J/MNRAS/462/4371    Sample of faint X-ray pulsators          (Israel+, 2016)

The Chandra ACIS Timing Survey Project: glimpsing a sample of faint X-ray pulsators. Israel G.L., Esposito P., Rodriguez Castillo G.A., Sidoli L. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 462, 4371-4385 (2016)> =2016MNRAS.462.4371I 2016MNRAS.462.4371I (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Binaries, X-ray ; Pulsars Keywords: methods: data analysis - catalogues - stars: oscillations - pulsars: general - X-rays: binaries - X-rays: stars Abstract: We report on the discovery of 41 new pulsating sources in the data of the Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer, which is sensitive to X-ray photons in the 0.3-10 keV band. The archival data of the first 15 yr of Chandra observations were retrieved and analysed by means of fast Fourier transforms, employing a peak-detection algorithm able to screen candidate signals in an automatic fashion. We carried out the search for new X-ray pulsators in light curves with more than 50 photons, for a total of about 190000 light curves out of about 430000 extracted. With these numbers, the ChAndra Timing Survey at Brera And Roma astronomical observatories (CATS @ BAR) - as we called the project - represents the largest ever systematic search for coherent signals in the classic X-ray band. More than 50 per cent of the signals were confirmed by further Chandra (for those sources with two or more pointings), XMM-Newton or ROSAT data. The period distribution of the new X-ray pulsators above ∼2000s resembles that of cataclysmic variables, while there is a paucity of sources with shorter period and low fluxes. Since there is not an obvious bias against these detections, a possible interpretation is in terms of a magnetic gating mechanism in accreting neutron stars. Finally, we note that CATS @ BAR is a living project and the detection algorithm will continue to be routinely applied to the new Chandra data as they become public. Based on the results obtained so far, we expect to discover about three new pulsators every year. Description: As of 2015 December 31, we extracted about 430000 time series from sources with more than 10 counts (after background subtraction); ∼190000 of them have more than 50 counts and their PSDs were searched for significant peaks. At the time of writing, the total number of searched Fourier frequencies was about 4.3x109. After a detailed screening, we obtained a final sample of 41 (42) new X-ray pulsators (signals), which are listed in Table 1. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 168 46 *CATS catalogue -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note on table1.dat: An updated online version of the table is maintained at http://www.oa-roma.inaf.it/HEAG/catsatbar/. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: IX/45 : The Chandra Source Catalog, Release 1.1 (Evans+ 2012) http://www.oa-roma.inaf.it/HEAG/catsatbar : CATS catalog Home Page Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 A1 --- n_Name [*] Note on Name (1) 3- 23 A21 --- Name Name of the source (2) 25- 26 I2 h RAh Right ascension (J2000) 28- 29 I2 min RAm Right ascension (J2000) 31- 34 F4.1 s RAs Right ascension (J2000) 36 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) 37- 38 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) 40- 41 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) 43- 46 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) 48- 53 F6.2 arcmin GLAT Galactic latitude 55- 65 F11.5 s Per Period of the detected signal 67- 76 F10.5 s e_Per rms uncertainty on Per (90% confidence level) 79- 81 A3 --- Flag [* ] Flags (3) 85- 89 F5.1 10-16W/m2 Flux ? XMM flux (0.5-10keV) or lower limit of XXM flux interval (4) 90 A1 --- --- [-] 91- 94 F4.1 10-16W/m2 Flux2 ? Upper limit of XXM flux ((0.5-10keV) interval (4) 97-101 A5 --- NC Number of useful Chandra pointings used to evaluate the signal/source parameters (5) 102 A1 --- --- [/] 103-106 A4 --- NX Number of useful XMM pointings used to evaluate the signal/source parameters (5) 108-168 A61 --- Com Comments (6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): *: Sources with signals published by other groups while the project was on-going and/or with rough estimate of the periods Note (2): The name of the source, where the prefix CXO is used for sources listed in the Chandra Source Catalog version 1.1 (CSC; Evans et al., 2010ApJS..189...37E 2010ApJS..189...37E, Cat. IX/45), while CXOU for yet uncatalogued sources. Note (3): Flag as follows: *** = Multiple detection of the same signal (either with Chandra or with other missions) ** = Single high confidence (>10σ) detection * = Single detection (above 3.5σ). See also Section 4. Note (4): Observed 0.5-10keV flux in units of 10-13erg/cm2/s for a power-law fit. A range of values indicates different values measured in the Chandra observations used for the timing analysis. Note (5): Number of useful Chandra and XMM-Newton pointings used to evaluate the signal/source parameters. We counted only those observations where the signal was detected or those with no detection but 3σ pulsed fraction upper limits smaller than that of the modulation were inferred. We also counted observations where the source was not detected at a comparable or lower flux level with respect to the original detection level or detected at a significantly different flux level. Note (6): Comments: Abbreviations as follows: E = eclipsing T = transient: the source was not detected in some observations with Chandra or other missions Pst = persistent: the flux did not vary by more than a factor of 5 in the observations we considered V = variable: we measured flux variations larger than a factor of 5 O = optical counterpart or association ? = denote tentative identifications or associations References as follows: [1] = Esposito et al. (2013MNRAS.433.3464E 2013MNRAS.433.3464E) [2] = Bartlett et al., (2017MNRAS.466.4659B 2017MNRAS.466.4659B) [3] = Esposito et al. (2013MNRAS.436.3380E 2013MNRAS.436.3380E) [4] = Esposito et al. (2015MNRAS.452.1112E 2015MNRAS.452.1112E) [5] = Nichelli et al. (2011, Swift and the Surprising Sky: The First Seven Years of Swift 39) [6] = Farrell et al. (2015, Cat. J/ApJ/813/28) [7] = Muno et al. (2008ApJ...680..639M 2008ApJ...680..639M) [8] = Esposito et al. (2013MNRAS.433.2028E 2013MNRAS.433.2028E) [9] = Lin et al. (2014ApJ...780...39L 2014ApJ...780...39L) [10] = Sidoli et al. (2016MNRAS.460.3637S 2016MNRAS.460.3637S) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 25-Apr-2018
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line