J/ApJS/276/69 APOKASC-3: evolved KIC stars with APOGEE (Pinsonneault+, 2025)
APOKASC-3: the third joint spectroscopic and asteroseismic catalog for evolved
stars in the Kepler fields.
Pinsonneault M.H., Zinn J.C., Tayar J., Serenelli A., Garcia R.A.,
Mathur S., Vrard M., Elsworth Y.P., Mosser B., Stello D., Bell K.J.,
Bugnet L., Corsaro E., Gaulme P., Hekker S., Hon M., Huber D.,
Kallinger T., Cao K., Johnson J.A., Liagre B., Patton R.A., Santos A.R.G.,
Basu S., Beck P.G., Beers T.C., Chaplin W.J., Cunha K., Frinchaboy P.M.,
Girardi L., Godoy-Rivera D., Holtzman J.A., Jonsson H., Meszaros S.,
Reyes C., Rix H.-W., Shetrone M., Smith V.V., Spoo T., Stassun K.G.,
Wang Ji
<Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 276, 69 (2025)>
=2025ApJS..276...69P 2025ApJS..276...69P
ADC_Keywords: Asteroseismology; Stars, ages; Abundances; Rotational velocities;
Stars, masses; Stars, diameters; Surveys; Spectra, infrared;
Optical; Cross identifications
Keywords: Asteroseismology ; Stellar evolution ; Stellar ages ;
Stellar populations ; Stellar pulsations ; Stellar masses
Abstract:
In the third APOKASC catalog, we present data for the complete sample
of 15,808 evolved stars with APOGEE spectroscopic parameters and
Kepler asteroseismology. We used 10 independent asteroseismic analysis
techniques and anchor our system on fundamental radii derived from
Gaia L and spectroscopic Teff. We provide evolutionary state,
asteroseismic surface gravity, mass, radius, age, and the data used to
derive them for 12,418 stars. This includes 10,036 exceptionally
precise measurements, with median fractional uncertainties in
νmax, Δν, mass, radius, and age of 0.6%, 0.6%, 3.8%,
1.8%, and 11.1%, respectively. We provide more limited data for 1624
additional stars that either have lower-quality data or are outside of
our primary calibration domain. Using lower red giant branch (RGB)
stars, we find a median age for the chemical thick disk of
9.14±0.05(ran) ±0.9(sys) Gyr with an age dispersion of 1.1Gyr,
consistent with our error model. We calibrate our red clump (RC) mass
loss to derive an age consistent with the lower RGB and provide
asymptotic GB and RGB ages for luminous stars. We also find a sharp
upper-age boundary in the chemical thin disk. We find that scaling
relations are precise and accurate on the lower RGB and RC, but they
become more model dependent for more luminous giants and break down at
the tip of the RGB. We recommend the use of multiple methods,
calibration to a fundamental scale, and the use of stellar models to
interpret frequency spacings.
Description:
SDSS Data Releases 16 and 17 (V/154 and III/286) have been used for
APOKASC-3. See Section 2.1.
All of our targets have long-cadence Kepler data, and are in the
domain where we expect to be able to detect oscillations.
See Section 2.2.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table1.dat 33 707 Outlier categories
table4.dat 484 15808 Catalog of recommended stellar properties
table5.dat 865 15808 Catalog of alternate stellar properties
table7.dat 259 23363 Raw asteroseismic measurements and filtering results
table9.dat 335 23363 Filtered asteroseismic measurements and different
methods for combining them
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
V/133 : Kepler Input Catalog (Kepler Mission Team, 2009)
III/286 : APOGEE-2 DR17 final allStar catalog (Abdurro'uf+, 2022)
I/357 : Gaia DR3 Part 3. Non-single stars (Gaia Collaboration, 2022)
V/154 : Sloan Digital Sky Surveys (SDSS), Release 16 (DR16) (Ahumada+, 2020)
J/A+A/497/497 : Physical param. from JHK flux (Gonzalez-Hernandez+, 2009)
J/A+A/506/465 : Solar-like oscillations in red giants (Hekker+, 2009)
J/AJ/142/112 : KIC photometric calibration (Brown+, 2011)
J/ApJ/732/39 : Rotational velocities of K giant stars (Carlberg+, 2011)
J/A+A/530/A138 : Geneva-Copenhagen survey re-analysis (Casagrande+, 2011)
J/ApJS/199/30 : Effective temp. scale for KIC stars (Pinsonneault+, 2012)
J/ApJ/765/L41 : Asteroseismic classification of KIC objects (Stello+, 2013)
J/MNRAS/444/392 : Synthetic Stellar Photometry. I. (Casagrande+, 2014)
J/A+A/572/L5 : Evol. state of red giants from seismology (Mosser+, 2014)
J/ApJS/215/19 : APOKASC catalog of Kepler red giants (Pinsonneault+, 2014)
J/ApJ/807/82 : Rotational velocities of APOKASC red giants (Tayar+, 2015)
J/AJ/151/144 : ASPCAP weights for APOGEE chemical elements (Garcia+, 2016)
J/ApJ/827/50 : Kepler faint red giants (Mathur+, 2016)
J/A+A/588/A87 : Seismic global parameters of 6111 KIC (Vrard+, 2016)
J/A+A/605/A111 : Surface rotation of Kepler red giant stars (Ceillier+, 2017)
J/MNRAS/469/4578 : Deep learning classif. in asteroseismology (Hon+, 2017)
J/ApJS/229/30 : Revised properties of Q1-17 Kepler targets (Mathur+, 2017)
J/A+A/616/A24 : Rotation in RGBs from Kepler asteroseismology (Gehan+, 2018)
J/ApJS/239/32 : APOKASC-2 cat. of Kepler evolved stars (Pinsonneault+, 2018)
J/ApJS/237/17 : Temporal frequency shifts in 87 Kepler stars (Santos+, 2018)
J/MNRAS/475/5487 : Stellar properties of KIC stars (Silva Aguirre+, 2018)
J/ApJS/236/42 : Asteroseismology of ∼16000 Kepler red giants (Yu+, 2018)
J/MNRAS/482/616 : Detecting solar-like oscillations (Bell+, 2019)
J/MNRAS/489/4641 : APOKASC Evol. state of red-giant stars (Elsworth+, 2019)
J/MNRAS/485/5616 : Red giant solar-like oscillations in Kepler (Hon+, 2019)
J/ApJS/244/21 : Surface rot. & activity of Kepler stars. I. (Santos+, 2019)
J/ApJ/871/174 : Kepler rapid rotators and Ks-band excesses (Simonian+, 2019)
J/ApJS/245/34 : Abund. for 6 million stars from LAMOST DR5 (Xiang+, 2019)
J/A+A/639/A63 : Active red giants asteroseismic & rotations (Gaulme+, 2020)
J/A+A/650/A115 : Seismic global parameters of 2103 KIC (Dreau+, 2021)
J/ApJ/919/131 : Oscillating red giants from the TESS QLP (Hon+, 2021)
J/A+A/645/A85 : Age dissection of the Milky Way discs (Miglio+, 2021)
J/other/NatAs/5.640 : MW chronologically early assembly (Montalban+, 2021)
J/A+A/657/A31 : Solar-like oscillations in Kepler DR25 (Mathur+, 2022)
J/MNRAS/511/5578 : Vetting asteroseismic Delν measurements (Reyes+, 2022)
J/AJ/163/229 : Open cluster abund. & mapping survey. VII. (Spoo+, 2022)
J/A+A/679/L12 : Close-in planets around fast-rotating stars (Garcia+, 2023)
J/A+A/677/A21 : Asteroseismic dist. to 12500 red-giant stars (Khan+, 2023)
J/A+A/682/A7 : Ensemble seismology of Gaia DR3 binary systems (Beck+, 2024)
J/A+A/681/L20 : Seismic global parameters of 1507 red giants (Mosser+, 2024)
J/AJ/167/50 : APO-K2 Catalog. I. 7672 Red giants (Schonhut-Stasik+, 2024)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 8 I8 --- KIC [1164274/12508882] Kepler Input Catalog number
10- 17 A8 --- STARCAT Category the outlier is found in (1)
19- 19 I1 --- SEISB [0/1] 1= double-peaked power spectrum
21- 21 I1 --- ROT [0/1] 1= strong stellar rotation signal
23- 23 I1 --- EB [0/1] 1= Eclipsing Binary
25- 25 I1 --- BadTS [0/1] 1= pollution, background or pathological
signal
27- 27 I1 --- HighN [0/1] 1= nu-max above or close to Nyquist
29- 29 I1 --- LowN [0/1] 1= nu-max below 1 microHz
31- 31 I1 --- Nomodes [0/1] 1= no clear detection
33- 33 I1 --- Short [0/1] 1= 1 or fewer quarters of data (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Categories as follows:
NoDet_OL = Nondetection, later classified as outlier (184 occurrences)
SilverOl = Silver category, later classified as outlier (177 occurrences)
DetectOl = Detect category, later classified as outlier (111 occurrences)
HighNmax = Classifed as numax likely to be above Nyquist (80 occurrences)
LowNmax = Classified as numax likely to be below 1µHz (67 occurrences)
Backgrnd = Classified as background source (43 occurrences)
Dwarf = Classified as spectroscopic dwarf (33 occurrences)
Gold_Ol = Gold category, later classified as outlier (12 occurrences)
Note (2): Note that we do not list the non-detections with short time
series; the Short category was only used for initial detections
for which we identified contradictory or poor results.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 8 I8 --- KIC [893214/12885196] Kepler Input Catalog
number
10- 16 A7 --- EvolSt Evolutionary State (1)
18- 21 A4 --- EvolSrc Evolutionary Source (2)
23- 30 A8 --- CatTab Category (3)
32- 35 A4 --- SeisSrc Seismic Weighting Scheme (4)
37- 40 A4 --- SpecSrc Spectroscopic Data Release (5)
42- 43 I2 --- NNumax [0/10] Number of Filtered νmax values
45 I1 --- NDNu [0/7] Number of Filtered Δν values
47- 48 I2 --- Quar [1/18] Quarters of Kepler data
50- 59 F10.4 uHz Numax [0.099/494]?=-9999 νmax value
61- 70 F10.4 uHz e_Numax [0/894]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Numax
72- 81 F10.4 uHz DNu [0.066/23.6]?=-9999 Δν value
83- 92 F10.4 uHz e_DNu [0.003/2.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in DNu
94- 103 F10.4 --- fDNu [0.94/1.2]?=-9999 Mosser fΔν (6)
105- 114 F10.4 --- e_fDNu [0.005/0.03]?=-9999 Uncertainty in fDNu
116- 125 F10.4 --- fNumax [0.99/1.1]?=-9999 Mosser fνmax
127- 136 F10.4 Msun Mass [0.49/6.3]?=-9999 Mosser Mass
138- 147 F10.4 Msun e_Mass [0.02/2.3]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Mass
149- 158 F10.4 Rsun Radius [3.3/99.7]?=-9999 Mosser Radius
160- 169 F10.4 Rsun e_Radius [0.066/13.22]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Radius
171- 180 F10.4 [cm.s-2] loggSeis [-0.15/3.63]?=-9999 Log, Mosser Seismic
surface gravity
182- 191 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_loggSeis [0.0027/0.9]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
loggSeis
193- 202 F10.4 K Teff [3259/7480]?=-9999 Stellar effective
temperature
204- 213 F10.4 K e_Teff [16/743]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Teff
215- 224 F10.4 [cm.s-2] loggSpec [-0.35/4.8]?=-9999 Log, Spectroscopic
surface gravity
226- 235 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_loggSpec [0.058/0.14]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
loggSpec
237- 246 F10.4 [-] [Fe/H] [-2.44/0.53]?=-9999 Metallicity, Fe/H
248- 257 F10.4 [-] e_[Fe/H] [0.058]?=-9999 Uncertainty in [Fe/H]
259- 268 F10.4 [-] [a/Fe] [-0.51/0.4]?=-9999 α metal abundance
ratio
270- 279 F10.4 [-] e_[a/Fe] [0.02/0.5]?=-9999 Uncertainty in [Alp/Fe]
281- 290 F10.4 [-] [C/Fe] [-9999.99/0.9]?=-9999 Carbon/Iron
abundance ratio
292- 301 F10.4 [-] e_[C/Fe] [-999.99/0.5]?=-9999 Uncertainty in [C/Fe]
303- 312 F10.4 [-] [N/Fe] [-9999.99/1.6]?=-9999 Nitrogen/Iron
abundance ratio
314- 323 F10.4 [-] e_[N/Fe] [-999.99/41.6]?=-9999 Uncertainty in [N/Fe]
325- 336 F12.6 --- InvRGaia [0.002/3]?=-9999 MIST inverse Gaia radius,
1/Rgaia (7)
338- 349 F12.6 --- e_InvRGaia [0.0005/0.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in InvRGaia
351- 357 A7 --- AgeCat Recommended Age Class (8)
359- 368 F10.4 Gyr AgeRGB [0.12/66.1]?=-9999 Garstec Age, RGB
370- 379 F10.4 Gyr E_AgeRGB [0.0098/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
AgeRGB
381- 390 F10.4 Gyr e_AgeRGB [-44/-0.009]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty in
AgeRGB
392- 401 F10.4 Gyr AgeRC [0.094/60.2]?=-9999 Garstec Age, RC or AGB
403- 412 F10.4 Gyr E_AgeRC [0.008/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
AgeRC
414- 423 F10.4 Gyr e_AgeRC [-44/-0.001]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty in
AgeRC
425- 434 F10.4 km.s-1 vsini [-5/57]?=-9999 Projected rotational
velocity
436- 440 A5 --- alphaCat α-based category (9)
442- 460 I19 --- GaiaDR3 Gaia DR3 source identifier
462- 466 A5 --- --- [2MASS]
468- 484 A17 --- 2MASS 2MASS position-based identifier
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Evolutionary State as follows:
Dwarf = Main-sequence dwarf (241 occurrences)
RC = Red clump (5736 occurrences)
RC/RGB = Red clump or Red Giant Branch (29 occurrences)
RGB = Red giant branch (9632 occurrences)
Unknown = Unknown (170 occurrences)
Note (2): Evolutionary Source as follows:
None = No source provided;
Seis = asteroseismic-based source;
Spec = spectroscopic-based source.
Note (3): Category as follows:
Backgrnd = Seismic signal inconsistent with spectroscopic logg;
Detect = 0-1 Dnu detections, but 2+ numax detections;
DetectOl = Detect category, later classified as outlier;
Gold = 5+ numax and Dnu detections;
Gold_Ol = Gold category, later classified as outlier ;
HighNmax = numax>220muHz or classified as likely to be such;
LowNmax = numax<1muHz or classified as likely to be such;
NoDet_OL = other recognized issues;
NoDet_Sh = less than 3 quarters of data;
NoDetect = 0-1 Dnu and numax detections;
NoSpec = No spectroscopic data;
Silver = 2-4 Dnu detections;
SilverOl = Silver category, later classified as outlier.
Note (4): Seismic Weighting Scheme as follows:
Med = Mosser;
None = None;
WAvg = White.
Note (5): Spectroscopic Data Release as follows:
DR16 = Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR16, if DR17 is not;
DR17 = Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR17, if available;
NONE = No spectrum used.
Note (6): The fΔν term relates the mean density to the observed
frequency spacing, and is computed from stellar interiors models
(see Section 3.1).
Note (7): Rgaia^-1, computed using DR17 MIST K-band, in solar units.
Note (8): Recommended age class as follows:
NONE = No recommended age class;
RC = Red Clump;
RC/RGB = Red Clump/ Red Giant Branch;
RGB = Red Giant Branch;
RGB_AGB = Red Giant Branch/ Asymptotic Giant Branch.
Note (9): α-based category, from Figure 2, as follows:
Apoor = Plotted in Figure 2 but not Arich;
Arich = [A/Fe] was above (0.08-0.15[Fe/H]) in the range -0.4<[Fe/H]<+0.2;
a threshold of +0.14 was assigned for [Fe/H] below -0.4; and a
threshold of +0.05 was used for [Fe/H] above +0.2.;
None = No category assigned.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 8 I8 --- KIC [893214/12885196] Kepler Input Catalog
number
10- 11 I2 --- Quar [1/18] Quarters of Kepler data
13 I1 --- ESA3 [0/4] Adopted APOKASC-3 Evolutionary
State (1)
15- 19 I5 --- ESSe [-9999/2] Asteroseismic Evolutionary
State (1)
21 I1 --- ESSp [0/4] Spectroscopic Evolutionary State (1)
23- 32 F10.4 K Teff16 [3212/6983]?=-9999.99 DR16-based
surface effective temperature
34- 42 F9.4 K e_Teff16 [52/232]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in Teff16
44- 53 F10.4 [cm.s-2] logg16 [-0.2/5.1]?=-9999.99 Log, DR16
Spectroscopic surface gravity
55- 63 F9.4 [cm.s-2] e_logg16 [0.023/0.2]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in logg16
65- 74 F10.4 [-] [Fe/H]16 [-2.43/0.6]?=-9999.99 DR16-based
Metallicty
76- 84 F9.4 [-] e_[Fe/H]16 [0.0046/0.2]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in
[Fe/H]16
86- 95 F10.4 [-] [a/Fe]16 [-0.51/0.6]?=-9999.99 DR16-based
α metal abundance ratio
97- 105 F9.4 [-] e_[a/Fe]16 [0.003/0.08]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in
[a/Fe]16
107- 116 F10.4 [-] [C/Fe]16 [-0.9/0.84]?=-9999.99 DR16-based
Carbon/Hydrogen abundance ratio
118- 126 F9.4 [-] e_[C/Fe]16 [0.0025/0.2]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in
[C/Fe]16
128- 137 F10.4 [-] [N/Fe]16 [-0.25/1.2]?=-9999.99 DR16-based
Nitrogen/Iron abundance ratio
139- 147 F9.4 [-] e_[N/Fe]16 [0.0064/0.2]?=-999.99 Uncertainty in
[N/Fe]16
149- 158 F10.4 K Teff17 [3259/7480]?=-9999 DR17-based surface
effective temperature
160- 169 F10.4 K e_Teff17 [2.86/149]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Teff17
171- 180 F10.4 [cm.s-2] logg17 [-0.35/4.8]?=-9999 Log, DR17
Spectroscopic surface gravity
182- 191 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_logg17 [0.016/0.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in logg17
193- 202 F10.4 [-] [Fe/H]17 [-2.44/0.6]?=-9999 DR17-based Metallicty
204- 213 F10.4 [-] e_[Fe/H]17 [0.004/0.05]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
[Fe/H]17
215- 224 F10.4 [-] [a/Fe]17 [-0.4/0.4]?=-9999 DR17-based α
metal abundance ratio
226- 235 F10.4 [-] e_[a/Fe]17 [0.003/0.5]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
[a/Fe]17
237- 246 F10.4 [-] [C/Fe]17 [-1.08/0.6]?=-9999 DR17-based
Carbon/Hydrogen abundance ratio
248- 257 F10.4 [-] e_[C/Fe]17 [0.0067/0.5]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
[C/H]17
259- 268 F10.4 [-] [N/Fe]17 [-0.6/1.6]?=-9999 DR17-based
Nitrogen/Iron abundance ratio
270- 279 F10.4 [-] e_[N/Fe]17 [0.007/41.6]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
[N/H]17
281- 287 F7.4 mas plx [0.026/13.2]?=0 Gaia DR3 parallax
289- 294 F6.4 mas e_plx [0.008/0.7]?=0 Uncertainty in plx
296- 302 F7.4 mag Ksmag [6.22/14]?=0 2MASS Ks magnitude
304- 309 F6.4 mag e_Ksmag [0.01/0.1]?=0 Uncertainty in Ksmag
311- 323 F13.7 --- RG16 [0.002/3]?=-9999 Rgaia^-1, computed
using DR16 MIST K-band, in solar units
325- 337 F13.7 --- e_RG16 [0.0005/0.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
RG16
339- 347 F9.7 --- RG17 [0.002/2.2]?=0 Rgaia^-1, computed using
DR17 MIST K-band, in solar units
349- 357 F9.7 --- e_RG17 [0.0005/0.2]?=0 Uncertainty in
RG17
359- 371 F13.7 --- RGGH [0.0076/1]?=-9999 Rgaia^-1, computed
using GHB09 IRFM, in solar units
373- 385 F13.7 --- e_RGGH [0.0003/0.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
RGGH
387- 396 F10.4 --- fDNuSH [0.7/1.2]?=-9999 FΔν,
Sharma+White weighting
398- 407 F10.4 --- e_fDNuSH [0.005/2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in fDNuSH
409- 418 F10.4 --- fNumaxSH [0.9/1.1]?=-9999 Fνmax, Sharma+White
weighting
420- 429 F10.4 [cm.s-2] loggSH [-0.15/3.7]?=-9999 Seismic surface
gravity, Sharma+White weighting, fν
max = 1
431- 440 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_loggSH [0.0027/1]?=-9999 Uncertainty in loggSH
442- 451 F10.4 Msun MSH [0.38/10.7]?=-9999 Mass,
Sharma+White weighting, corrected
453- 462 F10.4 Msun e_MSH [0.025/54.2]?=-9999 Uncertainty in MSH
464- 473 F10.4 Rsun RSH [3.4/92.6]?=-9999 Radius,
Sharma+White weighting, corrected
475- 484 F10.4 Rsun e_RSH [0.06/181]?=-9999 Uncertainty in RSH
486- 495 F10.4 --- fDNuMo [0.94/1.2]?=-9999 FΔν,
GARSTEC+Mosser weighting
497- 506 F10.4 --- e_fDNuMo [0.005/0.03]?=-9999 Uncertainty in fDNuMo
508- 517 F10.4 --- fNumaxMo [0.99/1.1]?=-9999 Fνmax,
GARSTEC+Mosser weighting
519- 528 F10.4 [cm.s-2] loggMo [-0.15/3.7]?=-9999 Seismic surface
gravity, GARSTEC+Mosser weighting, fν
max = 1
530- 539 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_loggMo [0.0027/1]?=-9999 Uncertainty in loggMo
541- 550 F10.4 Msun MMo [0.49/6.3]?=-9999 Mass,
GARSTEC+Mosser weighting, corrected
552- 561 F10.4 Msun e_MMo [0.02/2.3]?=-9999 Uncertainty in MMo
563- 572 F10.4 Rsun RMo [3.3/99.7]?=-9999 Radius,
GARSTEC+Mosser weighting, corrected
574- 583 F10.4 Rsun e_RMo [0.06/13.3]?=-9999 Uncertainty in RMo
585- 594 F10.4 --- fDNuWh [0.94/1.2]?=-9999 FΔν,
GARSTEC+White weighting
596- 605 F10.4 --- e_fDNuWh [0.005/0.02]?=-9999 Uncertainty in fDNuWh
607- 616 F10.4 --- fNumaxWh [0.94/1.06]?=-9999 Fνmax,
GARSTEC+White weighting
618- 627 F10.4 [cm.s-2] loggWh [-0.15/3.7]?=-9999 Seismic surface
gravity, GARSTEC+White weighting, fν
max = 1
629- 638 F10.4 [cm.s-2] e_loggWh [0.0027/1]?=-9999 Uncertainty in loggWh
640- 649 F10.4 Msun MWh [0.49/6.7]?=-9999 Mass,
GARSTEC+White weighting, corrected
651- 660 F10.4 Msun e_MWh [0.02/2.4]?=-9999 Uncertainty in MWh
662- 671 F10.4 Rsun RWh [3.3/92.6]?=-9999 Radius,
GARSTEC+White weighting, corrected
673- 682 F10.4 Rsun e_RWh [0.06/12]?=-9999 Uncertainty in RWh
684- 693 F10.4 Gyr RGBAgeM [0.13/67.4]?=-9999 Garstec RGB Age
including mass loss
695- 704 F10.4 Gyr E_RGBAgeM [0.0098/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
RGBAgeM
706- 715 F10.4 Gyr e_RGBAgeM [-43.9/3.7]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty in
RGBAgeM
717- 726 F10.4 Gyr RCAgeM [0.097/61.1]?=-9999 Garstec RC/AGB Age
including mass loss
728- 737 F10.4 Gyr E_RCAgeM [0.008/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
RCAgeM
739- 748 F10.4 Gyr e_RCAgeM [-44/-0.001]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty in
RCAgeM
750- 759 F10.4 Gyr RGBAgeNom [0.14/68]?=-9999 Garstec RGB Age not
including mass loss
761- 770 F10.4 Gyr E_RGBAgeNom [0.003/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
RGBAgeNom
772- 781 F10.4 Gyr e_RGBAgeNom [-46.1/46.3]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty in
RGBAgeNom
783- 792 F10.4 Gyr RCAgeNom [0.097/67.4]?=-9999 Garstec RC/AGB Age
not including mass loss
794- 803 F10.4 Gyr E_RCAgeNom [0.008/99]?=-9999 Upper uncertainty in
RCAgeNom
805- 814 F10.4 Gyr e_RCAgeNom [-55.5/-0.0009]?=-9999 Lower uncertainty
in RCAgeNom
816- 825 F10.4 Gyr YRECAge [0.42/86.3]?=-9999 YREC Model Age
827- 836 F10.4 --- FAgeCOR [0.46/0.99]?=-9999 Age correction factor
between trial and final mass
838- 843 F6.4 Msun Mtrial [0.6/4.8]?=0 Trial mass
845- 854 F10.4 --- FAgeMDRGB [0.99/1.1]?=-9999 Age correction factor
for mass loss for RGB
856- 865 F10.4 --- FAgeMDRC [0.98/1.3]?=-9999 Age correction factor
for mass loss for RC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Evolutionary states derived from asteroseismology as well
as those derived from spectroscopy alone as follows:
-1 = for ESSe, cases where no state could be assigned;
0 = no state assigned;
1 = RGB, Red Giant Branch (degenerate core);
2 = RC, Red Clump (non-degenerate core);
3 = DW, Dwarf (spectroscopic logg>3.5);
-9999 = for ESSe, for stars not checked for states.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table7.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 8 I8 --- KIC [892376/12885196] Kepler Input Catalog number
10- 19 F10.4 --- Nmax-MIN [0.09/21738]?=-9999 Lower bound,
spectroscopic prior on νmax
21- 30 F10.4 --- Nmax-MAX [0.16/55797]?=-9999 Upper bound,
spectroscopic prior on νmax
32- 33 I2 --- NDet [0/10] Total number, νmax detections prior
to quality cuts
35- 36 I2 --- NNmax [0/10] Number, valid νmax measurements
after outlier rejection
38 I1 --- NDnu [0/7] Number, valid Δν measurements
after outlier rejection
40 I1 --- NCOR [0/6] νmax data quality flag, COR pipeline
(G1) (1)
42 I1 --- NELS [0/9] νmax data quality flag, ELS pipeline
(G1) (1)
44 I1 --- NGAU [0/6] νmax data quality flag, GAU pipeline
(G1) (1)
46 I1 --- NSYD [0/9] νmax data quality flag, SYD pipeline
(G1) (1)
48 I1 --- NA2Z [0/6] νmax data quality flag, A2Z pipeline
(G1) (1)
50 I1 --- NDIA [0/6] νmax data quality flag, DIA pipeline
(G1) (1)
52 I1 --- NCAN [0/6] νmax data quality flag, CAN pipeline
(G1) (1)
54 I1 --- NCV [0/6] νmax data quality flag, CV pipeline
(G1) (1)
56 I1 --- NHON [0/6] νmax data quality flag, HON pipeline
(G1) (1)
58 I1 --- NFLI [0/6] νmax data quality flag, FLI pipeline
(G1) (1)
60- 69 F10.4 --- Nmax-COR [0.17/245]?=-9999 νmax value, COR pipeline
(G1)
71- 80 F10.4 --- Nmax-ELS [1.33/265]?=-9999 νmax value, ELS pipeline
(G1)
82- 91 F10.4 --- Nmax-GAU [1/293]?=-9999 νmax value, GAU pipeline
(G1)
93- 102 F10.4 --- Nmax-SYD [0.01/547]?=-9999 νmax value, SYD pipeline
(G1)
104- 113 F10.4 --- Nmax-A2Z [1.33/284]?=-9999 νmax value, A2Z pipeline
(G1)
115- 124 F10.4 --- Nmax-DIA [0.08/328]?=-9999 νmax value, DIA pipeline
(G1)
126- 135 F10.4 --- Nmax-CAN [0.27/343]?=-9999 νmax value, CAN pipeline
(G1)
137- 146 F10.4 --- Nmax-CV [0.0008/378]?=-9999 νmax value, CV
pipeline (G1)
148- 157 F10.4 --- Nmax-HON [4.28/306]?=-9999 νmax value, HON pipeline
(G1)
159- 168 F10.4 --- Nmax-FLI [0.37/1888]?=-9999 νmax value, FLI
pipeline (G1)
170 I1 --- DCOR [0/6] Δν data quality flag, COR
pipeline (G1) (1)
172 I1 --- DELS [0/6] Δν data quality flag, ELS
pipeline (G1) (1)
174 I1 --- DGAU [0/9] Δν data quality flag, GAU
pipeline (G1) (1)
176 I1 --- DSYD [0/6] Δν data quality flag, SYD
pipeline (G1) (1)
178 I1 --- DA2Z [0/9] Δν data quality flag, A2Z
pipeline (G1) (1)
180 I1 --- DDIA [0/6] Δν data quality flag, DIA
pipeline (G1) (1)
182 I1 --- DCAN [0/6] Δν data quality flag, CAN
pipeline (G1) (1)
184- 193 F10.4 --- DNu-COR [0.058/19.7]?=-9999 Δν values, COR
pipeline (G1)
195- 204 F10.4 --- DNu-ELS [0.48/25.1]?=-9999 Δν values, ELS
pipeline (G1)
206- 215 F10.4 --- DNu-GAU [1.65/29]?=-9999 Δν values, GAU
pipeline (G1)
217- 226 F10.4 --- DNu-SYD [0.083/25.5]?=-9999 Δν values, SYD
pipeline (G1)
228- 237 F10.4 --- DNu-A2Z [0.026/25.72]?=-9999 Δν values, A2Z
pipeline (G1)
239- 248 F10.4 --- DNu-DIA [0.097/23]?=-9999 Δν values, DIA
pipeline (G1)
250- 259 F10.4 --- DNu-CAN [0.039/28.6]?=-9999 Δν values, CAN
pipeline (G1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Flags, which reflect the category of the data (νmax or
Δν) for each star are as follows:
0 = no data;
1 = valid filtered measurement;
2 = failed the spectroscopic prior;
6 = failed the ensemble prior test;
9 = data excluded from usage because it fell outside the range of
validity for that pipeline.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table9.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 8 I8 --- KIC [892376/12885196] Kepler Input Catalog
number
10- 11 I2 --- NDet [0/10] Total number, νmax detections
prior to quality cuts
13- 14 I2 --- NFDet [0/10] Total number, νmax detections,
filtered
16 I1 --- NDNDet [0/7] Number of filtered Δν
detections
18- 27 F10.4 --- Nmax-CRCT [0.14/1790]?=-9999 Zero-point adjusted
average νmax
29- 38 F10.4 --- e_Nmax-CRCT [0.0029/1110]?=-9999 Uncertainty in
Nmax-CRCT
40- 49 F10.4 --- Nmax-WTCOR [0.19/323]?=-9999 Weighted mean νmax
51- 60 F10.4 --- e_Nmax-WTCOR [0.008/24]?=-9999 Uncertainty in Nmax-WTCOR
62- 71 F10.4 --- Nmax-MED [0.09/676]?=-9999 Median νmax
73- 82 F10.4 --- Nmax-MAD [0/263]?=-9999 Median absolute deviation,
νmax
84- 93 F10.4 --- Nmax-COR [0.17/246]?=-9999 νmax values for COR
pipeline (G1)
95- 104 F10.4 --- Nmax-ELS [10/267]?=-9999 νmax values for ELS
pipeline (G1)
106- 115 F10.4 --- Nmax-GAU [1/293]?=-9999 νmax values for GAU
pipeline (G1)
117- 126 F10.4 --- Nmax-SYD [9.98/546]?=-9999 νmax values for SYD
pipeline (G1)
128- 137 F10.4 --- Nmax-A2Z [1.33/284]?=-9999 νmax values for A2Z
pipeline (G1)
139- 148 F10.4 --- Nmax-DIA [0.1/328]?=-9999 νmax values for DIA
pipeline (G1)
150- 159 F10.4 --- Nmax-CAN [0.27/342]?=-9999 νmax values for CAN
pipeline (G1)
161- 170 F10.4 --- Nmax-CV [0.09/339]?=-9999 νmax values for CV
pipeline (G1)
172- 181 F10.4 --- Nmax-HON [4.27/306]?=-9999 νmax values for HON
pipeline (G1)
183- 192 F10.4 --- Nmax-FLI [0.38/1941]?=-9999 νmax values for FLI
pipeline (G1)
194- 203 F10.4 --- DNu-CRCT [0.06/23]?=-9999 Zero-point adjusted
average Δν
205- 214 F10.4 --- e_DNu-CRCT [0/10.22]?=-9999 Unweighted σ in
DNu-CRCT
216- 225 F10.4 --- DNu-WTCOR [0.06/23.6]?=-9999 Weighted mean
Δν
227- 236 F10.4 --- e_DNu-WTCOR [0.003/2.2]?=-9999 Weighted σ in
DNu-WTCOR
238- 247 F10.4 --- DNu-MED [0.06/23]?=-9999 Median Δν
249- 258 F10.4 --- DNu-MAD [0/3]?=-9999 Median absolute deviation,
Δν
260- 269 F10.4 --- DNu-COR [0.05/19.5]?=-9999 Δν values, COR
pipeline (G1)
271- 280 F10.4 --- DNu-ELS [0.49/24.1]?=-9999 Δν values, ELS
pipeline (G1)
282- 291 F10.4 --- DNu-GAU [1.65/28.3]?=-9999 Δν values, GAU
pipeline (G1)
293- 302 F10.4 --- DNu-SYD [0.25/25.5]?=-9999 Δν values, SYD
pipeline (G1)
304- 313 F10.4 --- DNu-A2Z [0.52/23.53]?=-9999 Δν values, A2Z
pipeline (G1)
315- 324 F10.4 --- DNu-DIA [0.098/23]?=-9999 Δν values, DIA
pipeline (G1)
326- 335 F10.4 --- DNu-CAN [0.039/23.6]?=-9999 Δν values, CAN
pipeline (G1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Global notes:
Note (G1): Pipelines are:
COR = Envelope autocorrelation function (EACF), as described in
Mosser & Appourchaux (2009A&A...508..877M 2009A&A...508..877M);
ELS = Methods described in Elsworth et al. (2020RNAAS...4..177E 2020RNAAS...4..177E);
GAU = Designed to estimate νmax, Δν, and Amax, the
amplitude of the Gaussian function employed to model the
oscillations' power excess;
SYD = SYD pipeline, Huber et al. (2009CoAst.160...74H 2009CoAst.160...74H);
A2Z = Combination of the A2Z (Mathur+ 2010A&A...511A..46M 2010A&A...511A..46M) and an
implementation of the EACF (COR) method;
DIA = Adoption of the Bayesian inference code DIAMONDS, Corsaro &
De Ridder (2014A&A...571A..71C 2014A&A...571A..71C);
CAN = Described in APOKASC-2 paper, Pinsonneault+ 2018, J/ApJS/239/32
and in Kallinger+ (2010A&A...522A...1K 2010A&A...522A...1K);
CV = "Coefficient of Variation" (CV) method for detecting
solar-like oscillations and reporting νmax values is
described in Bell+ 2019, J/MNRAS/482/616
HON = Deep learning to detect the presence of a power excess
corresponding to solar-like oscillations within power
spectra. As described in Hon+ 2018ApJ...859...64H 2018ApJ...859...64H
FLI = FliPer method described in Bugnet+ 2018A&A...620A..38B 2018A&A...620A..38B is based
on the averaged power density contained in the PSD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
History:
From electronic version of the journal
(End) Prepared by [AAS], Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 31-Oct-2025