J/ApJS/261/11        SMUDGes. III. The Southern catalog        (Zaritsky+, 2022)

Systematically Measuring Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies (SMUDGes). III. The Southern SMUDGes catalog. Zaritsky D., Donnerstein R., Karunakaran A., Barbosa C.E., Dey A., Kadowaki J., Spekkens K., Zhang H. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 261, 11 (2022)> =2022ApJS..261...11Z 2022ApJS..261...11Z
ADC_Keywords: Photometry, ugriz; Galaxy catalogs; Morphology; Extinction; Surveys Keywords: Low surface brightness galaxies ; Galaxy structure Abstract: We present a catalog of 5598 ultra-diffuse galaxy (UDG) candidates with effective radius re>5.3" distributed throughout the southern portion of the DESI Legacy Imaging Survey covering ∼15000deg2. The catalog is most complete for physically large (re>2.5kpc) UDGs lying in the redshift range 1800≲cz/km.s-1≲7000, where the lower bound is defined by where incompleteness becomes significant for large objects on the sky and the upper bound by our minimum angular size selection criterion. Because physical size is integral to the definition of a UDG, we develop a method of distance estimation using existing redshift surveys. With three different galaxy samples, two of which contain UDGs with spectroscopic redshifts, we estimate that the method has a redshift accuracy of ∼75% when the method converges, although larger, more representative spectroscopic UDG samples are needed in order to fully understand the behavior of the method. We are able to estimate distances for 1079 of our UDG candidates (19%). Finally, to illustrate some uses of the catalog, we present both distance-independent and distance-dependent results. In the latter category, we establish that the red sequence of UDGs lies on the extrapolation of the red sequence relation for bright ellipticals and that the environment-color relation is at least qualitatively similar to that of high surface brightness galaxies. Both of these results challenge some of the models proposed for UDG evolution. Description: We report the results of our analysis of all images obtained with DECam at the CTIO 4m, or Blanco telescope, which are included in Data Release 9 (DR9) of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys (Dey+ 2019AJ....157..168D 2019AJ....157..168D). To keep our simulation pipeline identical to our science pipeline, we include all 5760 candidates in our catalog, with those visually identified as false positives flagged. See Section 4. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table2.dat 365 5760 The catalog -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/ApJS/225/11 : Subaru-UDGs in the Coma cluster (Yagi+, 2016) J/ApJ/842/133 : HI-bearing ultra-diffuse ALFALFA galaxies (Leisman+, 2017) J/ApJ/857/104 : Low surface brightness galaxies from HSC-SSP (Greco+, 2018) J/ApJS/240/1 : SMUDGes. I. First results in the Coma Cluster (Zaritsky+, 2019) J/ApJS/247/46 : Opt. phot. of SMUDGes ultra-diffuse galaxies (Barbosa+, 2020) J/ApJ/923/257 : Ultra-diffuse gal. with spectroscopic obs. (Kadowaki+, 2021) J/ApJS/252/18 : Low-surface-brightness galaxies from DES Y3 (Tanoglidis+, 2021) J/ApJS/257/60 : SMUDGes. II. Expanded survey & Stripe 82 cat. (Zaritsky+, 2021) http://www.legacysurvey.org/ : DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys home page Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 A4 --- --- [SMDG] 5- 18 A14 --- SMDG Galaxy name in SMDG catalog (HHMMSSs+DDMMSS; J2000) 20- 28 F9.5 deg RAdeg Right Ascension (J2000) 30- 38 F9.5 deg DEdeg [-65.6/34.8] Declination (J2000) 40- 45 F6.2 arcsec Re [5/125] Effective radius in angular units 47- 52 F6.2 arcsec B_ReBias [-7.1/12]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in ReBias (1) 54- 59 F6.2 arcsec ReBias [-6.3/8.4]?=-99.99 Bias; angular; corrected Re=Re-ReBias 61- 66 F6.2 arcsec b_ReBias [-1.3/20]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in ReBias (1) 68 I1 --- f_Re [0/1] Flag on Re: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 70- 73 F4.2 --- b/a [0.37/1] Minor to major axis ratio 75- 80 F6.2 --- B_b/aBias [-0.2/0.3]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in b/aBias (1) 82- 87 F6.2 --- b/aBias [-0.05/0.08]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected b/a=b/a-b/aBias 89- 94 F6.2 --- b_b/aBias [-0.08/0.3]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in b/aBias (1) 96 I1 --- f_b/a [0/1] Flag on b/a: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 98- 101 F4.2 --- n [0.12/1.95] Sersic index 103- 108 F6.2 --- B_nBias [-0.02/1.2]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in nBias (1) 110- 115 F6.2 --- nBias [-0.6/0.6]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected n=n-nBias 117- 122 F6.2 --- b_nBias [-0.5/0.7]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in nBias (1) 124 I1 --- f_n [0/1] Flag on n: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 126- 131 F6.2 deg PA [-90/90] Position angle of major axis measured N to E 133- 138 F6.2 deg B_PABias [-12/58]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in PABias (1) 140- 145 F6.2 deg PABias [0]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected PA=PA-PABias (always "0") 147- 152 F6.2 deg b_PABias [-98/55]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in PABias (1) 154 I1 --- f_PA [0/1] Flag on PA: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 156- 161 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0g [24/28.96]?=-99.99 Central surface brightness in g, AB mag (2) 163- 168 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 B_mu0gBias [-0.3/0.52]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in mu0gBias (1) 170- 175 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0gBias [-0.4/0.64]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected mu0g=mu0g-mu0gBias 177- 182 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 b_mu0gBias [0.03/1.52]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in mu0gBias (1) 184 I1 --- f_mu0g [0/1] Flag on mu0g: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 186- 191 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0r [23/28.8]?=-99.99 Central surface brightness in r, AB mag (2) 193- 198 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 B_mu0rBias [-0.15/0.7]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in mu0rBias (1) 200- 205 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0rBias [-0.4/0.8]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected mu0r=mu0r-mu0rBias 207- 212 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 b_mu0rBias [0.04/1.43]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in mu0rBias (1) 214 I1 --- f_mu0r [0/1] Flag on mu0r: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 216- 221 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0z [13/27.43]?=-99.99 Central surface brightness in z, AB mag (2) 223- 228 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 B_mu0zBias [-0.6/0.44]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in mu0zBias (1) 230- 235 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 mu0zBias [-0.12/0.95]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected mu0z=mu0z-mu0zBias 237- 242 F6.2 mag/arcsec2 b_mu0zBias [0.03/1.58]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in mu0zBias (1) 244 I1 --- f_mu0z [0/1] Flag on mu0z: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 246- 251 F6.2 mag gmag [15.47/22.5]?=-99.99 Total apparent g mag, AB mag (2) 253- 258 F6.2 mag B_gmagBias [-0.7/0.4]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in gmagBias (1) 260- 265 F6.2 mag gmagBias [-0.42/0.9]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected gmag=mmag-gmagBias 267- 272 F6.2 mag b_gmagBias [-0.3/1.4]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in gmagBias (1) 274 I1 --- f_gmag [0/1] Flag on gmag: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 276- 281 F6.2 mag rmag [12.67/21.84]?=-99.99 Total apparent r mag, AB mag (2) 283- 288 F6.2 mag B_rmagBias [-0.3/0.77]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in rmagBias (1) 290- 295 F6.2 mag rmagBias [-0.53/0.8]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected rmag=rmag-rmagBias 297- 302 F6.2 mag b_rmagBias [-0.3/1.52]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in rmagBias (1) 304 I1 --- f_rmag [0/1] Flag on rmag: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 306- 311 F6.2 mag zmag [10.47/21.86]?=-99.99 Total apparent z mag, AB mag (2) 313- 318 F6.2 mag B_zmagBias [-0.7/0.68]?=-99.99 The 1σ upper limit in zmagBias (1) 320- 325 F6.2 mag zmagBias [-0.6/0.98]?=-99.99 Bias; corrected zmag=zmag-zmagBias 327- 332 F6.2 mag b_zmagBias [-0.51/1.8]?=-99.99 The 1σ lower limit in zmagBias (1) 334 I1 --- f_zmag [0/1] Flag on zmag: 0=good; 1=extrapolated 336 I1 --- VC [0/2] Visual classification; 0=good; 1=rejected (146 occurrences); 2=disagreement (16 occurrences) 338- 341 F4.2 --- SFD [0/0.07] Optical depth at location from Schlegel+ maps for DECaLS filters 343- 346 F4.2 mag Ag [0.01/0.24] Corresponding extinction in g band 348- 351 F4.2 mag Ar [0.01/0.16] Corresponding extinction in r band 353- 356 F4.2 mag Az [0/0.09] Corresponding extinction in z band 358- 363 F6.2 --- comp [-0.33/0.58]?=-99.99 Fractional completeness 365 I1 --- f_comp [0/2] Flag on comp: 0=good, 1=extrapolated completness, 2=biases extrapolated -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Uncertainties bounds are to be applied relative to the measured value but describe the bias-corrected uncertainty interval. Note (2): Magnitudes not extinction corrected. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal References: Zaritsky et al. Paper I. 2019ApJS..240....1Z 2019ApJS..240....1Z Cat. J/ApJS/240/1 Zaritsky et al. Paper II. 2021ApJS..257...60Z 2021ApJS..257...60Z Cat. J/ApJS/257/60 Zaritsky et al. Paper III. 2022ApJS..261...11Z 2022ApJS..261...11Z This catalog Zaritsky et al. Paper V. 2023ApJS..267...27Z 2023ApJS..267...27Z Cat. J/ApJS/267/27
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 21-Sep-2022
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line