J/ApJS/56/403        X-ray survey of clusters of galaxies. IV. (Kowalski+, 1984)

An X-ray survey of clusters of galaxies. IV. A survey of southern clusters and a compilation of upper limits for both Abell and Southern clusters. KOWALSKI M.P., ULMER M.P., CRUDDACE R.G., WOOD K.S. <Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 56, 403 (1984)> =1984ApJS...56..403K 1984ApJS...56..403K (SIMBAD/NED Reference)
Keywords: galaxies: clustering - luminosity function - X-rays: sources Description: The HEAO 1 A-1 X-ray survey of clusters of galaxies has been completed. We present X-ray error boxes and intensities or explicit upper limits for all clusters in the Abell catalog, and for the catalog of southern clusters and groups by Duus and Newell. The total of more than 3600 clusters surveyed makes this the most comprehensive survey of cluster X-ray emission to date. We have determined a subset of the southern sky catalog which is suitable for statistical studies and which may be combined with the Abell catalog. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1 193 128 Abell cluster X-ray sources table2 189 74 Southern cluster X-ray sources table3 131 2712 Abell cluster survey table4 117 951 Southern cluster survey table5a 100 26 L type confused regions for Abell clusters table5b 100 60 O type confused regions for Abell clusters table5c 20 29 *UWC confused regions for Abell clusters table6a 100 14 L type confused regions for southern clusters table6b 100 35 O type confused regions for southern clusters table6c 21 26 *UWC type confused regions for southern clusters refs 153 121 References -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note on table5c and table6c: These clusters do not have error box. They represent the lowest luminosity upper limits Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 5 A5 --- Name Cluster name (Abell 1958) 6 A1 --- n_Name [#] A "#" indicates new HEAO A-1 source 7 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterisk indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample. 9- 14 F6.2 deg RAdeg Right ascension 1950 of optical center 16- 21 F6.2 deg DEdeg Declination 1950 of optical center 23- 28 F6.2 deg RAdeg2 Right ascension 1950 of X-ray error box center 30- 35 F6.2 deg DEdeg2 Declination 1950 of X-ray error box center 37- 42 F6.2 deg RA1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner RA 44- 49 F6.2 deg DE1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner DE 51- 56 F6.2 deg RA2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner RA 58- 63 F6.2 deg DE2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner DE 65- 70 F6.2 deg RA3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner RA 72- 77 F6.2 deg DE3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner DE 79- 84 F6.2 deg RA4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner RA 86- 91 F6.2 deg DE4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner DE 93- 96 F4.2 deg2 Area Area of error box 99 I1 --- D Distance class (Abell 1958) 102 I1 --- R Richness class (Abell 1958) 105-110 A6 --- B-M Bautz-Morgan class from LV, unless noted. 111 A1 --- u_B-M A colon means uncertain classification 112-115 A4 --- R-S Revised Rood-Sastry class (1) 117-122 A6 --- R-S2 Alternate classification under primary classification 124-129 F6.4 --- z Redshift 131-136 F6.4 --- e_z []? rms uncertainty on z. If no value is given, redshift error is assumed to be 0.0210 (Kowalski 1982) 138 I1 --- r_z [1-8] Redshift reference (2) 141-146 F6.2 10-3ct/cm2/s FX Flux in 10-3 A-1 counts cm-2 s-1. Data were summed in 1-day intervals (Kowalski 1982) 149-152 F4.2 10-3ct/cm2/s e_FX rms uncertainty on FX 155-159 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) Log of the X-ray luminosity (2-6 keV). (Ho=75km/s/Mpc) 162-190 A29 --- Other Other objects which could have been identified with this error box. 192-193 I2 --- Notes [1-19]? Individual notes (3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): D<5: Revised Rood-Sastry class from Struble and Rood 1982 D=5: Revised Rood-Sastry class from Struble and Rood 1983 D=6: Revised Rood-Sastry class from Struble 1982 Note (2): (1) Abell 1958. (2) Corwin 1974. (3) Hoessel, Gunn, and Thuan 1980. (4) KUC. (5) LV. (6) Noonan 1981. (7) de Vaucouleurs 1961. (8) Hintzen, Scott, and McKee 1981. Note (3): Individual notes: (1) Distance, richness, and B-M classes from Sandage, Kristian, and Westphal 1976. Optical position is average of both spiral and elliptical components from de Vaucouleurs 1961. (2) Arp peculiar galaxy 102 is nearby (Biermann et al. 1981). Comparison shows that A2252 is the dominant source. (3) Error box contains globular cluster NGC 7089, but NGC 7089 is not the X-ray source (Grindlay 1980). (4) B-M class from Corwin 1974. (5) B-M classification discrepancy with Corwin 1974. LV classification adopted. (6) B-M class from Sandage, Kristian, and Westphal 1976. (7) Flux is not 3.5, but cluster is kept as an identified source. Paper I gave this identification to A2159, and Paper III gave it to A2152. Here we have assigned A2151 to the source according to our identification criteria (see text; Giovanelli 1983). (8) The error box is too far from the cluster for our association criteria, but HEAO-2 analysis shows that there is a source at the position of A2177. (9) Flux is not 3.5, but cluster is kept as an identified source. (10) Error box contains both A396 and AWM 7 (Schwartz et al. 1980). Comparison shows that A396 is the dominant source. (11) MKW 3 observed to have extended emission (Kriss et al. 1980). Comparison shows that A2063 is the dominant source. (12) HEAO-2 detected QSO 1028+313 at 5.5 X 10-12 ergs cm-2 s-1 (Zamorani et al. 1981), therefore half of the flux is from A1045. (13) Possible contamination with NGC 3227 (Marshall et al. 1980). Our HEAO-2 result shows that A992 is the dominant source. Monitor proportional counter data confirm this (Halpern 1980). (14) There is some source contamination with NGC 5548 (Piccinotti et al. 1982), but A-1 able to resolve cluster component. (15) X-ray source 3C 390.3 is nearby (Marshall et al. 1979), but is not the source. (16) X-ray source Mrk 501 is nearby (Piccinotti et al. 1982). Error box slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification. (17) Error box slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification (18) Revised Rood-Sastry class is "L10a". (19) Bimodal redshift distribution (Noonan 1981); redshift for A2319A chosen for cluster. Also, B-M classification discrepancy with Corwin 1974. LV classification adopted. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 A9 --- Name Cluster name (DN) 10 A1 --- n_Name [#] A "#" indicates new HEAO A-1 source 11 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterisk indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample. 13- 18 F6.2 deg RAdeg Right ascension 1950 of optical center (DN) 20- 25 F6.2 deg DEdeg Declination 1950 of optical center (DN) 27- 32 F6.2 deg RAdeg2 Right ascension 1950 of X-ray error box center 34- 39 F6.2 deg DEdeg2 Declination 1950 of X-ray error box center 41- 46 F6.2 deg RA1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner RA 48- 53 F6.2 deg DE1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner DE 55- 60 F6.2 deg RA2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner RA 62- 67 F6.2 deg DE2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner DE 69- 74 F6.2 deg RA3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner RA 76- 81 F6.2 deg DE3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner DE 83- 88 F6.2 deg RA4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner RA 90- 95 F6.2 deg DE4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner DE 97-100 F4.2 deg2 Area Area of error box 103 A1 --- D Distance class (DN) 106 A1 --- T [OMC] Concentration class (DN) 109-114 A6 --- B-M Bautz-Morgan class from White 1980 115 A1 --- u_B-M A colon means uncertain classification 117 A1 --- R-S R-S classification (Lugger 1978) 119-121 I3 --- N []? Number of galaxies in the cluster uncorrected for field (DN) 122 A1 --- u_N Uncertainty flag on N 123-128 F6.4 --- z []? Redshift 130-135 F6.4 --- e_z []? rms uncertainty on z. If no value is given, redshift error is assumed to be 0.0210 (Kowalski 1982) 137 I1 --- r_z [1-9]? Redshift reference (1) 140-145 F6.2 10-3ct/cm2/s FX Flux in 10-3 A-1 counts cm-2 s-1. Data were summed in 1-day intervals (Kowalski 1982) 148-151 F4.2 10-3ct/cm2/s e_FX rms uncertainty on FX 154-158 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) []? Log of the X-ray luminosity (2-6 keV). (Ho=75km/s/Mpc) 161-183 A23 --- Other Other objects which could have been identified with this error box. 188-189 I2 --- Notes [1-30]? Individual notes (2) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): (1) DN: Duus and Newell 1977 (2) Chincarini, Tarenghi, and Bettis 1981. (3) Noonan 1981. (4) Yahil and Vidal 1977. (5) Sandage 1975a. (6) Zwicky distance class and redshift estimated directly from ESO films. (7) de Vaucouleurs, de Vaucouleurs, and Corwin 1976. (8) de Vaucouleurs 1975. (9) Dressler 1980b. Note (2): Individual notes: (1) Rose 5 (Rose 1976). (2) Rose 6. (3) Error box slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification. (4) Very poor group (White 1980). (5) Ser 031-05 (Sersic 1974). (6) Ser 033-07. (7) Ser 040-06. (8) Snow 23 (Snow 1970). (9) Dev G8 (de Vaucouleurs 1975). X-ray Seyfert NGC 2997 is part of this group (Piccinotti et al. 1982). (10) Antilia group. (11) Abell cluster 1060 (Sandage 1975a). Revised R-S reference is C6 (Struble and Rood 1982). (12) Klem 15 (Klemola 1969). (13) Centaurus cluster. (14) Klem 21. Ex Hya is the source, not the cluster. (15) Klem 22. (16) Dev G4. Cen A (NGC 5128) is the source, not the cluster. (17) Sandage 1975. X-ray source MCG 6-30-15 is nearby (Marshall et al. 1980), but is not the source. (18) X-ray Seyfert ESO140G-43 is part of this group (Marshall et al. 1979). (19) There are two error boxes associated with this cluster. (20) Double cluster. Error box is slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification. (21) Ser 137-02. Pavo cluster. There are two error boxes associated with this cluster. (22) Ser 138-07. Not given D/C classes by DN, but is on film #186 which they surveyed. (23) Ser 145-03. (24) Very poor group (White 1980). (25) Klem 34. X-ray source NGC 7163 is nearby (Marshall et al. 1979), but is not the source. (26) Ser 149-11. Not given D/C classes by DN, but is on film #146 which they surveyed. Error box slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification. (27) Ser 151-02. X-ray source NGC 7213 is nearby (Piccinotti et al. 1982), but is not the source. (28) Rose 85. Error box slightly outside cluster, but kept as the identification. (29) Rose 107. NGC 7582 is part of Grus Quartet, G27 (de Vaucouleurs 1975). (30) Klem 44. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterisk indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 7 A5 --- Name Name (Abell 1958). 13 A1 --- Code HEAO-1 A-1 letter code (see code table) 15- 21 F7.3 deg RAdeg Right ascension 1950 of the optical center (Sastry and Rood 1971) 23- 29 F7.3 deg DEdeg Declination 1950 of optical center (Sastry and Rood 1971) 31- 37 F7.3 deg GLON Cluster optical center new galactic longitude (epoch 1950) 39- 45 F7.3 deg GLAT Cluster optical center new galactic latitude (epoch 1950) 47 A1 --- l_Flux [<] Limit flag on Flux 48- 57 E10.4 ct/cm2/s Flux Flux or upper limit to flux in A-1 cts/cm2/s Data were summed in 1-day intervals for S and D clusters, and 4-day intervals for all other clusters (Kowalski 1982). 59 A1 --- l_log(LX) [<] Limit flag on LX 60- 64 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) Log of the X-ray luminosity or 2 upper limit (2-6 keV). (Ho=75km/s/Mpc). 66- 71 F6.4 --- z Redshift. For clusters with bimodal distributions (Noonan 1981) we choose one component: A2151B, A2241B, A2319A, and A2645B 73- 78 F6.4 --- e_z []? rms uncertainty on z. If no value is given, error is assumed to be 0.0210 (Kowalski 1982). 80- 82 I3 --- o_z []? Number of galaxies used to calculate measured redshifts. 84 I1 --- r_z [1-8]? Redshift reference (1) 86- 89 F4.1 mag Mag Magnitude of 10th brightest galaxy (Abell 1958). 91 I1 --- D Distance class (Abell 1958). 93 I1 --- R Richness class (Abell 1958). 95- 97 I3 --- N Abell's counts of galaxies (Abell 1980). 99-100 I2 mm Radius Cluster optical radius in mm (LV). 102-107 A6 --- B-M Bautz-Morgan class. 108 A1 --- u_B-M A colon means uncertain classification. 109 I1 --- r_B-M [1-5]? B-M class reference (2) 111-115 A5 --- R-S Revised Rood-Sastry class. 117 I1 --- r_R-S [1-3]? Revised R-S class reference (3) 119-127 A9 --- R-S2 Alternate Revised R-S class. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Redshift reference. (1) Abell 1958. (2) Corwin 1974. (3) Hoessel, Gunn, and Thuan 1980. (4) KUC.Kowalski et al., 1983 (5) LV. Leir et al., 1977 (6) Noonan 1981. (7) de Vaucouleurs 1961. (8) Hintzen, Scott, and McKee 1981. Note (2): Bautz-Morgan class reference. (1) LV. Leir et al., 1977 (2) Corwin 1974. (3) Sandage, Kristian, and Westphal 1976. (4) Bautz and Morgan 1970. (5) Bautz 1972. Note (3): Revised Rood-Sastry class reference. (1) Struble and Rood 1982. (2) Struble and Rood 1983. (3) Struble 1982. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterisk indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 11 A9 --- Name Name (DN). (1) 13 A1 --- Code HEAO-1 A-1 letter code (see code table) 15- 21 F7.3 deg RAdeg Right ascension 1950 of optical center (DN) 23- 29 F7.3 deg DEdeg Declination 1950 of optical center (DN) 31- 37 F7.3 deg GLON Cluster optical center new galactic longitude 39- 45 F7.3 deg GLAT Cluster optical center new galactic latitude 47 A1 --- l_Flux [<] Limit flag on Flux 48- 57 E10.4 ct/cm2/s Flux Flux or 1 sigma upper limit to flux in A-1 cts/cm2/s. Data were summed in 1-day intervals for S and D clusters, and 4-day intervals for all other clusters (Kowalski 1982). 59 A1 --- l_log(LX) [<] Limit flag on LX 60- 64 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) Log of the X-ray luminosity or 2 sigma upper limit (2-6 keV). (Ho=75km/s/Mpc). 66- 71 F6.4 --- z Redshift. 73- 78 F6.4 --- e_z []? rms uncertainty on z. If no value is given, error is assumed to be 0.0210 (Kowalski 1982), except for values from Dressler 1980b which are 0.001. 80- 82 I3 --- o_z []? Number of galaxies used to calculate measured redshifts. 83- 84 I2 --- r_z [1-9]? Redshift reference (2) 91 A1 --- D Distance class (DN) (3) 93 A1 --- T [OMC] Concentration class (DN) 95- 97 I3 --- N []? Number of galaxies in the cluster uncorrected for field (DN) 102-107 A6 --- B-M Bautz-Morgan class. 108 A1 --- u_B-M A colon means uncertain classification. 109 I1 --- r_B-M [1]? B-M class reference (4) 111-115 A5 --- R-S Rood-Sastry class. 117 I1 --- r_R-S [1-2]? R-S class reference (5) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): DN identified 710 new clusters and groups, but included 248 previously identified clusters in their catalog. This table contains only 951 entries, because in some cases DN identified two clusters of different distances at the same coordinates. Our results are not capable of resolving the X-ray emission in such cases. Note (2): Redshift reference: (1) DN. (2) Chincarini, Tarenghi, and Bettis 1981. (3) Noonan 1981. (4) Yahil and Vidal 1977. (5) Sandage 1975a. (6) Zwicky distance class and redshift estimated directly from ESO films. (7) de Vaucouleurs, de Vaucouleurs, and Corwin 1976. (8) de Vaucouleurs 1975. (9) Dressler 1980b. (10) (unexplained) (occurs four times) Note (3): Of the 782 clusters located on the 97 ESO films which DN surveyed, only 667 were given distance and concentration classes Note (4): Bautz-Morgan class reference: (1) White 1980 Note (5): Rood-Sastry class reference: (1) Lugger 1978. (2) Struble and Rood 1982. Revised R-S class. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5a table5b -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterix indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 7 A5 --- Name Name (Abell 1958) 14- 19 F6.2 deg RAdeg X-ray error box center right ascension (1950) 21- 26 F6.2 deg DEdeg X-ray error box center declination (1950) 28- 33 F6.2 deg RA1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner RA 35- 40 F6.2 deg DE1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner DE 42- 47 F6.2 deg RA2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner RA 49- 54 F6.2 deg DE2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner DE 56- 61 F6.2 deg RA3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner RA 63- 68 F6.2 deg DE3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner DE 70- 75 F6.2 deg RA4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner RA 77- 82 F6.2 deg DE4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner DE 84- 87 F4.2 deg2 Area Area of error box 90- 94 F5.2 10-3ct/cm2/s FX Flux in 10-3 A-1 counts cm-2 s-1. Data were summed in 1-day intervals (Kowalski 1982) 97-100 F4.2 10-3ct/cm2/s e_FX rms uncertainty on FX -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5c -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterix indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 7 A5 --- Name Name (Abell 1958) 11 A1 --- l_log(LX) Limit flag on LX 12- 16 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) 2 sigma limit of the log of X-ray luminosity (2-6 keV) (Ho=75km/s/Mpc) 20 A1 --- Code HEAO1 A-1 letter code (see code table) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6a table6b -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterix indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 11 A9 --- Name Name (DN) 14- 19 F6.2 deg RAdeg X-ray error box center right ascension (1950) (1) 21- 26 F6.2 deg DEdeg X-ray error box center declination (1950) (1) 28- 33 F6.2 deg RA1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner RA 35- 40 F6.2 deg DE1 90% confidence X-ray error box 1st corner DE 42- 47 F6.2 deg RA2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner RA 49- 54 F6.2 deg DE2 90% confidence X-ray error box 2nd corner DE 56- 61 F6.2 deg RA3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner RA 63- 68 F6.2 deg DE3 90% confidence X-ray error box 3d corner DE 70- 75 F6.2 deg RA4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner RA 77- 82 F6.2 deg DE4 90% confidence X-ray error box 4th corner DE 84- 87 F4.2 deg2 Area Area of error box 90- 94 F5.2 10-3ct/cm2/s FX Flux in 10-3 A-1 counts cm-2 s-1. Data were summed in 1-day intervals (Kowalski 1982) 96-100 F5.2 10-3ct/cm2/s e_FX rms uncertainty on FX ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): These error boxes were constructed in the data analysis, but they do not fulfill the criteria necessary for the association of the error box with the cluster (see text). In table6a, the error box is too large (L) In table6b, the error box does not overlap a 1 Abell radius circle which is concentric with the cluster center (O) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table6c -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 A1 --- n_Name [*] Asterix indicates cluster is not in Abell's statistical sample 3- 11 A9 --- Name Name (DN) 13 A1 --- l_log(LX) Limit flag on LX 14- 18 F5.2 10-7W log(LX) 2 sigma limit of the log of X-ray luminosity (2-6 keV) (Ho=75km/s/Mpc) 21 A1 --- Code HEAO1 A-1 letter code (see code table) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table: code HEAO-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- C: Clusters for which error boxes could not be defined. "C" clusters are regions with relatively strong emission (∼1-3x10-3ct/cm2/s), but are sufficiently "confused" so that error boxes could not be obtained. D: Firmly identified X-ray clusters. When two or more clusters could be associated with a given source, the primary choice is given the letter "D" and alternates are given the letter "T" L: Clusters have error boxes that are "larger" than 1 deg2 O: Clusters have error boxes which do not "overlap" the circle of one Abell radius. S: Firmly identified X-ray clusters. S refers to a "single" identified cluster T: For firmly identified X-ray clusters, when two or more clusters could be associated with a given source, alternates are given the letter "T" U: Clusters for which error boxes could not be defined. Error box construction was not attempted for "U" clusters, for which "upper" limits are available only. W: Clusters for which error boxes could not be defined. "W" clusters have relatively "weak" emission, so that error box construction was not attempted. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: The files were forwarded to CDS by Heinz J. Andernarch (courtesy M.J. West, Aug. 1991)
(End) Patricia Bauer [CDS] 30-Jan-1995
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line