [0.002/0.02] 1σ uncertainty in imag-PS 43- 46 F4.2 --- zphot [2.8/4.5] Photometric redshift 48- 51 F4.2 --- zprob [0.47/1] Random forest pseudo-probability of being a quasars 53- 57 A5 --- zclass Most likely redshift class ("highz" or "midz") 59 I1 --- Prior [1/5] Priority (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): PS-ELQS quasar candidates and their selection priorities (see Table 5): ---------------------------------------------------- Priority Criteria ---------------------------------------------------- 1 3.5≤zreg and mi≤18.0 2 3.0≤zreg≤3.5 and mi≤18.0 3 (2.5≤zreg≤3.0 and mi≤18.0) OR (3.5≤zreg and 18.0<mi≤18.5) 4 3.0≤zreg≤3.5 and 18.0<mi≤18.5 5 2.5≤zreg≤3.0 and 18.0<mi≤18.5 ---------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global notes: Note (G1): Absolute magnitude at 1450Å calculated using the k-correction determined for this work. Note (G2): The near and far UV magnitudes were obtained from cross-matches within 2 arcsec to the GALEX GR6/7 data release. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 09-Dec-2019
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line