J/ApJS/275/17 UVCANDELS: phot. redshifts & galaxy physical param. (Mehta+, 2024)
UVCANDELS: catalogs of photometric redshifts and galaxy physical properties.
Mehta V., Rafelski M., Sunnquist B., Teplitz H.I., Scarlata C., Wang X.,
Fontana A., Hathi N.P., Iyer K.G., Alavi A., Colbert J., Grogin N.,
Koekemoer A., Nedkova K.V., Hayes M., Prichard L., Siana B., Smith B.M.,
Windhorst R., Ashcraft T., Bagley M., Baronchelli I., Barro G.,
Blanche A., Broussard A., Carleton T., Chartab N., Codoreanu A., Cohen S.,
Conselice C., Dai Y.S., Darvish B., Dave R., DeGroot L., De Mello D.,
Dickinson M., Emami N., Ferguson H., Ferreira L., Finkelstein K.,
Finkelstein S., Gardner J.P., Gawiser E., Gburek T., Giavalisco M.,
Grazian A., Gronwall C., Guo Y., Arrabal Haro P., Hemmati S., Howell J.,
Jansen R.A., Ji Z., Kaviraj S., Kim K.J., Kurczynski P., Lazar I.,
Lucas R.A., MacKenty J., Mantha K.B., Martin A., Martin G., McCabe T.,
Mobasher B., Morales A.M., O'Connell R., Olsen C., Otteson L.,
Ravindranath S., Redshaw C., Rutkowski M., Robertson B., Sattari Z.,
Soto E., Sun L., Taamoli S., Vanzella E., Yung L.Y.A., Zabelle B.,
The UVCANDELS Team
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 275, 17 (2024)>
=2024ApJS..275...17M 2024ApJS..275...17M
ADC_Keywords: Galaxy catalogs; Photometry, ugriz; Ultraviolet; Redshifts; Colors
Keywords: Catalogs ; Galaxies ; Astronomical methods
Abstract:
The UltraViolet imaging of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep
Extragalactic Legacy Survey Fields (UVCANDELS) program provides deep
Hubble Space Telescope (HST) F275W and F435W imaging over four CANDELS
fields (GOODS-N, GOODS-S, COSMOS, and Extended Groth Strip). We
combine this newly acquired UV imaging with existing HST imaging from
CANDELS as well as existing ancillary data to obtain robust
photometric redshifts and reliable estimates for galaxy physical
properties for over 150,000 galaxies in the ∼430arcmin2 UVCANDELS
area. Here, we leverage the power of the new UV photometry to not only
improve the photometric redshift measurements in these fields, but
also constrain the full redshift probability distribution combining
multiple redshift-fitting tools. Furthermore, using the full UV-to-IR
photometric data set, we measure the galaxy physical properties by
fitting templates from population synthesis models with two different
parameterizations (flexible and fixed form) of the star formation
histories (SFHs). Compared to the flexible SFH parameterization, we
find that the fixed-form SFHs systematically underestimate the galaxy
stellar masses, both at the low-mass (≲109M☉) and high-mass
(≳1010M☉) end, by as much as ∼0.5dex. This underestimation is
primarily due the limited ability of fixed-form SFH parameterization
to simultaneously capture the chaotic nature of star formation in
these galaxies.
Description:
The UltraViolet imaging of the Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep
Extragalactic Legacy Survey Fields (UVCANDELS; PI: H. Teplitz;
PID: 15647; X. Wang+ 2024RNAAS...8...26W 2024RNAAS...8...26W) is a Cycle 26 Hubble
Treasury program that obtained WFC3/UVIS F275W and ACS/WFC F435W (in
parallel) for four of the deep-wide survey fields defined by CANDELS
(Grogin+ 2011ApJS..197...35G 2011ApJS..197...35G; Koekemoer+ 2011ApJS..197...36K 2011ApJS..197...36K), namely
GOODS-N, GOODS-S, COSMOS, and EGS, covering a combined area of
∼430arcmin2.
The UVCANDELS F275W mosaics are available at the Mikulski Archive for
Space Telescopes (MAST; doi:10.17909/8s31-f778) for all four fields
along with EGS.
The photometric data set used for modeling the galaxy SEDs in this
work are primarily based on the publicly available CANDELS catalogs
(Faber 2011, doi=10.17909/T94S3X), with the addition of the new F275W
and F435W UVCANDELS photometry. Specifically, the CANDELS
multiwavelength photometric catalogs that we use for GOODS-N, GOODS-S,
COSMOS, and EGS fields are described and presented in
Guo+ 2013, J/ApJS/207/24; Nayyeri+ 2017, J/ApJS/228/7;
Barro+ 2019, J/ApJS/243/22 and Stefanon+ 2017, J/ApJS/229/32 respectively.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
photz.dat 194 150503 UVCANDELS photometric redshifts catalog
cos-cig.dat 561 38671 *UVCANDELS physical property COSMOS-CIGALE catalog
(from 09/09/2025 Update)
egs-cig.dat 469 41457 *UVCANDELS physical property EGS-CIGALE catalog
(from 09/09/2025 Update)
gs-cig.dat 373 34930 *UVCANDELS physical property GOODSS-CIGALE catalog
(from 09/09/2025 Update)
gn-cig.dat 364 35445 *UVCANDELS physical property GOODSN-CIGALE catalog
(from 09/09/2025 Update)
gs-db.dat 835 34930 *UVCANDELS physical property GOODSS-DBASIS catalog
gn-db.dat 822 35445 *UVCANDELS physical property GOODSN-DBASIS catalog
egs-db.dat 1005 41457 *UVCANDELS physical property EGS-DBASIS catalog
cos-db.dat 1011 38671 *UVCANDELS physical property COSMOS-DBASIS catalog
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note on *cig.dat: For our fiducial approach, we use the traditional approach of
using fixed, functional forms for the galaxy SFHs. In this case, we
implement the Code Investigating GALaxy Emission (CIGALE;
http://cigale.lam.fr/) tool for the estimation of the galaxy physical
properties. See Section 4.2.
Note on *db.dat: For the flexible-SFH approach, we use the SED-modeling tool
Dense Basis (http://dense-basis.readthedocs.io/), which uses Gaussian
process (GP) regression to model highly flexible SFHs. See Section 4.1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
II/261 : GOODS initial results (Giavalisco+, 2004)
II/253 : Chandra Deep Field South: multi-colour data (Wolf+, 2008)
II/373 : The fourth UltraVISTA data release (DR4) (Moneti+, 2019)
VII/223 : The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey. V. The 10k catalogue (Croom+ 2001)
J/AJ/120/2206 : NTT, HDF-S and HDF-N photometric redshifts (Fontana+, 2000)
J/ApJS/150/1 : VV29 and NGC 4676 HST photometry (Benitez+, 2004)
J/ApJ/613/200 : Hubble Higher z Supernova Search, HHZSS (Strolger+, 2004)
J/MNRAS/361/525 : Las Campanas Infrared Survey. V. (Doherty+, 2005)
J/A+A/437/883 : K20 survey: spectroscopic catalogue (Mignoli+, 2005)
J/AJ/132/926 : Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field (Coe+, 2006)
J/A+A/449/951 : GOODS-MUSIC sample: multicolour catalog (Grazian+, 2006)
J/ApJS/172/70 : zCOSMOS-bright catalog, DR3 (Lilly+, 2007)
J/A+A/465/1099 : Redshift catalog of 691 objects in CDFS (Ravikumar+, 2007)
J/ApJ/689/687 : GOODS-N spectroscopic survey (Barger+, 2008)
J/ApJS/177/431 : Mid-IR sources in EGS (Barmby+, 2008)
J/A+A/478/83 : GOODS-South Field VLT/FORS2 redshifts. III. (Vanzella+, 2008)
J/ApJ/682/985 : FIREWORKS photometry of GOODS CDF-S (Wuyts+, 2008)
J/ApJ/706/158 : Early-type galaxies in PEARS (Ferreras+, 2009)
J/ApJ/690/1236 : COSMOS photometric redshift catalog (Ilbert+, 2009)
J/ApJS/184/218 : The zCOSMOS 10k-bright spectroscopic sample (Lilly+, 2009)
J/ApJ/703/2033 : Lyman-break galaxies (LBG) in the HUDF (Rafelski+, 2009)
J/A+A/504/751 : GOODS-MUSIC catalog updated version (Santini+, 2009)
J/AJ/138/1022 : Emission-line gal. from HST PEARS survey (Straughn+, 2009)
J/ApJ/693/1713 : Spectroscopy of X-ray sources in ECDF-S (Treister+, 2009)
J/ApJ/696/1195 : COSMOS AGN spectroscopic survey. I. (Trump+, 2009)
J/A+A/512/A12 : VLT/VIMOS spectroscopy in GOODS-South field (Balestra+, 2010)
J/A+A/511/A50 : JHks of GOODS-South field (Retzlaff+, 2010)
J/ApJS/193/14 : DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: GOODS-N field (Cooper+, 2011)
J/PASJ/63/S379 : MOIRCS Deep Survey deep and wide catalogs (Kajisawa+, 2011)
J/ApJ/735/86 : NEWFIRM MBS: photometric catalogs (Whitaker+, 2011)
J/A+A/544/A156 : UltraVISTA Catalogue Release DR1 (McCracken+, 2012)
J/ApJ/744/44 : Hα and UV fluxes in nearby galaxies (Weisz+, 2012)
J/ApJ/769/80 : Spitzer/IRAC observations of five deep fields (Ashby+, 2013)
J/ApJS/207/24 : GOODS-S CANDELS multiwavelength catalog (Guo+, 2013)
J/A+A/549/A63 : GMASS photometry (Kurk+, 2013)
J/A+A/559/A14 : VIMOS VLT Deep Survey final data release (Le Fevre+, 2013)
J/ApJ/777/18 : Stellar mass functions of galaxies to z=4 (Muzzin+, 2013)
J/A+A/570/A11 : The Hawk-I UDS and GOODS Survey (HUGS) (Fontana+, 2014)
J/ApJS/214/24 : 3D-HST+CANDELS catalog (Skelton+, 2014)
J/ApJS/218/33 : Spitzer-CANDELS catalog within 5 deep fields (Ashby+, 2015)
J/AJ/150/31 : Phot. and redshifts of galaxies in the UDF (Rafelski+, 2015)
J/ApJS/220/12 : FMOS-COSMOS survey III. 0.7<z<2.5 galaxies (Silverman+, 2015)
J/AJ/150/153 : Team Keck Redshift Survey 2 (TKRS2) (Wirth+, 2015)
J/ApJS/225/27 : 3D-HST Survey: grism spectra master catalog (Momcheva+, 2016)
J/ApJS/224/15 : Improved 2Ms and 250ks Chandra catalogs (Xue+, 2016)
J/A+A/606/A12 : MUSE-Wide survey: 831 emission line galaxies (Herenz+, 2017)
J/A+A/608/A2 : MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field Survey. II. (Inami+, 2017)
J/ApJ/835/254 : GLASS. IX. Param. from HFF & GLASS (Morishita+, 2017)
J/ApJS/228/7 : Multiwavelength obs. in CANDELS COSMOS field (Nayyeri+, 2017)
J/ApJS/229/32 : CANDELS: multiwavelength cat. in the EGS (Stefanon+, 2017)
J/ApJS/234/21 : hCOSMOS: Hectospec survey of gal. in COSMOS (Damjanov+, 2018)
J/ApJ/858/77 : DEIMOS 10K sp. survey in COSMOS field (Hasinger+, 2018)
J/ApJS/235/36 : SPLASH-SXDF multi-wavelength photometric cat. (Mehta+, 2018)
J/ApJS/243/22 : CANDELS/SHARDS multiwavelength cat. in GOODS-N (Barro+, 2019)
J/ApJ/871/233 : Photometric redshifts in the EGOODS-North field (Hsu+, 2019)
J/ApJ/877/81 : The C3R2 survey: DR2 new sp. redshifts (Masters+, 2019)
J/MNRAS/506/928 : Stellar mass-size relation for low M* gal. (Nedkova+, 2021)
J/ApJS/256/9 : Euclid preparation. XIV. C3R2 survey DR3 (Stanford+, 2021)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: photz.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 6 A6 --- Field The CANDELS field (cosmos, egs, goodsn or
goodss) (field)
8- 12 I5 --- ID [1/41457] The CANDELS identifier
within Field (ID)
14- 25 F12.8 deg RAdeg [52.99/215.31] Right ascension (J2000) (RA)
27- 38 F12.8 deg DEdeg [-28/62.4] Declination (J2000) (DEC)
40- 44 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/11.92] Best photometric redshift (zphot)
(1)
46- 50 F5.2 --- b_zphot [0.03/11.5] Lower 68.3% confidence interval
of zphot (zphot_l68)
52- 56 F5.2 --- B_zphot [0.09/12] Upper 68.3% confidence interval of
zphot (zphot_u68)
58- 62 F5.2 --- zpeak Highest P(z) peak (zpeak)
64- 68 F5.2 --- b_zpeak [0.03/11.91] Lower 68.3% confidence interval
of zpeak (zpeak_l68)
70- 74 F5.2 --- B_zpeak [0.08/11.97] Upper 68.3% confidence interval
of zpeak (zpeak_u68)
76- 81 F6.2 --- zpeak2 [0.05/11.95]? Second highest P(z) peak
(zpeak2)
83- 88 F6.2 --- b_zpeak2 [0.03/12]? Lower 68.3% confidence interval of
zpeak2 (zpeak2_l68)
90- 95 F6.2 --- B_zpeak2 [0.08/12]? Upper 68.3% confidence interval of
zpeak2 (zpeak2_u68)
97- 102 F6.2 --- zpeak3 ? Third highest P(z) peak (zpeak3)
104- 109 F6.2 --- b_zpeak3 [0.03/11.43]? Lower 68.3% confidence interval
of zpeak3 (zpeak3_l68)
111- 116 F6.2 --- B_zpeak3 [0.09/11.9]? Upper 68.3% confidence interval
of zpeak3 (zpeak3_u68)
118- 122 F5.2 --- zphotMed [0.06/11.92] Median of the P (z) (zphot_med)
124- 128 F5.2 --- b_zphotMed Lower 68.3% confidence interval of zphotMed
(zphotmedl68)
130- 134 F5.2 --- B_zphotMed Upper 68.3% confidence interval of zphotMed
(zphotmedu68)
136- 143 F8.4 --- zspec [0.0008/7.1]? The spectroscopic redshift
(zspec)
145- 194 A50 --- r_zspec The source of the spectroscopic redshift
(zspec_ref) (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): The zphot column is the best redshift to use, and generally consists
of the median of the P(z) (i.e., zphotzMed). However, sometimes if the
first peak is at low redshift (z<0.1), it is instead the second P(z)
peak (i.e., zpeak2) to avoid issues with the photometric-redshift
software as described in the text.
Note (2): The final spectroscopic reference sample used in this analysis is
assembled from a combination of the following publications:
3D_HST = Momcheva+ 2016ApJS..225...27M 2016ApJS..225...27M
DEEP2_DR4 = Newman+ 2013ApJS..208....5N 2013ApJS..208....5N
zCOSMOS = Lilly+ 2007ApJS..172...70L 2007ApJS..172...70L & 2009ApJS..184..218L 2009ApJS..184..218L
PRIMUS = Coil+ 2011ApJ...741....8C 2011ApJ...741....8C
MOSDEF = Kriek+ 2015ApJS..218...15K 2015ApJS..218...15K
DEIMOS_2018 = Hasinger+ 2018ApJ...858...77H 2018ApJ...858...77H
ACES_2012 = Cooper et al. 2012MNRAS.419.3018C 2012MNRAS.419.3018C
VLT_2008 = Vanzella+ 2008A&A...478...83V 2008A&A...478...83V
MUSE_WIDE = Herenz et al. 2017A&A...606A..12H 2017A&A...606A..12H
VIMOS10MR = Balestra+ 2010A&A...512A..12B 2010A&A...512A..12B
hCOSMOS = Damjanov+ 2018ApJS..234...21D 2018ApJS..234...21D
MUSE_HUDF = Inami+ 2017A&A...608A...2I 2017A&A...608A...2I
K20 = Mignoli+ 2005A&A...437..883M 2005A&A...437..883M
C3R2 = Masters+ 2019ApJ...877...81M 2019ApJ...877...81M; Stanford+ 2021ApJS..256....9S 2021ApJS..256....9S
LEGA-C = van der Wel+ 2016ApJS..223...29V 2016ApJS..223...29V
VIMOS10LR = Balestra+ 2010A&A...512A..12B 2010A&A...512A..12B
Barger_K = Barger+ 2008ApJ...689..687B 2008ApJ...689..687B
VUDS_2015 = Le Fevre+ 2015A&A...576A..79L 2015A&A...576A..79L
Kurk_2012 = Kurk et al. 2013A&A...549A..63K 2013A&A...549A..63K
VVDS_Final = Le Fevre+ 2013A&A...559A..14L 2013A&A...559A..14L
VANDELS = McLure+ 2018MNRAS.479...25M 2018MNRAS.479...25M
Trump_2013 = Trump+ 2013ApJ...763L...6T 2013ApJ...763L...6T
Barger_ACS = Barger+ 2008ApJ...689..687B 2008ApJ...689..687B
Cooper_2011 = Cooper et al. 2011ApJS..193...14C 2011ApJS..193...14C
MOSFIRE = Kriek+ 2015ApJS..218...15K 2015ApJS..218...15K
Barger_24mu = Barger+ 2008ApJ...689..687B 2008ApJ...689..687B
ePEARS_CDFS = Straughn et al. 2009AJ....138.1022S 2009AJ....138.1022S
Barger_UV = Barger+ 2008ApJ...689..687B 2008ApJ...689..687B
Wirth_2015 = Wirth+ 2015AJ....150..153W 2015AJ....150..153W
FMOST = Silverman et al. 2015ApJS..220...12S 2015ApJS..220...12S
VLT_IMAG = Ravikumar+ 2007A&A...465.1099R 2007A&A...465.1099R
IMACS = Trump+ 2011ApJ...743..144T 2011ApJ...743..144T
Yoshikawa_2010 = Yoshikawa+ 2010ApJ...718..112Y 2010ApJ...718..112Y
FW_7 = van der Wel+ 2005ApJ...631..145V 2005ApJ...631..145V
VLT_LBGs = Vanzella+ 2009ApJ...695.1163V 2009ApJ...695.1163V
FW_6 = Croom+ 2001MNRAS.322L..29C 2001MNRAS.322L..29C
COMBO-17 = Wolf+ 2004A&A...421..913W 2004A&A...421..913W
ePEARS_HUDF = Straughn et al. 2009AJ....138.1022S 2009AJ....138.1022S
Trump_2015 = Trump+ 2015ApJ...811...26T 2015ApJ...811...26T
Wuyts_2009 = Wuyts et al. 2009ApJ...706..885W 2009ApJ...706..885W (FIREWORKS?)
PEARS_ETGs = Ferreras et al. 2009ApJ...706..158F 2009ApJ...706..158F
Trump_2009 = Trump+ 2009ApJ...696.1195T 2009ApJ...696.1195T
FW_16 = Huang+ 2009ApJ...700..183H 2009ApJ...700..183H
WFC3 = Krogager+ 2014ApJ...797...17K 2014ApJ...797...17K
CANDELSz7 = Pentericci+ 2018A&A...616A.174P 2018A&A...616A.174P
FW_10 = Daddi+ 2004ApJ...617..746D 2004ApJ...617..746D
GRAPES_HUDF = Pasquali+ 2006ApJ...636..115P 2006ApJ...636..115P; Hathi+ 2009ApJ...690.1866H 2009ApJ...690.1866H
FW_9 = Strolger+ 2004ApJ...613..200S 2004ApJ...613..200S
FW_15 = Roche+ 2006MNRAS.370...74R 2006MNRAS.370...74R
FW_8 = Cristiani+ 2000A&A...359..489C 2000A&A...359..489C
Xue_8 = Treister+ 2009ApJ...693.1713T 2009ApJ...693.1713T
LCIRS = Doherty et al. 2005MNRAS.361..525D 2005MNRAS.361..525D
See Section 3.1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: cos-cig.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID [1/38671] Object identifier in the
corresponding CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 17 F11.7 deg RAdeg [150/150.3] CANDELS right ascension
(J2000) (RA)
19- 29 F11.7 deg DEdeg [2/2.6] CANDELS declination (J2000)
(DEC)
31- 35 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/11.9] Photometric redshift
used for fitting (photz)
37- 42 F6.3 [Msun] logM [4.96/13.5]? Galaxy stellar mass
(logM)
44- 51 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR [-120/4.6]? Instantaneous
star-formation rate (logSFR)
53- 60 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR100 [-119.2/4.1]? 100Myr-averaged
star-formation rate (logSFR100)
62- 66 F5.3 mag Av [0/0.3] Dust attenuation in the
V-band (Av)
68- 73 F6.3 [Sun] logZ [-2.31/0.4] Stellar metallicity
(logZsol)
75- 80 F6.3 [yr] logage [10/13.2] Age of the main stellar
population (logage)
82- 87 F6.3 [yr] logtau [10.5/13.5] E-folding timescale of
the main stellar population (logtau)
89- 94 F6.3 --- fracBurst [0/0.9] Fraction of mass formed in
late burst (f_burst)
96- 101 F6.3 mag FUV-NUV [-0.4/5.7] Rest-frame FUV-NUV color
index (color_fuvnuv)
103- 108 F6.3 mag NUV-R [-0.5/11.5] Rest-frame NUV-R color
index (color_nuvr)
110- 115 F6.3 --- chi2 [0.4/58.3]? Reduced chi2 value
(chi2)
117- 130 E14.7 uJy FnuF275W [-1.2e-17/29.5]? Model template
flux for the observed HST WFC3/UVIS
F275W band (modelFnuF275W)
132- 145 E14.7 uJy FnuF435W [-5.92e-22/107]? Model template
flux for the observed HST ACS F435W
band (modelFnuF435W)
147- 160 E14.7 uJy FnuF606W [-6.1e-28/377]? Model template flux
for the observed HST/ACS F606W band
(modelFnuF606W)
162- 174 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W [0/800]? Model template flux for
the observed HST/ACS F814W band
(modelFnuF814W)
176- 188 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W [4.5e-14/1628]? Model template flux
for the observed HST/WFC3 F125W band
(modelFnuF125W)
190- 202 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W [2.8e-05/1836]? Model template flux
for the observed HST/WFC3 F160W band
(modelFnuF160W)
204- 217 E14.7 uJy Fnuu [-5.5e-20/59.1]? Model template flux
for the observed CFHT/Megaprime u
band (modelFnuCFHT_u)
219- 232 E14.7 uJy Fnug [-5e-22/164]? Model template flux
for the observed CFHT/Megaprime
g band (modelFnuCFHT_g)
234- 247 E14.7 uJy Fnur [-2.3e-25/455]? Model template flux
for the observed CFHT/Megaprime
r band (modelFnuCFHT_r)
249- 262 E14.7 uJy Fnui [-5.1e-32/720]? Model template flux
for the observed CFHT/Megaprime
i band (modelFnuCFHT_i)
264- 276 E13.7 uJy Fnuz [0/919]? Model template flux for
the observed CFHT/Megaprime z band
(modelFnuCFHT_z)
278- 291 E14.7 uJy FnuB [-2.2e-22/120]? Model template flux
for the observed Subaru B band
(modelFnuSubaru_B)
293- 306 E14.7 uJy FnuV [-10e-25/296]? Model template flux
for the observed Subaru V band
(modelFnuSubaru_V)
308- 321 E14.7 uJy Fnugp [-1.1e-21/155]? Model template flux
for the observed Subaru g' band
(modelFnuSubaru_gp)
323- 336 E14.7 uJy Fnurp [-1.7e-28/463]? Model template flux
for the observed Subaru r' band
(modelFnuSubaru_rp)
338- 351 E14.7 uJy Fnuip [-5.2e-37/742]? Model template flux
for the observed Subaru i' band
(modelFnuSubaru_ip)
353- 365 E13.7 uJy Fnuzp [0/957]? Model template flux for
the observed Subaru z' band
(modelFnuSubaru_zp)
367- 379 E13.7 uJy FnuY [0/1180]? Model template flux for
the observed UVISTA Y band
(modelFnuUVISTA_Y)
381- 393 E13.7 uJy FnuJ [4.5e-14/1662]? Model template flux
for the observed UVISTA J band
(modelFnuUVISTA_J)
395- 407 E13.7 uJy FnuH [7.3e-05/1879]? Model template flux
for the observed UVISTA H band
(modelFnuUVISTA_H)
409- 421 E13.7 uJy FnuKs [0.0002/2233]? Model template flux
for the observed UVISTA Ks band
(modelFnuUVISTA_Ks)
423- 435 E13.7 uJy FnuJ1 [0/1244]? Model template flux for
the observed NEWFIRM J1 band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J1)
437- 449 E13.7 uJy FnuJ2 [8.3e-18/1582]? Model template flux
for the observed NEWFIRM J2 band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J2)
451- 463 E13.7 uJy FnuJ3 [7.7e-14/1696]? Model template flux
for the observed NEWFIRM J3 band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J3)
465- 477 E13.7 uJy FnuH1 [2.9e-05/1854]? Model template flux
for the observed NEWFIRM H1 band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H1)
479- 491 E13.7 uJy FnuH2 [0.0001/1898]? Model template flux
for the observed NEWFIRM H2 band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H2)
493- 505 E13.7 uJy FnuK [0.0002/2218]? Model template flux
for the observed NEWFIRM K band
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_K)
507- 519 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 [0.0002/1017]? Model template flux
for the observed Spitzer/IRAC Ch1
(3.6um) band (modelFnuIRAC_CH1)
521- 533 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 [0.0002/831]? Model template flux
for the observed Spitzer/IRAC Ch2
(4.5um) band (modelFnuIRAC_CH2)
535- 547 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 [0.0001/534]? Model template flux
for the observed Spitzer/IRAC Ch3
(5.8um) band (modelFnuIRAC_CH3)
549- 561 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 [0.0001/2151]? Model template flux
for the observed Spitzer/IRAC Ch4
(8.0um) band (modelFnuIRAC_CH4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: egs-cig.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID Object identifier in the corresponding
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 16 F10.6 deg RAdeg CANDELS right ascension (J2000) (RA)
18- 26 F9.6 deg DEdeg CANDELS declination (J2000) (DEC)
28- 32 F5.2 --- zphot Photometric redshift used for fitting
(photz)
34- 39 F6.3 [Msun] logM ? Galaxy stellar mass (logM)
41- 48 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR ? Instantaneous star-formation rate
(logSFR)
50- 57 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR100 ? 100Myr-averaged star-formation rate
(logSFR100)
59- 63 F5.3 mag Av Dust attenuation in the V-band (Av)
65- 70 F6.3 [Sun] logZ Stellar metallicity (logZsol)
72- 77 F6.3 [yr] logage Age of the main stellar population
(logage)
79- 84 F6.3 [yr] logtau E-folding timescale of the main stellar
population (logtau)
86- 91 F6.3 --- fracBurst Fraction of mass formed in late burst
(f_burst)
93- 98 F6.3 mag FUV-NUV Rest-frame FUV-NUV color (color_fuvnuv)
100- 105 F6.3 mag NUV-R Rest-frame NUV-R color (color_nuvr)
107- 112 F6.3 --- chi2 ? Reduced chisq value (chi2)
114- 127 E14.7 uJy FnuF275W ? Model template fluxes for HST/UVIS
F275W observed band (modelFnuF275W)
129- 142 E14.7 uJy FnuF435W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F435W observed band (modelFnuF435W)
144- 157 E14.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F606W observed band (modelFnuF606W)
159- 171 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F814W observed band (modelFnuF814W)
173- 185 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F125W observed band (modelFnuF125W)
187- 199 E13.7 uJy FnuF140W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F140W observed band (modelFnuF140W)
201- 213 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F160W observed band (modelFnuF160W)
215- 228 E14.7 uJy FnuCFHTu ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/MegaCam observed u-band
(modelFnuCFHT_u)
230- 243 E14.7 uJy FnuCFHTg ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/MegaCam observed g-band
(modelFnuCFHT_g)
245- 258 E14.7 uJy FnuCFHTr ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/MegaCam observed r-band
(modelFnuCFHT_r)
260- 273 E14.7 uJy FnuCFHTi ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/MegaCam observed i-band
(modelFnuCFHT_i)
275- 287 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTz ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/MegaCam observed z-band
(modelFnuCFHT_z)
289- 301 E13.7 uJy FnuJ ? Model template fluxes for CFHT/WIRCam
observed J-band (modelFnuWIRCAM_J)
303- 315 E13.7 uJy FnuH ? Model template fluxes for CFHT/WIRCam
observed H-band (modelFnuWIRCAM_H)
317- 329 E13.7 uJy FnuKs ? Model template fluxes for CFHT/WIRCam
observed Ks-band (modelFnuWIRCAM_Ks)
331- 343 E13.7 uJy FnuJ1 ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed J1-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_J1)
345- 357 E13.7 uJy FnuJ2 ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed J2-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_J2)
359- 371 E13.7 uJy FnuJ3 ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed J3-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_J3)
373- 385 E13.7 uJy FnuH1 ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed H1-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_H1)
387- 399 E13.7 uJy FnuH2 ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed H1-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_H2)
401- 413 E13.7 uJy FnuK ? Model template fluxes for NEWFIRM
observed K-band (modelFnuNEWFIRM_K)
415- 427 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 ? Model template fluxes for Spitzer/IRAC
observed Ch1-band (3.6um)
(modelFnuIRAC_CH1)
429- 441 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for Spitzer/IRAC
observed Ch2-band (4.5um)
(modelFnuIRAC_CH2)
443- 455 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for Spitzer/IRAC
observed Ch3-band (5.8um)
(modelFnuIRAC_CH3)
457- 469 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 ? Model template fluxes for Spitzer/IRAC
observed Ch4-band (8.0um)
(modelFnuIRAC_CH4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: gs-cig.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID Object identifier in the corresponding
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 17 F11.7 deg RAdeg CANDELS right ascension (J2000) (RA)
19- 29 F11.7 deg DEdeg CANDELS declination (J2000) (DEC)
31- 35 F5.2 --- zphot Photometric redshift used for fitting
(photz)
37- 42 F6.3 [Msun] logM ? Galaxy stellar mass (logM)
44- 51 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR ? Instantaneous star-formation rate
(logSFR)
53- 60 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR100 ? 100Myr-averaged star-formation rate
(logSFR100)
62- 66 F5.3 mag Av Dust attenuation in the V-band (Av)
68- 73 F6.3 [Sun] logZ Stellar metallicity (logZsol)
75- 80 F6.3 [yr] logage Age of the main stellar population
(logage)
82- 87 F6.3 [yr] logtau E-folding timescale of the main
stellar population (logtau)
89- 94 F6.3 --- fracBurst Fraction of mass formed in late burst
(f_burst)
96- 101 F6.3 mag FUV-NUV Rest-frame FUV-NUV color (color_fuvnuv)
103- 108 F6.3 mag NUV-R Rest-frame NUV-R color (color_nuvr)
110- 116 F7.3 --- chi2 ? Reduced chisq value (chi2)
118- 131 E14.7 uJy FnuF275W ? Model template fluxes for HST/UVIS
F275W observed band (modelFnuF275W)
133- 146 E14.7 uJy FnuF435W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F435W observed band (modelFnuF435W)
148- 161 E14.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F606W observed band (modelFnuF606W)
163- 175 E13.7 uJy FnuF775W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F775W observed band (modelFnuF775W)
177- 189 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F814W observed band (modelFnuF814W)
191- 203 E13.7 uJy FnuF850LP ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F850LP observed band (modelFnuF850LP)
205- 217 E13.7 uJy FnuF098M ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F098M observed band (modelFnuF098M)
219- 231 E13.7 uJy FnuF105W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F105W observed band (modelFnuF105W)
233- 245 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F125W observed band (modelFnuF125W)
247- 259 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F160W observed band (modelFnuF160W)
261- 274 E14.7 uJy FnuUCTIO ? Model template fluxes for
Blanco/MOSAICII observed U-band
(modelFnuCTIO_U)
276- 289 E14.7 uJy FnuUVIMOS ? Model template fluxes for VLT/VIMOS
observed U-band (modelFnuVIMOS_U)
291- 303 E13.7 uJy FnuKsHAWKI ? Model template fluxes for VLT/HAWK-I
observed Ks-band (modelFnuHAWKI_Ks)
305- 317 E13.7 uJy FnuKsISAAC ? Model template fluxes for VLT/ISAAC
observed Ks-band (modelFnuISAAC_Ks)
319- 331 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch1 (3.6um) observed band
(modelFnuIRAC_CH1)
333- 345 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um) observed band
(modelFnuIRAC_CH2)
347- 359 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um) observed band
(modelFnuIRAC_CH3)
361- 373 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch4 (8.0um) observed band
(modelFnuIRAC_CH4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: gn-cig.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID Object identifier in the
corresponding CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 17 F11.7 deg RAdeg CANDELS right ascension (J2000) (RA)
19- 29 F11.7 deg DEdeg CANDELS declination (J2000) (DEC)
31- 35 F5.2 --- zphot Photometric redshift used for fitting
(photz)
37- 42 F6.3 [Msun] logM ? Galaxy stellar mass (logM)
44- 51 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR ? Instantaneous star-formation rate
(logSFR)
53- 60 F8.3 [Msun/yr] logSFR100 ? 100Myr-averaged star-formation rate
(logSFR100)
62- 66 F5.3 mag Av Dust attenuation in the V-band (Av)
68- 73 F6.3 [Sun] logZ Stellar metallicity (logZsol)
75- 80 F6.3 [yr] logage Age of the main stellar population
(logage)
82- 87 F6.3 [yr] logtau E-folding timescale of the main
stellar population (logtau)
89- 94 F6.3 --- fracBurst Fraction of mass formed in late burst
(f_burst)
96- 101 F6.3 mag FUV-NUV Rest-frame FUV-NUV color
(color_fuvnuv)
103- 108 F6.3 mag NUV-R Rest-frame NUV-R color (color_nuvr)
110- 122 E13.7 --- chi2 ? Reduced chisq value (chi2)
124- 137 E14.7 uJy FnuF275W ? Model template fluxes for HST/UVIS
F275W observed band (modelFnuF275W)
139- 152 E14.7 uJy FnuF435W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F435W observed band (modelFnuF435W)
154- 167 E14.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F606W observed band (modelFnuF606W)
169- 181 E13.7 uJy FnuF775W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F775W observed band (modelFnuF775W)
183- 195 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F814W observed band (modelFnuF814W)
197- 209 E13.7 uJy FnuF850LP ? Model template fluxes for HST/ACS
F850LP observed band
(modelFnuF850LP)
211- 223 E13.7 uJy FnuF105W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F105W observed band (modelFnuF105W)
225- 237 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F125W observed band (modelFnuF125W)
239- 251 E13.7 uJy FnuF140W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F140W observed band (modelFnuF140W)
253- 265 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W ? Model template fluxes for HST/WFC3
F160W observed band (modelFnuF160W)
267- 280 E14.7 uJy FnuULBC ? Model template fluxes for LBT/LBC
observed U' band (modelFnuLBC_U)
282- 294 E13.7 uJy FnuKsWIRCAM ? Model template fluxes for
CFHT/WIRCam observed Ks band
(modelFnuWIRCAM_Ks)
296- 308 E13.7 uJy FnuKsMOIRCS ? Model template fluxes for
Subaru/MOIRCS observed Ks band
(modelFnuMOIRCS_Ks)
310- 322 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch1 (3.6um) observed
band (modelFnuIRAC_CH1)
324- 336 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um) observed
band (modelFnuIRAC_CH2)
338- 350 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um) observed
band (modelFnuIRAC_CH3)
352- 364 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 ? Model template fluxes for
Spitzer/IRAC ch4 (8.0um) observed
band (modelFnuIRAC_CH4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: gs-db.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID [1/34930] Object identifier in the
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 17 F11.7 deg RAdeg [52.99/53.3] CANDELS right
ascension (J2000) (RA)
19- 29 F11.7 deg DEdeg [-28/-27.6] CANDELS declination
(J2000) (DEC)
31- 35 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/10.57] Photometric redshift
used for fitting (photz)
37- 43 F7.5 --- e_zphot [0.026/0.3] Error (assumed) on
photometric redshift (delz)
45- 46 I2 --- Nbands [17/18] Number of photometric bands
used for fitting (nbands)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
48- 53 F6.3 [Msun] logM [5.19/12.6]? Best estimate for
Galaxy stellar mass from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (logM)
55- 60 F6.3 [Msun] b_logM [4.5/12.6]? 16%ile of galaxy
stellar mass posterior (logM_16)
62- 67 F6.3 [Msun] B_logM 84%ile of galaxy stellar mass
posterior (logM_84)
69- 75 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFR [-4.7/3.5]? Best estimate for
Star-formation rate from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (logSFR)
77- 83 F7.4 [Msun/yr] b_logSFR [-5.3/3.1]? 16%ile of
star-formation rate posterior
(logSFR_16)
85- 91 F7.4 [Msun/yr] B_logSFR 84%ile of star-formation rate
posterior (logSFR_84)
93- 98 F6.4 mag Av [0.0015/3.6]? Best estimate for
Dust attenuation in the V-band from
the posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (Av)
100- 105 F6.4 mag b_Av [0.0015/3]? 16%ile of V-band dust
attenuation posterior (Av_16)
107- 112 F6.4 mag B_Av ? 84%ile of V-band dust attenuation
posterior (Av_84)
114- 120 F7.4 [Sun] logZ [-1.5/0.3]? Best estimate for
Stellar metallicity from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (logZsol)
122- 128 F7.4 [Sun] b_logZ [-1.5/0.23]? 16%ile of stellar
metallicity posterior (logZsol_16)
130- 136 F7.4 [Sun] B_logZ 84%ile of stellar metallicity
posterior (logZsol_84)
138- 143 F6.4 --- t20 [0.036/0.99]? Time when 20% of
galaxy mass was formed estimated
from the posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t20) (G1)
145- 150 F6.4 --- b_t20 [0.033/0.99]? 16%ile of t20
posterior (t20_16)
152- 157 F6.4 --- B_t20 84%ile of t20 posterior (t20_84)
159- 164 F6.4 --- t40 [0.067/1]? Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t40) (G1)
166- 171 F6.4 --- b_t40 [0.065/0.99]? 16%ile of t40
posterior (t40_16)
173- 178 F6.4 --- B_t40 84%ile of t40 posterior (t40_84)
180- 185 F6.4 --- t60 [0.13/1]? Time when 60% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t60) (G1)
187- 192 F6.4 --- b_t60 [0.13/1]? 16%ile of t60 posterior
(t60_16)
194- 199 F6.4 --- B_t60 84%ile of t60 posterior (t60_84)
201- 206 F6.4 --- t80 [0.5/1]? Time when 80% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t80) (G1)
208- 213 F6.4 --- b_t80 [0.4/1]? 16%ile of t80 posterior
(t80_16)
215- 220 F6.4 --- B_t80 84%ile of t80 posterior (t80_84)
222- 228 F7.4 mag NUV-U [-0.15/2.9]? Rest-frame NUV-U color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvu)
230- 236 F7.4 mag b_NUV-U [-0.16/2.9]? 16%ile of rest-frame
NUV-U posterior (colornuvu16)
238- 244 F7.4 mag B_NUV-U 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-U
posterior (colornuvu84)
246- 252 F7.4 mag NUV-R [0.09/5.6]? Rest-frame NUV-R color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvr)
254- 260 F7.4 mag b_NUV-R [0.1/5.4]? 16%ile of rest-frame
NUV-R posterior (colornuvr16)
262- 268 F7.4 mag B_NUV-R 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-R
posterior (colornuvr84)
270- 276 F7.4 mag U-V [-0.12/2.7]? Rest-frame U-V color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_uv)
278- 284 F7.4 mag b_U-V [-0.12/2.4]? 16%ile of rest-frame
U-V posterior (coloruv16)
286- 292 F7.4 mag B_U-V 84%ile of rest-frame U-V posterior
(coloruv84)
294- 300 F7.4 mag V-J [-0.5/2.8]? Rest-frame V-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_vj)
302- 308 F7.4 mag b_V-J [-0.5/2.6]? 16%ile of rest-frame
V-J posterior (colorvj16)
310- 316 F7.4 mag B_V-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame V-J
posterior (colorvj84)
318- 324 F7.4 mag R-J [-0.5/2.3]? Rest-frame R-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_rj)
326- 332 F7.4 mag b_R-J [-0.5/2]? 16%ile of rest-frame R-J
posterior (colorrj16)
334- 340 F7.4 mag B_R-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame R-J
posterior (colorrj84)
342 I1 --- Flags [0/2] Quality flags (flags) (G2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
344- 350 F7.4 [Msun] logMchi2 [4.9/14] Galaxy stellar mass
estimated from the minimum-chisq
model (logM_chi2)
352- 358 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFRchi2 [-5.3/3.8] Star-formation rate
estimated from the minimum-chisq
model (logSFR_chi2)
360- 368 E9.4 mag Avchi2 [8.5e-05/4] Dust attenuation in the
V-band estimated from the
minimum-chisq model (Av_chi2)
370- 376 F7.4 [Sun] logZchi2 [-1.5/0.3] Stellar metallicity from
the minimum-chisq model
(logZsol_chi2)
378- 383 F6.4 --- t20chi2 [0.019/0.6] Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed from the
minimum-chisq model (t20_chi2) (G1)
385- 390 F6.4 --- t40chi2 [0.08/0.8] Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed from the
minimum-chisq model (t40_chi2) (G1)
392- 397 F6.4 --- t60chi2 [0.2/0.93] Time when 60% of galaxy
mass was formed from the
minimum-chisq model (t60_chi2) (G1)
399- 404 F6.4 --- t80chi2 [0.4/1] Time when 80% of galaxy
mass was formed from the
minimum-chisq model (t80_chi2) (G1)
406- 412 F7.4 mag NUV-Uchi2 [-0.17/3.4] Rest-frame NUV-U color
from the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvuchi2)
414- 419 F6.4 mag NUV-Rchi2 [0.08/7] Rest-frame NUV-R color
from the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvrchi2)
421- 427 F7.4 mag U-Vchi2 [-0.13/3.1] Rest-frame U-V color
from the minimum-chisq model
(coloruvchi2)
429- 435 F7.4 mag V-Jchi2 [-0.8/3.3] Rest-frame V-J color
from the minimum-chisq model
(colorvjchi2)
437- 443 F7.4 mag R-Jchi2 [-1.16/2.6] Rest-frame R-J color
from the minimum-chisq model
(colorrjchi2)
445- 457 E13.8 --- chi2 [2.15e-06/1216] Chisq value for the
best solution (chi2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
459- 471 E13.7 uJy SnuNUV [1e+22/1.2e+31]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame NUV filter
(modelLnurestNUV) (G3)
473- 485 E13.7 uJy SnuFUV ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame FUV filter
(modelLnurestFUV) (G3)
487- 499 E13.7 uJy SnuU ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson U filter
(modelLnurestU) (G3)
501- 513 E13.7 uJy SnuB ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson B filter
(modelLnurestB) (G3)
515- 527 E13.7 uJy SnuV ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson V filter
(modelLnurestV) (G3)
529- 541 E13.7 uJy SnuR ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson R filter
(modelLnurestR) (G3)
543- 555 E13.7 uJy SnuI ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson I filter
(modelLnurestI) (G3)
557- 569 E13.7 uJy SnuJ ? Model template fluxes for
rest-frame Johnson J filter
(modelLnurestJ) (G3)
571- 583 E13.7 uJy SnuK [1.6e+24/4.1e+31]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame Johnson K
filter (modelLnurestK) (G3)
585- 597 E13.7 uJy FnuF275W [9e-20/1031]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/UVIS F275W filter
(modelFnuF275W) (G3)
599- 611 E13.7 uJy FnuF435W [2e-30/1124]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/ACS F435W filter
(modelFnuF435W) (G3)
613- 625 E13.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for
observed HST/ACS F606W filter
(modelFnuF606W) (G3)
627- 639 E13.7 uJy FnuF775W ? Model template fluxes for
observed HST/ACS F775W filter
(modelFnuF775W) (G3)
641- 653 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for
observed HST/ACS F814W filter
(modelFnuF814W) (G3)
655- 667 E13.7 uJy FnuF850LP ? Model template fluxes for
observed HST/ACS F850LP filter
(modelFnuF850LP) (G3)
669- 681 E13.7 uJy FnuF098M ? Model template fluxes for
observed F098M filter
(modelFnuF098M) (G3)
683- 695 E13.7 uJy FnuF105W [8.3e-07/7339]? Model template
fluxes for observed HST/WFC3 F105W
filter (modelFnuF105W) (G3)
697- 709 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W [0.0003/8067]? Model template
fluxes for observed HST/WFC3 F125W
filter (modelFnuF125W) (G3)
711- 723 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W [0.0006/8543]? Model template
fluxes for observed HST/WFC3 F160W
filter (modelFnuF160W) (G3)
725- 737 E13.7 uJy FnuUCTIO [2.7e-67/961]? Model template
fluxes for observed CTIO U filter
(modelFnuCTIO_U) (G3)
739- 751 E13.7 uJy FnuUVIMOS [2.8e-67/961]? Model template
fluxes for observed VIMOS U filter
(modelFnuVIMOS_U) (G3)
753- 765 E13.7 uJy FnuKsHAWKI [0.001/8890]? Model template fluxes
for observed HAWKI Ks filter
(modelFnuHAWKI_Ks) (G3)
767- 779 E13.7 uJy FnuKsISAAC [0.001/8928]? Model template fluxes
for observed ISAAC Ks filter
(modelFnuISAAC_Ks) (G3)
781- 793 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 [0.0009/4778]? Model template
fluxes for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch1
(3.6um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH1) (G3)
795- 807 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for
observed Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH2) (G3)
809- 821 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for
observed Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH3) (G3)
823- 835 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 [0.0008/7037]? Model template
fluxes for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch4
(8.0um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH4) (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: gn-db.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID [1/35451] Object identifier in the
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 18 F12.8 deg RAdeg [188.9/189.6] CANDELS right ascension
(J2000) (RA)
20- 30 F11.8 deg DEdeg [62/62.4] CANDELS declination (J2000)
(DEC)
32- 36 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/11.1] Photometric redshift used
for fitting (photz)
38- 44 F7.5 --- e_zphot [0.026/0.31] Error (assumed) on
photometric redshift (delz)
46- 47 I2 --- Nbands [16/17] Number of photometric bands
used for fitting (nbands)
49- 54 F6.3 [Msun] logM [4.6/13.3]? Best estimate for Galaxy
stellar mass from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (logM)
56- 61 F6.3 [Msun] b_logM [4.4/13]? 16%ile of galaxy stellar mass
posterior (logM_16)
63- 68 F6.3 [Msun] B_logM ? 84%ile of galaxy stellar mass
posterior (logM_84)
70- 76 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFR [-4.5/3.4]? Best estimate for
Star-formation rate from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logSFR)
78- 84 F7.4 [Msun/yr] b_logSFR [-5.2/3.4]? 16%ile of star-formation
rate posterior (logSFR_16)
86- 92 F7.4 [Msun/yr] B_logSFR ? 84%ile of star-formation rate
posterior (logSFR_84)
94- 99 F6.4 mag Av [0.0015/3.9]? Best estimate for Dust
attenuation in the V-band from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (Av)
101- 106 F6.4 mag b_Av [0.0015/3.7]? 16%ile of V-band dust
attenuation posterior (Av_16)
108- 113 F6.4 mag B_Av ? 84%ile of V-band dust attenuation
posterior (Av_84)
115- 121 F7.4 [Sun] logZ [-1.5/0.3]? Best estimate for Stellar
metallicity from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logZsol)
123- 129 F7.4 [Sun] b_logZ [-1.5/0.24]? 16%ile of stellar
metallicity posterior (logZsol_16)
131- 137 F7.4 [Sun] B_logZ ? 84%ile of stellar metallicity
posterior (logZsol_84)
139- 144 F6.4 --- t20 [0.036/1]? Time when 20% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (t20)
(G1)
146- 151 F6.4 --- b_t20 [0.026/0.99]? 16%ile of t20 posterior
(t20_16)
153- 158 F6.4 --- B_t20 ? 84%ile of t20 posterior (t20_84)
160- 165 F6.4 --- t40 [0.067/1]? Time when 40% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (t40)
(G1)
167- 172 F6.4 --- b_t40 [0.05/1]? 16%ile of t40 posterior
(t40_16)
174- 179 F6.4 --- B_t40 ? 84%ile of t40 posterior (t40_84)
181- 186 F6.4 --- t60 [0.13/1]? Time when 60% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (t60)
(G1)
188- 193 F6.4 --- b_t60 [0.09/1]? 16%ile of t60 posterior
(t60_16)
195- 200 F6.4 --- B_t60 ? 84%ile of t60 posterior (t60_84)
202- 207 F6.4 --- t80 [0.5/1]? Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (t80)
(G1)
209- 214 F6.4 --- b_t80 [0.3/1]? 16%ile of t80 posterior
(t80_16)
216- 221 F6.4 --- B_t80 ? 84%ile of t80 posterior (t80_84)
223- 229 F7.4 mag NUV-U [-0.17/3.3]? Rest-frame NUV-U color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvu)
231- 237 F7.4 mag b_NUV-U [-0.17/3]? 16%ile of rest-frame NUV-U
posterior (colornuvu16)
239- 245 F7.4 mag B_NUV-U ? 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-U posterior
(colornuvu84)
247- 253 F7.4 mag NUV-R [0.08/6]? Rest-frame NUV-R color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvr)
255- 261 F7.4 mag b_NUV-R [0.08/5.8]? 16%ile of rest-frame NUV-R
posterior (colornuvr16)
263- 269 F7.4 mag B_NUV-R ? 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-R posterior
(colornuvr84)
271- 277 F7.4 mag U-V [-0.14/3]? Rest-frame U-V color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_uv)
279- 285 F7.4 mag b_U-V [-0.14/2.9]? 16%ile of rest-frame U-V
posterior (coloruv16)
287- 293 F7.4 mag B_U-V ? 84%ile of rest-frame U-V posterior
(coloruv84)
295- 301 F7.4 mag V-J [-0.5/3.1]? Rest-frame V-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_vj)
303- 309 F7.4 mag b_V-J [-0.5/2.9]? 16%ile of rest-frame V-J
posterior (colorvj16)
311- 317 F7.4 mag B_V-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame V-J posterior
(colorvj84)
319- 325 F7.4 mag R-J [-0.5/2.5]? Rest-frame R-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_rj)
327- 333 F7.4 mag b_R-J [-0.5/2.4]? 16%ile of rest-frame R-J
posterior (colorrj16)
335- 341 F7.4 mag B_R-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame R-J posterior
(colorrj84)
343 I1 --- Flags [0/2] Quality flags (flags) (G2)
345- 351 F7.4 [Msun] logMchi2 [4/14.5] Galaxy stellar mass estimated
from the minimum-chisq model (logM_chi2)
353- 359 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFRchi2 [-5.6/4.3] Star-formation rate
estimated from the minimum-chisq model
(logSFR_chi2)
361- 369 E9.4 mag Avchi2 [8.5e-05/4] Dust attenuation in the
V-band estimated from the minimum-chisq
model (Av_chi2)
371- 377 F7.4 [Sun] logZchi2 [-1.5/0.3] Stellar metallicity from the
minimum-chisq model (logZsol_chi2)
379- 384 F6.4 --- t20chi2 [0.019/0.6] Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t20_chi2) (G1)
386- 391 F6.4 --- t40chi2 [0.08/0.8] Time when 40% of galaxy mass
was formed from the minimum-chisq model
(t40_chi2) (G1)
393- 398 F6.4 --- t60chi2 [0.2/0.93] Time when 60% of galaxy mass
was formed from the minimum-chisq model
(t60_chi2) (G1)
400- 405 F6.4 --- t80chi2 [0.4/1] Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed from the minimum-chisq model
(t80_chi2) (G1)
407- 413 F7.4 mag NUV-Uchi2 [-0.17/3.9] Rest-frame NUV-U color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvuchi2)
415- 420 F6.4 mag NUV-Rchi2 [0.08/7.8] Rest-frame NUV-R color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvrchi2)
422- 428 F7.4 mag U-Vchi2 [-0.14/3.5] Rest-frame U-V color from
the minimum-chisq model (coloruvchi2)
430- 436 F7.4 mag V-Jchi2 [-0.8/3.8] Rest-frame V-J color from
the minimum-chisq model (colorvjchi2)
438- 444 F7.4 mag R-Jchi2 [-1.17/3.1] Rest-frame R-J color from
the minimum-chisq model (colorrjchi2)
446- 458 E13.8 --- chi2 [0/1e+10]? Chisq value for the best
solution (chi2)
460- 472 E13.7 uJy SnuNUV [8.8e+21/2.01e+31]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame NUV filter
(modelLnurestNUV) (G3)
474- 486 E13.7 uJy SnuFUV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
FUV filter (modelLnurestFUV) (G3)
488- 500 E13.7 uJy SnuU ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson U filter (modelLnurestU) (G3)
502- 514 E13.7 uJy SnuB ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson B filter (modelLnurestB) (G3)
516- 528 E13.7 uJy SnuV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson V filter (modelLnurestV) (G3)
530- 542 E13.7 uJy SnuR ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson R filter (modelLnurestR) (G3)
544- 556 E13.7 uJy SnuI ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson I filter (modelLnurestI) (G3)
558- 570 E13.7 uJy SnuJ ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson J filter (modelLnurestJ) (G3)
572- 584 E13.7 uJy SnuK [1.8e+24/2.1e+32]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame Johnson K filter
(modelLnurestK) (G3)
586- 598 E13.7 uJy FnuF275W [8.9e-26/118]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/UVIS F275W filter
(modelFnuF275W) (G3)
600- 612 E13.7 uJy FnuF435W [1.6e-43/773]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/ACS F435W filter
(modelFnuF435W) (G3)
614- 626 E13.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F606W filter (modelFnuF606W)
(G3)
628- 640 E13.7 uJy FnuF775W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F775W filter (modelFnuF775W)
(G3)
642- 654 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F814W filter (modelFnuF814W)
(G3)
656- 668 E13.7 uJy FnuF850LP ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F850LP filter (modelFnuF850LP)
(G3)
670- 682 E13.7 uJy FnuF105W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/WFC3 F105W filter (modelFnuF105W)
(G3)
684- 696 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W [8.8e-07/15024]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/WFC3 F105W filter
(modelFnuF125W) (G3)
698- 710 E13.7 uJy FnuF140W [0.001/16839]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/WFC3 F125W filter
(modelFnuF140W) (G3)
712- 724 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W [0.001/18749]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/WFC3 F160W filter
(modelFnuF160W) (G3)
726- 738 E13.7 uJy FnuULBC [2.6e-67/264]? Model template fluxes
for observed LBC U filter
(modelFnuLBC_U) (G3)
740- 752 E13.7 uJy FnuKsWIRCAM [0.006/20561]? Model template fluxes
for observed WIRCAM Ks filter
(modelFnuWIRCAM_Ks) (G3)
754- 766 E13.7 uJy FnuKsMOIRCS [0.006/20586]? Model template fluxes
for observed MOIRCS Ks filter
(modelFnuMOIRCS_Ks) (G3)
768- 780 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 [0.009/14705]? Model template fluxes
for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch1 (3.6um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH1) (G3)
782- 794 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 [0.007/9415]? Model template fluxes for
observed Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH2) (G3)
796- 808 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH3) (G3)
810- 822 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch4 (8.0um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH4) (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: egs-db.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID [1/41457] Object identifier in the
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 16 F10.6 deg RAdeg [214.5/215.4] CANDELS right ascension
(J2000) (RA)
18- 26 F9.6 deg DEdeg [52.6/53.2] CANDELS declination (J2000)
(DEC)
28- 32 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/12] Photometric redshift used
for fitting (photz)
34- 42 F9.5 --- e_zphot [0.026/0.3]? Error (assumed) on
photometric redshift (delz)
44- 46 I3 --- Nbands [-99/25] Number of photometric bands
used for fitting (nbands)
48- 54 F7.3 [Msun] logM [5/13.4]? Best estimate for Galaxy
stellar mass from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (logM)
56- 62 F7.3 [Msun] b_logM [4.4/13.4]? 16%ile of galaxy stellar
mass posterior (logM_16)
64- 70 F7.3 [Msun] B_logM ? 84%ile of galaxy stellar mass
posterior (logM_84)
72- 79 F8.4 [Msun/yr] logSFR [-5/4]? Best estimate for
Star-formation rate from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logSFR)
81- 88 F8.4 [Msun/yr] b_logSFR [-4.7/4]? 16%ile of star-formation
rate posterior (logSFR_16)
90- 97 F8.4 [Msun/yr] B_logSFR ? 84%ile of star-formation rate
posterior (logSFR_84)
99- 106 F8.4 mag Av [0.0015/3.4]? Best estimate for Dust
attenuation in the V-band from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (Av)
108- 115 F8.4 mag b_Av [0.0015/3]? 16%ile of V-band dust
attenuation posterior (Av_16)
117- 124 F8.4 mag B_Av ? 84%ile of V-band dust attenuation
posterior (Av_84)
126- 133 F8.4 [Sun] logZ [-1.5/0.3]? Best estimate for Stellar
metallicity from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logZsol)
135- 142 F8.4 [Sun] b_logZ [-1.5/0.23]? 16%ile of stellar
metallicity posterior (logZsol_16)
144- 151 F8.4 [Sun] B_logZ ? 84%ile of stellar metallicity
posterior (logZsol_84)
153- 160 F8.4 --- t20 [0.036/1]? Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t20) (G1)
162- 169 F8.4 --- b_t20 [0.033/1]? 16%ile of t20 posterior
(t20_16)
171- 178 F8.4 --- B_t20 ? 84%ile of t20 posterior (t20_84)
180- 187 F8.4 --- t40 [0.067/1]? Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t40) (G1)
189- 196 F8.4 --- b_t40 [0.065/1]? 16%ile of t40 posterior
(t40_16)
198- 205 F8.4 --- B_t40 ? 84%ile of t40 posterior (t40_84)
207- 214 F8.4 --- t60 [0.13/1]? Time when 60% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t60) (G1)
216- 223 F8.4 --- b_t60 [0.13/1]? 16%ile of t60 posterior
(t60_16)
225- 232 F8.4 --- B_t60 ? 84%ile of t60 posterior (t60_84)
234- 241 F8.4 --- t80 [0.47/1]? Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t80) (G1)
243- 250 F8.4 --- b_t80 [0.4/1]? 16%ile of t80 posterior
(t80_16)
252- 259 F8.4 --- B_t80 ? 84%ile of t80 posterior (t80_84)
261- 268 F8.4 mag NUV-U [-0.17/3.1]? Rest-frame NUV-U color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvu)
270- 277 F8.4 mag b_NUV-U [-0.16/3]? 16%ile of rest-frame NUV-U
posterior (colornuvu16)
279- 286 F8.4 mag B_NUV-U ? 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-U posterior
(colornuvu84)
288- 295 F8.4 mag NUV-R [0.08/6]? Rest-frame NUV-R color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvr)
297- 304 F8.4 mag b_NUV-R [0.1/5.7]? 16%ile of rest-frame NUV-R
posterior (colornuvr16)
306- 313 F8.4 mag B_NUV-R ? 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-R posterior
(colornuvr84)
315- 322 F8.4 mag U-V [-0.14/3]? Rest-frame U-V color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_uv)
324- 331 F8.4 mag b_U-V [-0.12/2.6]? 16%ile of rest-frame U-V
posterior (coloruv16)
333- 340 F8.4 mag B_U-V ? 84%ile of rest-frame U-V posterior
(coloruv84)
342- 349 F8.4 mag V-J [-0.5/3]? Rest-frame V-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_vj)
351- 358 F8.4 mag b_V-J [-0.5/2.6]? 16%ile of rest-frame V-J
posterior (colorvj16)
360- 367 F8.4 mag B_V-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame V-J posterior
(colorvj84)
369- 376 F8.4 mag R-J [-0.5/2.4]? Rest-frame R-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_rj)
378- 385 F8.4 mag b_R-J [-0.5/2.1]? 16%ile of rest-frame R-J
posterior (colorrj16)
387- 394 F8.4 mag B_R-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame R-J posterior
(colorrj84)
396- 398 I3 --- Flags [0/4]? Quality flags (flags) (G2)
400- 407 F8.4 [Msun] logMchi2 [4/14]? Galaxy stellar mass estimated
from the minimum-chisq model
(logM_chi2)
409- 416 F8.4 [Msun/yr] logSFRchi2 [-5/4]? Star-formation rate estimated
from the minimum-chisq model
(logSFR_chi2)
418- 425 F8.4 mag Avchi2 [0.0001/4]? Dust attenuation in the
V-band estimated from the
minimum-chisq model (Av_chi2)
427- 434 F8.4 [Sun] logZchi2 [-1.5/0.3]? Stellar metallicity from
the minimum-chisq model (logZsol_chi2)
436- 443 F8.4 --- t20chi2 [0.019/0.6]? Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t20_chi2) (G1)
445- 452 F8.4 --- t40chi2 [0.08/0.8]? Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t40_chi2) (G1)
454- 461 F8.4 --- t60chi2 [0.2/0.93]? Time when 60% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t60_chi2) (G1)
463- 470 F8.4 --- t80chi2 [0.4/1]? Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t80_chi2) (G1)
472- 479 F8.4 mag NUV-Uchi2 [-0.17/4]? Rest-frame NUV-U color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvuchi2)
481- 488 F8.4 mag NUV-Rchi2 [0.08/8]? Rest-frame NUV-R color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvrchi2)
490- 497 F8.4 mag U-Vchi2 [-0.14/3.4]? Rest-frame U-V color from
the minimum-chisq model (coloruvchi2)
499- 506 F8.4 mag V-Jchi2 [-0.8/3.6]? Rest-frame V-J color from
the minimum-chisq model (colorvjchi2)
508- 515 F8.4 mag R-Jchi2 [-1.17/3]? Rest-frame R-J color from
the minimum-chisq model (colorrjchi2)
517- 529 E13.8 --- chi2 [3.3e-05/1264]? Chisq value for the
best solution (chi2)
531- 543 E13.7 uJy SnuNUV [2.5e+22/1.1e+32]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame NUV filter
(modelLnurestNUV) (G3)
545- 557 E13.7 uJy SnuFUV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
FUV filter (modelLnurestFUV) (G3)
559- 571 E13.7 uJy SnuU ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson U filter (modelLnurestU) (G3)
573- 585 E13.7 uJy SnuB ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson B filter (modelLnurestB) (G3)
587- 599 E13.7 uJy SnuV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson V filter (modelLnurestV) (G3)
601- 613 E13.7 uJy SnuR ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson R filter (modelLnurestR) (G3)
615- 627 E13.7 uJy SnuI ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson I filter (modelLnurestI) (G3)
629- 641 E13.7 uJy SnuJ ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson J filter (modelLnurestJ) (G3)
643- 655 E13.7 uJy SnuK [3.5e+24/2.3e+32]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame Johnson K filter
(modelLnurestK) (G3)
657- 669 E13.7 uJy FnuF275W [1.4e-14/4157]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/UVIS F275W filter
(modelFnuF275W) (G3)
671- 683 E13.7 uJy FnuF435W [7.5e-15/2655]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/ACS F435W filter
(modelFnuF435W) (G3)
685- 697 E13.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F606W filter (modelFnuF606W)
(G3)
699- 711 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F814W filter (modelFnuF814W)
(G3)
713- 725 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/WFC3 F125W filter (modelFnuF125W)
(G3)
727- 739 E13.7 uJy FnuF140W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/WFC3 F140W filter (modelFnuF140W)
(G3)
741- 753 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W [1.2e-05/8319]? Model template fluxes
for observed F160W filter
(modelFnuF160W) (G3)
755- 767 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTu [3.3e-67/2670]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaCam u filter
(modelFnuCFHT_u) (G3)
769- 781 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTg [3.2e-47/2615]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaCam g filter
(modelFnuCFHT_g) (G3)
783- 795 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTr [2e-39/2775]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaCam r filter
(modelFnuCFHT_r) (G3)
797- 809 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTi [4.3e-36/3089]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaCam i filter
(modelFnuCFHT_i) (G3)
811- 823 E13.7 uJy FnuCFHTz [1e-09/4641]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaCam z filter
(modelFnuCFHT_z) (G3)
825- 837 E13.7 uJy FnuJ [7.8e-06/6295]? Model template fluxes
for observed WIRCAM J filter
(modelFnuWIRCAM_J) (G3)
839- 851 E13.7 uJy FnuH ? Model template fluxes for observed
WIRCAM H filter (modelFnuWIRCAM_H)
(G3)
853- 865 E13.7 uJy FnuKs ? Model template fluxes for observed
WIRCAM Ks filter (modelFnuWIRCAM_Ks)
(G3)
867- 879 E13.7 uJy FnuJ1 [1.3e-07/6354]? Model template fluxes
for observed NEWFIRM J1 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J1) (G3)
881- 893 E13.7 uJy FnuJ2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM J2 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J2) (G3)
895- 907 E13.7 uJy FnuJ3 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM J3 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J3) (G3)
909- 921 E13.7 uJy FnuH1 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM H1 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H1) (G3)
923- 935 E13.7 uJy FnuH2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM H2 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H2) (G3)
937- 949 E13.7 uJy FnuK [1.5e-05/8014]? Model template fluxes
for observed NEWFIRM K filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_K) (G3)
951- 963 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 [2e-05/7859]? Model template fluxes
for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch1 (3.6um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH1) (G3)
965- 977 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH2) (G3)
979- 991 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH3) (G3)
993- 1005 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 [2e-05/5158]? Model template fluxes
for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch4 (8.0um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH4) (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: cos-db.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 5 I5 --- ID [1/38671] Object identifier in the
CANDELS catalog (ID)
7- 17 F11.7 deg RAdeg [150/150.21] CANDELS right ascension
(J2000) (RA)
19- 27 F9.7 deg DEdeg [2.1/2.6] CANDELS declination (J2000)
(DEC)
29- 33 F5.2 --- zphot [0.06/11.9] Photometric redshift used
for fitting (photz)
35- 41 F7.5 --- e_zphot [0.026/0.33] Error (assumed) on
photometric redshift (delz)
43- 44 I2 --- Nbands [29/31] Number of photometric bands
used for fitting (nbands)
46- 51 F6.3 [Msun] logM [4.8/13.4]? Best estimate for Galaxy
stellar mass from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution) (logM)
53- 58 F6.3 [Msun] b_logM [4.3/12.8]? 16%ile of galaxy stellar
mass posterior (logM_16)
60- 65 F6.3 [Msun] B_logM 84%ile of galaxy stellar mass
posterior (logM_84)
67- 73 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFR [-4.4/3.6]? Best estimate for
Star-formation rate from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logSFR)
75- 81 F7.4 [Msun/yr] b_logSFR [-5.2/3.6]? 16%ile of star-formation
rate posterior (logSFR_16)
83- 89 F7.4 [Msun/yr] B_logSFR 84%ile of star-formation rate
posterior (logSFR_84)
91- 96 F6.4 mag Av [0.0015/3.9]? Best estimate for Dust
attenuation in the V-band from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (Av)
98- 103 F6.4 mag b_Av [0.0015/3.7]? 16%ile of V-band dust
attenuation posterior (Av_16)
105- 110 F6.4 mag B_Av ? 84%ile of V-band dust attenuation
posterior (Av_84)
112- 118 F7.4 [Sun] logZ [-1.5/0.3]? Best estimate for Stellar
metallicity from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(logZsol)
120- 126 F7.4 [Sun] b_logZ [-1.5/0.23]? 16%ile of stellar
metallicity posterior (logZsol_16)
128- 134 F7.4 [Sun] B_logZ 84%ile of stellar metallicity
posterior (logZsol_84)
136- 141 F6.4 --- t20 [0.036/1]? Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t20) (G1)
143- 148 F6.4 --- b_t20 [0.033/1]? 16%ile of t20 posterior
(t20_16)
150- 155 F6.4 --- B_t20 84%ile of t20 posterior (t20_84)
157- 162 F6.4 --- t40 [0.067/1]? Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t40) (G1)
164- 169 F6.4 --- b_t40 [0.065/1]? 16%ile of t40 posterior
(t40_16)
171- 176 F6.4 --- B_t40 84%ile of t40 posterior (t40_84)
178- 183 F6.4 --- t60 [0.13/1]? Time when 60% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t60) (G1)
185- 190 F6.4 --- b_t60 [0.13/1]? 16%ile of t60 posterior
(t60_16)
192- 197 F6.4 --- B_t60 84%ile of t60 posterior (t60_84)
199- 204 F6.4 --- t80 [0.47/1]? Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed estimated from the
posterior distribution
(Bayesian solution) (t80) (G1)
206- 211 F6.4 --- b_t80 [0.39/1]? 16%ile of t80 posterior
(t80_16)
213- 218 F6.4 --- B_t80 84%ile of t80 posterior (t80_84)
220- 226 F7.4 mag NUV-U [-0.17/4]? Rest-frame NUV-U color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvu)
228- 234 F7.4 mag b_NUV-U [-0.14/3.9]? 16%ile of rest-frame
NUV-U posterior (colornuvu16)
236- 242 F7.4 mag B_NUV-U 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-U posterior
(colornuvu84)
244- 250 F7.4 mag NUV-R [0.08/6]? Rest-frame NUV-R color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_nuvr)
252- 258 F7.4 mag b_NUV-R [0.09/6]? 16%ile of rest-frame NUV-R
posterior (colornuvr16)
260- 266 F7.4 mag B_NUV-R 84%ile of rest-frame NUV-R posterior
(colornuvr84)
268- 274 F7.4 mag U-V [-0.14/3.6]? Rest-frame U-V color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_uv)
276- 282 F7.4 mag b_U-V [-0.08/3.6]? 16%ile of rest-frame U-V
posterior (coloruv16)
284- 290 F7.4 mag B_U-V 84%ile of rest-frame U-V posterior
(coloruv84)
292- 298 F7.4 mag V-J [-0.5/3.8]? Rest-frame V-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_vj)
300- 306 F7.4 mag b_V-J [-0.5/3.6]? 16%ile of rest-frame V-J
posterior (colorvj16)
308- 314 F7.4 mag B_V-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame V-J posterior
(colorvj84)
316- 322 F7.4 mag R-J [-0.5/3.1]? Rest-frame R-J color
estimated from the posterior
distribution (Bayesian solution)
(color_rj)
324- 330 F7.4 mag b_R-J [-0.5/3]? 16%ile of rest-frame R-J
posterior (colorrj16)
332- 338 F7.4 mag B_R-J ? 84%ile of rest-frame R-J posterior
(colorrj84)
340 I1 --- Flags [1/3] Quality flags (flags) (G2)
342- 348 F7.4 [Msun] logMchi2 [4/15] Galaxy stellar mass estimated
from the minimum-chisq model
(logM_chi2)
350- 356 F7.4 [Msun/yr] logSFRchi2 [-5.3/5.2] Star-formation rate
estimated from the minimum-chisq model
(logSFR_chi2)
358- 366 E9.4 mag Avchi2 [1.7e-06/4] Dust attenuation in the
V-band estimated from the
minimum-chisq model (Av_chi2)
368- 374 F7.4 [Sun] logZchi2 [-1.5/0.3] Stellar metallicity from
the minimum-chisq model (logZsol_chi2)
376- 381 F6.4 --- t20chi2 [0.019/0.6] Time when 20% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t20_chi2) (G1)
383- 388 F6.4 --- t40chi2 [0.08/0.8] Time when 40% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t40_chi2) (G1)
390- 395 F6.4 --- t60chi2 [0.2/0.93] Time when 60% of galaxy
mass was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t60_chi2) (G1)
397- 402 F6.4 --- t80chi2 [0.4/1] Time when 80% of galaxy mass
was formed from the minimum-chisq
model (t80_chi2) (G1)
404- 410 F7.4 mag NUV-Uchi2 [-0.17/4] Rest-frame NUV-U color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvuchi2)
412- 417 F6.4 mag NUV-Rchi2 [0.08/8.3] Rest-frame NUV-R color from
the minimum-chisq model
(colornuvrchi2)
419- 425 F7.4 mag U-Vchi2 [-0.14/3.7] Rest-frame U-V color from
the minimum-chisq model (coloruvchi2)
427- 433 F7.4 mag V-Jchi2 [-0.8/4] Rest-frame V-J color from the
minimum-chisq model (colorvjchi2)
435- 441 F7.4 mag R-Jchi2 [-1.17/3.2] Rest-frame R-J color from
the minimum-chisq model (colorrjchi2)
443- 451 F9.4 --- chi2 [0.05/1395] Chisq value for the best
solution (chi2)
453- 465 E13.7 uJy SnuNUV [1e+22/1.3e+31]? Model template fluxes
for rest-frame NUV filter
(modelLnurestNUV) (G3)
467- 479 E13.7 uJy SnuFUV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
FUV filter (modelLnurestFUV) (G3)
481- 493 E13.7 uJy SnuU ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson U filter (modelLnurestU) (G3)
495- 507 E13.7 uJy SnuB ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson B filter (modelLnurestB) (G3)
509- 521 E13.7 uJy SnuV ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson V filter (modelLnurestV) (G3)
523- 535 E13.7 uJy SnuR ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson R filter (modelLnurestR) (G3)
537- 549 E13.7 uJy SnuI ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson I filter (modelLnurestI) (G3)
551- 563 E13.7 uJy SnuJ ? Model template fluxes for rest-frame
Johnson J filter (modelLnurestJ) (G3)
565- 577 E13.7 uJy SnuK [1.6e+24/2.2e+32]? Model template
fluxes for rest-frame Johnson K filter
(modelLnurestK) (G3)
579- 591 E13.7 uJy FnuF275W [2.9e-50/78]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/UVIS F275W filter
(modelFnuF275W) (G3)
593- 605 E13.7 uJy FnuF435W [8.2e-56/105]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/ACS F435W filter
(modelFnuF435W) (G3)
607- 619 E13.7 uJy FnuF606W ? Model template fluxes for observed
HST/ACS F606W filter (modelFnuF606W)
(G3)
621- 633 E13.7 uJy FnuF814W [7.5e-56/656]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/ACS F814W filter
(modelFnuF814W) (G3)
635- 647 E13.7 uJy FnuF125W [9.6e-07/1395]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/WFC3 F125W filter
(modelFnuF125W) (G3)
649- 661 E13.7 uJy FnuF160W [0.0002/1590]? Model template fluxes
for observed HST/WFC3 F160W filter
(modelFnuF160W) (G3)
663- 675 E13.7 uJy Fnuu [2.4e-67/130]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaPrime u filter
(modelFnuCFHT_u) (G3)
677- 689 E13.7 uJy Fnug ? Model template fluxes for observed
CFHT/MegaPrime g filter
(modelFnuCFHT_g) (G3)
691- 703 E13.7 uJy Fnur ? Model template fluxes for observed
CFHT/MegaPrime r filter
(modelFnuCFHT_r) (G3)
705- 717 E13.7 uJy Fnui ? Model template fluxes for observed
CFHT/MegaPrime i filter
(modelFnuCFHT_i) (G3)
719- 731 E13.7 uJy Fnuz [9.6e-51/771]? Model template fluxes
for observed CFHT/MegaPrime z filter
(modelFnuCFHT_z) (G3)
733- 745 E13.7 uJy FnuB [2.6e-67/104]? Model template fluxes
for observed Subaru B filter
(modelFnuSubaru_B) (G3)
747- 759 E13.7 uJy FnuV [4e-63/274]? Model template fluxes for
observed Subaru V filter
(modelFnuSubaru_V) (G3)
761- 773 E13.7 uJy Fnugp [2.7e-67/145]? Model template fluxes
for observed Subaru gp filter
(modelFnuSubaru_gp) (G3)
775- 787 E13.7 uJy Fnurp ? Model template fluxes for observed
Subaru rp filter (modelFnuSubaru_rp)
(G3)
789- 801 E13.7 uJy Fnuip [2e-58/606]? Model template fluxes for
observed Subaru ip filter
(modelFnuSubaru_ip) (G3)
803- 815 E13.7 uJy Fnuzp [1.2e-51/814]? Model template fluxes
for observed Subaru zp filter
(modelFnuSubaru_zp) (G3)
817- 829 E13.7 uJy FnuY [1e-37/1048]? Model template fluxes
for observed UVISTA Y filter
(modelFnuUVISTA_Y) (G3)
831- 843 E13.7 uJy FnuJ [1.4e-08/1430]? Model template fluxes
for observed UVISTA J filter
(modelFnuUVISTA_J) (G3)
845- 857 E13.7 uJy FnuH ? Model template fluxes for observed
UVISTA H filter (modelFnuUVISTA_H)
(G3)
859- 871 E13.7 uJy FnuKs [0.0008/1966]? Model template fluxes
for observed UVISTA Ks filter
(modelFnuUVISTA_Ks) (G3)
873- 885 E13.7 uJy FnuJ1 [1.9e-14/1099]? Model template fluxes
for observed NEWFIRM J1 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J1) (G3)
887- 899 E13.7 uJy FnuJ2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM J2 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J2) (G3)
901- 913 E13.7 uJy FnuJ3 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM J3 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_J3) (G3)
915- 927 E13.7 uJy FnuH1 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM H1 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H1) (G3)
929- 941 E13.7 uJy FnuH2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
NEWFIRM H2 filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_H2) (G3)
943- 955 E13.7 uJy FnuK [0.0008/1956]? Model template fluxes
for observed NEWFIRM K filter
(modelFnuNEWFIRM_K) (G3)
957- 969 E13.7 uJy FnuCh1 [0.001/1031]? Model template fluxes
for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch1 (3.6um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH1) (G3)
971- 983 E13.7 uJy FnuCh2 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch2 (4.5um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH2) (G3)
985- 997 E13.7 uJy FnuCh3 ? Model template fluxes for observed
Spitzer/IRAC ch3 (5.8um) filter
(modelFnuIRAC_CH3) (G3)
999- 1011 E13.7 uJy FnuCh4 [0.0009/1222]? Model template fluxes
for observed Spitzer/IRAC ch4 (8.0um)
filter (modelFnuIRAC_CH4) (G3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global notes:
Note (G1): The time is given as the fraction of the age of the Universe
(at the redshift of the galaxy).
Note (G2): Quality flags as follows:
1 = invalid fit (nan for mass estimate);
2 = large SFR uncertainties (Δ(logSFR)>2)
3 = objects flagged as stars in photometry catalog (CLASS_STAR>0.5);
4 = poor fit/large χ2 (>1000)
Note (G3): These model magnitudes are computed for the best-fit parameters
estimated from the full Bayesian posterior distribution (not the
minimum-χ2) solution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nomenclature Notes:
ID for GOODSN from Barro+ 2019 (J/ApJS/243/22), <[BPC2019] NNNNN> for Simbad;
ID for GOODSS from Guo+ 2013 (J/ApJS/207/24), <[GFG2013b] NNNNN> for Simbad;
ID for EGS from Stefanon+ 2017 (J/ApJS/229/32), <[SYM2017] NNNNN> in Simbad;
ID for COSMOS from Nayyeri+ 2017 (J/ApJS/228/7), <[NHM2017] NNNNN> in Simbad
History:
From http://archive.stsci.edu/hlsp/uvcandels (doi:10.17909/8s31-f778)
on 18-Aug-2025; except for CIGALE files downloaded on 20-Oct-2025
Acknowledgmements:
Vihang Mehta [vmehta at ipac.caltech.edu]
Licences:
These High Level Science Products (HLSP) data products from MAST
are licensed for use under CC BY 4.0.
(End) Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 18-Aug-2025