J/MNRAS/488/4905 SuperWASP transit false positive catalog (Schanche+, 2019)
SuperWASP dispositions and false positive catalogue.
Schanche N., Collier Cameron A., Almenara J.M., Alsubai K.A.,
Anderson D.R., Armstrong D.J., Barkaoui K., Barros S.C.C., Bochinski J.,
Bonomo A.S., Bouchy F., Brown D.J.A., Burdanov A., Busuttil R., Deleuil M.,
Delrez L., Faedi F., Gillon M., Hay K., Hebb L., Hebrard G., Jehin E.,
Kolb U., Maxted P.F.L., Miller G., Nielsen L.D., Pollacco D.L.,
Pozuelos F.J., Queloz D., Relles H., Smalley B., Triaud A.H.M.J., Udry S.,
West R., Wheatley P.J.
<Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 488, 4905-4915 (2019)>
=2019MNRAS.488.4905S 2019MNRAS.488.4905S (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: Stars, bright ; Binaries, eclipsing ; Stars, double and multiple ;
Positional data ; Photometry ; Exoplanets
Keywords: methods: observational - catalogues -
planets and satellites: detection
Abstract:
SuperWASP, the Northern hemisphere WASP observatory, has been
observing the skies from La Palma since 2004. In that time, more than
50 planets have been discovered with data contributions from
SuperWASP. In the process of validating planets, many false-positive
candidates have also been identified. The TESS telescope is set to
begin observations of the northern sky in 2019. Similar to the WASP
survey, the TESS pixel size is relatively large (13 arcsec for WASP
and 21 arcsec for TESS), making it susceptible to many blended signals
and false detections caused principally by grazing and blended stellar
eclipsing binary systems. In order to reduce duplication of effort on
targets, we present a catalogue of 1041 Northern hemisphere SuperWASP
targets that have been rejected as planetary transits through
follow-up observation.
Description:
The WASP FP catalogue contains entries for each star that has been
dispositioned after additional observation.
File Summary:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FileName Lrecl Records Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReadMe 80 . This file
table2.dat 942 1041 SuperWASP false positive catalogue
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See also:
I/340 : UCAC5 Catalogue (Zacharias+ 2017)
I/345 : Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration, 2018)
II/328 : AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013)
II/246 : 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003)
Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1- 26 A26 --- SWASP WASP identification number, taken from
the USNO-B1 catalog (SWASP_ID)
27 A1 --- n_SWASP [*] * for EBLMs already reported by
Triaud et al. (2017A&A...608A.129T 2017A&A...608A.129T)
29- 30 I2 h RAh Right Ascension (J2000) (RA)
31 A1 --- --- [:]
32- 33 I2 min RAm Right Ascension (J2000) (RA)
34 A1 --- --- [:]
35- 39 F5.2 s RAs Right Ascension (J2000) (RA)
41 A1 --- DE- Declination sign (J2000) (dec)
42- 43 I2 deg DEd Declination (J2000) (dec)
44 A1 --- --- [:]
45- 46 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (J2000) (dec)
47 A1 --- --- [:]
48- 51 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (J2000) (dec)
53- 72 F20.17 d Per [0.3/15] Period estimate from BLS fit
of SuperWASP data (period)
74- 78 A5 --- Flag Primary disposition (flag) (1)
80- 82 A3 --- Ffollowup Further information about
the disposition (followup_flag) (2)
84-102 A19 --- Blended-star In the case of a blend, SWASP ID of star
exhibiting the transit,
if reported (blended_star)
104-121 F18.13 d Epoch [3128.4/6552.6] Epoch of the predicted
transit from the WASP archive
(HJD-2450000.0) (epoch)
123-144 F22.19 mag Depth [-0.2/-0.0] Depth of the predicted
transit from WASP data (depth)
146-165 F20.18 --- Width [0.0/0.5]? Fractional width of the
transit in WASP data (period/transit
length) (width)
167-186 E20.16 --- ImpactPar ? Estimated impact parameter for transit
fit (impact_par)
188-205 F18.15 mag Vmag [8.2/18.0]? Apparent magnitude in the
V band from the NOMAD catalogue (Vmag)
207-210 I4 K Teff(J-H) [3587/7760] Stellar effective
temperature, from J minus H colour
measure (teff_jh)
212-229 f18.16 Rsun R*mcmc [0.3/2.1]? radius of the star from the
mcmc transit fit. this mcmc fit forces
the star onto the ms (rstar_mcmc)
231-250 F20.18 Msun M*mcmc [0.0/2.0]? Mass of the star from the
mcmc transit fit. This mcmc fit forces
the star onto the MS (mstar_mcmc)
252-271 F20.18 Rjup Rplmcmc [0.0/6.3]? Predicted radius of the
transiting object (planet_mcmc)
273-293 F21.18 mag J-H [-0.2/0.9] Difference in brightness
between J and H filters from the
NOMAD catalogue (jmag-hmag)
295-301 F7.1 --- Dilutionv [-1675.0/94.0]? Fractional amount of
contaminating light from nearby stars
in the WASP aperture (dilution_v)
303-495 A193 --- Comments Brief description of follow-up
measurements (Comments)
497-514 A18 --- USNO-B1 Star location from USNO B1 catalogue
(USNO_B1)
516 I1 --- Photom [0/1] Was photometry follow-up obtained?
1 = yes (Photom)
518 I1 --- Spectra [0/1] Was spectral follow-up obtained?
1 = yes (Spectra)
520-539 F20.16 solRad rGaia [-99.0/45.2]? Estimated stellar radius
from Gaia DR2 (Gaia_rad)
541 I1 --- AstraLux [0/1] Was AstraLux telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (AstraLux)
543 I1 --- Euler [0/1] Was Euler telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (Euler)
545 I1 --- IAC80 [0/1] Was IAC80 telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (IAC80)
547 I1 --- TRAPPIST [0/1] Was TRAPPIST telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (TRAPPIST)
549 I1 --- JGT [0/1] Was JGT telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (JGT)
551 I1 --- RATCAM [0/1] Was Liverpool/RATCAM telescope
used for follow-up?
1 = yes (Liverpool/RATCAM)
553 I1 --- NITES [0/1] Was NITES telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (NITES)
555 I1 --- PIRATE [0/1] Was PIRATE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (PIRATE)
557 I1 --- MERCATOR [0/1] Was MERCATOR telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (MERCATOR)
559 I1 --- KEELE [0/1] Was KEELE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (KEELE)
561 I1 --- LCO [0/1] Was LCO telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (LCO)
563 I1 --- Tenagra [0/1] Was Tenagra telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (Tenagra)
565 I1 --- CORALIE [0/1] Was CORALIE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (CORALIE)
567 I1 --- OHP/SOPHIE [0/1] Was OHP/SOPHIE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (OHP/SOPHIE)
569 I1 --- INT/IDS [0/1] Was INT/IDS telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (INT/IDS)
571 I1 --- TrES [0/1] Was TrES telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (TrES)
573 I1 --- ELODIE [0/1] Was ELODIE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (ELODIE)
575 I1 --- CAFE [0/1] Was CAFE telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (CAFE)
577 I1 --- NOT/FIES [0/1] Was NOT/FIES telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (NOT/FIES)
579 I1 --- HET [0/1] Was HET telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (HET)
581 I1 --- HARPS [0/1] Was HARPS telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (HARPS)
583 I1 --- SARG [0/1] Was SARG telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (SARG)
585 I1 --- Tautenburg [0/1] Was Tautenburg telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (Tautenburg)
587 I1 --- KPNO [0/1] Was KPNO telescope used for
follow-up? 1 = yes (KPNO)
589 I1 --- SanPedroMartir [0/1] Was SanPedroMartir telescope used
for follow-up? 1 = yes (SanPedorMartir)
591-601 F11.1 --- TESS ? TESS Input Catalog identifier
(TESS_ID)
603-612 A10 --- UCAC UCAC identifier (UCAC_ID)
614-629 A16 --- 2MASS 2MASS identifier (TWOMASS_ID)
631-649 A19 --- ALLWISE Allwise identifier (ALLWISE_ID)
651-669 I19 --- Gaia ?=- Gaia identifier (Gaia_ID)
671-690 F20.16 deg RATdeg ? Right ascension for the TESS input
catalogue (RA_TIC)
692-711 F20.16 deg DETdeg ? Declination for the TESS input
catalogue (Dec_TIC)
713-732 F20.16 deg GLON ? Galactic Longitude (GalLong)
734-753 F20.16 deg GLAT ? Galactic Latitude (GalLat)
755-774 F20.16 deg ELON ? Ecliptic Longitude (EcLong)
776-796 F21.17 deg ELAT ? Ecliptic Latitude (EcLat)
798-815 F18.15 mag Tmag [7.3/15.3]? TESS magnitude (Tmag)
817-836 F20.18 mag e_Tmag [0.0/0.7]? Error in TESS magnitude
(e_Tmag)
838-855 F18.15 mag Gmag [7.9/16.0]? Gaia magnitude (Gmag)
857-878 F22.20 mag e_Gmag [0.0/0.7]? Error in Gaia magnitude
(e_Gmag)
880-898 F19.14 pc Dist [41.5/2350.3]? Distance to star from
Gaia DR2 (distance)
900-919 F20.16 pc e_Dist [2.1/971]? Error in distance measurement
(distance_err)
921-942 E22.17 --- TESSpriority ? TESS priority (TESS_priority)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): SuperWASP primary disposition flag (see paper, sections 2 & 3 for
more details) as follows:
EB = Eclipsing binary
Blend = Blend with nearby Star(s)
EBLM = Low Mass Companion
V = Variable Star
X = False Detection
RAF = Rejected after follow-up
Note (2): SuperWASP follow-up flag as follows:
SB1 = Single lines eclipsing binary (spectral)
SB2 = Double lined eclipsing binary (spectral)
LB = Line bissector variations (spectral)
RR = Rapid rotator, generally FWHM > 8km^s
G = Giant star
BEB = blended eclipsing binary
FP = Non-astrophysical false positive
O = Other, see Comment column for more detail
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acknowledgements:
Nicole Schanche, ns81(at)st-andrews.ac.uk
(End) Patricia Vannier [CDS] 08-Oct-2019