J/MNRAS/493/4463   Crystalline silicate absorption at 11.1µm  (Do-Duy+, 2020)

Crystalline silicate absorption at 11.1µm: ubiquitous and abundant in embedded YSOs and the interstellar medium. Do-Duy T., Wright C.M., Fujiyoshi T., Glasse A., Siebenmorgen R., Smith R., Stecklum B., Sterzik M. <Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 493, 4463-4517 (2020)> =2020MNRAS.493.4463D 2020MNRAS.493.4463D (SIMBAD/NED BibCode)
ADC_Keywords: YSOs ; Interstellar medium ; H II regions ; Spectra, infrared Keywords: (stars:) circumstellar matter - stars: protostars - (ISM:) dust, extinction - ISM: evolution Abstract: Utilizing several instruments on 4-8m telescopes, we have observed a large sample of objects in the mid-infrared (8-13µm). These comprise a few evolved stars, multiple envelopes of embedded young stellar objects (YSOs) or compact H-II regions, and several sightlines through the interstellar medium (ISM). The latter is where dust resides - and is potentially modified - between its formation in evolved stellar outflows and deposition in molecular clouds. In most objects, we detect not only the well-known 9.7µm absorption feature of amorphous silicates but also a second absorption band around 11.1µm whose carrier is attributed to crystalline forsterite. We propose that crystalline silicates are essentially ubiquitous in the ISM and earliest phases of star formation, and are evolutionary precursors to T-Tauri and Herbig stars where such silicates have been commonly found. Modelling shows that in most YSOs, H-II regions and ISM cases, the forsterite mass fraction is between 1 and 2 per cent, suggesting that the younger phases inherit their abundance from the ISM. However, several sources show much stronger features (abundances ≥3 per cent). This suggests that significant processing, perhaps crystallization by thermal annealing, occurs early on in star formation. Most intriguing is the first detection of crystalline silicate in the diffuse ISM. We propose that our observed abundance is consistent with a mass fraction of crystalline silicates of 10-20 per cent injected into the ISM, along with commonly accepted lifetimes against their destruction, but only if cosmic ray-induced amorphization is insignificant over a few Giga years. Description: The 8-13µm spectra presented here were obtained using several different instruments principally between 2002 and 2007. These include the mid-infrared (MIR) long-slit spectrometers T-ReCS at the Gemini-South telescope (under programme GS-2006B-Q-81) and Michelle at both the UKIRT and Gemini-North telescopes (under programme GN-2005B-Q-83), TIMMI2 on the ESO 3.6m telescope, and COMICS on the Subaru telescope. The TIMMI2 and Michelle-on-UKIRT data were collected in the spectropolarimetric mode of those instruments, but only the conventional spectrum (Stokes I) is presented here. The spectral resolution was in the range of 100-200 for all instruments, with slit widths of 0.7arcsec for T-ReCS, 0.4arcsec for Michelle on Gemini, 0.64 or 1.28arcsec for Michelle on UKIRT, 3arcsec for TIMMI2, and 0.33arcsec for COMICS. Standard chopping and nodding were implemented. Technical parameters of all our observations are listed in Table 1. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1.dat 99 93 Observation log table2.dat 149 28 Comparisons of optical depths at different wavelengths table3.dat 84 57 Asymmetric Gaussian fit parameters for the 11.1um feature and independent estimates of τ9.7 table5.dat 77 53 Mass fraction (per cent) of each component over the total mass of the silicate dust in the spectral fits table8.dat 84 13 Optically thin model - mass fraction (per cent) and χ2 for each spectral fit refs.dat 76 34 References for Table 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Source name 16 A1 --- n_Name [*+] Note on Name (1) 18 A1 --- f_Name [EYS] Flag on Name (G1) 20- 30 A11 --- Date Date of observation 32- 43 A12 --- Inst Instrument used for the observation (2) 45- 49 F5.1 deg PAslit Slit position angle 51- 54 F4.1 arcsec Chop Chop throw 56- 60 F5.1 deg Nod Nod throw 62- 72 A11 --- StdStar Standard star 74- 77 F4.2 --- AirmassSrc Airmass of the source 79- 82 F4.2 --- AirmassStd Airmass of the standard star 84- 92 A9 --- ISOID ISO identifier 94- 99 A6 --- Type Type of the object (3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Note as follows: * = S140 IRS3 has been previously reported as an IR triple at the K band by Preibisch et al. (2001A&A...378..539P 2001A&A...378..539P) but to our knowledge not previously resolved in the mid-IR. The notation of Preibisch et al. (2001A&A...378..539P 2001A&A...378..539P) is used here, where IRS3a and IRS3b are separated by 0.63arcsec along a position angle of 85°. The Michelle acquisition image shows them to be similarly bright. The slit was set to a position angle of 74° to include IRS1 and IRS3 but some flux from IRS3b is probably lost in the 0.4arcsec-wide slit. + = S255 NIRS1 and NIRS3 are components of an IR double separated by about 2.5arcsec along a position angle of 104°. We use the notation of Tamura et al. (1991ApJ...378..611T 1991ApJ...378..611T), in which NIRS1 is the brightest K-band source. NIRS3 is the brightest at L-, N-, and Q-band source (Beichman, Becklin & Wynn-Williams 1979ApJ...232L..47B 1979ApJ...232L..47B; Itoh et al. 2001PASJ...53..495I 2001PASJ...53..495I; Longmore et al. 2006MNRAS.369.1196L 2006MNRAS.369.1196L; de Wit et al. 2009A&A...494..157D 2009A&A...494..157D), and the more deeply embedded (this work). Note (2): For those targets observed with Michelle, the letter in brackets refers to the telescope, G for Gemini and U for UKIRT. In some cases, especially for the TIMMI2 observations, multiple independent spectra of the same target were taken on the same night. Note (3): Object type as follows: OH/IR = OH/IR star ES = Embedded YSO ISM = Interstellar medium DISM = Diffuse interstellar medium HII = H-II region MC = Molecular cloud HE = Herbig Ae/Be star FU = FU Orionis object -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Source name 16 A1 --- f_Name [YI] Flag on Name (1) 18- 22 F5.3 --- tau11.1 ? Optical depth at 11.1um 24- 28 F5.3 --- e_tau11.1 ? Error on tau11.1 30- 33 F4.2 --- tau3.0 ? Optical depth at 3.0um 35- 38 F4.2 --- e_tau3.0 ? Error on tau3.0 40- 44 F5.3 --- tau3.25 ? Optical depth at 3.25um 46- 50 F5.3 --- e_tau3.25 ? Error on tau3.25 52- 56 F5.3 --- tau3.4 ? Optical depth at 3.4um 58- 62 F5.3 --- e_tau3.4 ? Error on tau3.4 64- 68 F5.3 --- tau3.47 ? Optical depth at 3.47um 70- 75 F6.4 --- e_tau3.47 ? Error on tau3.47 77- 80 F4.2 --- tau4.27 ? Optical depth at 4.27um 82- 85 F4.2 --- e_tau4.27 ? Error on tau4.27 87- 90 F4.2 --- tau6.0 ? Optical depth at 6.0um 92- 96 F5.3 --- e_tau6.0 ? Error on tau6.0 98 A1 --- l_tau6.2 Limit flag on tau6.2 100-104 F5.3 --- tau6.2 ? Optical depth at 6.2um 106-110 F5.3 --- e_tau6.2 ? Error on tau6.2 112-116 F5.3 --- tau6.85 ? Optical depth at 6.85um 118-122 F5.3 --- e_tau6.85 ? Error on tau6.85 124-127 F4.2 --- B_tau6.85 ? Upper bound on tau6.85 129-149 A21 --- Ref References -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flag as follows: Y = Embedded young stellar objects and other youthful sources I = ISM paths to the GC and Wolf-Rayet stars -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table3.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Source name 16- 17 A2 --- Inst Intrument used (G2) 19 A1 --- f_Name [EYS] Flag on Name (G1) 21- 25 F5.3 --- tau11.1 ? Optical depth at 11.1um 27 A1 --- f_tau11.1 [e] Flag on tau11.1 (1) 29- 33 F5.3 --- e_tau11.1 ? Error on tau11.1 35- 39 F5.2 um lambdac ? Central wavelength of the 11.1um feature 41- 44 F4.2 um e_lambdac ? Error on lambdac 46- 49 F4.2 um FWHM ? FWHM of the 11.1um feature 51- 54 F4.2 um e_FWHM ? Error on FWHM 56- 59 F4.2 --- tau9.7ap ? Optical depth at 9.7um evaluated by eyeball estimation 61- 64 F4.2 --- e_tau9.7ap ? Error on tau9.7ap 66- 69 F4.2 --- tau9.7bf ? Optical depth at 9.7um evaluated by the best fit with optically thick model 71- 74 F4.2 --- e_tau9.7bf ? Error on tau9.7bf 76- 79 F4.2 --- tau9.7ot ? Optical depth at 9.7um evaluated by the best fit with optically thin model 81- 84 F4.2 --- e_tau9.7ot ? Error on tau9.7ot -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): The 11.1um feature is in emission for R Mon -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table5.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Source Name 16- 17 A2 --- Inst Intrument used (G2) 19 A1 --- f_Name [EYS] Flag on Name (G1) 21- 24 F4.1 % Olisg ? Mass fraction of small grain Olivine (0.1um) 26- 28 F3.1 % e_Olisg ? Error on Olisg 30- 33 F4.1 % Olilg ? Mass fraction of large grain Olivine (2um) 35- 37 F3.1 % e_Olilg ? Error on Olilg 39- 42 F4.1 % Pyrsg ? Mass fraction of small grain Pyroxene (0.1um) 44- 46 F3.1 % e_Pyrsg ? Error on Pyrsg 48- 51 F4.1 % Pyrlg ? Mass fraction of large grain Pyroxene (2um) 53- 56 F4.1 % e_Pyrlg ? Error on Pyrlg 58- 60 F3.1 % Fors Mass fraction of 0.1um-grain Forsterite 62- 64 F3.1 % e_Fors Error on Fors 66- 68 F3.1 % Enst ? Mass fraction of 0.1um-grain Enstatite 70- 72 F3.1 % e_Enst ? Error on Enst 74- 77 F4.2 % chi2 Reduced chi-squared of the spectral fit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table8.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 14 A14 --- Name Source name 16- 17 A2 --- Inst Intrument used (G2) 19 A1 --- f_Name [EYO] Flag on Name (1) 21- 24 F4.1 % Olisg Mass fraction of small grain Olivine (0.1um) 26- 29 F4.1 % e_Olisg Error on Olisg 31- 34 F4.1 % Olilg ? Mass fraction of large grain Olivine (2um) 36- 39 F4.1 % e_Olilg ? Error on Olilg 41- 44 F4.1 % Pyrsg Mass fraction of small grain Pyroxene (0.1um) 46- 49 F4.1 % e_Pyrsg Error on Pyrsg 51- 53 F3.1 % Pyrlg ? Mass fraction of large grain Pyroxene (2um) 55- 58 F4.1 % e_Pyrlg ? Error on Pyrlg 60- 62 F3.1 % Fors Mass fraction of 0.1um-grain Forsterite 64- 66 F3.1 % e_Fors Error on Fors 68- 70 F3.1 % Enst ? Mass fraction of 0.1um-grain Enstatite 72- 74 F3.1 % e_Enst ? Error on Enst 76- 79 F4.2 % chi2thin Reduced chi-squared of the optically thin model spectral fit 81- 84 F4.2 % chi2thick ? Reduced chi-squared of the optically thick model spectral fit (same as Table 5) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Flag as follows: E = Evolved source (stellar outflow = dust factory) Y = Young source (molecular cloud, circumstellar envelope or disc, HII region = dust repository) O = Young source that do not require crystalline silicate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: refs.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 2 I2 --- Ref [1/34] Reference number 4- 22 A19 --- BibCode BibCode 24- 57 A34 --- Aut Author's name 59- 76 A18 --- Com Comments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global Notes: Note (G1): Flag as follows: E = Evolved source (stellar outflow = dust factory) Y = Young source (molecular cloud, circumstellar envelope or disc = dust repository) S = Sightline through dense and/or diffuse ISM = (dust residence) Note (G2): Instrument as follows: MI = observed with Michelle UK = observed with Michelle on UKIRT TR = observed with T-ReCS TI = observed with TIMMI2 CO = observed with COMICS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: From electronic version of the journal
(End) Ana Fiallos [CDS] 02-May-2023
The document above follows the rules of the Standard Description for Astronomical Catalogues; from this documentation it is possible to generate f77 program to load files into arrays or line by line