J/MNRAS/474/2479    Orbital parameters of globular clusters  (Balbinot+, 2018)

The devil is in the tails: the role of globular cluster mass evolution on stream properties. Balbinot E., Gieles M. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 474, 2479-2492 (2018)> =2018MNRAS.474.2479B 2018MNRAS.474.2479B (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Milky Way ; Clusters, globular ; Proper motions ; Morphology Keywords: globular clusters: general - Galaxy: structure Abstract: We present a study of the effects of collisional dynamics on the formation and detectability of cold tidal streams. A semi-analytical model for the evolution of the stellar mass function was implemented and coupled to a fast stellar stream simulation code, as well as the synthetic cluster evolution code EMACSS for the mass evolution as a function of a globular cluster orbit. We find that the increase in the average mass of the escaping stars for clusters close to dissolution has a major effect on the observable stream surface density. As an example, we show that Palomar 5 would have undetectable streams (in an SDSS-like survey) if it was currently three times more massive, despite the fact that a more massive cluster loses stars at a higher rate. This bias due to the preferential escape of low-mass stars is an alternative explanation for the absence of tails near massive clusters, than a dark matter halo associated with the cluster. We explore the orbits of a large sample of Milky Way globular clusters and derive their initial masses and remaining mass fraction. Using properties of known tidal tails, we explore regions of parameter space that favour the detectability of a stream. A list of high-probability candidates is discussed. Description: We compiled a set of GCs from literature that has measured PMs. The sample was further expanded by using UCAC-4 absolute PMs by Dambis (2006A&AT...25..185D 2006A&AT...25..185D, Cat. J/other/A+AT/25.185); however, the uncertainties in this catalogue can be significant. The complete sample analysed here is shown in Table 1 where appropriate references are given for each individual object. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 133 145 Summary of the orbital parameters obtained from the sampling of positions and velocities for the clusters in our sample -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- See also: J/other/A+AT/25.185 : globular clusters absolute proper motions (Dambis, 2006) Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 9 A9 --- Name Name 10 A1 --- n_Name [*] * indicates clusters with no proper motions 13- 18 F6.2 mas/yr pmRA ?=- Proper motion along RA, pmRA*cosDE 20- 23 F4.2 mas/yr e_pmRA ? rms uncertainty on pmRA 25- 30 F6.2 mas/yr pmDE ?=- Proper motion along DE 32- 35 F4.2 mas/yr e_pmDE ? rms uncertainty on pmDE 38- 43 F6.1 km/s Vlos ?=- LOS velocity 45- 48 F4.1 km/s e_Vlos ? rms uncertainty on Vlos 50- 56 F7.2 kpc Rapo Apocentre radius 58- 63 F6.2 kpc e_Rapo rms uncertainty on Rapo 65- 69 F5.2 kpc Rperi Pericentre radius distance 71- 75 F5.2 kpc e_Rperi rms uncertainty on Rperi 77- 80 F4.2 --- ecc Orbital eccentricity 82- 85 F4.2 --- e_ecc rms uncertainty on Ecc 87- 91 F5.2 10+5Msun Mi Initial mass 93- 96 F4.2 10+5Msun e_Mi rms uncertainty on Mi 98-101 F4.2 --- mu Remaining mass fraction in the cluster 103-106 F4.2 --- e_mu rms uncertainty on mu 108-111 F4.2 --- phi Orbital phase 113-116 F4.2 --- e_phi rms uncertainty on phi 118-123 F6.2 pc rJ Jacobi radius 125-129 F5.2 pc e_rJ rms uncertainty on rJ 131-133 A3 --- r_pmRA Proper motion references (1) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): References as follows: 1 = Dinescu et al. (1997AJ....114.1014D 1997AJ....114.1014D) 2 = Dinescu et al. (1999AJ....117..277D 1999AJ....117..277D) 3 = Dinescu, Girard & van Altena (1999AJ....117.1792D 1999AJ....117.1792D) 4 = Dinescu et al. (2003AJ....125.1373D 2003AJ....125.1373D) 5 = Casetti-Dinescu et al. (2007AJ....134..195C 2007AJ....134..195C) 6 = Casetti-Dinescu et al. (2010AJ....140.1282C 2010AJ....140.1282C) 7 = Casetti-Dinescu et al. (2013AJ....146...33C 2013AJ....146...33C) 8 = Dambis (2006A&AT...25..185D 2006A&AT...25..185D, Cat. J/other/A+AT/25.185) 9 = Kuepper et al. (2015ApJ...803...80K 2015ApJ...803...80K) 10 = Rossi et al. (2015MNRAS.450.3270R 2015MNRAS.450.3270R) 11 = Scholz et al. (1996MNRAS.278..251S 1996MNRAS.278..251S) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 23-Feb-2021
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line